Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 1889
Length: 3:49
Plays (last 30 days): 0
Upbeat, Shindig and Ed Sullivan too?
Do you remember rock'n'roll radio?
Do you remember rock'n'roll radio?
Do you remember Murray the K,
Alan Freed, and high energy?
It's the end, the end of the 70's
It's the end, the end of the century
Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so one can see
We need change, we need it fast
Before rock's just part of the past
'Cause lately it all sounds the same to me
Oh-oh
Will you remember Jerry Lee, John Lennon, T. Rex and Ol' Moulty?
It's the end, the end of the 70's
It's the end, the end of the century
Because Johnny always had an affinity for 50s pop rock songs and liked to write his own versions of them in the Ramones style. Every band wants a "hit" and wants to make money at doing what they love. The question is how far from their vision will they stray to get that hit. The Ramones tried to do it many times, including this one, but they couldn't get away from being the Ramones. As someone else said, they stripped RNR back to it's bones, but tripled the time. Ramones concerts were brutal marathons of 3 min songs. Despite the occasional attempt at a hit, they always stayed being the Ramones.
Very well stated!
I don't understand the Ramones. They always sound to me like a group playing cheesy, throw-back 1950s songs with a bit of a grungy, hard-edged vibe. What am I missing?
Because Johnny always had an affinity for 50s pop rock songs and liked to write his own versions of them in the Ramones style. Every band wants a "hit" and wants to make money at doing what they love. The question is how far from their vision will they stray to get that hit. The Ramones tried to do it many times, including this one, but they couldn't get away from being the Ramones. As someone else said, they stripped RNR back to it's bones, but tripled the time. Ramones concerts were brutal marathons of 3 min songs. Despite the occasional attempt at a hit, they always stayed being the Ramones.
the way you say that it almost sounds like it was a bad thing...
hey ho! let's go!
this is rock'n'roll radio - stay tuned for more rock'n'roll!
Yes! I Agree!
I don't understand the Ramones. They always sound to me like a group playing cheesy, throw-back 1950s songs with a bit of a grungy, hard-edged vibe. What am I missing?
the way you say that it almost sounds like it was a bad thing...
hey ho! let's go!
this is rock'n'roll radio - stay tuned for more rock'n'roll!
Having said that, I will say until my dying breath that The Ramones - It’s Alive, recorded New Year’s Eve 1977 at The Rainbow London (full vid on youtube) is the greatest live rock ‘n roll album ever recorded. That moment, that night, before all the bullshit, The Ramones were the greatest rock band every to take a stage. I got it as a Dutch import in Austin 1981. It wasn’t released state side until 1996.
I saw them at the Austin Opera House 1983 (?). From the snippets I remember a really good show lol....
AY O LETS GO !
YOU BET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No. The Ramones mattered but this song isn't why.
Do you remember rock and roll radio ... while you're listening to the internet? (Yes, I do, but the fidelity is much better here.)
because there isn't a moshing smiley face....
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...
ROCK ON DUDE!!!
Super solid viewpoint Propayne : )
Propayne wrote:
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...
Propayne wrote:
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...
Thanks for keeping it fresh, RP...
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...
Didn't get that segue this time but you're right. RP should survive and thrive because it offers a better selection and flow of music than listener-adjusted streaming services like Pandora and Spotify. Listening to radio can be a passive experience but you have to want to be rowed down a river of moods, memories and associations, to go along with the DJ's lead. I don't know if algorithms can replace people like Bill and Rebecca when it comes to mastery of tapping into listeners' psyches.
This reminds me of something Steve Jobs said back in '98, I think when he was talking about computers and operating systems:
But in the end, for something this complicated, it's really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them.
Also (not sure if Steve actually said this): It's not the consumers' job to know what they want.
It may have been a very regional occurrence along the East coast, but I definitely know that they had to pay for the rights to use the Hullabaloo name and logo. I remember that they also sold officially licensed clothes; specifically sweatshirts with the pyramid of big letters spelling the name. Like you I've never found any reference in the few web searches I've done. My Dad passed away in 2002 and we never found any keepsakes from the club when we had to clean out the house. I don't think it was a particularly fond memory for him or my Mom. My older brother and sister and I still get a laugh out of it occasionally when we get together.
Thanks for the response, and for not mentioning that I spelled "franchised" wrong in my original post!
Great story—I did not know Hullabaloo was "franshised", as they surely didn't make it to central Minnesota! There's no mention of the spin-off dance clubs on the Wikipedia page either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hullabaloo_(TV_series)
That picture in the link of Petula Clark appears to be the inspiration for the "Laugh-In' opening!
It may have been a very regional occurrence along the East coast, but I definitely know that they had to pay for the rights to use the Hullabaloo name and logo. I remember that they also sold officially licensed clothes; specifically sweatshirts with the pyramid of big letters spelling the name. Like you I've never found any reference in the few web searches I've done. My Dad passed away in 2002 and we never found any keepsakes from the club when we had to clean out the house. I don't think it was a particularly fond memory for him or my Mom. My older brother and sister and I still get a laugh out of it occasionally when we get together.
I always crack up when I hear this song just for the opening line "Do you remember Hullabaloo"
Well I remember it because in addition to being a TV dance/music show of it's time (late 60's), it was also franchised out as a live music club in different parts of the country. My Dad, along with several of his business friends, invested in the franchise and opened a Hullabaloo club in our little town. It did OK for a while and introduced me to a bunch of good bands from the DC/Baltimore area. I helped run the lights and concessions even though I was only 11 at the time.
Unfortunately, for my Dad and his partners, it was a teen dance club that did not serve what most older teens are always looking for; beer. Eventually it went under due to smaller and smaller crowds of kids that wanted to just dance to live music. It did however instill a life long love of live music in me and for that I am always grateful. Thanks Dad
Great story—I did not know Hullabaloo was "franchised", as they surely didn't make it to central Minnesota! There's no mention of the spin-off dance clubs on the Wikipedia page either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hullabaloo_(TV_series)
That picture in the link of Petula Clark appears to be the inspiration for the "Laugh-In' opening!
WonderLizard wrote:
So true.
I always crack up when I hear this song just for the opening line "Do you remember Hullabaloo"
Well I remember it because in addition to being a TV dance/music show of it's time (late 60's), it was also franchised out as a live music club in different parts of the country. My Dad, along with several of his business friends, invested in the franchise and opened a Hullabaloo club in our little town. It did OK for a while and introduced me to a bunch of good bands from the DC/Baltimore area. I helped run the lights and concessions even though I was only 11 at the time.
Unfortunately, for my Dad and his partners, it was a teen dance club that did not serve what most older teens are always looking for; beer. Eventually it went under due to smaller and smaller crowds of kids that wanted to just dance to live music. It did however instill a life long love of live music in me and for that I am always grateful. Thanks Dad
I agree. They had tremendous PR.
Yep—It gets trashed by many of their long time fans, but I'm still digging it 34 years later. I really wish there were more songs off it being played here.
Here's a review of End of the Century which I pulled off some blog, and I gotta say it's right on:
>>This album makes little sense within the narrative of "The Ramones are the godfathers of punk rock." It would be hard to come up with a producer whose trademark style had less to do with punk rock than Phil Spector. Heck, Phil was the very embodiment of the question I mentioned in the overall introduction ("how much can we add ..."), and thus the philosophical opposite of what the band had done on its first three albums. Teaming up with Phil Spector, it seems, would have transcended any possible accusations of "selling out" and would have entered the realm of "absolutely out of their minds."
On the other hand, though, the album makes a good deal more sense within the narrative of "The Ramones were an interesting modernized update of 50's/60's lightweight pop." Spector was, after all, one of the most sought-after producers of the 1960's, helping to generate hit single after hit single, and in the early 70's he produced albums for George Harrison and John Lennon that are often considered among the best albums of their time. If the band was looking for a new direction for its next album, why wouldn't they consider turning to a man who had helped so many of spiritual musical kin years before?
What made this episode in the band's history so interesting and so volatile was that both narratives had a significant amount of merit and truth to them. These two sides of the band had managed to co-exist just fine up to this point, with both feeding off each other and creating the sound and approach we all know and love, but this album really pitted the two against one another. The "punk" elements are cannibalized and reused in a pretty grotesque way, all in the name of strongly serving the "neo-retro" nature of the songs. The stories from the recording sessions, especially Phil pulling a gun on Dee Dee and Phil making Johnny play a single chord for 8 hours straight, are fairly well-known, and show that this arrangement was a combination that pretty much doomed itself to the stuff of legend from the moment it was suggested. The end result was an album that's one of the strangest I've ever heard, yet strange in a fairly predictable way: endless layers of instrumentation, most individually playing in a punkish manner, but thrown on top of each other until the punk elements disappear, while various other supporting instruments (e.g. saxophone) buoy up Joey's echo-laden vocals.
Truth be told, I really like the overall sound. The main problem I have with the album is the slightly inconsistent songwriting. Songs like "Let's Go," "All the Way" and "High Risk Insurance," as cool as they sound production-wise, and as much as they ostensibly rock, just aren't going to cut it with me when they feel this undercooked in the chord sequences. Plus, I'm still not sure how I feel about "I'm Affected," which is kinda catchy and intense but also sounds kinda ugly to me. I do kinda like the lead slidey parts in the guitars, but I'm not at all convinced Johnny had anything to do with those parts.
Still, there's a lot of great material on this album. The opening "Do You Remember Rock 'N' Roll Radio?" must have thrown everybody for a loop upon first listen, from the opening radio broadcast sounds to the endless layering of instruments to the main sax-driven groove that screams out "50's" loudly with every repetition. The song is incredible, arrangements aside, from a great vocal melody that doesn't sound like anything the band had done before, to the fun looking-back-and-looking-forward lyrics, to just about anything else that Phil buried in the mix just to have. And man, does Joey ever sound great in this context. Another major classic comes later in "Rock 'N' Roll High School," aka the song with the first chord that was played hundreds of times to get it just right. It's largely a rewrite of "Rockaway Beach," but it's definitely a rewrite that I'm glad exists, as the guitar parts and Joey's singing are just oodles of fun. And, well, I dig the opening schoolbell sound, and the totally random explosion sound at the end.
The ballads are represented by "Danny Says" and "Baby I Love You," two songs that are incredibly unlike anything the band had done previously but which I find myself liking quite a lot. "Danny Says" just feels like it should have gone down as more of a classic than it did; it just has a really nice timeless feel to it that I like a lot, and the juxtaposition of the lovely melody with more of the usual Ramones lyrical themes (like sitting around watching "Get Smart" on TV) just fascinates me. "Baby I Love You" is the album's sole cover, of a Ronettes' song produced by Spector in 1964, and while it's more of a solo Joey song than a proper Ramones song (and thus not really a great choice for a lead single), it's pretty nice. I wouldn't have wanted any more songs like this on the album, but it's a neat little novelty.
The remaining songs are pretty nice, overall. "Chinese Rock" is a solid hard stomper that could have fit in well on Road to Ruin, and while "The Return of Jackie and Judy" seems a little too reminiscient of "Judy is a Punk" (and others) for comfort at first, it does have a couple of melody twists here and there that definitely sound like they haven't been used yet. "I Can't Make it on Time" is another bit of mid-tempo rock, and not exactly rousing, but I definitely enjoy the vocal melody. And finally, there's just something incredibly appealing about the "ba ba banana, this ain't Havana" hook in "This Ain't Havana," enough anyway to make me want to give it a second listen once in a while.
Still, for all of the praises that can be thrown out to many of the songs, and for the interesting sound, I just can't give this album quite as high a rating as the last few. There are just a few too many instances where it feels like the cool sound is covering up a clear decline in the songwriting. Still, when everything is put together, I like the album way more than I dislike it, and I happily give it an A. It's definitely the last Ramones album I'd call very good.
Thought they were unsubstantial.
I was wrong.
They did have something different.
They were and are real.
You are forgiven.
Johnny had great hair. I remember standing about 10 feet from him at a show in 1980, and the way it moved when he rocked out was MESMERIZING!
Thought they were unsubstantial.
I was wrong.
They did have something different.
They were and are real.
bump.
Please let me know that your tongue was firmly planted in your cheek.
Pretty sure they were actually influenced by the BCR.
The genius of Radio !!! Screw Televison.
Please let me know that your tongue was firmly planted in your cheek.
Why not, they sound similar just dress different.
The Ramones did list, as one of their influences, the Bay City Rollers, so...
Please let me know that your tongue was firmly planted in your cheek.
Too bad for you
I think I've found it, and The Ramones are still very close to my heart, though they don't exist anymore and at least one of the members is dead. They left a legacy, similar to the Sex Pistols (which I could do without, but who nevertheless contributed a huge amount of valid material to the music-pool.) So - music is flux, not anchor (read your Jack Chalker for this one.) It moves, though its roots are firm. We all love different types of music for different reasons, but it's all music.
And I love it all, even if sometimes I can't bear to listen to it.
Not to be all school marmy, but in reality the Sex Pistols only put out one proper album - Nevermind the Bollocks (in their original form i.e., excluding Filthy Lucre). Some additional material on The Great Rock n Roll Swindle, but that's about it. Everything else was rehashed and repackaged with maybe an added outtake, demo or live recording thrown in. They did indeed have a HUGE influence.
Miss you so much, Cynaera...
The Ramones did list, as one of their influences, the Bay City Rollers, so...
Lucky! I think they'd be/have been a great act live! (BTW, this song has a *great* hook! IMHO)
Joey, Johnny & DeeDee-
i miss the ramones....
Lordy, me too. I'm sooo glad I got to see them perform live.
The rock-n-roll cliche is that it's usually the drummers that go first - except with the Ramones it would seem.
Joey, Johnny & DeeDee-
i miss the ramones....
Yeah, this song would have been perfect radio material, but we got "Supertramppled" to death back then.
copy that...
I think I've found it, and The Ramones are still very close to my heart, though they don't exist anymore and at least one of the members is dead. They left a legacy, similar to the Sex Pistols (which I could do without, but who nevertheless contributed a huge amount of valid material to the music-pool.) So - music is flux, not anchor (read your Jack Chalker for this one.) It moves, though its roots are firm. We all love different types of music for different reasons, but it's all music.
And I love it all, even if sometimes I can't bear to listen to it.
You say the darnedest things, Marina.
8—>9 This really is brilliant... As is the current RP lineup: I Heard Ramona Sing —> Do You Remember Rock 'n' Roll Radio —> Radio, Radio. Three of my favorite artists in a row there... Nicely done, Bill...
And this is different than other Ramones songs in which way?
Viva punk! 7 from the rock 'n' rollin' Nottingham jury.
I think I've found it, and The Ramones are still very close to my heart, though they don't exist anymore and at least one of the members is dead. They left a legacy, similar to the Sex Pistols (which I could do without, but who nevertheless contributed a huge amount of valid material to the music-pool.) So - music is flux, not anchor (read your Jack Chalker for this one.) It moves, though its roots are firm. We all love different types of music for different reasons, but it's all music.
And I love it all, even if sometimes I can't bear to listen to it.
Old Phil was just starting his glorious decline into the abyss at that time. He's done now. Well Done.
I love Yes too.
Variety is the spice of life, or so I've heard.
Why? Because at the time the Ramones burst on the scene, we had endured the horrible miasma of 70's disco and prog-rock. If you were around at the time you know what an incredible breath of fresh air they were after years of being tortured with the pretentious and gaudy feculence of Yes on album-rock FM radio.
Ramones are always welcome in my world.
coffeeadikt wrote:
More Ramones!
what the Hanson Brothers are to hockey
What's wrong with that? I hate Picasso. Come to think of it, I hate cubism, too.
The RAMONs
Now how about something by RAy LaMONtagne?
This song is pretty cool, along with Blitzkrieg Bop, but yes, the Ramones have always sucked ass and I think deep down they even knew that, but to their credit I don't think they cared!
Even if you don't like these guys (and I do), some of the comments here are pretty darned funny.
I love to read these comments! Puts me just in the best mood to go to sleep and have funny dreams, happy!
rockola wrote:
jagdriver wrote:
Hells yeah!
More Ramones!
jagdriver wrote:
Hells yeah!
Still true. There are some bands that one is apparently obligated to like, despite their inadequacies and, in this case, near incompetence. The Ramones are at the top of the sludge heap.
Yes. I publicly admit that I have actually played in the mosh pit at a Ramones show. Fun. Pain. Ah, those were the days.
Well, I will honestly try to answer this -
I was born in 1960, and there was always a lot of music being played around my house. Early Beatles, the Monkees, The Beach Boys, Paul Revere and the Raiders, Dick Dale, the Astronauts, the Byrds, Bob Dylan.
I grew and things got more mature - Blue Cheer, the MC5, Hendrix, Zeppelin, King Crimson.
I loved, and still love Psychedelic/Art/Progressive Rock and Jazz Fusion.
But a lot of those bands did start to disappear up their own asses and then I heard Iggy and the Stooges, The Ramones, The Sex Pistols and X.
In X I heard the folk and country music roots - Johnny and June Carter Cash.
In the Ramones I immediately heard the surf and garage rock I loved as a kid. They brought the fun and sense of humor back. The feeling of just grab and instrument and jump up on stage and play.
It's often said that Punk killed Prog - but for me a better description would be that bands like The Ramones kind of hit the reset button on Rock and Roll at a time when that was really needed. It was such a breath of fresh air. Unpretentious and stripped back again to it's essentials - back to it's roots and to what made the music so great in the first place. The timing was perfect. Maybe that is a part of appreciating The Ramones.
Psych morphed into Art morphed into Prog morphed into Glam and Glam kinda split off into Punk and New Wave.
Bands like Pink Floyd and King Crimson put out some of their best and most successful music right at the height of Punk - and progressive (maybe Art Rock would be a better description) kind of hid in bands like XTC, Television, The Talking Heads, Ultravox - and bands like The Damned and Husker Du still did 17 minute songs and double albums. Great stuff.
Anyway, that's my take on it...