Belief is holding something as a truth
Faith is hoping something is truth...so there should be a nice heaping of doubt in faith.
...and if you hold something of faith (and there are universal things of faith) as a belief,
then we haven't slayed the dragon of ego...
If a faithful person claims that the evidence is positively everything and everywhere, what would an undecided or negatively inclined person as to faith accept as evidence? Not being tricky. Literally is there a marker or condition?
I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal. Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations. And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.
Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ?
Or never mind. Maybe next year.
"I can't explain it" encompasses vast amount of daily life. None of that implies any particular actor or cause being at play.
If you assign some cause (outside of the influence of the physical) to anything you can't explain you have entered the realm of religious belief.
I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal. Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations. And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.
Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ?
Or never mind. Maybe next year.
One size doesn't fit all. Some atheists might believe in spirits/ghosts/whatever, while not believing in deities of any kind.
One of my oldest friends, a college buddy/roomie is a planetary scientist. He discovered the furthest known contacted object in our solar system, untouched by thermal influence since the beginning, and therefore a treasure trove of information as to what happened at the beginning of the system. He predicted its shape using occultation, and has an understanding of space that boggles the mind. He was friends with Sagan.
Once, sitting with him and another (very religious) friend, I tried to ask him what his (limited human) understanding of the universe meant to him in terms of god or whatever. Heâs a quiet, thoughtful guy, and - in the milliseconds he paused - my religious friend jumped in and hijacked the convo. Iâll try again on another day, but I kinda think it was a moment thatâs passed.
Does the vastness of the universe say something about the non existence of a god? Or is it that we just are unable to comprehend something that would be that big compared to us?
Similarly, when you study biological functions, does the complexity of things like kidney function with its semipermeable membranes here but not there as urine gets made say something about a divine intervention that allowed something so microscopically detailed to exist, and therefore for us to exist?
I canât believe in an anthropomorphic god; that makes no sense. But is all of this vastness and complexity really random?
One of my oldest friends, a college buddy/roomie is a planetary scientist. He discovered the furthest known contacted object in our solar system, untouched by thermal influence since the beginning, and therefore a treasure trove of information as to what happened at the beginning of the system. He predicted its shape using occultation, and has an understanding of space that boggles the mind. He was friends with Sagan.
Once, sitting with him and another (very religious) friend, I tried to ask him what his (limited human) understanding of the universe meant to him in terms of god or whatever. Heâs a quiet, thoughtful guy, and - in the milliseconds he paused - my religious friend jumped in and hijacked the convo. Iâll try again on another day, but I kinda think it was a moment thatâs passed.
Does the vastness of the universe say something about the non existence of a god? Or is it that we just are unable to comprehend something that would be that big compared to us?
Similarly, when you study biological functions, does the complexity of things like kidney function with its semipermeable membranes here but not there as urine gets made say something about a divine intervention that allowed something so microscopically detailed to exist, and therefore for us to exist?
I canât believe in an anthropomorphic god; that makes no sense. But is all of this vastness and complexity really random?
Do atheists have any interests beyond the material world ?
Like arguing on the internet?
I consider that part of the material world.
I was thinking more in terms of the paranormal. Things that do manifest themselves without any known physical explanations. And outside of religious acceptance and explanations as well.
Or in other words, is the paranormal (and perhaps reincarnation) considered not real and therefore self delusional ? Or never mind. Maybe next year.
I feel loved and cared for as a human, not a professing atheist. I don't generally profess.
Atheists don't go knocking on doors to proselytize. We don't have revival meetings. I don't score any points by converting a believer, so honestly the subject never comes up.
Most of the people I know (outside of immediate family) are believers at least socially; I don't know what's in anyone's heart but mine so I can't tell if they believe what they profess. And since religions take credit for basic human morality I'd bet most of the people I know don't have any idea I'm an atheist. They probably assume I just go to a different church from them.
And I'm puzzled why you'd wonder if I have fulfilling relationships with believers. Why wouldn't I? Would you ask the same question of a Hindu, a Muslim, a neopagan?
And atheism (no need to capitalize) isn't a belief system, it's the absence of a belief system. I don't know any atheists that profess that gods can't possibly exist, we just haven't been convinced that they do. As for resolving the Sermon on the Mount with the Battle of Jericho...that's not my cross to bear. Believing contradictory things requires a religious mind and I don't have one.
Ask the average Christian to explain the trinity and you'll get a non-nonsensical word salad. This is not the realm of logic and reason, it's unashamedly the realm of magical thinking. I don't do magical thinking. And I don't care what kind of metaphorical terrarium other people keep their gods in. It's your god, house it as you like. If your god is offended by its kennel feel free to change the kennel, but you're more likely to change the god. And if history is any guide that god always seems right at home.
Personal- Do you have interesting if not fullfilling relationships or friendships with those who profess a seeking or spiritual kindred and do you as a professing Athiest feel equally loved and cared for?
I'm thinking you most definitely do. Existential- Does it mean to be an Athiest that there is no purpose in seeking proof of that which can't possibly exist, and is looked upon as faulty logic or reasoning? Scripture and dogma aside for a moment, as a battle with certainty of fortitude as opposed to a battle with passive belief, can the idea of a God of love coexist with a God of horrors? Have we evolved our individual choice to be one of putting God in a prison made of the mind of our anthromorphic if imbalanced understanding?
I feel loved and cared for as a human, not a professing atheist. I don't generally profess. Atheists don't go knocking on doors to proselytize. We don't have revival meetings. I don't score any points by converting a believer, so honestly the subject never comes up. Most of the people I know (outside of immediate family) are believers at least socially; I don't know what's in anyone's heart but mine so I can't tell if they believe what they profess. And since religions take credit for basic human morality I'd bet most of the people I know don't have any idea I'm an atheist. They probably assume I just go to a different church from them. And I'm puzzled why you'd wonder if I have fulfilling relationships with believers. Why wouldn't I? Would you ask the same question of a Hindu, a Muslim, a neopagan? And atheism (no need to capitalize) isn't a belief system, it's the absence of a belief system. I don't know any atheists that profess that gods can't possibly exist, we just haven't been convinced that they do. As for resolving the Sermon on the Mount with the Battle of Jericho...that's not my cross to bear. Believing contradictory things requires a religious mind and I don't have one. Ask the average Christian to explain the trinity and you'll get a non-nonsensical word salad. This is not the realm of logic and reason, it's unashamedly the realm of magical thinking. I don't do magical thinking. And I don't care what kind of metaphorical terrarium other people keep their gods in. It's your god, house it as you like. If your god is offended by its kennel feel free to change the kennel, but you're more likely to change the god. And if history is any guide that god always seems right at home.
Declare, exclaim profess, signify- Oh I love this reply so much!
I capitalized because I wasn't sure. My bad.
I did use "existential' for the second question.
Also, I used "God" within a commonly understood attribution as to a operative spiritual concept and context not so much for control or convenience.
I had a longer reply and lost it. Yes I would and have asked this of other folks. I'm interested in people and who they are as individuals. Where they are from. How they were raised. Belief or operative worldview in something greater than ourselves need not carry a prerequisite to be seeking reason and acceptance. Not meaning to be shifty or vague. Also, not a vain attempt to proselytize or convince anyone by my own words or actions.
Personal- Do you have interesting if not fullfilling relationships or friendships with those who profess a seeking or spiritual kindred and do you as a professing Athiest feel equally loved and cared for?
I'm thinking you most definitely do.
Existential- Does it mean to be an Athiest that there is no purpose in seeking proof of that which can't possibly exist, and is looked upon as faulty logic or reasoning? Scripture and dogma aside for a moment, as a battle with certainty of fortitude as opposed to a battle with passive belief, can the idea of a God of love coexist with a God of horrors? Have we evolved our individual choice to be one of putting God in a prison made of the mind of our anthromorphic if imbalanced understanding?
I feel loved and cared for as a human, not a professing atheist. I don't generally profess.
Atheists don't go knocking on doors to proselytize. We don't have revival meetings. I don't score any points by converting a believer, so honestly the subject never comes up.
Most of the people I know (outside of immediate family) are believers at least socially; I don't know what's in anyone's heart but mine so I can't tell if they believe what they profess. And since religions take credit for basic human morality I'd bet most of the people I know don't have any idea I'm an atheist. They probably assume I just go to a different church from them.
And I'm puzzled why you'd wonder if I have fulfilling relationships with believers. Why wouldn't I? Would you ask the same question of a Hindu, a Muslim, a neopagan?
And atheism (no need to capitalize) isn't a belief system, it's the absence of a belief system. I don't know any atheists that profess that gods can't possibly exist, we just haven't been convinced that they do. As for resolving the Sermon on the Mount with the Battle of Jericho...that's not my cross to bear. Believing contradictory things requires a religious mind and I don't have one.
Ask the average Christian to explain the trinity and you'll get a non-nonsensical word salad. This is not the realm of logic and reason, it's unashamedly the realm of magical thinking. I don't do magical thinking. And I don't care what kind of metaphorical terrarium other people keep their gods in. It's your god, house it as you like. If your god is offended by its kennel feel free to change the kennel, but you're more likely to change the god. And if history is any guide that god always seems right at home.
Personal- Do you have interesting if not fullfilling relationships or friendships with those who profess a seeking or spiritual kindred and do you as a professing Athiest feel equally loved and cared for?
I'm thinking you most definitely do.
Existential- Does it mean to be an Athiest that there is no purpose in seeking proof of that which can't possibly exist, and is looked upon as faulty logic or reasoning? Scripture and dogma aside for a moment, as a battle with certainty of fortitude as opposed to a battle with passive belief, can the idea of a God of love coexist with a God of horrors? Have we evolved our individual choice to be one of putting God in a prison made of the mind of our anthromorphic if imbalanced understanding?
Personal- Do you have interesting if not fullfilling relationships or friendships with those who profess a seeking or spiritual kindred and do you as a professing Athiest feel equally loved and cared for?
I'm thinking you most definitely do.
Existential- Does it mean to be an Athiest that there is no purpose in seeking proof of that which can't possibly exist, and is looked upon as faulty logic or reasoning? Scripture and dogma aside for a moment, as a battle with certainty of fortitude as opposed to a battle with passive belief, can the idea of a God of love coexist with a God of horrors? Have we evolved our individual choice to be one of putting God in a prison made of the mind of our anthromorphic if imbalanced understanding?
