[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Sofi Tukker — What a Wonderful World
Album: WET TENNIS
Avg rating:
6.6

Your rating:
Total ratings: 1055









Released: 0
Length: 2:50
Plays (last 30 days): 0
share tweet wikiwebsitesearchamg
cd
mp3
search
I see trees of green
Red roses too
I see them bloom
For me and you
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world

I see skies of blue
And clouds of white
The bright blessed day
The dark sacred night
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
What a wonderful world

The colors of the rainbow
So pretty in the sky
Are also on the faces
Of people going by
I see friends shaking hands
Saying, "How do you do?"
But they're really saying
"I, I love you"

I hear babies cry
I watch them grow
They'll learn much more
Than I'll ever know
And I think to myself
What a wonderful world
What a wonderful world

What a wonderful world
Comments (29)add comment
can we now let this maudlin kitsch fade away? we can count this as its burial. 
Posted 3 months ago by thewiseking    [ Reply ]
 teg710 wrote:

Louis Armstrong, Eva Cassidy, Sofi Tukker. I love all three versions.



Each adds something different and are great on their own. 
Posted 3 months ago by nelsonha    [ Reply ]
 teg710 wrote:

Louis Armstrong, Eva Cassidy, Sofi Tukker. I love all three versions.



Don't forget Joey Ramone!
Posted 3 months ago by ScottishWillie    [ Reply ]
 teg710 wrote:

Louis Armstrong, Eva Cassidy, Sofi Tukker. I love all three versions.




Not to forget Ministry's. 
Posted 4 months ago by andrello    [ Reply ]
meh. I’ll pass on this one. It’s rather dopey. 
Posted 4 months ago by Roguewarer    [ Reply ]
I really like this band. But, this is NOT one of their best tunes!   
Posted 5 months ago by joejennings    [ Reply ]
 bigbobbybubba wrote:

They trashed this version of a great song. Sucko-Barfo xN


because of what you wrote, i just gave it a 9
Posted 5 months ago by jp33442    [ Reply ]
blasphemy
Posted 6 months ago by Red_Dragon    [ Reply ]
They trashed this version of a great song. Sucko-Barfo xN
Posted 6 months ago by bigbobbybubba    [ Reply ]
Posted 7 months ago by On_The_Beach    [ Reply ]
OMG another Sofi Tukker cover on RP today! Earlier it was Chasing Cars. This one is no better and not really worth the effort on their part of this is all there is to it.
Posted 7 months ago by VV    [ Reply ]
What a positively annoying, unimaginative, and boring cover. 
Noop.  👎🏼  🤮 
Posted 7 months ago by Roguewarer    [ Reply ]
 teg710 wrote:

Louis Armstrong, Eva Cassidy, Sofi Tukker. I love all three versions.



I heartily agree.
Posted 8 months ago by teg710    [ Reply ]
The chilled out downbeat is what first caught my attention, then I recognized the lyrics. I went 7+1 on my first listening, and looking forward to hearing again on another chilled out Sunday evening on the shortest day of the year.
LLRP
Posted 8 months ago by lizardking    [ Reply ]
If you like this, you might like the DiPap Remix even more, I know I do.
Posted 8 months ago by TonyApuzzo    [ Reply ]
Interesting...from someone who normally doesn't like covers
Posted 9 months ago by smartn1    [ Reply ]
 MassivRuss wrote:

Despite the musical quality, this sad, downbeat take is not at all what Louis’ original was about. Inverting the whole point of the original makes this a bad cover.



Couldn't agree more.
Autotune has made a trainwreck of this.
Posted 9 months ago by Hea!    [ Reply ]
 gringozono wrote:

There's been a disturbing trend of late, where great songs being covered by singers with "better trained" voices, employing all sorts of tonal gymnastics, but that fall far short of the soulfulness of the originals, leaving the experience shallow and flat.



Yes, and just in general they don't bring anything to it other than it being an exercise of 'use a great song, throw it on the wall to see if it sticks and now we have another track done'.  I don't hear what the positive reviewers are hearing, this is another 'Ho-hum', why is this any good?
Posted 9 months ago by domreo    [ Reply ]

There's been a disturbing trend of late, where great songs being covered by singers with "better trained" voices, employing all sorts of tonal gymnastics, but that fall far short of the soulfulness of the originals, leaving the experience shallow and flat.

Posted 9 months ago by gringozono    [ Reply ]
 bruceandjenna wrote:

Nope.  If it wasn't for the words, I would barely recognize the song.  Don't get me wrong.  I like some of the other covers here.  Not this one.




I totally agree. Not all major-to-minor key covers are created equal. "Mr. Sandman" by SMYL is exceptional imo.
Posted 1 year ago by hipsig    [ Reply ]
Nope.  If it wasn't for the words, I would barely recognize the song.  Don't get me wrong.  I like some of the other covers here.  Not this one.
Posted 1 year ago by bruceandjenna    [ Reply ]
Despite the musical quality, this sad, downbeat take is not at all what Louis’ original was about. Inverting the whole point of the original makes this a bad cover.
Posted 1 year ago by MassivRuss    [ Reply ]
Louis Armstrong, Eva Cassidy, Sofi Tukker. I love all three versions.
Posted 1 year ago by teg710    [ Reply ]
Hooowee what a funky, delightful cover.
Posted 1 year ago by MassivRuss    [ Reply ]
Different vibe for sure.
Posted 1 year ago by renegade_X    [ Reply ]
Funkified version...This is a keeper!
Posted 1 year ago by drewd    [ Reply ]
ST has been re-working covers in a very nice way. 
Posted 1 year ago by sunybuny    [ Reply ]
Yep, like it.

7
Posted 1 year ago by vandal    [ Reply ]
I kinda like this version.
Posted 1 year ago by Akazungu    [ Reply ]