Wordle - daily game
- rgio - Jun 8, 2024 - 5:09am
NY Times Strands
- Proclivities - Jun 8, 2024 - 4:43am
NYTimes Connections
- Proclivities - Jun 8, 2024 - 4:33am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 8, 2024 - 2:51am
China
- R_P - Jun 7, 2024 - 11:55pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Jun 7, 2024 - 10:03pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 7, 2024 - 9:54pm
TEXAS
- R_P - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:36pm
Republican Party
- kcar - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:11pm
favorite love songs
- Manbird - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:06pm
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- Manbird - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:04pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Jun 7, 2024 - 7:54pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jun 7, 2024 - 7:42pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- Isabeau - Jun 7, 2024 - 6:30pm
Things You Thought Today
- Antigone - Jun 7, 2024 - 4:11pm
Israel
- R_P - Jun 7, 2024 - 2:50pm
Can you afford to retire?
- JrzyTmata - Jun 7, 2024 - 2:05pm
Old timers, crosswords &
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 7, 2024 - 12:09pm
Military Matters
- R_P - Jun 7, 2024 - 11:31am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Laptopdog - Jun 7, 2024 - 11:09am
NASA & other news from space
- GeneP59 - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:42am
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 7, 2024 - 8:01am
Joe Biden
- ColdMiser - Jun 7, 2024 - 7:53am
Favorite Quotes
- black321 - Jun 7, 2024 - 7:45am
What makes you smile?
- Red_Dragon - Jun 7, 2024 - 6:32am
June 2024 Photo Theme - Eyes
- fractalv - Jun 6, 2024 - 3:58pm
Artificial Intelligence
- johkir - Jun 6, 2024 - 3:57pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Antigone - Jun 6, 2024 - 2:48pm
Snakes & streaming images. WTH is going on?
- kcar - Jun 6, 2024 - 1:25pm
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- oldviolin - Jun 6, 2024 - 12:35pm
Economix
- black321 - Jun 6, 2024 - 11:31am
What's with the Sitar? ...and Robert Plant
- thisbody - Jun 6, 2024 - 11:16am
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Jun 6, 2024 - 10:39am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jun 6, 2024 - 8:32am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Jun 6, 2024 - 7:28am
Climate Change
- Red_Dragon - Jun 6, 2024 - 5:17am
Democratic Party
- kurtster - Jun 5, 2024 - 9:23pm
Name My Band
- Manbird - Jun 5, 2024 - 7:02pm
Canada
- Beaker - Jun 5, 2024 - 1:58pm
the Todd Rundgren topic
- miamizsun - Jun 5, 2024 - 5:00am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- MrDill - Jun 5, 2024 - 2:26am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Steely_D - Jun 5, 2024 - 12:44am
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 4, 2024 - 9:47pm
Automotive Lust
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 4, 2024 - 9:28pm
Art Show
- Manbird - Jun 4, 2024 - 8:20pm
Bad Poetry
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 12:11pm
Classic TV Curiosities
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 12:09pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Jun 4, 2024 - 11:50am
Trump
- Red_Dragon - Jun 4, 2024 - 11:05am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jun 4, 2024 - 10:11am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 4, 2024 - 8:28am
Your First Albums
- Manbird - Jun 3, 2024 - 5:42pm
King Crimson
- Steely_D - Jun 3, 2024 - 2:25pm
2024 Elections!
- R_P - Jun 3, 2024 - 10:19am
Your favourite conspiracy theory?
- Beaker - Jun 3, 2024 - 8:00am
Beer
- Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2024 - 5:20am
Ukraine
- R_P - Jun 2, 2024 - 3:07pm
RP on Twitter
- R_P - Jun 1, 2024 - 2:47pm
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio...
- thisbody - Jun 1, 2024 - 10:20am
What Did You See Today?
- Isabeau - May 31, 2024 - 1:15pm
ONE WORD
- thisbody - May 31, 2024 - 10:39am
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- Alchemist - May 30, 2024 - 6:58pm
Human Curated?
- Ipse_Dixit - May 30, 2024 - 2:55pm
Evolution!
- R_P - May 30, 2024 - 12:22pm
Sonos
- konz - May 30, 2024 - 10:26am
Fascism In America
- R_P - May 29, 2024 - 11:01pm
You might be getting old if......
- Bill_J - May 29, 2024 - 6:05pm
Science in the News
- black321 - May 29, 2024 - 11:56am
Roku App - Roku Asterisk Menu
- RPnate1 - May 29, 2024 - 11:15am
Geomorphology
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 29, 2024 - 10:56am
The Obituary Page
- Steve - May 29, 2024 - 5:49am
Notification bar on android
- tjux - May 28, 2024 - 10:26pm
Interviews with the artists
- dischuckin - May 28, 2024 - 1:33pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - May 28, 2024 - 12:02pm
RP Daily Trivia Challenge
- ScottFromWyoming - May 27, 2024 - 8:24pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
COVID-19
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 273, 274, 275 ... 395, 396, 397 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 20, 2020 - 11:39am |
|
Covid-19: Study reveals six clusters of symptoms that could be used as a clinical prediction tool
- âFlu-likeâ with no feverâheadache, loss of smell, muscle pains, cough, sore throat, chest pain, no fever
- âFlu-likeâ with feverâheadache, loss of smell, cough, sore throat, hoarseness, fever, loss of appetite
- Gastrointestinalâheadache, loss of smell, loss of appetite, diarrhoea, sore throat, chest pain, no cough
- Severe level one, fatigueâheadache, loss of smell, cough, fever, hoarseness, chest pain, fatigue
- Severe level two, confusionâheadache, loss of smell, loss of appetite, cough, fever, hoarseness, sore throat, chest pain, fatigue, confusion, muscle pain
- Severe level three, abdominal and respiratoryâheadache, loss of smell, loss of appetite,
cough, fever, hoarseness, sore throat, chest pain, fatigue, confusion, muscle pain, shortness of breath, diarrhoea, abdominal pain.
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 1:26pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
steeler wrote:
Perhaps, although I doubt that a public health emergency can best be handled without governmental direction. Countries such as those in Europe that have taken a national approach seem to be faring better. My understanding is that Germany, for example, has robust testing and contact tracing that has been instrumental in its success in controlling the spread of the virus.
I understand that technological advances/innovations in testing would help. However, as I pointed out, we have the capacity, albeit limited, that allows for relatively quick testing and expedited results. That kind of testing apparently is available to those with more resources who essentially can cut the line. That kind of âsystemâ does not make sense to me in terms of public policy in the face of a public health emergency. That is just capitalism doing what capitalism will do. I would not expect â and I do not believe you would â that private labs, for example, would coordinate a unified response throughout the country. The âhot spotsâ can and do pop up anywhere and some jurisdictions in which they surface are ill-equipped to handle them. A hodgepodge State-by-state approach, for example, pits states against each other in terms of purchasing power. Then there are the differences in resources among the jurisdictions within the state. We have shortages in some jurisdictions in cotton swabs and reagents that complicate and slow testing. The private marketplace has not eliminated those shortages.
Innovations may be forthcoming, but what is to be done in the interim?
Get out of their way. I have no idea (and neither do you) how sports teams, say, get priority for testing. If they paid for it why is that worse than getting it due to political pull? At least in that case the people testing acquired more resources in the process, resources they can put to the task at hand. A mandate treats testing like a zero-sum game: sports teams (or the White House staff, or the mayor's kid's nanny) getting tested means someone else goes without. Testing takes resourcesâlabor, materials, energy, machinery and facilities made scarce by government approval processes. Resources cost money. Need resources in a hurry? Costs more money. There are currently 185 active Emergency Use Authorizations for COVID-19 tests n place at FDA. As of today I count 72 applications n process. Some of these applications are months old. Government control is not getting testing out to people, government control is an obstacle to people getting tested. Be outraged if you like that some people are getting tested in a hurry, but that outrage would be better directed at those keeping the process slow.
Your ire and most of your argument is aimed at the FDA approval system. I do not necessarily disagree with that concern/argument. I would agree that costs for Covid-19 testing and prescription drugs in general would be lower if there were not requirements for FDA approval. That is a debate about whether FDA approval is beneficial or not, and weighing the benefits, if any, versus the transactional costs. Not sure exactly how that explains shortages for things like cotton swabs , the lack of which currently are hampering testing for Covid-19. Your argument also presupposes that we have to accept that testing â and perhaps all medical care â is a zero-sum game. The funny/ironic thing is that the lack of testing for some in the case of this virus is that it will increase the probabilities of more people being infected, including even those with better access. It seems to me that leveling the playing field as much as possible is a better way to go. My understanding is that test results coming back a week or so later renders contact tracing essentially impossible. It is testing and contact tracing that will mitigate the spread. Again, my understanding is that Germany has been successful in doing this countrywide. The United States has not been successful. Do you think that is primarily due to our FDA approval requirements? You are right that I am assuming that the professional sport teams pay to secure expedited testing (it does not matter why they â or anyone else â can cut the line for the purposes of my argument). You argue this provides more $ for the overall system, which I guess you believe will result in expanded testing capacity. Maybe at some point. I believe this expedited testing contributes to pushing back testing for the general populace, at least in the short term. I am not sure whether you are implicitly contending that it is better to address a public health emergency without governmental direction. Just step aside and let the private market do its thing. If so, I obviously disagree.
|
|
BlueHeronDruid
Location: Заебани сме луѓе
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 12:49pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
Get out of their way. I have no idea (and neither do you) how sports teams, say, get priority for testing. If they paid for it why is that worse than getting it due to political pull? At least in that case the people testing acquired more resources in the process, resources they can put to the task at hand. A mandate treats testing like a zero-sum game: sports teams (or the White House staff, or the mayor's kid's nanny) getting tested means someone else goes without. Testing takes resourcesâlabor, materials, energy, machinery and facilities made scarce by government approval processes. Resources cost money. Need resources in a hurry? Costs more money. There are currently 185 active Emergency Use Authorizations for COVID-19 tests n place at FDA. As of today I count 72 applications n process. Some of these applications are months old. Government control is not getting testing out to people, government control is an obstacle to people getting tested. Be outraged if you like that some people are getting tested in a hurry, but that outrage would be better directed at those keeping the process slow.
My sister and her husband (NJ) have been tested twice, pretty much at will, for infection, and once each for antibodies. My nephew was out with buddies and saw some girls who looked a little sick, but they were hot. So he's got it (no symptoms whatsoever) after his THIRD test and second exposure. Brother (extremely high risk) tested multiple times also because his son isn't isolating. The kid has to have two more negative tests before going out and trying to get it again. That's a lot of tests. Here? Only if I have symptoms. Period. There are no testing sites. The triage nurse at the hospital will decide if I get to drive there and get a swab stuck up my nose. I don't particularly feel like I need a test, but reading about the daily testing being wasted on our leaders who won't bother to wear masks, the testing for athletes, etc. is jarring.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 12:37pm |
|
steeler wrote:
Perhaps, although I doubt that a public health emergency can best be handled without governmental direction. Countries such as those in Europe that have taken a national approach seem to be faring better. My understanding is that Germany, for example, has robust testing and contact tracing that has been instrumental in its success in controlling the spread of the virus.
I understand that technological advances/innovations in testing would help. However, as I pointed out, we have the capacity, albeit limited, that allows for relatively quick testing and expedited results. That kind of testing apparently is available to those with more resources who essentially can cut the line. That kind of âsystemâ does not make sense to me in terms of public policy in the face of a public health emergency. That is just capitalism doing what capitalism will do. I would not expect â and I do not believe you would â that private labs, for example, would coordinate a unified response throughout the country. The âhot spotsâ can and do pop up anywhere and some jurisdictions in which they surface are ill-equipped to handle them. A hodgepodge State-by-state approach, for example, pits states against each other in terms of purchasing power. Then there are the differences in resources among the jurisdictions within the state. We have shortages in some jurisdictions in cotton swabs and reagents that complicate and slow testing. The private marketplace has not eliminated those shortages.
Innovations may be forthcoming, but what is to be done in the interim?
Get out of their way. I have no idea (and neither do you) how sports teams, say, get priority for testing. If they paid for it why is that worse than getting it due to political pull? At least in that case the people testing acquired more resources in the process, resources they can put to the task at hand. A mandate treats testing like a zero-sum game: sports teams (or the White House staff, or the mayor's kid's nanny) getting tested means someone else goes without. Testing takes resources—labor, materials, energy, machinery and facilities made scarce by government approval processes. Resources cost money. Need resources in a hurry? Costs more money. There are currently 185 active Emergency Use Authorizations for COVID-19 tests n place at FDA. As of today I count 72 applications n process. Some of these applications are months old. Government control is not getting testing out to people, government control is an obstacle to people getting tested. Be outraged if you like that some people are getting tested in a hurry, but that outrage would be better directed at those keeping the process slow.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 10:02am |
|
The president described the nation's top infectious diseases expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, as a âa little bit of an alarmistâ about the coronavirus pandemic, and Trump stuck to what he had said back in February â that the virus is âgoing to disappear.â On Fox, he said, âI'll be right eventually.â The United States tops the global death toll list with over 140,000 and confirmed infections, with 3.7 million.
The common language of deniers...
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 9:17am |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
steeler wrote:
Why is the Defense Production Act not being employed to require all labs to contract only with the federal government and eliminate these private contracts?
Because the federal government has shown itself to be so competent and efficient at this. More centralization, more top-down control is the opposite of what we need. We need as many labs as possible working on the problem, as many tests in as many hands as possible. Innovation (and the incentives that drive it) are stifled by the order you want.
Perhaps, although I doubt that a public health emergency can best be handled without governmental direction. Countries such as those in Europe that have taken a national approach seem to be faring better. My understanding is that Germany, for example, has robust testing and contact tracing that has been instrumental in its success in controlling the spread of the virus. I understand that technological advances/innovations in testing would help. However, as I pointed out, we have the capacity, albeit limited, that allows for relatively quick testing and expedited results. That kind of testing apparently is available to those with more resources who essentially can cut the line. That kind of âsystemâ does not make sense to me in terms of public policy in the face of a public health emergency. That is just capitalism doing what capitalism will do. I would not expect â and I do not believe you would â that private labs, for example, would coordinate a unified response throughout the country. The âhot spotsâ can and do pop up anywhere and some jurisdictions in which they surface are ill-equipped to handle them. A hodgepodge State-by-state approach, for example, pits states against each other in terms of purchasing power. Then there are the differences in resources among the jurisdictions within the state. We have shortages in some jurisdictions in cotton swabs and reagents that complicate and slow testing. The private marketplace has not eliminated those shortages. Innovations may be forthcoming, but what is to be done in the interim?
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 19, 2020 - 8:26am |
|
steeler wrote:
Why is the Defense Production Act not being employed to require all labs to contract only with the federal government and eliminate these private contracts?
Because the federal government has shown itself to be so competent and efficient at this. More centralization, more top-down control is the opposite of what we need. We need as many labs as possible working on the problem, as many tests in as many hands as possible. Innovation (and the incentives that drive it) are stifled by the order you want.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2020 - 10:17pm |
|
steeler wrote: Interesting.
Is this just a matter of paying for quicker return times?
Yes and all kinds of hoops to jump through due to existing contracts with labs and hospitals and clinics and throw in the insurance carriers. IIRC, the kits are usually bought directly from the lab that will read the test. Switching tests would also mean switching labs. Some like the Cleveland Clinic does in house at all different turnaround times. If you present yourself to the ER or ED with the appropriate symptoms or in just for general pulmonary problems or look like you will likely be admitted, you get the quick one. Otherwise you make an appointment, wait 24 to 48 hours to take the test and another 5 to 10 days for the results. So MLB has no doubt contracted with a lab to supply what they need. They are probably paying a bundle for it, too. What we need is a home antibody test kit.
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2020 - 9:07pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:
I was medical director for a few months at a relatively small, growing, medical company. As I watch them flail now (not because Iâm gone, but Iâd like to think so) Iâm so glad Iâm not in charge.
They started by offering free COVID tests to everyone. Period. No copay. If they could recoup some money from the patientsâ insurance then they would but nothing out of pocket for the visit. That was losing them a minimum of $10K/week in unclaimed visit costs - while they were still paying me full salary. After me telling them repeatedly they needed to charge, they finally did.
The clinics got some of the early rapid testing kits - then had to give them back after they were un-approved. So all the press theyâd done to say how they had them drove people to drop in - and be told no.
Then they got the routine testing straightened out, after jumping from one lab to another, and kept a few of the newly approved rapid tests in clinic for people needing urgent surgery, etc. But people kept showing up saying âI know you have rapid tests here.â And using up the very limited (maybe 3-4 swabs a day?) supply.
In the meantime, since there were the protests, and the people partying for the holiday, and people traveling to see relatives (Fatherâs Day), and people seeing the new reports...demand for even routine testing skyrocketed. When I spoke to people by Zoom, Iâd warn them that the turnaround time for tests is now 1-2 weeks.
âOh, then I need the rapid test because I canât return to work/fly home/take care of my mom until I get a result.â So do we rapid test those folks? Even the ones who come in saying âThe state Iâm flying to needs a negative result within 72 hours of the flight, but turnaround time is a week, so the only choice I have is rapid testing.â
And, if it takes a few days to a week to get an appointment in clinic, and then the testing takes a week to get an answer, the person whoâs thinking theyâre ill wonât get a definitive answer for two weeks. By then, theyâre likely OK.
So my replacement medical director has to answer to all those situations, telling the staff what they should do. Better him than me...
Interesting. Here is what I am wondering about testing: I am reading that with demands for testing growing exponentially in some states that test results are taking 5-7 days or more. I also read that professional sports teams can have players tested every other day with test results being returned 24-48 hours later. Is this just a matter of paying for quicker return times? Why is the Defense Production Act not being employed to require all labs to contract only with the federal government and eliminate these private contracts?
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2020 - 8:53pm |
|
I was medical director for a few months at a relatively small, growing, medical company. As I watch them flail now (not because Iâm gone, but Iâd like to think so) Iâm so glad Iâm not in charge. The pandemic hit months after I was gone.
They started by offering free COVID tests to everyone. Period. No copay. If they could recoup some money from the patientsâ insurance then they would but nothing out of pocket for the visit. That was losing them a minimum of $10K/week in unclaimed visit costs - while they were still paying me full salary. After me telling them repeatedly they needed to charge, they finally did.
The clinics got some of the early rapid testing kits - then had to give them back after they were un-approved. So all the press theyâd done to say how they had them drove people to drop in - and be told no.
Then they got the routine testing straightened out, after jumping from one lab to another, and kept a few of the newly approved rapid tests in clinic for people needing urgent surgery, etc. But people kept showing up saying âI know you have rapid tests here.â And using up the very limited (maybe 3-4 swabs a day?) supply.
In the meantime, since there were the protests, and the people partying for the holiday, and people traveling to see relatives (Fatherâs Day), and people seeing the new reports...demand for even routine testing skyrocketed. When I spoke to people by Zoom, Iâd warn them that the turnaround time for tests is now 1-2 weeks.
âOh, then I need the rapid test because I canât return to work/fly home/take care of my mom until I get a result.â So do we rapid test those folks? Even the ones who come in saying âThe state Iâm flying to needs a negative result within 72 hours of the flight, but turnaround time is a week, so the only choice I have is rapid testing.â
And, if it takes a few days to a week to get an appointment in clinic, and then the testing takes a week to get an answer, the person whoâs thinking theyâre ill wonât get a definitive answer for two weeks. By then, theyâre likely OK.
So my replacement medical director has to answer to all those situations, telling the staff what they should do. Better him than me...
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2020 - 10:53am |
|
|
|
Isabeau
Location: sou' tex Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2020 - 7:06pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote: "First we were encouraging Granny to take her chances. Now, we'd like your kids to be canaries in a coal mine. We're pro-life, but hee-ey, if ya gonna CO$T money, well, y'know, 'we all die someday.' But we'd appreciate it if you or a family member pays that $650,000.00 hospital bill before ya go . . . "
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2020 - 1:34pm |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2020 - 10:31am |
|
White House document shows 18 states in coronavirus âred zoneâUnpublicized recommendations say states should return to stringent control measures A document prepared for the White House Coronavirus Task Force but not publicized suggests more than a dozen states should revert to more stringent protective measures, limiting social gatherings to 10 people or fewer, closing bars and gyms and asking residents to wear masks at all times.
The document, dated July 14 and obtained by the Center for Public Integrity, says 18 states are in the âred zoneâ for COVID-19 cases, meaning they had more than 100 new cases per 100,000 population last week. Eleven states are in the âred zoneâ for test positivity, meaning more than 10 percent of diagnostic test results came back positive.
It includes county-level data and reflects the insistence of the Trump administration that states and counties should take the lead in responding to the coronavirus. The document has been shared within the federal government but does not appear to be posted publicly.
Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said he thought the information and recommendations were mostly good.
âThe fact that itâs not public makes no sense to me,â Jha said Thursday. âWhy are we hiding this information from the American people? This should be published and updated every day.â (...)
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2020 - 9:52am |
|
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 16, 2020 - 8:07pm |
|
Centivax Inc, the therapeutics spinout of Contract Research Organization Distributed Bio Inc, announced today that their antibody therapeutic protects hamsters from SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19-causing coronavirus. Confirmed simultaneously at two independent national laboratories, these results provide critical support for the antibody to move to clinical studies to protect and treat human patients. At the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in the Department of Defense (DoD), the Centivax lead antibody was administered to hamsters preventatively to protect against future exposures. The researchers found that the antibody protected the hamsters from COVID-19 symptoms and radically reduced the amount of the pathogenic virus in hamster lungs, even in immunocompromised hamsters. At the University of Texas Medical Branch/Galveston National Laboratory (UTMB/GNL) the Centivax lead antibody was administered as a therapeutic to previously infected hamsters: within 48 hours, the hamsters had a 97% reduction of virus in the lungs and significantly reduced lung damage. "Hamsters, like humans, can become infected and fall ill after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This is why hamsters are considered the gold standard to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutics to treat and prevent the novel coronavirus in humans," explains Dr. Sawsan Youssef, Chief Science Officer of Distributed Bio and Centivax. "This is a watershed moment for a COVID-19 therapy," says Dr. Jacob Glanville, Founder, CEO, and President of Centivax and Distributed Bio. "These two world-class laboratories came to the same robust conclusion: that we had generated neutralizing antibodies that successfully protected hamsters from the novel coronavirus. Independent validation of this kind is a cornerstone of good medical science. We move forward now with confidence into rapid clinical development of our human therapy."
hamsters are the gold standard? who knew
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 16, 2020 - 4:48pm |
|
buddy wrote:âThe President has said unmistakably that he wants schools to open ... and when he says âopenâ he means open and full, kids being able to attend each and every day at their school,â McEnany said at a press briefing. âThe science should not stand in the way of this.â ~ Kayleigh McEnany, White House Press Shill
âWe donât want CDC guidance to be a reason why people donât reopen their schools.â ~ Mike Pence, Vice Moron...playing Russian Roulette with COVID-19....
To be fair to her, I read that her full quote said listen to the science - she just lied and said the science supported opening the schools. Better?
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 15, 2020 - 6:26pm |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 15, 2020 - 4:13pm |
|
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 15, 2020 - 2:05pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: cc_rider wrote: R_P wrote: There are classes for those? Dang, I missed out. c. McConnell and Graham had apparently moved their "expert-level" classes to online platforms a few months ago. I guess Cruz and Conway TA for them... c.
|
|
|