[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Removing rated songs - Cache personalization - BillG - Jul 9, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
New Doves album ‘The Universal Want’ coming in September - miamizsun - Jul 9, 2020 - 8:02pm
 
COVID-19 - miamizsun - Jul 9, 2020 - 7:58pm
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - Jul 9, 2020 - 5:52pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Isabeau - Jul 9, 2020 - 5:50pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - BlueHeronDruid - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:59pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:41pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:40pm
 
Trump - cc_rider - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:32pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:27pm
 
South Korea - haresfur - Jul 9, 2020 - 2:38pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - Proclivities - Jul 9, 2020 - 1:43pm
 
Social Networking - R_P - Jul 9, 2020 - 12:54pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2020 - 12:27pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jul 9, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
One Reason I Don't Trust the Police - miamizsun - Jul 9, 2020 - 11:19am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 9, 2020 - 10:32am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Jul 9, 2020 - 9:26am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2020 - 8:53am
 
Ask the Libertarian - Lazy8 - Jul 9, 2020 - 7:40am
 
RP streams in Opus - Romain98 - Jul 9, 2020 - 6:06am
 
Dog - kcar - Jul 8, 2020 - 11:13pm
 
Questions. - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 6:49pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 6:41pm
 
Sunrise, Sunset - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 4:01pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 4:00pm
 
Iran - R_P - Jul 8, 2020 - 1:31pm
 
China - R_P - Jul 8, 2020 - 11:48am
 
Happy Birthdy, Ringo Starr - norbertZ - Jul 8, 2020 - 4:07am
 
The Obituary Page - haresfur - Jul 7, 2020 - 8:16pm
 
Trump Lies - ScottN - Jul 7, 2020 - 8:00pm
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Jul 7, 2020 - 7:48pm
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - R_P - Jul 7, 2020 - 3:18pm
 
Things that are just WRONG - kcar - Jul 7, 2020 - 3:00pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Jul 7, 2020 - 2:28pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - black321 - Jul 7, 2020 - 1:29pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 7, 2020 - 11:14am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 7, 2020 - 10:36am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Jul 7, 2020 - 9:16am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2020 - 9:03am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Jul 7, 2020 - 7:53am
 
2020 Elections - KarmaKarma - Jul 7, 2020 - 7:47am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2020 - 5:29am
 
Sweet horrible irony. - kcar - Jul 6, 2020 - 9:36pm
 
New Music - R_P - Jul 6, 2020 - 7:58pm
 
Why are 2 of the best albums of the last decade completel... - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 6, 2020 - 1:55pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 6, 2020 - 1:31pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Jul 6, 2020 - 11:58am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - Steely_D - Jul 6, 2020 - 11:04am
 
The Electoral College - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 6, 2020 - 10:36am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jul 6, 2020 - 8:55am
 
The List of Reasons Why Schlabby Hates People - sunybuny - Jul 6, 2020 - 7:47am
 
Florida - Coaxial - Jul 6, 2020 - 6:09am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - miamizsun - Jul 6, 2020 - 5:44am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - buddy - Jul 5, 2020 - 7:06pm
 
Live Music - buddy - Jul 5, 2020 - 6:59pm
 
Outstanding Covers - buddy - Jul 5, 2020 - 6:51pm
 
Gardeners Corner - kctomato - Jul 5, 2020 - 3:24pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jul 5, 2020 - 2:35pm
 
Movie Quote - rhahl - Jul 5, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Jul 5, 2020 - 11:53am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Jul 5, 2020 - 8:50am
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Jul 5, 2020 - 8:45am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jul 4, 2020 - 10:27pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - KarmaKarma - Jul 4, 2020 - 9:14pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jul 4, 2020 - 6:40pm
 
In My Room - Coaxial - Jul 4, 2020 - 12:26pm
 
RP stops playing after a few minutes on iPod (iOS) - gtufano - Jul 3, 2020 - 11:33pm
 
Canada - westslope - Jul 3, 2020 - 3:38pm
 
how do you feel right now? - miamizsun - Jul 3, 2020 - 1:54pm
 
US Empire - R_P - Jul 3, 2020 - 12:46pm
 
• • • PUZZLES • • • - BlueHeronDruid - Jul 3, 2020 - 10:02am
 
• • • Things Magicians Exclaim • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 3, 2020 - 8:20am
 
Bluos App and Vault 2 Streamer. Is it playing in Flac? - BillG - Jul 3, 2020 - 8:05am
 
::odd but intriguing:: - oldviolin - Jul 3, 2020 - 8:01am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 37, 38, 39  Next
Post to this Topic
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 9:26am



 kurtster wrote:


So you're 100% sure that it is settled science ?  I'm not.

Here try this ...

Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas, Swedish Researchers Find

Wiki

and lastly ...

The Origin of Crude Oil or Petroleum: Biotic or Abiotic?

It's been well talked about here over 10 years ago.  It was dismissed then as who haw.  Things have changed since then.

https://radioparadise.com/community/forum/topic/5371


 

.. and the beat goes on...  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 9:06am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

So you are saying that all coal, oil, shale, etc, cannot exist without an organic component ?
 
Do you play the drums by any chance Kurtster?
 

So you're 100% sure that it is settled science ?  I'm not.

Here try this ...

Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas, Swedish Researchers Find

Wiki

and lastly ...

The Origin of Crude Oil or Petroleum: Biotic or Abiotic?

It's been well talked about here over 10 years ago.  It was dismissed then as who haw.  Things have changed since then.

https://radioparadise.com/community/forum/topic/5371


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:33am



 kurtster wrote:

So you are saying that all coal, oil, shale, etc, cannot exist without an organic component ?
 
Do you play the drums by any chance Kurtster?

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:32am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

So you're saying that petrochemicals, et al, are indirect solar power ?
 
 
Kurtster, let's just stop now. you make me into a worse person than I want to be.

 Go check out where oil ultimately comes from.
 
So you are saying that all coal, oil, shale, etc, cannot exist without an organic component ?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:27am



 SeriousLee wrote:

Interesting. I did not know that.
 
"All the energy in oil, gas, and coal originally came from the sun, captured through photosynthesis. In the same way that we burn wood to release energy that trees capture from the sun, we burn fossil fuels to release the energy that ancient plants captured from the sun."  (http://techalive.mtu.edu/meec/module19/Page4.htm)

 

Seriously?  In our country they stopped teaching physical geography at some stage, looks like NZ wasn't the only country to do so. Well pardon me if I came across all haughty taughty.. I thought everyone knew that.
SeriousLee

SeriousLee Avatar

Location: Dans l'milieu d'deux milles livres


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:20am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

So you're saying that petrochemicals, et al, are indirect solar power ?
 
 
Kurtster, let's just stop now. you make me into a worse person than I want to be.

 Go check out where oil ultimately comes from.

 
Interesting. I did not know that.
 
"All the energy in oil, gas, and coal originally came from the sun, captured through photosynthesis. In the same way that we burn wood to release energy that trees capture from the sun, we burn fossil fuels to release the energy that ancient plants captured from the sun."  (http://techalive.mtu.edu/meec/module19/Page4.htm)

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:12am



 kurtster wrote:

So you're saying that petrochemicals, et al, are indirect solar power ?


 
 
Kurtster, let's just stop now. you make me into a worse person than I want to be.

 Go check out where oil ultimately comes from.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 8:08am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

What in the hell are you talking about ?

I thought that you said that, 90% of the world's energy is sourced directly or indirectly from the sun.

 

oh dearie.. what powers the water cycle? what powers the wind? 

 
So you're saying that petrochemicals, et al, are indirect solar power ?


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 7:26am



 kurtster wrote:

What in the hell are you talking about ?

I thought that you said that, 90% of the world's energy is sourced directly or indirectly from the sun.

 

oh dearie.. what powers the water cycle? what powers the wind? 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 7:13am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:
 

double fail on your part:
a) I rounded to the nearest blockhead,
look at 2014 compared to 2015, nuclear accounts for roughly 10% in  2014 and roughly 5% in 2015 - I was actually being generous.

b) you are forgetting hydro

 
What in the hell are you talking about ?

I thought that you said that, 90% of the world's energy is sourced directly or indirectly from the sun.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:55am



 kurtster wrote:
 

double fail on your part:
a) I rounded to the nearest blockhead, ten percent.
look at 2014 compared to 2015, nuclear accounts for roughly 10% in  2014 and roughly 5% in 2015 - I was actually being generous.

b) you are forgetting hydro
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:50am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

Show me that source, please.
 
my pleasure

 
Fail.
 with fossil fuels supplying 86% of the world's energy:
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:37am



 kurtster wrote:

Show me that source, please.
 
my pleasure


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:35am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 kurtster wrote:

So the sun made Uranium and the resulting nuclear radiation / energy ?

And geothermal is solar powered ?

Did AOC tell you this ?  The science party, hah !

Energy is conserved.  It cannot be created nor destroyed.  It can only be converted into other forms.  

As usual, I could be wrong.  I did get my education in public schools.

Ra, Ra, Ra !!!
 

says the man who believes in chem trails..  but point taken, a mere 90% of the world's energy is sourced directly or indirectly from the sun.

 
Show me that source, please.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:30am



 kurtster wrote:

So the sun made Uranium and the resulting nuclear radiation / energy ?

And geothermal is solar powered ?

Did AOC tell you this ?  The science party, hah !

Energy is conserved.  It cannot be created nor destroyed.  It can only be converted into other forms.  

As usual, I could be wrong.  I did get my education in public schools.

Ra, Ra, Ra !!!


 

says the man who believes in chem trails..  but point taken, a mere 90% of the world's energy is sourced directly or indirectly from the sun.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2019 - 6:05am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Solar and wind generated power are ultimately the only sustainable sources. ALL the energy on this planet came/comes from the sun. We need to stop mining the stored solar energy and start using the solar energy that is dumped on the planet on a daily - sustainable - basis.

 
So the sun made Uranium and the resulting nuclear radiation / energy ?

And geothermal is solar powered ?

Did AOC tell you this ?  The science party, hah !

Energy is conserved.  It cannot be created nor destroyed.  It can only be converted into other forms.  

As usual, I could be wrong.  I did get my education in public schools.

Ra, Ra, Ra !!!


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 6, 2019 - 7:11am

Solar and wind generated power are ultimately the only sustainable sources. ALL the energy on this planet came/comes from the sun. We need to stop mining the stored solar energy and start using the solar energy that is dumped on the planet on a daily - sustainable - basis.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 6, 2019 - 6:39am

It's not their land. And certainly not their oil. 

The oil industry is only more competitive because they are basically selling stolen goods.

If it is not sustainable it is stealing from the common good. End of discussion.
no kittens were harmed in the making of this statement.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 6, 2019 - 5:21am

 Lazy8 wrote:
black321 wrote:
Who gives a s#$t about whether its a tax break, lease discount, subsidy....these all impact the cost, which is ultimately all that is important.  

It matters so we can have an honest discussion about the topic.

If, say, wind power were a completely economically viable proposition all on its own—that is, the value of the power generated exceeded the cost of the labor, land, and resources required to generate it—governments would be looking for a way to tax it. Not because windmills have externalities that need to be compensated for, not because windmills are a burden on the public treasury, but because there's money there that the state isn't getting a piece of. They want a cut. Period.

The word subsidy is used (even when it isn't appropriate) because it's emotionally charged. It implies other people are being taxed to pay for something—that money is coming out of their pockets to prop up something that can't support itself. In some cases that is completely accurate, in some cases it's simply false.

We won't make progress on issues if we don't face them honestly.

Wind farms pay a $1/MWh tax in Wyoming. That's in large part because coal, a much bigger employer than wind, makes the state of Wyoming a lot of money in taxes and thus has a lot of political pull. They see it as only fair.

No other state taxes wind power directly. Is that a subsidy? No?

If Wyoming cut that tax to $.687/MWh would that be a subsidy? If it raised it to $1.178 would that mean that it was being subsidized, but isn't any longer? What if that tax could have been raised to $1.1839, but wasn't—is the difference a subsidy?

When Amazon threatened to open a headquarters in Brooklyn the city of New York offered it $3.4B in tax abatement—taxes it promised not to collect—to make it worthwhile to move there. There was outrage! How dare they, giving Amazon all that money!

So Amazon pulled out of the deal. Did the city of New York save itself $3.4B? No, the deal was a net gain for NYC and now it won't realize that gain. The $3.4B was never coming to NYC and now the jobs and paychecks and building rentals and restaurant meals won't either.

This is what happens when the discussion is dishonest. That's why it matters.

 
Terminology does matter. 

The best example I can think of is when discussing the federal budget, it is common for the framing of a reduction of an automatic increase to be called a budget cut.  The budget is still being increased, just not as much.  An increase is an increase, yet in political speak, it becomes a cut because it is not a full increase.  The federal government assumes that the budget increase is automatic regardless of need instead of using a zero based system where a function is analyzed and say an adjustment for increased efficiency would offset the need for an increase is ignored.  This is the primary difference between how the government operates vs a private enterprise.

The only way now that a budget item will not get an automatic increase is if the previously allocated monies are not all spent, and even in that case is still unlikely.  This method only causes increased waste and inefficiency where administrators seek out ways to spend all "their" money (our money) regardless of need or merit to insure the next year's automatic increase.  This method also assures that there will never be another surplus of government funds.  And insures the need for continually higher taxes to pay for increased automatic spending.



westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Apr 5, 2019 - 3:28pm

Jesuz jumpin' catfish Lazy8.

This is by far the worst post of yours I have read on RP.  "Honesty"?   Gimme a break.


 Lazy8 wrote:
black321 wrote:
Who gives a s#$t about whether its a tax break, lease discount, subsidy....these all impact the cost, which is ultimately all that is important.  

It matters so we can have an honest discussion about the topic.

If, say, wind power were a completely economically viable proposition all on its own—that is, the value of the power generated exceeded the cost of the labor, land, and resources required to generate it—governments would be looking for a way to tax it. Not because windmills have externalities that need to be compensated for, not because windmills are a burden on the public treasury, but because there's money there that the state isn't getting a piece of. They want a cut. Period.

The word subsidy is used (even when it isn't appropriate) because it's emotionally charged. It implies other people are being taxed to pay for something—that money is coming out of their pockets to prop up something that can't support itself. In some cases that is completely accurate, in some cases it's simply false.

We won't make progress on issues if we don't face them honestly.

Wind farms pay a $1/MWh tax in Wyoming. That's in large part because coal, a much bigger employer than wind, makes the state of Wyoming a lot of money in taxes and thus has a lot of political pull. They see it as only fair.

No other state taxes wind power directly. Is that a subsidy? No?

If Wyoming cut that tax to $.687/MWh would that be a subsidy? If it raised it to $1.178 would that mean that it was being subsidized, but isn't any longer? What if that tax could have been raised to $1.1839, but wasn't—is the difference a subsidy?

When Amazon threatened to open a headquarters in Brooklyn the city of New York offered it $3.4B in tax abatement—taxes it promised not to collect—to make it worthwhile to move there. There was outrage! How dare they, giving Amazon all that money!

So Amazon pulled out of the deal. Did the city of New York save itself $3.4B? No, the deal was a net gain for NYC and now it won't realize that gain. The $3.4B was never coming to NYC and now the jobs and paychecks and building rentals and restaurant meals won't either.

This is what happens when the discussion is dishonest. That's why it matters.
 


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 37, 38, 39  Next