[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

how do you feel right now? - GeneP59 - Feb 17, 2020 - 4:08pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Feb 17, 2020 - 4:03pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Feb 17, 2020 - 3:57pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - blackjellybean - Feb 17, 2020 - 2:14pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - RabbitEars - Feb 17, 2020 - 2:11pm
 
RP 20th anniversary, Feb 2020 - miamizsun - Feb 17, 2020 - 1:02pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - westslope - Feb 17, 2020 - 11:56am
 
Show us your NEW _______________!!!! - sunybuny - Feb 17, 2020 - 11:45am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Feb 17, 2020 - 11:41am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Feb 17, 2020 - 10:56am
 
Things You Thought Today - Steely_D - Feb 17, 2020 - 9:54am
 
Family Ties - miamizsun - Feb 17, 2020 - 8:03am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Feb 17, 2020 - 6:52am
 
Climate Change - Ohmsen - Feb 17, 2020 - 3:14am
 
Live Music - R_P - Feb 16, 2020 - 10:35pm
 
Google Home - jarro - Feb 16, 2020 - 1:00pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Feb 16, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Back to the 90's - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 7:34pm
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - Ohmsen - Feb 15, 2020 - 5:03pm
 
March Of The Locusts - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 3:31pm
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Feb 15, 2020 - 2:39pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Ohmsen - Feb 15, 2020 - 2:28pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 12:12pm
 
hAPPY aNNIVERSARY bUZZ and jRZYTMATA - Coaxial - Feb 14, 2020 - 6:28pm
 
Valentine 's - You wouldn't see today... - Antigone - Feb 14, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
Name My Band - buddy - Feb 14, 2020 - 12:41pm
 
Canada - R_P - Feb 14, 2020 - 12:37pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 14, 2020 - 12:00pm
 
Best Song Comments. - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 14, 2020 - 8:42am
 
A motivational quote - Proclivities - Feb 14, 2020 - 7:52am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - buddy - Feb 14, 2020 - 7:16am
 
Preferred media player? - haresfur - Feb 13, 2020 - 10:32pm
 
Growing Humanity... - black321 - Feb 13, 2020 - 6:39pm
 
ok, am i crazy? - pilgrim - Feb 13, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Feb 13, 2020 - 3:25pm
 
The Obituary Page - oldviolin - Feb 13, 2020 - 3:24pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Feb 13, 2020 - 2:16pm
 
The House I Want (Today) - miamizsun - Feb 13, 2020 - 1:55pm
 
Bill and Rebecca, Thank You - BillG - Feb 13, 2020 - 1:17pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Feb 13, 2020 - 11:27am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Antigone - Feb 13, 2020 - 11:13am
 
Bernie Sanders - R_P - Feb 13, 2020 - 10:45am
 
Business as Usual - R_P - Feb 12, 2020 - 10:37pm
 
Bryston BDP Pi - jbuhl - Feb 12, 2020 - 4:26pm
 
Films you're excited about. - miamizsun - Feb 12, 2020 - 2:28pm
 
Australia Burns - haresfur - Feb 12, 2020 - 1:20pm
 
Immigration - steeler - Feb 12, 2020 - 9:36am
 
FLAC Streaming - icculus - Feb 12, 2020 - 7:35am
 
songs that ROCK! - sirdroseph - Feb 12, 2020 - 6:13am
 
Tech & Science - miamizsun - Feb 12, 2020 - 5:20am
 
New Music - miamizsun - Feb 12, 2020 - 5:16am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - miamizsun - Feb 12, 2020 - 4:59am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Feb 11, 2020 - 8:28pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oppositelock - Feb 11, 2020 - 6:07pm
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - R_P - Feb 11, 2020 - 5:43pm
 
WTF??!! - Steely_D - Feb 11, 2020 - 5:12pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - haresfur - Feb 11, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
2020 Elections - miamizsun - Feb 11, 2020 - 1:12pm
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - rgio - Feb 11, 2020 - 11:16am
 
Corrections - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 11, 2020 - 8:40am
 
~ Have a good joke you can post? ~ - Steely_D - Feb 10, 2020 - 10:40pm
 
Republican Party - Steely_D - Feb 10, 2020 - 10:36pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - Antigone - Feb 10, 2020 - 3:59pm
 
Are you ready for some football? - miamizsun - Feb 10, 2020 - 3:58pm
 
Cell Phone Hell - miamizsun - Feb 10, 2020 - 3:51pm
 
Who Would You Like To See As President? - miamizsun - Feb 10, 2020 - 3:12pm
 
Photos you have taken of other people - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 10, 2020 - 1:19pm
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - Feb 10, 2020 - 6:51am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - sirdroseph - Feb 10, 2020 - 5:52am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - SeriousLee - Feb 9, 2020 - 1:27pm
 
The Grateful Dead - buddy - Feb 9, 2020 - 12:25pm
 
What makes you smile? - miamizsun - Feb 9, 2020 - 11:16am
 
Impeachment Time: - miamizsun - Feb 9, 2020 - 11:15am
 
KUDOS for BillG - miamizsun - Feb 9, 2020 - 11:13am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Ask the Libertarian Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 165, 166, 167  Next
Post to this Topic
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 26, 2020 - 7:14am

Red_Dragon wrote:

It will come as a shock no doubt that Hitchens wasn't addressing libertarians, but Objectivists. He was a frequent guest at the Cato Institute and Reason magazine. He also wrote admiring biographies of libertarian heroes Thomas Payne and Thomas Jefferson.

You don't make the intellectual evolution Hitchens underwent in one step. Along the way he had a lot to say, but his advocacy for a number of libertarian principles (free expression chief among them) was a constant.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 26, 2020 - 3:42am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 24, 2020 - 7:32pm

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 15, 2019 - 8:26am

 miamizsun wrote:
The Alternative to Ideology

 


He has a great quote from Norberto Bobbio at the end:

There were only a few of us who preserved a small bag in which, before throwing ourselves into the sea, we deposited for safekeeping the most salutary fruits of the European intellectual tradition, the value of enquiry, the ferment of doubt, a willingness to dialogue, a spirit of criticism, moderation of judgment, philological scruple, a sense of the complexity of things. Many, too many, deprived themselves of this baggage: they either abandoned it, considering it a useless weight; or they never possessed it, throwing themselves into the waters before having the time to acquire it. I do not reproach them; but I prefer the company of the others. Indeed, I suspect that this company is destined to grow, as the years bring wisdom and events shed new light on things. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 15, 2019 - 6:20am

i think i've posted this before, but it may be worth posting again

it falls short in a couple of areas and makes great points in others

probably worth your time...enjoy


The Alternative to Ideology


When we launched the Niskanen Center in January 2015, we happily identified ourselves as libertarians. Sure, we were heterodox libertarians, but there are many schools of libertarianism beyond those promoted by Charles Koch’s political operationsThe school we identified with was a left-libertarianism concerned with social justice (a libertarian perspective that I’ve defended in debates with more orthodox libertarians here and here). That worldview lacked an institutional voice in 2015. Our ambition was to create a space for it and, in so doing, redefine what it meant to be libertarian in the 21st century.

I have abandoned that libertarian project, however, because I have come to abandon ideology. This essay is an invitation for you to do likewise — to walk out of the “clean and well-lit prison of one idea.” Ideology encourages dodgy reasoning due to what psychologists call “motivated cognition,” which is the act of deciding what you want to believe and using your reasoning power, with all its might, to get you there. Worse, it encourages fanaticism, disregard for social outcomes, and invites irresolvable philosophical disputes. It also threatens social pluralism — which is to say, it threatens freedom.

The better alternative is not moral relativism. The better alternative is moderation, a commodity that is rapidly disappearing in political life, with dangerous consequences for the American republic.

more...





westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 9:30am

I believe that monetary policy should be a priority issue for Libertarians and libertarian-minded folks.

James Bullard, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank president just called for interest rate cuts for a couple of reasons, among them, to increase the inflation rate which is sitting well below the 2% target at roughly 1.6% in recent years.

I believe that the inflation target should be 0% and the US Federal Reserve should drop the employment mandate.    Insure price stability (including financial asset stability) and then get the hell out of the way.  

Many macro economists  believe that positive rates of inflation are necessary in order to fool agents into better outcomes.   It is paternalism of the worst kind and contradicts the approach taken to most economic policy issues by economists who tend to favour transparency and accurate information.

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 1:38pm

Now islander, that bottle is a thing of beauty!
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 12:51pm



 westslope wrote:


 Lazy8 wrote:
.....

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

.........

Well that should not surprise any of us as this is a music-inspired forum.

Though, personally, I would have hoped that you were chasing summer-run steelhead on the Olympic Peninsula.    With dry flies.  



 


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 11:38am



 Lazy8 wrote:
.....

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

.........

Well that should not surprise any of us as this is a music-inspired forum.

Though, personally, I would have hoped that you were chasing summer-run steelhead on the Olympic Peninsula.    With dry flies.  



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 10:52am

 sirdroseph wrote:
This is in this thread and not the other because this is much more than weed, this is a libertarians dream on many levels.  JFK got shot over this.   Ron Paul is smiling.



California Senate Passes Revolutionary Bill to Bypass Federal Reserve, Create Cannabis Banking Industry



 
This is very very cool.  IIRC one of the Dakotas has their own state banking system which has been in place for decades.  The state has been prospering as a direct result.

And yes about JFK ...

.
OBTW ... The Federal banking system has doing the same thing to gun store owners for about the past 10 or so years.  They have a hard time keeping a bank that will handle their money.  And their businesses are legal and well regulated ...

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 8:34am



 Lazy8 wrote:
westslope wrote:
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

You paint yours and I'll paint mine.
 
Spoken like a true individualist.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 7:34am

westslope wrote:
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

You paint yours and I'll paint mine.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 7:08am



 Lazy8 wrote:
......

As for the statist claim...I've only ever heard that from anarchists before, and I think even they realize how silly it sounds. But whatever floats your valves.
 
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 2:59pm

westslope wrote:
Lift the libertarian's skirt a bit and there you find  the essence of a devoted Statist.   With just a slight albeit interesting variation on how to do Statism.     

Social anarchists make a more gallant attempt to dismantle the State as much as possible.  Just sayin'.

At one point I was referencing the harm reduction approach literature which I vaguely recall getting some support from  Libertarian writers.

The fact that a popular, widely-used drug like cannabis is dangerous is an excellent reason for legalizing it.  Social control is largely sacrificed in a black market situation.

If you want to make a harm reduction argument I'm down with that, but I'd also argue that it really doesn't apply to cannabis. "Dangerous" is a relative term of course. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were getting at.

As for the statist claim...I've only ever heard that from anarchists before, and I think even they realize how silly it sounds. But whatever floats your valves.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 2:39pm

Lift the libertarian's skirt a bit and there you find  the essence of a devoted Statist.   With just a slight albeit interesting variation on how to do Statism.     

Social anarchists make a more gallant attempt to dismantle the State as much as possible.  Just sayin'.

At one point I was referencing the harm reduction approach literature which I vaguely recall getting some support from  Libertarian writers.

The fact that a popular, widely-used drug like cannabis is dangerous is an excellent reason for legalizing it.  Social control is largely sacrificed in a black market situation.
 

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 8:30am

westslope wrote:
Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches. Let me add to the initial assertion.

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically
contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.

Discuss.

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

If you want those better ideas discussed you need to demonstrate that you read what gets written. Those better ways of doing things (or simply not doing them, as some of them aren't legitimate social objectives in the first place) have been discussed. If you have a specific policy question fire away.

A Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

B
Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.  C  I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

D
So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?

I'll try to parse this one wobbly concept at a time:

A
Legal in 10 years: yay! I'm betting on less than 5.

B
Don't care what many of those in favour are arguing, tho:

1. I've never, in 40 years of libertarian activism, ever heard anyone argue that—likely because
2. "It should be legal because it's dangerous" is a stupid argument.

C Your second assertion does not follow. Legalizing things means less state control. Period.

If you want to argue that legalizing a trade or substance means the state can regulate that trade or substance (to a lesser degree than an outright ban) then...um, yeah, that happens. California, for instance, taxed legal weed at such an absurdly high rate that people were sticking to the black market. Colorado's less-heavy-handed approach resulted in substantial revenue for the state, which has other lessons for taxation that I won't digress into here.

In other words the possibility that a state might clumsily interfere with a market is not an argument for the state to...interfere with a market in a more-drastic fashion. And as an argument against advocating for less state interference in markets it's utterly incoherent.

D
More powerful: no. More effective: maybe, but only at the legitimate purposes of a state.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 8:25am

 westslope wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.{#Cowboy}
 

Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches.    Let me add to the initial assertion. 

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.  Discuss.

 
Which is fine, only the anarchist extreme version of Libertarians would advocate no government at all.  We want more efficient and productive government, but are extremely and rightfully suspicious of the stronger part and demand proving the need for the power in every instance is vetted properly and in line with the Constitution.

 

Por ejemple',  I advocate a better way to defend the country by bringing all of our troops home and only meddling in others affairs if it can be proven that the homeland is in danger from offensive action. This will immediately make us a lot safer.  There that was easy and did not increase the power of the government. {#Cowboy}




westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 7:53am



 sirdroseph wrote:
 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.
{#Cowboy}

 

Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches.    Let me add to the initial assertion. 

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.  Discuss.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 30, 2019 - 8:19am

 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.{#Cowboy}
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 30, 2019 - 8:06am

Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  


Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   In other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?



Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 165, 166, 167  Next