[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

If you are allowed to pack ten things to take to the Afte... - rashad - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:27pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Oct 19, 2019 - 9:48pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - GeneP59 - Oct 19, 2019 - 9:38pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 19, 2019 - 9:30pm
 
Things You Thought Today - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 19, 2019 - 6:46pm
 
President Elizabeth Warren - haresfur - Oct 19, 2019 - 6:28pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - haresfur - Oct 19, 2019 - 6:23pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - haresfur - Oct 19, 2019 - 6:18pm
 
Trump - kurtster - Oct 19, 2019 - 5:52pm
 
Tech & Science - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 4:05pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 3:40pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:50pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:33pm
 
Classical Music - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:19pm
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 1:51pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 11:18am
 
Counting with Pictures - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:51am
 
Anti-War - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:43am
 
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •  - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:29am
 
Democratic Party - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:00am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - SeriousLee - Oct 19, 2019 - 8:02am
 
Bob Dylan - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 19, 2019 - 7:27am
 
Health Care - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2019 - 5:45am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2019 - 5:13am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 12:03am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jpdakine - Oct 18, 2019 - 2:08pm
 
New Music - R_P - Oct 18, 2019 - 11:45am
 
Room 3a - Proclivities - Oct 18, 2019 - 11:19am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - islander - Oct 18, 2019 - 11:07am
 
Interesting or Weird Cover Versions - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 18, 2019 - 9:20am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - SeriousLee - Oct 18, 2019 - 9:08am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 18, 2019 - 8:29am
 
Economix - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 5:01am
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 4:14am
 
The RANT Forum - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 4:02am
 
Nice set Bill.... - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 3:55am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - SeriousLee - Oct 18, 2019 - 1:26am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - SeriousLee - Oct 18, 2019 - 1:23am
 
WORDS OF WISDOM - Proclivities - Oct 17, 2019 - 11:32am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - R_P - Oct 17, 2019 - 10:24am
 
Climate Change - westslope - Oct 17, 2019 - 10:15am
 
Ideology and large breasts - westslope - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:57am
 
KEF LS50 Wireless + Mac Mini + ? + RP FLAC = paradise - BillG - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:33am
 
sounds like... - Proclivities - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:25am
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - jarro - Oct 17, 2019 - 8:42am
 
The Obituary Page - Isabeau - Oct 17, 2019 - 6:06am
 
Race in America - miamizsun - Oct 17, 2019 - 4:46am
 
Suggestion: Americana Mix - sirdroseph - Oct 17, 2019 - 1:34am
 
Regarding dogs - kcar - Oct 16, 2019 - 10:20pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Oct 16, 2019 - 1:11pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 16, 2019 - 12:29pm
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 16, 2019 - 12:24pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 16, 2019 - 10:31am
 
Google Inc. - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:56am
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2019 - 4:23am
 
Favorite Quotes - sirdroseph - Oct 16, 2019 - 2:12am
 
MANBIRD: appropriate or not? Dicuss. - SeriousLee - Oct 15, 2019 - 6:35pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - R_P - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:27pm
 
Visual DNA – Another fine time-waster .... - haresfur - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:00pm
 
David Bowie tribute show.... - Proclivities - Oct 15, 2019 - 1:54pm
 
Vintage Vinyl - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 15, 2019 - 12:43pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - GeneP59 - Oct 15, 2019 - 9:14am
 
Ask the Libertarian - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 15, 2019 - 8:26am
 
Syria - sirdroseph - Oct 15, 2019 - 8:24am
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - miamizsun - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:35am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:54pm
 
King Crimson - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:51pm
 
HomeKit HomePod AppleTV - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:33pm
 
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 1:12pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 12:43pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Oct 14, 2019 - 8:35am
 
'Til Death - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 7:54am
 
Immigration - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2019 - 7:24am
 
Political Humor Images - buzz - Oct 14, 2019 - 6:18am
 
Living in America - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 6:05am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » WikiLeaks Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 54, 55, 56  Next
Post to this Topic
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 12, 2017 - 7:24am

Glenn Greenwald on Wikileaks, Russian Hacking, and Distrusting Legacy Media and U.S. Intel (Reason Podcast)

The co-founder of The Intercept doesn't like Donald Trump but thinks the new president may just wake liberals up to reining in the government.

Listen or download here

about 43 minutes and worth your time

i especially paid attention @ the 30 min mark

regards

 


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 18, 2016 - 9:54pm


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 5, 2016 - 11:25am

The New Dirty War for Africa's uranium and mineral rights

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 29, 2015 - 8:18pm

Assange: What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates
The secret documents made public by Wikileaks offer a rare insight into how U.S. foreign policy really works.
(...) The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015) begins to address the need for scholarly analysis of what the millions of documents published by WikiLeaks say about international geopolitics. The chapters use a constellation approach to these documents to reveal how the United States deals with various regional and international power dynamics.

It is impossible to cover the wealth of material or relationships in this first volume, but I hope that this work will stimulate long- form journalists and academics to eclipse it.

Chapter 1 reflects on America's status as an "empire," and considers what this means, seeking to characterize US economic, military, administrative and diplomatic power with reference to the long sweep of global history over the last century.

The chapter establishes the "imperialism of free trade" framework that the rest of Part II then develops—a framework wherein American military might is used not for territorial expansion but to perpetuate American economic preeminence. Both themes are considered in more detail in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3. Chapter 1 also situates WikiLeaks in the context of an unprecedented growth in American official secrecy, and the evolution of US power following the commencement of the "war on terror."

Chapter 2 examines the WikiLeaks materials on the so-called "war on terror." Besides providing a keen summary of the war crimes and human rights abuses documented in WikiLeaks publications, along with a detailed historical overview of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq and the consequent unfolding disaster there, the chapter also draws conclusions about the ideological and conceptual substructure of America's "war on terror," and investigates how an aspect of the imperial prerogative of the United States is to exercise decisive power to ensure that terms like "just war," "torture," "terrorism" and "civilian" are defined in its own favor.

The argument adduces evidence from the full range of WikiLeaks publications, along with other sources, such as the recent CIA torture report. In the process, the chapter also examines the double standards and problems arising from the misuse of these concepts (including the attempt to delegitimize and marginalize WikiLeaks itself).

Chapter 3 embarks on a thoroughgoing discussion of the "empire of free trade"—the relationship of the American form of empire with the worldwide promotion of neoliberal economic reform, providing American corporations with access to "global markets."

The chapter draws on State Department cables published by WikiLeaks, as well as WikiLeaks publications dating back to 2007 concerning the "private sector," including material on banks and global multilateral treaty negotiations. The chapter provides luminous examples of how the drive toward economic integration buttresses the position of the United States as an arms-length empire, and provides the underlying rationale for the patterns of intervention, military or otherwise, pursued in Latin America and beyond.

Chapter 4 is a do-it-yourself guide on how to use Wiki- Leaks' Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD), written by investigations editor Sarah Harrison. At the time of writing, PlusD contains 2,325,961 cables and other diplomatic records. The State Department uses its own logic to create, transmit and index these records, the totality of which form its primary institutional memory.

Harrison explains how to get started searching, reading and interpreting cable metadata and content, from the infamous CHEROKEE restriction to the use of State Department euphemisms such as "opposing resource nationalism."

The history of US policy regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC) is a rich case study in the use of diplomacy in a concerted effort to undermine an international institution.

In Chapter 5, Linda Pearson documents what the cables reveal about the efforts of successive US administrations to limit the ICC's jurisdiction. These include the use of both bribes and threats by the George W. Bush administration to corral states signed up to the ICC into providing immunity from war crimes prosecutions for US persons—and, under the Obama administration, more subtle efforts to shape the ICC into an adjunct of US foreign policy.

Japan and South Korea have been epicenters of US influence within East Asia for decades. The cables document nearly a decade of US efforts to affect domestic political outcomes within these two countries in line with its own long-term interests.

In Chapter 14, investigative journalist Tim Shorrock examines the geopolitical triangle created by US relations with both countries, including its attempts to play one off against the other, as part of long- term efforts to undermine left-wing governments and policies within the region.

Of global GDP growth over the last decade, over 50 percent has been in Southeast Asia. This understanding has led to an explicit reassignment of military, diplomatic and surveillance assets to Southeast Asia, epitomized by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a strategy of "forward deployed diplomacy." In Chapter 15, Richard Heydarian examines the cables on Southeast Asia and situates his findings within a broader historical critique of US influence in the region.

The critique of Western imperialism is most contentious in regions of the world that have historically been US protectorates, such as western Europe. So indoctrinated are European liberals in modern imperialist ideology that even the idea that the United States might be administering a global empire is routinely dismissed with references to concepts like "right to protect," demonstrating a willful deafness not only to the structure of US power around the world, but also to how it increasingly talks about itself as an "empire."

In Chapter 6, Michael Busch examines the broad patterns of influence and subversion pursued by the global superpower on the political systems of Europe and its member states. Themes include European government collusion with the CIA's rendition and torture programs, the subversion of European criminal justice and judicial systems to rescue alleged US government torturers from prosecution and the use of US diplomacy to open up European markets to US aerospace companies, or to invasive, monopolistic technologies and patents, such as Monsanto's genetically modified organisms.

In Chapter 13, Phyllis Bennis opts for a broad overview of WikiLeaks' publications on Afghanistan—including not just the State Department cables, but also the Significant Action Reports (SIGACTs) published by WikiLeaks as the Afghan War Diary, and Congressional Research Reports and other documents on Afghanistan published by WikiLeaks prior to 2010.

What emerges is a stark assessment of the folly of US military involvement in Afghanistan since 2001 and its cost in terms of human life and societal well-being.

Geopolitics is complicated, and all the more so in relation to a country like Israel. Israel's military dominance in the Middle East; its diplomatic relations with other regional players such as Egypt, Syria, Iran, Lebanon and Turkey; its role as an avatar for US imperial policy within the area; its wayward exploitation of its protected status in pursuing its own genocidal policies toward the Palestinian people—all of these themes are brought to the fore in Chapter 9, by Peter Certo and Stephen Zunes, which carefully interrogates the relevant State Department cables.

In Chapter 11, on Iran, Gareth Porter provides an excellent companion to the chapter on Israel, choosing to focus on what the cables reveal about the tripartite geopolitical standoff between the US, Israel and Iran, and the shadow this structure casts on the rest of the Middle East.

In particular, Porter focuses on the P5+1 talks about Iran's nuclear enrichment program, on US efforts to misrepresent intelligence in order to tip the international consensus against Iran, and on the role of Israel as both a catalyst for and an agent of US policy in the Middle East.

The conflict in Iraq is the focus of Chapter 12, by journalist Dahr Jamail, which draws on a wide range of WikiLeaks materials to argue that the United States had a deliberate policy of exacerbating sectarian divisions in Iraq following its invasion and occupation, in the belief that the country would be easier to dominate in such circumstances.

The consequent devastation is documented in painstaking detail using WikiLeaks materials, including US cables, Congressional Research Reports dating between 2005 and 2008 and the Iraq War Logs from 2010.

Jamail pays specific attention to the "Sahwa" movement— the US-sponsored program of counter-insurgency that was implemented to respond to the growing influence of al-Qaeda affiliates among Sunni Iraqis disaffected by the Shia-dominated US-client government of Nouri al-Maliki.

The United States paid large numbers of Iraqis to defect from the Sunni insurgency and instead fight against al-Qaeda, on the promise of receiving regular employment through integration into the Iraqi military. As Jamail argues, the failure of the Maliki government to honor this promise saw huge numbers of US-trained, US-armed and US-financed—but now unemployed—Sunni militants return to the insurgency, eventually swelling the ranks of the former al- Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, which in 2014 became known as ISIS, or the "Islamic State."

Across Iraq's northeastern border, in Syria, the cables also describe how the scene was set for the emergence of ISIS. Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, warmongers in the media have demanded the Western military pounding of Syria to depose Bashar Al-Assad—presented, in typical liberal-interventionist fashion, as a "new Hitler."

The emergence of the Islamic State, to which the Assad government is the only viable counterweight within Syria, has thrown this propagandistic consensus into disarray. But US government designs on Syrian regime change, and its devotion to regional instability, long pre-date the Syrian civil war, as is demonstrated in the cables.

Chapter 10, by Robert Naiman, offers a careful reading of the Damascus cables, pointing out important historical presentiments of the current situation in Syria, and unpicking the benign-sounding human rights constructions of US diplomats to bring into focus the imperialist inflection of US foreign policy and rhetoric toward Syria—including concrete efforts within the country to undermine the government and bring about the chaos of recent months during the entire decade preceding 2011.

Clichés abound about Turkey being a "bridge between East and West," but it cannot be denied that this country of some seventy-five million people occupies an important position— both as a regional player within Middle Eastern geopolitics and as a large and economically powerful nominal democracy on the fringes of Europe.

As Conn Hallinan argues in Chapter 8, State Department cables illustrate US efforts to exploit the rich geopolitical significance of Turkey. Hallinan uses the cables as a pretext to provide a tour of Turkey's regional alliances, strategic concerns and internal affairs. Among the topics he covers are the complex strategic energy calculations that necessitate Turkey's delicate relations with Iran and Russia, even as it cultivates the United States, Europe and Israel in its efforts to gain access to Western markets.

The chapter also examines Turkey's bargaining power, demonstrated in its use of a veto against the election of former Danish prime minister Anders Rasmussen as the head of NATO, in order to force the United States to pressure the Danish government into suppressing a Denmark-based Kurdish television channel.

The essay also deals with Turkey's internal issues, such as government policy toward Kurdish separatist groups, and the extraordinary underground political conflict and intrigue between Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the expatriate political figure Fethullah Gülen.

Since the end of the Cold War, and especially during the so- called "war on terror," US diplomacy has leaned toward South, Central and East Asia. Except in the case of one or two flare-ups, US-Russian relations receded from the popular consciousness as the main geopolitical dynamic.

This of course has changed as a result of the conflict in the Ukraine. But popular consciousness is not reality. As Russ Wellen shows in Chapter 7, in the decade following the century's turn the US has pursued a policy of aggressive NATO expansion, challenging Russia's regional hegemony within Eastern Europe and the former Soviet area and seeking to subvert nuclear treaties to maintain its strategic advantage.

As the cables show, these efforts have not gone unnoticed by Russia, and are recurring points of conflict in US-Russian diplomatic relations, even during the most cordial of periods. The chapter provides the necessary context for recent East-West tensions centering around Syria, Ukraine and the granting of asylum to Edward Snowden, and yields critical insight into a geopolitical relationship that, if mishandled, threatens the survival of our civilization and even of our species.

Perhaps no region of the world demonstrates the full spectrum of US imperial interference as vividly as Latin America. Since the 1950s, US policy in Central and South America has popularized the concept of the CIA coup d'état, deposing democratically elected left-wing governments and installing US-friendly right- wing dictatorships; inaugurating legacies of brutal civil war, death squads, torture and disappearances; and immiserating millions to the benefit of the American ruling class.

As Alexander Main, Jake Johnston, and Dan Beeton note in the first of their chapters on Latin America, Chapter 17, the English-speaking press saw no evil in the State Department cables, concluding that they did not fit "the stereotype of America plotting coups and caring only about business interests and consorting with only the right wing."

The exact opposite is true: the cables demonstrate a smooth continuity between the brutal US policy in Latin America during the Cold War and the more sophisticated plays at toppling governments that have taken place in recent years.

Chapter 17 offers a broad overview of the use of USAID and "civil society" astroturfing, as well as other, more direct methods of pursuing "regime change" in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador and Haiti.

Chapter 18, by the same authors, focuses on Venezuela, the socialist enemy of the day, and specifically on US efforts to undermine the country as a regional left-wing bulwark in the wake of the failed US-backed coup against the Chávez government in 2002.

The response of the United States to the release of the WikiLeaks materials betrays a belief that its power resides in a disparity of information: ever more knowledge for the empire, ever less for its subjects.

In 1969, Daniel Ellsberg—later famous for leaking the Pentagon Papers—had a top-secret security clearance. Henry Kissinger had applied for his own top-secret clearance. Ellsberg warned him of its dangers:

"t will ... become very hard for you to learn from anybody who doesn't have these clearances. Because you'll be thinking as you listen to them: "What would this man be telling me if he knew what I know? Would he be giving me the same advice, or would it totally change his predictions and recommendations?" You will deal with a person who doesn't have those clearances only from the point of view of what you want him to believe and what impression you want him to go away with, since you'll have to lie carefully to him about what you know. In effect, you will have to manipulate him. You'll give up trying to assess what he has to say. The danger is, you'll become something like a moron. You'll become incapable of learning from most people in the world, no matter how much experience they may have in their particular areas that may be much greater than yours."

Freed from their classified seals, the WikiLeaks materials bridge the gulf between the "morons" with security clearances and nothing to learn, and us, their readers.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2015 - 12:06pm

Julian Assange: the Untold Story of an Epic Struggle for Justice - John Pilger
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 31, 2015 - 1:30pm

US spied on Japan government, companies: WikiLeaks
The US spy agency targeted Japanese politicians, its top central banker and major firms for years, WikiLeakssaid on Friday, in the latest revelations about Washington's snooping on allies.

The intercepts exposing US National Security Agency activities follow other documents released by the whistleblower group that revealed spying on allies including Germany and France, straining relations.

Japan is one of Washington's key allies in the Asia-Pacific region and they regularly consult on defence, economic and trade issues.

The leaks comes as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe moves to expand the role of Japan's military, a move applauded by Washington but deeply unpopular at home.

The claims of spying on trade officials could prove particularly sensitive after high-profile talks kicked off this week in Hawaii aimed at hammering out a vast free-trade bloc encompassing 40 percent of the world's economy.

The United States, Japan, and 10 other Pacific Rim countries are looking to finalise the most ambitious trade deal in decades.

But Washington and Tokyo — the biggest economies in the negotiations — have sparred over auto sector access and Tokyo's concerns about including agricultural products in the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership.

"The reports demonstrate the depth of US surveillance of the Japanese government, indicating that intelligence was gathered and processed from numerous Japanese government ministries and offices," WikiLeaks said. (...)


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 23, 2015 - 9:53pm

François Hollande calls emergency meeting after WikiLeaks claims US spied on three French presidents
Documents appear to show that American agents spied on Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy and Hollande, even listening to their phone calls

The French president, François Hollande, has called an emergency meeting of his country’s defence council for Wednesday morning after claims that American agents spied on three successive French presidents between 2006 and 2012. According to WikiLeaks documents published late on Tuesday, even the French leaders’ mobile phone conversations were listened to and recorded.

The leaked US documents, marked “top secret”, were based on phone taps and filed in an NSA document labelled “Espionnage Elysée” (Elysée Spy), according to the newspaper Libération and investigative news website Mediapart. The US was listening to the conversations of centre-right president Jacques Chirac, his successor Nicolas Sarkozy, and the current French leader, Socialist François Hollande, elected in 2012.

The recorded conversations, which were handled by the summary services unit at the NSA, were said to reveal few state secrets but show clear evidence of the extent of American spying on countries considered allies. WikiLeaks documents suggest that other US spy targets included French cabinet ministers and the French ambassador to the United States.

“The documents contain the ‘selectors’ from the target list, detailing the cell phone numbers of numerous officials in the Elysée up to and including the direct cell phone of the president,” a report of the taps published in the French media revealed.

According to the documents released by Wikileaks, Sarkozy is said to have considered restarting the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks without US involvement. They also purport to show that Hollande feared a Greek euro zone exit as far back back as 2012.

The documents are said to include summaries of conversations between French government officials on the global financial crisis, the future of the European Union, the relationship between Hollande’s administration and Merkel’s government, French efforts to determine the make-up of the executive staff of the United Nations, and a dispute between the French and US governments over the latter spying on France.

The revelations come as France gives its domestic intelligence and surveillance services controversial greater powers to combat jihadist networks, with more permissions to bug phones and licences to carry out mass surveillance on the internet.

In an article co-authored by Julian Assange, the French newspaper Libération pointed out that in matters of spying, there are no friends: “Spying abroad is the ultimate ‘grey zone’ in surveillance – it is also, in France, the real blind spot of the planned law on surveillance, expected to be adopted this Wednesday.”

Mediapart said: “For almost 10 years, the United States has listened into French presidents … it was all classed top secret or ‘special intelligence’.

“In the five documents that we are publishing, four were marked with a G, kept for the most ‘highly sensitive material’, others were labelled ‘NF’, stipulating that they must not be communicated to foreign countries in any circumstances. Most were marked ‘unconventional’, meaning they had been got through hacking.”

The documents published by Mediapart suggest that the Americans were tapping into François Hollande’s conversations from the moment he was elected in 2012.

Ned Price, spokesperson for the US National Security Council, said on Tuesday in remarks that were grounded in the present and future tense: “We are not targeting and will not target the communications of President Hollande … we work closely with France on all matters of international concern, and the French are indispensable partners.”

On the historical allegations, Price said: “We are not going to comment on specific intelligence allegations. As a general matter we do not conduct any foreign intelligence surveillance activities unless there is a specific and national security purpose. This applies to ordinary citizens and world leaders alike.” (...)


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 19, 2015 - 10:14pm

The $audi Cables
Over half a million cables and other documents from the $audi Foreign Ministry.

WikiLeaks dumps even more Sony files
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 16, 2015 - 7:30pm

Today, 16 April 2015, WikiLeaks publishes an analysis and search system for The Sony Archives: 30,287 documents from Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) and 173,132 emails, to and from more than 2,200 SPE email addresses. SPE is a US subsidiary of the Japanese multinational technology and media corporation Sony, handling their film and TV production and distribution operations. It is a multi-billion dollar US business running many popular networks, TV shows and film franchises such as Spider-Man, Men in Black and Resident Evil.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 30, 2014 - 12:18am

WikiLeaks publishes 'unprecedented' secret Australian court suppression order

WikiLeaks has struck again, releasing the text of a secret court order that cannot be published in Australia.

The anti-secrecy group has this morning published a Victorian Supreme Court suppression order that WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange describes as “unprecedented” in scope. 

The suppression order is itself suppressed. No Australian media organisation can legally publish the document or its contents. 

In a statement provided to Fairfax Media, Assange said it was “completely egregious to block the public's right to know and suppress the media in any instance, and especially in cases of international corruption involving politicians and subsidiaries of a public organisation”.

“Despite the legal implications WikiLeaks publishes this suppression order, as it will others, to uphold our values of freedom of information and transparency of government - the Australian people have a right to know, we work to ensure this right for them, even when their government tries to obstruct it."

WikiLeaks suggests there has not been a comparable “blanket suppression order” since 1995 when the Australian government sought to suppress publication by Fairfax Media of details of a joint US-Australian espionage operation to bug a new Chinese embassy in Canberra.

Assange argues that the suppression order, together with the Australian government's recent introduction of legislation to criminalise reporting on certain types of intelligence operations, is part of “an increasing trend in Australia of suppressing press freedoms for the sake of politics".

"The Australian government is not just gagging the press, it is blindfolding the Australian public," Assange said. (...)

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 25, 2014 - 7:11pm

Police spend £6 MILLION guarding WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at Ecuador Embassy | UK | News | Daily Express
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 9, 2014 - 11:49am


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 6, 2014 - 8:01pm

In defence of Julian Assange
Julian Assange's publisher writes about his experience of working with the much-criticised WikiLeaks founder
A great deal has been written recently about the frustrations of publishing a book with Julian Assange, mainly in a widely discussed, marathon article for the London Review of Books by Andrew O'Hagan. {#Arrowd}
(...)

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 28, 2014 - 10:38am

A very long, but interesting read: 26467 words

Ghosting
Andrew O’Hagan
On 5 January 2011, at 8.30 p.m., I was messing about at home when the phone buzzed on the sofa. It was a text from Jamie Byng, the publisher of Canongate. ‘Are you about?’ it said. ‘I have a somewhat left-field idea. It’s potentially very exciting. But I need to discuss urgently.’ Canongate had bought, for £600,000, a memoir by the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. The book had also been bought for a high sum by Sonny Mehta at Knopf in New York and Jamie had sold foreign rights to a slew of big houses. He said he expected it to be published in forty languages. Assange didn’t want to write the book himself but didn’t want the book’s ghostwriter to be anybody who already knew a lot about him. I told Jamie that I’d seen Assange at the Frontline Club the year before, when the first WikiLeaks stories emerged, and that he was really interesting but odd, maybe even a bit autistic. Jamie agreed, but said it was an amazing story. ‘He wants a kind of manifesto, a book that will reflect this great big generational shift.’ He’d been to see Assange in Norfolk and was going again the next day. He said he and the agent Caroline Michel had suggested me for the job and that Assange wanted to meet me. I knew they’d been talking to other writers, and I was at first sceptical. It’s not unusual for published writers to get requests to write things anonymously. How much did Alex Haley protect Malcolm X when he ghosted his autobiography? To what extent did Ted Sorensen create the verbal manner of John F. Kennedy when he wrote Profiles in Courage, a book for which the future president won the Pulitzer Prize? And are the science fiction stories H.P. Lovecraft ghosted for Harry Houdini not the best things he ever wrote? There would be a touch of all this in the strange case of Assange. But there is something else about the genre, a sense that the world might be more ghosted now than at any time in history. Isn’t Wikipedia entirely ghosted? Isn’t half of Facebook? Isn’t the World Wide Web a new ether, in which we are all haunted by ghostwriters? (...)

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 16, 2013 - 9:28pm

The Banality of Systemic Evil - The Stone/NYTimes.com

(...) But wasn’t there arrogance or hubris in Snowden’s and Manning’s decisions to leak the documents? After all, weren’t there established procedures determining what was right further up the organizational chart? Weren’t these ethical decisions better left to someone with a higher pay grade? The former United States ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, argued that Snowden “thinks he’s smarter and has a higher morality than the rest of us … that he can see clearer than other 299, 999, 999 of us, and therefore he can do what he wants. I say that is the worst form of treason.”

For the leaker and whistleblower the answer to Bolton is that there can be no expectation that the system will act morally of its own accord. Systems are optimized for their own survival and preventing the system from doing evil may well require breaking with organizational niceties, protocols or laws. It requires stepping outside of one’s assigned organizational role. The chief executive is not in a better position to recognize systemic evil than is a middle level manager or, for that matter, an IT contractor. Recognizing systemic evil does not require rank or intelligence, just honesty of vision. (...)


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 6, 2013 - 1:22pm

WikiLeaks SpyFiles: New documents examine spy tech companies like Gamma, Hacking Team
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jul 30, 2013 - 12:01pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Yes but not "the big one." The charge that by posting stuff to the internet, and the enemy has access to the internet, that he was aiding the enemy. 

 
Yes but they may have had to prove intent, which is damn near impossible. He'll still probably spend the rest of this life in jail.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 30, 2013 - 11:55am

 MsJudi wrote:

I read that he was found guilty on 18 charges... ?!?

 
Yes but not "the big one." The charge that by posting stuff to the internet, and the enemy has access to the internet, that he was aiding the enemy. 
MsJudi

MsJudi Avatar

Location: Houston, TX
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 30, 2013 - 11:30am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote: 
I read that he was found guilty on 18 charges... ?!?
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 30, 2013 - 11:21am

Bradley Manning acquitted of aiding the enemy


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 54, 55, 56  Next