(...) In one of many ironies, the N.C.R.I. (National Council of Resistance of Iran) is dominated by the M.E.K., or Mujahideen-e-Khalq, a cultlike movement that blends Marxist and Islamic tenets. It was among the first groups added to the United States’ list of foreign terrorist organizations, in 1997. It is still held responsible for the murder of U.S. military personnel, an attempted kidnapping of an American Ambassador, and other violent attacks in Iran before the Revolution in 1979. It participated in the Revolution but eventually split with the clerics. The M.E.K. was harbored by the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, which is one of several reasons that it has limited support inside of Iran today. Many of its fighters were relocated to Albania after the American invasion. It was removed from the U.S.’s terrorist list in 2012. Speakers at M.E.K. rallies, in Paris and elsewhere, have reportedly been paid tens of thousands of dollars for their appearances.
The fiery comments from Giuliani and Gingrich follow recent talks between the new national-security adviser, John Bolton, and his European counterparts about the next steps in the U.S.’s foreign policy on Iran. On May 8th, Trump withdrew from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and unilaterally restored sanctions on the country, in defiance of the deal’s five cosponsors—Britain, China, France, Germany, and Russia. Bolton informed the Europeans that Washington intends to steadily escalate diplomatic pressure and impose additional economic sanctions on Iran throughout the summer and fall. The restored sanctions go into effect in two waves in August and November, and will also punish foreign companies and banks that continue to do business with Iran. The five other major powers have resisted U.S. pressure to join in. The Europeans came away from the talks with Bolton convinced that the Administration’s goal is to foster regime change, an outcome that Bolton had publicly endorsed as recently as January. (Bolton, who became the national-security adviser in March, had been a speaker at the annual N.C.R.I. meeting eights times, and was a keynote speaker last year.)
The Administration’s goal now is to cut off the Islamic Republic’s ability to export oil, its prime source of revenue and foreign exchange. The sanctions deadline is November 4th, which happens to coincide with the takeover, in 1979, of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. (Fifty-two American diplomats were held for fourteen months.) As part of its new strategy, the White House has quietly been lobbying Saudi Arabia to make up for any shortfall that could abruptly hike the global price of oil—up to ninety dollars a barrel, as some experts claim, a more than twelve per cent increase from the current price. Last year, Iran was the world’s sixth-largest oil exporter; it ranks fourth among the world’s proven oil reserves. OPEC countries could have difficultycompensating for the loss of Iranian exports.
On Saturday, President Trump appealed directly to King Salman. Afterward, he tweeted, “Just spoke to King Salman of Saudi Arabia and explained to him that, because of the turmoil & disfunction in Iran and Venezuela, I am asking that Saudi Arabia increase oil production, maybe up to 2,000,000 barrels, to make up the difference...Prices to (sic) high! He has agreed!” Since Trump took office, ties between Washington and Riyadh have deepened over their joint opposition to the revolutionary regime in Tehran. (...)
U.S. intelligence officials, citing newly obtained evidence, have concluded that North Korea does not intend to fully surrender its nuclear stockpile, and instead is considering ways to conceal the number of weapons it has and secret production facilities, according to U.S. officials.
The evidence, collected in the wake of the June 12 summit in Singapore, points to preparations to deceive the United States about the number of nuclear warheads in North Korea’s arsenal as well as the existence of undisclosed facilities used to make fissile material for nuclear bombs, the officials said.
The findings support a new, previously undisclosed Defense Intelligence Agency estimate that North Korea is unlikely to denuclearize.
...
The new intelligence, described by four officials who have seen it or received briefings, is based on material gathered in the weeks since the summit. The officials insisted on anonymity to discuss sensitive assessments about a country that has long been one of the most difficult targets for spy agencies to penetrate. Some aspects of the U.S. intelligence were reported Friday by NBC News.
Specifically, the DIA has concluded that North Korean officials are exploring ways to deceive Washington about the number of nuclear warheads, and missiles and the types and numbers of facilities they have, believing that the United States is not aware of the full range of their activities.
Some U.S. intelligence officials have for at least a year believed that the number of warheads is about 65, as reported last year by The Washington Post. But North Korean officials are suggesting that they declare far fewer.
The lone uranium-enrichment facility that has been acknowledged by North Korea is in Yongbyon, 60 miles north of Pyongyang. That site is estimated to have produced fissile material for as many as a couple of dozen warheads.
Meanwhile, the North Koreans also have operated a secret underground uranium enrichment site known as Kangson, which was first reported in May by The Washington Post. That site is believed by most officials to have twice the enrichment capacity of Yongbyon. U.S. intelligence agencies became aware of the nuclear facility in 2010.
In recent years, the United States, through imagery and computer hacking, has improved its intelligence collection in North Korea. Officials in Pyongyang are seeking to obfuscate the true number of their weapons facilities, and U.S. intelligence officials believe that more than just one hidden site exists. The Post is withholding details at the request of intelligence officials.
...
While North Korea made a public show in June of demolishing the country’s main nuclear weapons test site, there has been little public evidence of efforts to dismantle scores of other sites linked to production of nuclear and chemical weapons and delivery systems.
Even if North Korea’s promises were sincere, it could take years of work, accompanied by an unprecedented agreement to grant access to outside inspectors, before U.S. officials could confidently say that the weapons threat has been neutralized.
As of now, there is little proof that North Korea intends to go down that road, longtime North Korea observers say.
In 1973, a brash young would-be developer from Queens met one of New York’s premier power brokers: Roy Cohn, whose name is still synonymous with the rise of McCarthyism and its dark political arts. With the ruthless attorney as a guide, Trump propelled himself into the city’s power circles and learned many of the tactics that would inexplicably lead him to the White House years later.
(...) Melendez, host of “The Stuttering John” podcast, was patched through to the Air Force One line through the White House switchboard, calling White House security into question, Axios reports. He reportedly got through “three different interactions with two White House operators” and “two call screens before Jared Kushner called him from Air Force One.” Kushner then told Melendez that the line would call him back, and that’s how he eventually got through to the president. White House staffers are reportedly “freaking out,” and are trying to figure out how the podcast host managed to get the ear of the president.
I blame today's shootup of a newspaper squarely on Donnie. He spews hate - particularly at the media - and this sort of shit happens. Direct correlation. He INTENDS this sort of shit to happen.
Beaker a.k.a. Prof. Fake News wrote (and deleted already?):
No, my 'fake news' is not reporting that "all" liberals are cheering on the Red Hen.
My 'fake news' is calling it these ways:
a) shame on them - should have taken the high road b) hey leftys are you sure this is how you want it to be when the shoe is inevitably on the other foot? Can't have it both ways, etc. c) hey leftys now is the time for you to take a stand against the Red Hen (and others) for going way too far (see also Maxine Waters) d) this is an opportunity for liberal and Dem leaders to have their own Sister Souljah moment. One might hope they don't let the opportunity slip through their fingers, but alas, the Dem party is the home of such fine upstanding leaders as Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, whose personal records speaks for themselves.
If the left doesn't speak up to rein in the over the line outrage, all they are doing is giving license to the idiots on the right to be more idiot like, and also invigorating the electorate to show up at the voting booth come the midterms.
See also: This is why Trump won (also because many on the right are DONE trying to placate the never-ending demands of the left)
Snopes.com says the poster was for sale in the museum's gift shop but apparently not on display in the rest of the museum. I take that as an informal endorsement from the museum about the validity of the significance of the items listed on the poster.
FWIW the author of the list is a retired businessman and self-described amateur historian. It would be interesting to compare his effort to work done by political scientists, sociologists, etc.
In recent years, the only “contributions” to the charity seem to have been payments from business partners, not from the Trumps or the Trump Organization. The charity’s spending appears to have benefitted the Trumps themselves, not the public welfare. The organization had been operating this way for years, but, according to Underwood, in 2016 the Trump Foundation became an arm of the Trump political campaign, cutting checks to Trump’s political allies in key states just before the election. If true, this would mean that the Trump Foundation evolved from a mere tax-avoidance scheme into an instrument for carrying out potential acts of campaign-finance fraud. The Attorney General made clear that her evidence could support criminal cases against the Trumps, but she has no jurisdiction to bring such charges, since tax and campaign fraud are federal matters. She referred the case to federal officials, though it seems unlikely that the I.R.S. or the Federal Election Commission would choose to prosecute a sitting President or his children.
If they’re really interested in putting a check on Trump, maybe Jeff Flake and John McCain should consider switching parties until the end of this Congress.
There's talk of trying to drag the nomination process out until after November. My math says get that confirmation going right now. McCain might be absent, and Flake might obstruct. Throw in Murkowski and Collins, that's as good as it's going to get. Too many Democratic Senate seats are up this year, holding all of them and taking a GOP seat is asking a lot.