Radio Paradise

Recently Active Forum Topics:

Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1044, 1045, 1046 ... 1141, 1142, 1143 Next

rotekz

rotekz Avatar

Posted: Jun 5, 2016 - 3:32am
Former attorney general: Trump is right to question Trump University judge’s fairness hill.cm/KXDO5l0

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 4, 2016 - 5:33am
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: I thought he was shooting for the vatican? Trump is evil alright, but he is not Pope evil. That is a whole other level of evil built up over a thousand years.

Rod

Gender:

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 9:00pm
Lazy8 wrote: NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: I thought he was shooting for the vatican? Not gaudy enough. Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again! He would kick our current low energy pope's ass. It would be embarrassing. Loser.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 7:37pm
Lazy8 wrote: Not gaudy enough. Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again!

Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 6:25pm
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: I thought he was shooting for the vatican? Not gaudy enough. Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again!

R_P

Gender:

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 1:29pm

ScottFromWyoming wrote:

If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.?

No, he'd have to tear the disgusting dump down, because it is a disgrace as left behind by the last tenants, but he'll have it beautifully rebuilt (with lotsa, lotsa gilded kitsch) in no time. It'll be yuge and beautiful, 'cause he knows beautiful. In fact, no one knows beautiful like he does. Oh, and youse are gonna pay for it.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender:

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 1:25pm
ScottFromWyoming wrote: If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.? I thought he was shooting for the vatican?

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 1:24pm
ScottFromWyoming wrote: If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.? Sorry just had to repost this from a couple of months ago

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 1:20pm
If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.?

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:39am

Steely_D wrote:

Keith Olbermann: I can’t stand to live in a Trump building anymore

FTA:

This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: We’re gonna start winning again! We’re gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! We’re not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!

All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trump’s few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.

I think if Trump were truly courageous he would legally rename himself "Genitalia Supreme".

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:37am

Â Lazy8 wrote:

Â Steely_D wrote:

Keith Olbermann: I canât stand to live in a Trump building anymore

FTA:

This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: Weâre gonna start winning again! Weâre gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! Weâre not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!Â

All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trumpâs few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.

Wow, the hardships he's willing to endure to strike a blow for civil discourse in politics!

Oh, it's Keith Olbermann?

Never mind.

Â

lol You are more polite than I am, Sir!

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:35am

steeler wrote:

In earlier times and discussions, you railed against ends-justify-the-means policies. In this context, your support of Trump appears to be based on just that.

Yes, see my reply to Lazy8 3 pages back. Haven't changed my ideals on that, yet it no longer applies in today's world. Now that ideal is seen as obstructionist and as angry old white man.

Who is advocating that today ? Absolutely no one except the neocon poseurs of the #no trump group who only give it lip service because it suits their immediate needs, but in doing so is hypocritical. They sold out long ago.

Got to play with the hand that is dealt. I still haven't decided if I'm going to do any campaign work this year like I did for Romney, which regardless of the outcome, was a great learning experience.

Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:35am

Steely_D wrote:

Keith Olbermann: I can’t stand to live in a Trump building anymore

FTA:

This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: We’re gonna start winning again! We’re gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! We’re not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!

All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trump’s few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.

Wow, the hardships he's willing to endure to strike a blow for civil discourse in politics!

Oh, it's Keith Olbermann?

Never mind.

R_P

Gender:

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:19am
steeler wrote: In earlier times and discussions, you railed against ends-justify-the-means policies. In this context, your support of Trump appears to be based on just that. Inconsistency and hypocrisy are the new Trump normal.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 11:08am

kurtster wrote:

Yeah, I have problem with number 1, too. Its really annoying. A simple link with the headline as the click to is fine, but all the other bombast is just plain worthless. Rubbing somebody's nose in bs is self defeating.

Just to be clear, I do not admire Trump in any way shape or form. I see him as an opportunity to change the way things are done, that is to change the SOP. We, this country, have reached the point were we are at a Mexican Standoff within the two sides of the established power structure that controls this country. Something has to give. The only two I see capable are Sanders and Trump. HRC is the status quo. If the choice is between HRC and Trump, its a slam dunk. Bernie and Trump, I'd have to think about it and see how it would unfold. Either one of those two is a train wreck in DC waiting to happen and that is what I am voting for.

In earlier times and discussions, you railed against ends-justify-the-means policies. In this context, your support of Trump appears to be based on just that.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 10:49am

Â Steely_D wrote:

Keith Olbermann: I canât stand to live in a Trump building anymore

FTA:

This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: Weâre gonna start winning again! Weâre gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! Weâre not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!Â

All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trumpâs few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.

Â

I saw this when he first spewed it, if you can afford to live in an apartment like that in the first place and move at will without regard to financial hardship then you need to just keep your yap shut imo. Olbermann is as an elitist, arrogant, blowhard prick as Trump. He can move out and out of the country to the Riveria or wherever wealthy, arrogant pricks live for all I care.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 10:32am

Keith Olbermann: I can’t stand to live in a Trump building anymore

FTA:

This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: We’re gonna start winning again! We’re gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! We’re not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!

All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trump’s few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 10:25am
kcar wrote: Yeah, I've seen that thread. Can't be bothered to even glance at it. Reminds me of the sad types who are convinced that the Mafia's/the Cubans'/LBJ's conspiracy to kill JFK will soon be exposed. Dude, you're ignoring the chemtrails and the faked moon landing and the illuminati and what happened at Roswell and all the other stuff they don't want you to know. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

kcar

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 9:57am

kurtster wrote:

Thanks for clarifying things. Thought you were a strong Trump supporter!

I know that feeling about looking for a train wreck: that was the only consolation for me when GW Bush got re-elected in '04. (Wow, seems like yesterday). I (and a lot of my friends) thought, "Well, George is bound to screw up again and then he really sink the Republican ship..."

Obama was supposed to be the game-changer, the president who was going to unite Republicans and Democrats and usher in a new path for Washington. Sadly, that didn't happen.

I don't if a train wreck is going to change things. You'd have thought that 9/11 or the Great Recession would have jolted both sides to work together, but no. I hope we don't have a train wreck, actually. A lot of people haven't recovered from the '08 downturn.

It's possible that Trump's nomination will force the Republican leadership to re-assess things. So many of them were openly hostile towards him, but now they apparently feel compelled to fall in line behind him. They must know that this could turn into a huge catastrophe for them. The let the nomination process get completely away from them.

I'm sure a lot of Democratic leaders would like to move past Hillary. She has a lot of baggage, doesn't inspire young people and is in some ways a return to the past. I think she's quite capable and extremely experienced but a lot of Democratic friends aren't excited about her. I think that's where Bernie's support comes from.
Steely_D wrote:

Example: "Unindicted felon: candidate Hillary Clinton"

Yeah, I've seen that thread. {#Rolleyes}

Can't be bothered to even glance at it. Reminds me of the sad types who are convinced that the Mafia's/the Cubans'/LBJ's conspiracy to kill JFK will soon be exposed.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male

Posted: Jun 3, 2016 - 9:52am
kcar wrote: Feel free to express how you feel about HRC as a potential president. Call her whatever you want. Again, she's been smeared so many times that it's just not very interesting anymore. Example: "Unindicted felon: candidate Hillary Clinton"

Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1044, 1045, 1046 ... 1141, 1142, 1143 Next