[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Trump - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 31, 2020 - 10:22am
 
A designers worst nightmare - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 31, 2020 - 10:19am
 
What do you snack on? - GeneP59 - Mar 31, 2020 - 10:16am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Mar 31, 2020 - 10:06am
 
COVID-19 - haresfur - Mar 31, 2020 - 9:14am
 
Automotive Lust - islander - Mar 31, 2020 - 6:31am
 
Things You Thought Today - sirdroseph - Mar 31, 2020 - 4:56am
 
Tech & Science - kurtster - Mar 31, 2020 - 1:59am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 31, 2020 - 1:05am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - kurtster - Mar 30, 2020 - 9:30pm
 
Regarding dogs - kurtster - Mar 30, 2020 - 9:29pm
 
Cleveland Stuff - kurtster - Mar 30, 2020 - 6:59pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - R_P - Mar 30, 2020 - 6:26pm
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - Mar 30, 2020 - 5:41pm
 
John Prine - Paradise - Peabody Energy on verge of Ch... - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 30, 2020 - 3:27pm
 
I Just Saw . . . - Proclivities - Mar 30, 2020 - 1:46pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Mar 30, 2020 - 1:38pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Mar 30, 2020 - 12:17pm
 
Last gas price paid? - westslope - Mar 30, 2020 - 11:35am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Mar 30, 2020 - 10:18am
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Mar 30, 2020 - 9:56am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Mar 30, 2020 - 9:24am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 29, 2020 - 11:38pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 29, 2020 - 7:52pm
 
Cooking for Friends.... - oldviolin - Mar 29, 2020 - 7:06pm
 
The Obituary Page - haresfur - Mar 29, 2020 - 6:35pm
 
Friends of Bill W? - buddy - Mar 29, 2020 - 5:43pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - Antigone - Mar 29, 2020 - 5:08pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - GeneP59 - Mar 29, 2020 - 4:59pm
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - Mar 29, 2020 - 3:01pm
 
Canada - haresfur - Mar 29, 2020 - 2:57pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - haresfur - Mar 29, 2020 - 1:46pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Mar 29, 2020 - 1:44pm
 
Acoustic Guitar - R_P - Mar 29, 2020 - 1:29pm
 
Recommended documentaries - Ohmsen - Mar 29, 2020 - 12:11pm
 
More reggae, less Marley please - Ohmsen - Mar 29, 2020 - 11:49am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 29, 2020 - 9:47am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Mar 29, 2020 - 7:16am
 
Nice playlist now.. - spotr - Mar 28, 2020 - 6:30pm
 
Flower Pictures - kcar - Mar 28, 2020 - 12:22pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Mar 28, 2020 - 11:49am
 
how do you feel right now? - Coaxial - Mar 28, 2020 - 11:03am
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Mar 28, 2020 - 10:51am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Mar 28, 2020 - 10:18am
 
Airplay - jbuhl - Mar 28, 2020 - 9:47am
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2020 - 8:22am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2020 - 8:17am
 
What Did You See Today? - Paul_Andreev - Mar 28, 2020 - 2:52am
 
Funny Videos - kcar - Mar 27, 2020 - 4:28pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ndg - Mar 27, 2020 - 1:24pm
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 27, 2020 - 1:13pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Lazy8 - Mar 27, 2020 - 10:29am
 
Change mix channel on RP app - BillG - Mar 27, 2020 - 7:56am
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - Mar 26, 2020 - 10:38pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2020 - 2:32pm
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 26, 2020 - 1:26pm
 
Help!!!!!!!! - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2020 - 1:26pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 26, 2020 - 10:20am
 
Public Messages in a Private Forum - kurtster - Mar 26, 2020 - 6:49am
 
Music Videos - whatshisname - Mar 25, 2020 - 10:48pm
 
Trump Lies - kurtster - Mar 25, 2020 - 9:45pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:38pm
 
Democratic Party - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:18pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:14pm
 
THANK YOU GUYS - dawnbland - Mar 25, 2020 - 7:07am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2020 - 6:30pm
 
Preferred media player? - gvajda - Mar 24, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
Get the Quote - oldviolin - Mar 24, 2020 - 11:54am
 
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories - miamizsun - Mar 24, 2020 - 6:17am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - sirdroseph - Mar 24, 2020 - 2:42am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2020 - 5:12pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - westslope - Mar 23, 2020 - 3:16pm
 
Things that make you sick - sirdroseph - Mar 23, 2020 - 2:36am
 
Art Show - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 22, 2020 - 11:33pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 22, 2020 - 4:01pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Ask the Libertarian Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 165, 166, 167  Next
Post to this Topic
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 10, 2020 - 2:13am

If anyone was unsure of the libertarian position regarding foreign policy and funding of the MIC, perhaps this fellow will clear it up for you.

Making the Best of Running a ‘Sure to Lose’ Libertarian Presidential Campaign

Libertarian presidential candidate Jacob Hornberger provided on Saturday
a clear example of such an approach in regard to US military policy.
Speaking at the Pennsylvania Libertarian Party state convention,
Hornberger stated:
Yeah, I agree, bring the troops home from these so-called forever wars. But, it’s not enough. Bring them home from everywhere: Korea, Europe — World War II’s over, Latin America, wherever. And that’s not all. Discharge them as they hit American shores. Put them in the private sector. And then start concentrating on dismantling this alien form of governmental structure called a national security state. Get rid of the CIA. Get rid of the NSA. Get rid of the Pentagon, this whole military-industrial complex. Restore a limited-government republic with a basic military force.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 26, 2020 - 7:14am

Red_Dragon wrote:

It will come as a shock no doubt that Hitchens wasn't addressing libertarians, but Objectivists. He was a frequent guest at the Cato Institute and Reason magazine. He also wrote admiring biographies of libertarian heroes Thomas Payne and Thomas Jefferson.

You don't make the intellectual evolution Hitchens underwent in one step. Along the way he had a lot to say, but his advocacy for a number of libertarian principles (free expression chief among them) was a constant.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 26, 2020 - 3:42am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 24, 2020 - 7:32pm

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 15, 2019 - 8:26am

 miamizsun wrote:
The Alternative to Ideology

 


He has a great quote from Norberto Bobbio at the end:

There were only a few of us who preserved a small bag in which, before throwing ourselves into the sea, we deposited for safekeeping the most salutary fruits of the European intellectual tradition, the value of enquiry, the ferment of doubt, a willingness to dialogue, a spirit of criticism, moderation of judgment, philological scruple, a sense of the complexity of things. Many, too many, deprived themselves of this baggage: they either abandoned it, considering it a useless weight; or they never possessed it, throwing themselves into the waters before having the time to acquire it. I do not reproach them; but I prefer the company of the others. Indeed, I suspect that this company is destined to grow, as the years bring wisdom and events shed new light on things. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 15, 2019 - 6:20am

i think i've posted this before, but it may be worth posting again

it falls short in a couple of areas and makes great points in others

probably worth your time...enjoy


The Alternative to Ideology


When we launched the Niskanen Center in January 2015, we happily identified ourselves as libertarians. Sure, we were heterodox libertarians, but there are many schools of libertarianism beyond those promoted by Charles Koch’s political operationsThe school we identified with was a left-libertarianism concerned with social justice (a libertarian perspective that I’ve defended in debates with more orthodox libertarians here and here). That worldview lacked an institutional voice in 2015. Our ambition was to create a space for it and, in so doing, redefine what it meant to be libertarian in the 21st century.

I have abandoned that libertarian project, however, because I have come to abandon ideology. This essay is an invitation for you to do likewise — to walk out of the “clean and well-lit prison of one idea.” Ideology encourages dodgy reasoning due to what psychologists call “motivated cognition,” which is the act of deciding what you want to believe and using your reasoning power, with all its might, to get you there. Worse, it encourages fanaticism, disregard for social outcomes, and invites irresolvable philosophical disputes. It also threatens social pluralism — which is to say, it threatens freedom.

The better alternative is not moral relativism. The better alternative is moderation, a commodity that is rapidly disappearing in political life, with dangerous consequences for the American republic.

more...





westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 9:30am

I believe that monetary policy should be a priority issue for Libertarians and libertarian-minded folks.

James Bullard, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank president just called for interest rate cuts for a couple of reasons, among them, to increase the inflation rate which is sitting well below the 2% target at roughly 1.6% in recent years.

I believe that the inflation target should be 0% and the US Federal Reserve should drop the employment mandate.    Insure price stability (including financial asset stability) and then get the hell out of the way.  

Many macro economists  believe that positive rates of inflation are necessary in order to fool agents into better outcomes.   It is paternalism of the worst kind and contradicts the approach taken to most economic policy issues by economists who tend to favour transparency and accurate information.

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 1:38pm

Now islander, that bottle is a thing of beauty!
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 12:51pm



 westslope wrote:


 Lazy8 wrote:
.....

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

.........

Well that should not surprise any of us as this is a music-inspired forum.

Though, personally, I would have hoped that you were chasing summer-run steelhead on the Olympic Peninsula.    With dry flies.  



 


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 11:38am



 Lazy8 wrote:
.....

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

.........

Well that should not surprise any of us as this is a music-inspired forum.

Though, personally, I would have hoped that you were chasing summer-run steelhead on the Olympic Peninsula.    With dry flies.  



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 10:52am

 sirdroseph wrote:
This is in this thread and not the other because this is much more than weed, this is a libertarians dream on many levels.  JFK got shot over this.   Ron Paul is smiling.



California Senate Passes Revolutionary Bill to Bypass Federal Reserve, Create Cannabis Banking Industry



 
This is very very cool.  IIRC one of the Dakotas has their own state banking system which has been in place for decades.  The state has been prospering as a direct result.

And yes about JFK ...

.
OBTW ... The Federal banking system has doing the same thing to gun store owners for about the past 10 or so years.  They have a hard time keeping a bank that will handle their money.  And their businesses are legal and well regulated ...

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 8:34am



 Lazy8 wrote:
westslope wrote:
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

You paint yours and I'll paint mine.
 
Spoken like a true individualist.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 7:34am

westslope wrote:
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

You paint yours and I'll paint mine.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 3, 2019 - 7:08am



 Lazy8 wrote:
......

As for the statist claim...I've only ever heard that from anarchists before, and I think even they realize how silly it sounds. But whatever floats your valves.
 
Hey, I am doing my best here to paint Libertarians as mainstream and centrist.   We all want more Libertarians elected to office, no?

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 2:59pm

westslope wrote:
Lift the libertarian's skirt a bit and there you find  the essence of a devoted Statist.   With just a slight albeit interesting variation on how to do Statism.     

Social anarchists make a more gallant attempt to dismantle the State as much as possible.  Just sayin'.

At one point I was referencing the harm reduction approach literature which I vaguely recall getting some support from  Libertarian writers.

The fact that a popular, widely-used drug like cannabis is dangerous is an excellent reason for legalizing it.  Social control is largely sacrificed in a black market situation.

If you want to make a harm reduction argument I'm down with that, but I'd also argue that it really doesn't apply to cannabis. "Dangerous" is a relative term of course. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were getting at.

As for the statist claim...I've only ever heard that from anarchists before, and I think even they realize how silly it sounds. But whatever floats your valves.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 2:39pm

Lift the libertarian's skirt a bit and there you find  the essence of a devoted Statist.   With just a slight albeit interesting variation on how to do Statism.     

Social anarchists make a more gallant attempt to dismantle the State as much as possible.  Just sayin'.

At one point I was referencing the harm reduction approach literature which I vaguely recall getting some support from  Libertarian writers.

The fact that a popular, widely-used drug like cannabis is dangerous is an excellent reason for legalizing it.  Social control is largely sacrificed in a black market situation.
 

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 8:30am

westslope wrote:
Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches. Let me add to the initial assertion.

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically
contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.

Discuss.

If you must know I was in Seattle getting my dance on and soaking up some most excellent music.

If you want those better ideas discussed you need to demonstrate that you read what gets written. Those better ways of doing things (or simply not doing them, as some of them aren't legitimate social objectives in the first place) have been discussed. If you have a specific policy question fire away.

A Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

B
Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.  C  I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

D
So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?

I'll try to parse this one wobbly concept at a time:

A
Legal in 10 years: yay! I'm betting on less than 5.

B
Don't care what many of those in favour are arguing, tho:

1. I've never, in 40 years of libertarian activism, ever heard anyone argue that—likely because
2. "It should be legal because it's dangerous" is a stupid argument.

C Your second assertion does not follow. Legalizing things means less state control. Period.

If you want to argue that legalizing a trade or substance means the state can regulate that trade or substance (to a lesser degree than an outright ban) then...um, yeah, that happens. California, for instance, taxed legal weed at such an absurdly high rate that people were sticking to the black market. Colorado's less-heavy-handed approach resulted in substantial revenue for the state, which has other lessons for taxation that I won't digress into here.

In other words the possibility that a state might clumsily interfere with a market is not an argument for the state to...interfere with a market in a more-drastic fashion. And as an argument against advocating for less state interference in markets it's utterly incoherent.

D
More powerful: no. More effective: maybe, but only at the legitimate purposes of a state.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 8:25am

 westslope wrote:


 sirdroseph wrote:
 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.{#Cowboy}
 

Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches.    Let me add to the initial assertion. 

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.  Discuss.

 
Which is fine, only the anarchist extreme version of Libertarians would advocate no government at all.  We want more efficient and productive government, but are extremely and rightfully suspicious of the stronger part and demand proving the need for the power in every instance is vetted properly and in line with the Constitution.

 

Por ejemple',  I advocate a better way to defend the country by bringing all of our troops home and only meddling in others affairs if it can be proven that the homeland is in danger from offensive action. This will immediately make us a lot safer.  There that was easy and did not increase the power of the government. {#Cowboy}




westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 31, 2019 - 7:53am



 sirdroseph wrote:
 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.
{#Cowboy}

 

Well, for all I know Lazy8 could be out chasing the baetis hatch or perhaps one of the early stonefly hatches.    Let me add to the initial assertion. 

As soon as Libertarians come up with better ways of defending the country, with better ways of assuring security and with better ways of attaining public policy goals, then they are typically contributing to a stronger, more efficient, more productive state.  Discuss.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 30, 2019 - 8:19am

 westslope wrote:
Sir d,

Another 10 years and cannabis will be fully legal across the USA with the exception of some hold-out states.  
Now here's an easy philosophical challenge for Libertarians. 

Many of those in favour of legalization will argue that recreational cannabis should be legal precisely because it is dangerous.   I other words, legalizing cannabis allows the state to expand its influence so it can 'regulate' more effectively.  

So, are Libertarians in favour of a more powerful, effective state?


 
Yea sure whatevs better than being federally enforced as illegal, but you are correct more regulation and control is a problem already illustrated by Monsanto's moving in on the business. However that is just a small relatively insignificant part of all this.   The real issue is the bypassing of the Federal Reserve which should be shut down completely and relinquishing federal control of the money.
Now I will let Lazy school you on why that is a ridiculous non starter question.{#Cowboy}
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 165, 166, 167  Next