Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 4579
Length: 5:00
Plays (last 30 days): 1
Sleeping is giving in, so lift those heavy eyelids
People say that you'll die faster than without water
But we know it's just a lie, scare your son, scare your daughter
People say that your dreams are the only things that save you
Come on, baby, in our dreams, we can live our misbehavior
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes
Every time you close your eyes
Every time you close your eyes
Every time you close your eyes
People try and hide the night underneath the covers
People try and hide the light underneath the covers
Come on, hide your lovers underneath the covers
Come on, hide your lovers underneath the covers
Hiding from your brothers underneath the covers
Come on, hide your lovers underneath the covers
People say that you'll die faster than without water
But we know it's just a lie, scare your son, scare your daughter
Scare your son, scare your daughter, scare your son, scare your daughter
Now here's the sun, it's alright (lies, lies)
Now here's the moon, it's alright (lies, lies)
Now here's the sun, it's alright (lies, lies)
Now here's the moon, it's alright (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
Every time you close your eyes
Every time you close your eyes (lies, lies)
yeah this is what i want when i hear their name. i'm not a huge fan of their other stuff.
yeah I like Joy Division too
When I think of Arcade fire, this is the song I think of.
yeah this is what i want when i hear their name. i'm not a huge fan of their other stuff.
Good Tune!
When I think of Arcade fire, this is the song I think of.
Pleasantly surprised how excellent their live show at Lollapalooza was in 2017. This song was particularly good on a beautiful night.
Would agree. They played at a festival I was at on a stage I hadn't planned to view. The excellence and detail of their sound and the perfection stopped me in my tracks. From this day on they stand high in my estimation of musical brilliance. Was hooked from then onwards!
Baroque Pop? ...must be a Canadian thing! ...decent tune! ...bizarre genre label!
Baroque because they use every instrument imaginable. Actually they all play several, including vocal harmonies. A strings are in every song. And, really, I have no idea
The more I hear this band the more I love them.
Well that's one thing we have in common!
Both...it's on each of us to comment as we see fit and if others are being shitty well....that's their problem. Keep up the GOOD commenting and FORGET about the haters (whenever possible)
That said, I'm only at a 6 on this one, sometimes I feel like I like it more, though maybe one day I'll go +1 on it....though I like the Wiki page 'genres' listed as (Indie Rock, Alt Rock, Dance-rock and baroque pop) - Long Live RP and all the listeners here!!
Can someone please define "baroque pop" for me?
The funny part comes when someone is mad about that negative comment and they just need to say something negatively witty about that person.
A small tit for tat war of wills.
I really don't think I've ever been that attached to a song or artist to be offended by someone not liking it.
Although I really do like Tiny Tim's Tiptoe Through The Tulips, anyone who has anything negative to say about that work of art,,,well those would be fightin words.
It would be great if you could cut back on the snake pics!
Thanks!
Egads! This sucks!
As a long-time listener and reader-of-comments, I'm completely *shocked* to discover that you don't like Arcade Fire. Shocked, I say!
He's for sure never seen them live, they took the crowd through the roof and into outer space in Zürich a couple of years ago! And I grew up on LZ and 10 Years After, but staying open minded is a good quality.
i've got to listen to Natalie Merchant in order to hear them?
WTAF?
i thought this was the RP "Rock" channel
and i thought that the Beatles WERE "Rock"
What? It's the Main Mix man! Broaden your mind.
With a hand in my pants.
Figure that one out. Now hit PSD.
i've got to listen to Natalie Merchant in order to hear them?
WTAF?
i thought this was the RP "Rock" channel
and i thought that the Beatles WERE "Rock"
Both...it's on each of us to comment as we see fit and if others are being shitty well....that's their problem. Keep up the GOOD commenting and FORGET about the haters (whenever possible)
That said, I'm only at a 6 on this one, sometimes I feel like I like it more, though maybe one day I'll go +1 on it....though I like the Wiki page 'genres' listed as (Indie Rock, Alt Rock, Dance-rock and baroque pop) - Long Live RP and all the listeners here!!
Wow! Like their vocals are so unique!
Wow! Like their guitar playing is so unique!
Wow! Like their percussion and drumming is so unique!
Like, I don't know any other band in the history of music have ever sounded like them. And like I listen to Spotify, so I know a lot!
That is quite an obsession you've got there.
Wow! Like their vocals are so unique!
Wow! Like their guitar playing is so unique!
Wow! Like their percussion and drumming is so unique!
Like, I don't know any other band in the history of music have ever sounded like them. And like I listen to Spotify, so I know a lot!
Very funny, I getcha. I've thought this many a time too. A few of their tunes have grown on me, but yeah, –I getcha!
Wow! Like their vocals are so unique!
Wow! Like their guitar playing is so unique!
Wow! Like their percussion and drumming is so unique!
Like, I don't know any other band in the history of music have ever sounded like them. And like I listen to Spotify, so I know a lot!
Edit: Next on tap, The B-52s - Roam. I died and went back to work.
We can add "monotonic" to the list of words you use incorrectly.
What a bum way to start the new year!
The band plays monotonic, muted, boring, repetitive, predictable songs. They have so many members in the band, you would expect more creativity.
FYI: Last night I watched the Rolling Stones 1969 BBC live, studio concert, Rock n Roll Circus show.
Oh my God! The Stones were at their best. The Who was at their best. Jethro Tull was at their best. Guest appearances by Clapton, Taj Mahal, John Lennon. The bombastic/creative/fun vibe was intoxicating.
This is what set the standard for live RnR and blew your socks off. Its so sad to see so many bands today, that can't even get on the same stage with those bands. They just don't have the chops.
Leaving aside your thoughts on Arcade Fire's level of talent or quality of music, your last paragraph above is wrong on several levels.
The idea that "the standard for live RnR" is several HOF bands/artists playing at their best is an impossible bar to reach and would seem to imply that, if other bands can't reach that, they aren't worth watching. Standing before a stage and listening to quality musicians is pretty awesome; you don't have to be the best. Never mind saying that "so many bands today" (I'm guessing the bottom 90-95-99% of musicians) can't match the best - no shit. But the top group probably could and you're comparing them against the best of their contemporaries in the late sixties. There was a lot of dross back then, too, we just don't try to compare them against the best of today.
As well as trying to compare great bands that you first heard in your formative years against a solidly-good band from today. Old baseball players were known to exaggerate the abilities of those who played before them & diminish those after; "You throw pretty hard there, Bob Feller, but you are not even close to as fast as the first pitcher I ever faced, Willie Slowasallhell." Rock music was still fairly new and novel and generally simpler back then.The expectations for artists today are higher than they were back then. Plus you're essentially comparing the entirety of those bands' careers & their respective legends against the here & now of today's musicians.
Am I trying to imply that Arcade Fire is the equal of The Rolling Stones? No, but they aren't one of the best bands around; those bands might be, though.
Are you saying they don't play loud enough? Not enough notes? What is this complaint even about? Je ne comprends pas cela.
What a bum way to start the new year!
The band plays monotonic, muted, boring, repetitive, predictable songs. They have so many members in the band, you would expect more creativity.
FYI: Last night I watched the Rolling Stones 1969 BBC live, studio concert, Rock n Roll Circus show.
Oh my God! The Stones were at their best. The Who was at their best. Jethro Tull was at their best. Guest appearances by Clapton, Taj Mahal, John Lennon. The bombastic/creative/fun vibe was intoxicating.
This is what set the standard for live RnR and blew your socks off. Its so sad to see so many bands today, that can't even get on the same stage with those bands. They just don't have the chops.
There are power trios, that put these guys to shame.
Are you saying they don't play loud enough? Not enough notes? What is this complaint even about? Je ne comprends pas cela.
There are power trios, that put these guys to shame.
RP unworthy
annoying, silly no musical/cultural value just mainstream
within the delicate musical flow of RP this is like the serving of a tin of ravioli during a gourmet dinner prepared by a sublime Chief in a marvellous restaurant.
take it off the playlist please...
now go ahead and bash on me - but if you listen regular to RP - the Quality of this song is not holding up to the standard of the station
in the end it's just a matter of taste i know - so no insulting intended by this post - just express my irritation...
Do you like le post'-rock?
Yes, I like le post'-rock.
Even le Of Montreal?
Yes le Of Montreal.
Godspeed You! Black
Emperor?
Certainemant ze Emperor!
Un Arcade Fire du zut allors?
Oui! allor le Arcade Fire.
(Note: I know no French or Quebecois, and am at best a horrid Anglophone.)
Thump.
Thump.
Thump.
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
Repeat 10X
Every time you close your eyes
Repeat 10X
Underneath the covers
Repeat 10X
Thump.
Thump.
Thump.
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
Thump.
Thump.
Thump.
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
Repeat 10X
Every time you close your eyes
Repeat 10X
Underneath the covers
Repeat 10X
Thump.
Thump.
Thump.
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
this is so bad
This is the very definition of histrionic.
PLEASE
My pedantic English teacher would have insisted: fewer Beatles!
Shows how little she understood about grammar.
Otherwise I'd say more of this, more Beatles too, and I'll let you all decide what there should be less of...
PLEASE
Boring. Monotonic. No hooks.
But when there is a huge shortage of quality RnR bands, any band can step into the void and be anointed as a "killer band".
You keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Pondering why this creeps up on me. Yes, the drums are intrusive with their beat, but no worse than whatshisname with Springsteen's band. And the lead voice is indeed grating, and the backing la-las, taken in isolation, belong on a Take That B-side, while the lyric seems banal, at least what I can make out of it, but still, for some reason.... What's your opinion about this?
I detect some Pixies energy, the piano and those other chordlike thingies seem to come from Velvet Underground - all tomorrow's parties?, and there is an ebb and flow to the tune, crescendo, diminuendo, or whatever they're called, which I guess, though I'm no musical analyst, feel more random and unpredictable due to the monotony of the basic rhythm and the smooth progression of the string/voice "harmonies". The last third of the song, the bit where it changes somewhat, reminds me of something by Bowie, but I can't put my finger on it at the moment. Help me out please!
Yeah, no points for this one yet, but it's worth keeping an eye on.
Heckuv an analysis 2020sk! Agreed on all counts. I will simplify and say "I like the way it sounds"
Boring. Monotonic. No hooks.
But when there is a huge shortage of quality RnR bands, any band can step into the void and be anointed as a "killer band".
REPEAT
Every time you close your eyes
REPEAT
(This song competes heavily with Gabriel's Red Rain ... amongst other songs anxious to make it to the Top 10 for Repetitive Lyrics.)
Pondering why this creeps up on me. Yes, the drums are intrusive with their beat, but no worse than whatshisname with Springsteen's band. And the lead voice is indeed grating, and the backing la-las, taken in isolation, belong on a Take That B-side, while the lyric seems banal, at least what I can make out of it, but still, for some reason.... What's your opinion about this?
I detect some Pixies energy, the piano and those other chordlike thingies seem to come from Velvet Underground - all tomorrow's parties?, and there is an ebb and flow to the tune, crescendo, diminuendo, or whatever they're called, which I guess, though I'm no musical analyst, feel more random and unpredictable due to the monotony of the basic rhythm and the smooth progression of the string/voice "harmonies". The last third of the song, the bit where it changes somewhat, reminds me of something by Bowie, but I can't put my finger on it at the moment. Help me out please!
Yeah, no points for this one yet, but it's worth keeping an eye on.
Suggest the haters go and listen so some whining American country dreck instead... leave the real music to us!
That's about right. I think the drumming might kill them for me, eventually.
There's like 3 Arcade Fire songs each played 5 times in 4 weeks...not like their so easy to tell apart.
Mewling + POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND.
POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND...
A trained chimp could play that "percussion."
Monotonous cacophohy.
White noise.
Mercy, please.
A "cacophony" would rarely be monotonous (I'm not sure about a "cacophohy", though), and "white noise" would not have any pounding, or percussion. I know, it's poetic license - "ironic paradox" and all. However, it is apparent that you do not care for this band.
Muted, boring, no soul, milk toast.
And this is the best RnR can offer in today's world?
Egads.
Well there is one thing that really stands out; the singer is absolutely the worst singer I have ever heard! That includes my father in the shower!
You mean this singer is worst than Leonard Cohen or Bob Dylan??
This song makes me get up & dance at work
Damnation by faint praise, right? : )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLXuF6_bxc
Lowlands live 2005 - mindblowing I remember...
A lot of listeners complaining to the monotonic drums of AF - I don't know. it's ok for me. The real and big problem is the vocal (IMHO)...
There's like 3 Arcade Fire songs each played 5 times in 4 weeks...not like their so easy to tell apart.
Mewling + POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND.
POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND...
A trained chimp could play that "percussion."
Monotonous cacophohy.
White noise.
Mercy, please.
I kind of like it.
There's like 3 Arcade Fire songs each played 5 times in 4 weeks...not like their so easy to tell apart.
Mewling + POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND.
POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND...
A trained chimp could play that "percussion."
Monotonous cacophohy.
White noise.
Mercy, please.
It's nowhere near as tedious as your continual and repetitive Arcade Fire bashing. Your negative comments, often including strange references to Abba, feature under almost every AF song. You don't like AF, fine. Many others do. It's still pretty easy to avoid listening to them.
Well there is one thing that really stands out; the singer is absolutely the worst singer I have ever heard! That includes my father in the shower!
can't stop dance this song :)
thanks @checco!
And again today.....
There's like 3 Arcade Fire songs each played 5 times in 4 weeks...not like their so easy to tell apart.
Mewling + POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND.
POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND...
A trained chimp could play that "percussion."
Monotonous cacophohy.
White noise.
Mercy, please.
Get the right trained chimp and maybe it will know the correct "there, their and they're."
snark, snark - use the "PSD" button.
thanks !
great band !
There's like 3 Arcade Fire songs each played 5 times in 4 weeks...not like their so easy to tell apart.
Mewling + POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND.
POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND. POUND...
A trained chimp could play that "percussion."
Monotonous cacophohy.
White noise.
Mercy, please.
The lists may be repetitive, perhaps, for certain songs, but they're not especially redundant.
*Unlawful reproduction of this comment is subject to penalty. All right reserved. TM*
dw wrote:
Arcade Fire by Holly Erskine
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hollyerskine/
Arcade Fire at Brixton Academy.
14 March 2007
All rights reserved
But - I just don't like them much - not a lot of range, in almost every sense, melodically, rythmically, vocally, instrumentation. In fact the very chameleon like aspects of Bowie's career that I love so much seem to be absent in these guys.
If you disagree, set me straight.
They "started off" several years before they performed with David Bowie, and they are (still) on a relatively small, independent record label. Getting to work with David Bowie is quite a "leg-up" for any band, though. I'm not sure if their music can evolve as much as his did.
Damn, you have good taste !!!
Turn it up - this one rocks !!!
Good music, but IMO it doesn't hold up to repeated listens. Robo drumming and other annoyances.
One of my rare complaints about RP.
Thank heaven for the PSD.
https://vimeo.com/20089255
Every time I open psd