You are conflating one Trump claim into another to try to prove a point not being made here.
At issue is the SOS of Michigan unilaterally changing election rules she had no business doing. That's what the lawsuit is. That's what Trump complained about. Claiming otherwise is disingenuous.
Hall noted, âThe Legislature is an equal branch of government charged with crafting laws. This is not the role of the Secretary of State, and there is a clear process that must be respected.â
One of the concerns that the Trump campaign and Republicans had that was performed improperly in the 2020 election was the development of signature validation rules without the approval of a legislature.
In court cases around the country, Trumpâs campaign and Republicans argued that Article II of the Constitution allows state legislatures to make presidential election laws, and that state election officials and courts lack the power to modify such rules.
Murrayâs decision debunks the Democratic myth that Republican legal challenges to 2020 election processes were all frivolous and therefore dismissed by the courts. The lawsuit was first filed on Oct. 6, 2020, just before the presidential election, but it was not settled until March 9, 2021.
Let me expand on that... (for the sake of inclusivity) Anyone who continues be annoyed by people discussing Trump is insane, or an annoying twat, or both.
That's me! Oh wait, so if people are annoyed, does that mean the rest are a twat, and not insane?
He claimed the vote was stolen. He lost by 5% out of over 3 million votes cast. That would require over 150,000 fraudulent ballots.
This lawsuit did not prove anything like that, and did not even allege anything like that. It was procedural, and has no effect whatsoever on the outcome of the election. It doesn't even specify a remedy other than "don't do that again."
An analogy: your little league team loses 9 to 11. You notice the umpire was letting kids from both teams stand with one foot outside the batter's box, then (without any count of how many kids from which team stood with one foot outside the batter's box) claim that the kids from the other team were obviously professional ballplayers sent in to throw the game.
Sorry: if this analogy* doesn't work for you substitute whatever sportsball game they play in your country, imagine a trivial rule violation that advantaged neither side, then claim the game was rigged.
Oh yeah, and while they were in there, rigging votes, they forgot to rig the congressional elections and failed to change the partisan makeup of the state's congressional delegation at all. Oopsies.
*Baseball is a sport that is played in the United States—you might want to add it to your briefing books.
I really hate saying this, but I hate seeing the comments that persist, so...
People who continue to support Trump are either insane, or annoying twats.
It's one thing to think his partisan "policies" were something that had merit, but completely another to do anything but condemn Trump after his abhorrent post-election behavior.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Let me expand on this... anyone who continues to argue with someone who still supports trump is insane, or an annoying twat.
Let me expand on that... (for the sake of inclusivity) Anyone who continues be annoyed by people discussing Trump is insane, or an annoying twat, or both.
I really hate saying this, but I hate seeing the comments that persist, so...
People who continue to support Trump are either insane, or annoying twats.
It's one thing to think his partisan "policies" were something that had merit, but completely another to do anything but condemn Trump after his abhorrent post-election behavior.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Let me expand on this... anyone who continues to argue with someone who still supports trump is insane, or an annoying twat.
I can't be both?
This day really just got sucky.
Well, your mom did tell you you can be anything you want when you grow up.
I really hate saying this, but I hate seeing the comments that persist, so...
People who continue to support Trump are either insane, or annoying twats.
It's one thing to think his partisan "policies" were something that had merit, but completely another to do anything but condemn Trump after his abhorrent post-election behavior.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Let me expand on this... anyone who continues to argue with someone who still supports trump is insane, or an annoying twat.
Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas Gender:
Posted:
Mar 17, 2021 - 11:28am
black321 wrote:
black321 wrote:
I really hate saying this, but I hate seeing the comments that persist, so...
People who continue to support Trump are either insane, or annoying twats.
It's one thing to think his partisan "policies" were something that had merit, but completely another to do anything but condemn Trump after his abhorrent post-election behavior.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Let me expand on this... anyone who continues to argue with someone who still supports trump is insane, or an annoying twat.
Get off the fence man and tell us all how you feel.
I really hate saying this, but I hate seeing the comments that persist, so...
People who continue to support Trump are either insane, or annoying twats.
It's one thing to think his partisan "policies" were something that had merit, but completely another to do anything but condemn Trump after his abhorrent post-election behavior.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Let me expand on this... anyone who continues to argue with someone who still supports trump is insane, or an annoying twat.
Who cares ? The damage is done and once again your side cheats its way to the finish line.
That is all that matters.
Wrong again. Trump was the one engaged in cheating by pressuring officials to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Thatâs all that matters.
lolol Their really should be a reality test for voters. Obviously, you would fail. Do you even follow the news? A tiny wee bit?
Yes, do you?
There you go. All caught up now.
Correct, on a call Trump made to pressure an official to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Misquotes are certainly serious and need to be corrected but the inappropriate nature and basis for the call "trumped" / far overshadowed that. Did the misquotes change the fact that Trump was trying to strongarm someone into doing his bidding?
There ya go... now you are all caught up as well.
If Trump's actual words were so bad, then why the need for a deliberate misquote fed to friendly press? Logic isn't your strong suit.
This is the entire problem with this website. You all are so very focused on litigating (defending your Dems!) yesterdays news that you are (deliberately?) missing the important actions underway of here and now. You should be investing your enegies on those.
Litigating? Iâm not litigating anything. Trump lost a fair election that he tried his damnedest to reverse. It was fair the first time Trump won over Clinton and it was fair when he lost to Biden. Trump has kicked over every stone to prove otherwise and has found nothing... nada... ziltch.
Letâs all focus on a misquote... yeah that's the ticket.
It wasn't a misquote. Only a fool (or pretzel) would think so. Do what you wish though.
Sorry, put whatever label you want on it then if it helps keep your rage flowing.
Who cares ? The damage is done and once again your side cheats its way to the finish line.
That is all that matters.
Wrong again. Trump was the one engaged in cheating by pressuring officials to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Thatâs all that matters.
lolol Their really should be a reality test for voters. Obviously, you would fail. Do you even follow the news? A tiny wee bit?
Yes, do you?
There you go. All caught up now.
Correct, on a call Trump made to pressure an official to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Misquotes are certainly serious and need to be corrected but the inappropriate nature and basis for the call "trumped" / far overshadowed that. Did the misquotes change the fact that Trump was trying to strongarm someone into doing his bidding?
There ya go... now you are all caught up as well.
If Trump's actual words were so bad, then why the need for a deliberate misquote fed to friendly press? Logic isn't your strong suit.
This is the entire problem with this website. You all are so very focused on litigating (defending your Dems!) yesterdays news that you are (deliberately?) missing the important actions underway of here and now. You should be investing your enegies on those.
Litigating? Iâm not litigating anything. Trump lost a fair election that he tried his damnedest to reverse. It was fair the first time Trump won over Clinton and it was fair when he lost to Biden. Trump has kicked over every stone to prove otherwise and has found nothing... nada... ziltch.
Letâs all focus on a misquote... yeah that's the ticket.
It wasn't a misquote. Only a fool (or pretzel) would think so. Do what you wish though.
Who cares ? The damage is done and once again your side cheats its way to the finish line.
That is all that matters.
Wrong again. Trump was the one engaged in cheating by pressuring officials to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Thatâs all that matters.
lolol Their really should be a reality test for voters. Obviously, you would fail. Do you even follow the news? A tiny wee bit?
Yes, do you?
There you go. All caught up now.
Correct, on a call Trump made to pressure an official to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Misquotes are certainly serious and need to be corrected but the inappropriate nature and basis for the call "trumped" / far overshadowed that. Did the misquotes change the fact that Trump was trying to strongarm someone into doing his bidding?
There ya go... now you are all caught up as well.
If Trump's actual words were so bad, then why the need for a deliberate misquote fed to friendly press? Logic isn't your strong suit.
This is the entire problem with this website. You all are so very focused on litigating (defending your Dems!) yesterdays news that you are (deliberately?) missing the important actions underway of here and now. You should be investing your enegies on those.
Litigating? Iâm not litigating anything. Trump lost a fair election that he tried his damnedest to reverse. It was fair the first time Trump won over Clinton and it was fair when he lost to Biden. Trump has kicked over every stone to prove otherwise and has found nothing... nada... ziltch.
Letâs all focus on a misquote... yeah that's the ticket.
Who cares ? The damage is done and once again your side cheats its way to the finish line.
That is all that matters.
Wrong again. Trump was the one engaged in cheating by pressuring officials to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Thatâs all that matters.
lolol Their really should be a reality test for voters. Obviously, you would fail. Do you even follow the news? A tiny wee bit?
Yes, do you?
There you go. All caught up now.
Correct, on a call Trump made to pressure an official to magically find votes for him that werenât cast. He fortunately wasnât able to cheat his his way back into a second term though he certainly pulled out all the stops to do so.
Misquotes are certainly serious and need to be corrected but the inappropriate nature and basis for the call "trumped" / far overshadowed that. Did the misquotes change the fact that Trump was trying to strongarm someone into doing his bidding?
There ya go... now you are all caught up as well.
If Trump's actual words were so bad, then why the need for a deliberate misquote fed to friendly press? Logic isn't your strong suit.
This is the entire problem with this website. You all are so very focused on litigating (defending your Dems!) yesterdays news that you are (deliberately?) missing the important actions underway of here and now. You should be investing your enegies on those.
He said it...last night. He took the vaccines 2 months ago, and then last night he finally said, in a somewhat casual manner.. "sure, people should take the vaccines".
If he was really encouraging people to get it, why has he hidden his taking it so long, and refused to allow the release of photos showing him getting vaccinated?
Kurt, you're verging on KK stupidity when it comes to this issue. He wants credit for the success is the only reason he's popped his head out. Once he realized that he wasn't going to have the vaccines by the election, they were useless to him. He'd rather see you die of COVID than have you say Biden did a good job managing the vaccine distribution. He doesn't care about you...he just wants your vote and your money. Your personal well-being is of no interest to him. You've been bamboozled by one of the greatest grifters in history. Don't feel bad....you're not alone.
One vision of Hell: Kurt playing Trump's game of Three-card Monte for the rest of time.
Oh and Trump has endorsed the vaccine and encouraged everyone to get it. Perhaps you need to get some new news sources.
Maybe he should get his twitter account back and everyone would know it.
Let's stop pretending that Trump is a responsible, mature and other-regarding adult. He's said and done so many destructive things regarding Covid that his way overdue promotion of vaccines is pointless except that it may convince some of his lemmings to engage in reality.
Totally agree with VV about Twitter and Trump. The man tried to overthrow our democracy. FVKK him and his grifting family.
He said it...last night. He took the vaccines 2 months ago, and then last night he finally said, in a somewhat casual manner.. "sure, people should take the vaccines".
If he was really encouraging people to get it, why has he hidden his taking it so long, and refused to allow the release of photos showing him getting vaccinated?
Kurt, you're verging on KK stupidity when it comes to this issue. He wants credit for the success is the only reason he's popped his head out. Once he realized that he wasn't going to have the vaccines by the election, they were useless to him. He'd rather see you die of COVID than have you say Biden did a good job managing the vaccine distribution. He doesn't care about you...he just wants your vote and your money. Your personal well-being is of no interest to him. You've been bamboozled by one of the greatest grifters in history. Don't feel bad....you're not alone.
Oh and Trump has endorsed the vaccine and encouraged everyone to get it. Perhaps you need to get some new news sources.
Maybe he should get his twitter account back and everyone would know it.
Let's stop pretending that Trump is a responsible, mature and other-regarding adult. He's said and done so many destructive things regarding Covid that his way overdue promotion of vaccines is pointless except that it may convince some of his lemmings to engage in reality.
Totally agree with VV about Twitter and Trump. The man tried to overthrow our democracy. FVKK him and his grifting family.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Hold that thought. And maybe back-date it a few years too.
I'll see you one pelosi, and raise you one chucky:
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Hold that thought. And maybe back-date it a few years too.
As for his performance before the election...you can dismiss his tweets, lies...but you cannot dismiss that he was the most divisive president in our history. Even if a policy is the "right" one, it's wrong if the other half of the country isn't on board. It's your job as a president, senator, politician...to build consensus and unity, not cram down what your side thinks is right.
Hold that thought. And maybe back-date it a few years too.
Agreed, it's been a trend the last couple of decades, (e.g., i'm for universal healthcare, but didn't agree with how obamacare was passed, let alone the legislation itself) but never so blatant as under trump, and specifically directed at the American people.
