You are a walking projection machine. Your party is very proud of you.
So let's say that somewhere the Republicans leading the impeachment find proof (to date, nothing like a recorded "perfect" phone call or rally directing his followers to stop the certification of an election with no "steal"). What happens next?
Trials? Prison?
You come out here pounding your chest like you've proven something, followed by a statement like "You don't mean it if you say you want him punished too".
You've got it backward (hard to believe for someone so worried about law and order). Republicans will give anything to somehow turn Biden into a criminal so you can continue to support Trump. LOOK! He's a criminal! You are supporting a criminal! You're no better than us!
That's where you're wrong. Bring proof, and I think most of the people here wouldn't support Biden. I think it's clear most here don't want Biden to run again...but you want to ignore that and keep harping on his age.
I'd say you're better than that, but if I've learned anything in the past 7 years, it's that you're not. So dance around the fire with your party as you look for vindication, and continue supporting a well-documented crooked autocrat.
Most people here (I believe) aren't really supporting Biden... they are aware of
the danger of the apparent alternative and would support almost anyone
on the planet to avoid 4 more years of "making us great again". The damage done will likely be irreparable.
Republicans have already proven that...starting an impeachment inquiry without a house vote...and the democrats using the same excuses as the republicans had with trump
sow/reap....
I am wary of another 4 years of Biden as President because he would be 86 at the end of that term. I would say that about anyone who was in that position, so not just particular to Joe. In the main, I actually think the Biden administration has performed well to date.
The reality is that most Biden voters voted against Trump in 2020. I expect that will be true again in 2024.
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Sep 14, 2023 - 6:51am
rgio wrote:
. . .
Most people here (I believe) aren't really supporting Biden... they are aware of
the danger of the apparent alternative and would support almost anyone
on the planet to avoid 4 more years of "making us great again". The damage done will likely be irreparable.
Bingo.
I am wary of another 4 years of Biden as President because he would be 86 at the end of that term. I would say that about anyone who was in that position, so not just particular to Joe. In the main, I actually think the Biden administration has performed well to date.
The reality is that most Biden voters voted against Trump in 2020. I expect that will be true again in 2024.
Predictable deflections, Quid pro Joe . You're just virtue signaling. No one here means it. 25th Amendment. He is physically unable to perform..
Back to the crickets ...
You are a walking projection machine. Your party is very proud of you.
So let's say that somewhere the Republicans leading the impeachment find proof (to date, nothing like a recorded "perfect" phone call or rally directing his followers to stop the certification of an election with no "steal"). What happens next?
Trials? Prison?
You come out here pounding your chest like you've proven something, followed by a statement like "You don't mean it if you say you want him punished too".
You've got it backward (hard to believe for someone so worried about law and order). Republicans will give anything to somehow turn Biden into a criminal so you can continue to support Trump. LOOK! He's a criminal! You are supporting a criminal! You're no better than us!
That's where you're wrong. Bring proof, and I think most of the people here wouldn't support Biden. I think it's clear most here don't want Biden to run again...but you want to ignore that and keep harping on his age.
I'd say you're better than that, but if I've learned anything in the past 7 years, it's that you're not. So dance around the fire with your party as you look for vindication, and continue supporting a well-documented crooked autocrat.
Most people here (I believe) aren't really supporting Biden... they are aware of
the danger of the apparent alternative and would support almost anyone
on the planet to avoid 4 more years of "making us great again". The damage done will likely be irreparable.
Quid pro Joe has nothing to worry about. He's never discussed foreign business dealings with anyone. He's told us that over and over again.
Hey, it's just another impeachment over a (vice) presidential phone call. This time around it's over a call (or two or three) about the weather.
Oh and please spare me the If Joe is guilty of anything he should be tried and prosecuted for it. You're just virtue signaling if you say it. No one here means it.
So go ahead, worry about Trump, not Joe, he'll be fine. Except that he's not. If nothing else, the past two weeks has made Joe the poster child for the 25th Amendment. He is physically unable to perform the ceremonial duties of POTUS, let alone anything else..
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
Posted:
Sep 13, 2023 - 7:57pm
Steely_D wrote:
Lame, sad attempt to diminish the horrible things that Trump did while abusing his office. And, a massive waste of time by the government. Shame on them for wasting everyone’s time trying to do the fish dance.
We can add "but his laptop" to the good old "but her emails". Weak beer. Are the accusers of Biden the same folks who thought Jan 6 was "normal tourist visit"?
Lame, sad attempt to diminish the horrible things that Trump did while abusing his office. And, a massive waste of time by the government. Shame on them for wasting everyoneâs time trying to do the fish dance.
Not only that but now it has come out that Joe used Hunter's credit cards as well as his credit lines to make purchases and what not to prevent any direct contact with Hunter's funds and Joe's name. Now we know how Joe collected his 10% as the Big Guy. Do not remember the source, but I do have confidence it its accuracy. This was part of an email chain that also included Hunter bitching about having support to his Daddy for the last 11 years.
And to remind everyone what Joe's strategy throughout all of this was to engage in "plausible deniability" as told first hand to Tony Bobulinski in order to have answers to any questions for the purposes of misleading those wanting a closer look.
Is the room getting smokier or is the smoke starting to clear up a little ?
"Do not remember the source, but I do have confidence it its accuracy."
You do this A LOT. A LOT. The last time IIRC was something you saw somewhere on TV. Sorry I can't give you more detail than that, but you didn't really provide any to begin with.
I am not rejecting your statements out of hand. I'm saying that you should provide evidence to back them up. Otherwise you're still stuck in the pumpkin patch at midnight.
