Oh dear say the robed ones! He's messing with US! .... Too late they attempt to clawback what they have freely and politically surrendered.
Don't pee on wins. Fighting amongst themselves is why Democrats can't win.
Take the success and coalesce and move forward; don't start more internal arguing.
Oh dear say the robed ones! He's messing with US! .... Too late they attempt to clawback what they have freely and politically surrendered. The enablers are waking up to the fact King Henry IX, could on a whim or mood change, demand for them to be drawn and quartered. Golly Gosh Mr. Wizard!
Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a judge who sought to pause the removal of more than 200 migrants to El Salvador, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued a rare public statement.
âFor more than two centuries,â the chief justice said, âit has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.â
Mr. Trump had called the judge, James E. Boasberg, a âRadical Left Lunaticâ in a social media post and said he should be impeached.
The exchange was reminiscent of one in 2018, when Chief Justice Roberts defended the independence and integrity of the federal judiciary after Mr. Trump called a judge who had ruled against his administrationâs asylum policy âan Obama judge.â
The chief justice said that was a profound misunderstanding of the judicial role.
âWe do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,â he said in a statement then. âWhat we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.â
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said impeachment 'is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision'
I guess he decided it was easier to get rid of a judge than to follow the rules. Did Vlad tell him that's what he'd do? What part of "defending the Constitution" is this for you?
Tell us about the time Biden tried to remove the judge.... I'm sure you've got one.
PS - this source is rock solid. Only $787M in defamation suit settlements so far.
PSS - the comments are hilarious. "Why should a judge be able to overrule the POTUS"? - who needs laws when we have a willing and able dictator?
I've long banged the drum for 'less military spending'. But this is not what I meant. Like EVERYONE! Kids, less war is better. A world with fewer hammers has fewer nails.
Watched a talkshow on German national TV this morning (think it aired on Sunday) .. there is a VERY strong streak of pacifism in Germany (like Japan) due to its past. But the last three years has slowly seen the tug of war slowly shift in favour of rearming. The combination of Putin's aggression and Trump's public dumping of Ukraine and its NATO commitments did the rest.
Also doesn't hurt that the economy needs a shot in the arm, so to speak. eww.. pardon the metaphor.
Today we'll find out how beholden Trump actually is to Putin. I have a very slim hope that I have been wrong all this while and Trump is playing a sophisticated game to draw Putin in to an offer he really shouldn't refuse in the eyes of the whole world, but will, because he's Putin, whereupon Trump turns his colours and says, alright, if you don't even want to accept that, then its your own fault and we'll arm Ukraine to the hilt.
Yeah, as I said, it's a very slim hope.
In other news, the German parliament has just voted to amend its constitution to allow up to nearly 1 trillion in spending in breach of the budget rules, half of which is for defence. Measured on GDP, this dwarfs the spending on reunification and also the Marshall plan. It's a big deal. If this was also Trump's plan, then chapeau. Not quite sure why the States would want to shoot itself in the foot like that (for it also means a loss of US hegemony), but "whatever it takes."
I guess it qualifies as taking one for the team. So, thanks guys.
I've long banged the drum for 'less military spending'. But this is not what I meant. Like EVERYONE! Kids, less war is better. A world with fewer hammers has fewer nails.
Today we'll find out how beholden Trump actually is to Putin. I have a very slim hope that I have been wrong all this while and Trump is playing a sophisticated game to draw Putin in to an offer he really shouldn't refuse in the eyes of the whole world, but will, because he's Putin, whereupon Trump turns his colours and says, alright, if you don't even want to accept that, then its your own fault and we'll arm Ukraine to the hilt.
Yeah, as I said, it's a very slim hope.
In other news, the German parliament has just voted to amend its constitution to allow up to nearly 1 trillion in spending in breach of the budget rules, half of which is for defence. Measured on GDP, this dwarfs the spending on reunification and also the Marshall plan. It's a big deal. If this was also Trump's plan, then chapeau. Not quite sure why the States would want to shoot itself in the foot like that (for it also means a loss of US hegemony), but "whatever it takes."
I guess it qualifies as taking one for the team. So, thanks guys.
Where TF did you find this kid ? You rely upon his opinion to defend yourself ?
And you have the nerve to question my sources ?
Please, you're embarrassing yourself if this is the best that you can do.
Remember this ... there are two parts to a law, the letters or words and then the spirit behind it. Biden (or whoever was pulling his strings that day) did everything he could to defy the spirit or intent of the laws he cited as justification for his actions. He kept trying and trying. His actions in this sense were immoral regarding the laws he circumvented. That was Biden's intent, to defy the spirit behind the laws for his own personal gain (re election). It wasn't his money he was giving away for these purposes, it was the peoples money, the taxpayer. You are just a willing accomplice to his actions. And you also benefited, din't cha ?
When you post anything here, it's almost always bullshit. People don't put a lot of time into it because our time is finite, and your bullshit is apparently not. You could of course 'do your own research' as you seem to on every other subject, but then you would find many legitimate sources (https://www.axios.com/2023/10/...) explaining the situation. You would then have to formulate more bullshit as to why that's wrong and manufacture more cognitive dissonance to keep grip on your fantasy world of paranoia and fear.
So was is spirit of the law they were embracing when they ignored a judges order because it said "as discussed" instead of specifically mentioning the flights he ordered to be turned around? This is all okay with you because it's in the spirit of "we don't like brown people", right?
Where TF did you find this kid ? You rely upon his opinion to defend yourself ?
And you have the nerve to question my sources ?
Please, you're embarrassing yourself if this is the best that you can do.
Remember this ... there are two parts to a law, the letters or words and then the spirit behind it. Biden (or whoever was pulling his strings that day) did everything he could to defy the spirit or intent of the laws he cited as justification for his actions. He kept trying and trying. His actions in this sense were immoral regarding the laws he circumvented. That was Biden's intent, to defy the spirit behind the laws for his own personal gain (re election). It wasn't his money he was giving away for these purposes, it was the peoples money, the taxpayer. You are just a willing accomplice to his actions. And you also benefited, din't cha ?
You keep circling the drain... ignoring the argument (as usual). Trump defied a court order. Biden did not. You can accurately say that he was violating the spirit of the ruling by finding alternative methods, but that doesn't make it illegal or against the ruling of the SCOTUS. Trump violated the ruling, and lawyers were defending the actions in court yesterday because of it.
As for "our" money, an organized society runs on it. Your healthcare, water, sewage, parks, libraries, schools and roads rely on it. As a society, we've generally supported the idea that education is good (although Republicans appear less interested in ever in it).
I spent over $900k educating 2 children while paying taxes to educate everyone else's, and didn't receive a penny from any of Biden's programs. There were no loans. As a parent with children in their twenties, I do support loan forgiveness. It is crippling a generation. I don't love the idea of forgiveness, but it's the best available option. I would much prefer that public education be affordable, so that every kid knows in high school they can afford college if they want to go and develop the requisite abilities in high school. I'm also not against the reduction or possible elimination of Dept of Education, but in an intelligent and organized way.
We're not gonna agree on this, because your conditioning reinforces that anything Trump does, Biden has already done. That's patently incorrect. I would never have picked Biden to be POTUS, but given the options I didn't see much of a choice. Like him or not, I think Biden worked to make the lives of the majority of Americans better. Trump is working for 1% of Americans, and used your anger, and the anger of an active third of the country, to take all he can for himself.
So I get the usual treatment when I am correct on something, like now. Thanks for confirming it, y'all.
You're not correct.... https://www.wakeuptopolitics.c... Joe Biden did not defy court orders. Claims that he ignored judicial rulings, particularly regarding student loan forgiveness, are inaccurate. When the Supreme Court ruled that Biden lacked authority under the HEROES Act to cancel student loans, he abandoned the plan and pursued alternative legal avenues, such as using the Higher Education Act. These subsequent efforts were also struck down by courts, and Biden complied with those rulings as well. There is a difference between saying something you intend to do (with alternative plans) and defying a court order. I appreciate you aren't much for logic and reason. The expansion of your ignorant arrogance is really just icing on the cake.
Gabe Fleisher ?
I cite the WSJ and he is your reply source ?
Where TF did you find this kid ? You rely upon his opinion to defend yourself ?
And you have the nerve to question my sources ?
Please, you're embarrassing yourself if this is the best that you can do.
Remember this ... there are two parts to a law, the letters or words and then the spirit behind it. Biden (or whoever was pulling his strings that day) did everything he could to defy the spirit or intent of the laws he cited as justification for his actions. He kept trying and trying. His actions in this sense were immoral regarding the laws he circumvented. That was Biden's intent, to defy the spirit behind the laws for his own personal gain (re election). It wasn't his money he was giving away for these purposes, it was the peoples money, the taxpayer. You are just a willing accomplice to his actions. And you also benefited, din't cha ?
Joe Biden did not defy court orders. Claims that he ignored judicial rulings, particularly regarding student loan forgiveness, are inaccurate. When the Supreme Court ruled that Biden lacked authority under the HEROES Act to cancel student loans, he abandoned the plan and pursued alternative legal avenues, such as using the Higher Education Act. These subsequent efforts were also struck down by courts, and Biden complied with those rulings as well.
There is a difference between saying something you intend to do (with alternative plans) and defying a court order.
I appreciate you aren't much for logic and reason. The expansion of your ignorant arrogance is really just icing on the cake.
Thanks very much for this. I didn't have the energy to dig into the legal fight over Biden's loan relief efforts.
"I appreciate you aren't much for logic and reason. The expansion of your ignorant arrogance is really just icing on the cake."
Don't forget to add—as seen in his last post here—the continued self-portrayal as Disrespected Righteous Victim.
Joe Biden did not defy court orders. Claims that he ignored judicial rulings, particularly regarding student loan forgiveness, are inaccurate. When the Supreme Court ruled that Biden lacked authority under the HEROES Act to cancel student loans, he abandoned the plan and pursued alternative legal avenues, such as using the Higher Education Act. These subsequent efforts were also struck down by courts, and Biden complied with those rulings as well.
There is a difference between saying something you intend to do (with alternative plans) and defying a court order.
I appreciate you aren't much for logic and reason. The expansion of your ignorant arrogance is really just icing on the cake.
Must be fake news if it contradicts anything The Orange One utters. Must be. He is the sole arbiter of TRUTH in the world.
Joe Biden did not defy court orders. Claims that he ignored judicial rulings, particularly regarding student loan forgiveness, are inaccurate. When the Supreme Court ruled that Biden lacked authority under the HEROES Act to cancel student loans, he abandoned the plan and pursued alternative legal avenues, such as using the Higher Education Act. These subsequent efforts were also struck down by courts, and Biden complied with those rulings as well.
There is a difference between saying something you intend to do (with alternative plans) and defying a court order.
I appreciate you aren't much for logic and reason. The expansion of your ignorant arrogance is really just icing on the cake.
Let's talk about the guy who says autopens negate pardons - so that means his 1500 pardons for the insurrectionists who tried to injure or rape or kill members of Congress...they're not pardoned any more? LOCK THEM UP!
Oh hey now, that's unfair. Kurt can't talk about Jan. 6 or its aftermath. If he did, he'd twist himself into so many knots that he'd stop breathing.
So instead, Kurt treats us to kindergarten versiosn of current events and has a nice wet fever dream about senile/corrupt/heartless (choose one option) Joe Biden and how he screwed over astronauts in space.
Let's talk about the guy who says autopens negate pardons - so that means his 1500 pardons for the insurrectionists who tried to injure or rape or kill members of Congress...they're not pardoned any more? LOCK THEM UP!
