Yes, they are interesting "secondary" findings but it seems like a leap to conclude that myocarditis risk can be "ten times higher" for vaccinated people than unvaccinated people. They would have to have had a control group of 42,000,000 unvaccinated or placebo subjects to verify such a claim. I imagine they just compared it to existing general population projections for myocarditis.
I can only guess you're right there. However... doctors (local GPs, not pro or against vaccination) are observing just that, as far as I can tell.
There may seem to be a significantly elevated risk of dying from the vaccines for young males, 30- or 40-minus years of age.
Their codebase only entails 42,200,614 people aged 13+, including 10,978,507 people receiving a third dose...
Yes, they are interesting "secondary" findings but it seems like a leap to conclude that myocarditis risk can be "ten times higher" for vaccinated people than unvaccinated people. They would have to have had a control group of 42,000,000 unvaccinated or placebo subjects to verify such a claim. I imagine they just compared it to existing general population projections for myocarditis.
A research group from Oxford University, which has been dealing with the side effects of Covid-19 vaccinations for some time, came to the conclusion in a study that for men under 40 the risk of heart muscle inflammation in connection with a corona infection is significantly higher for those who have been vaccinated than for the unvaccinated (more than 10x as high).
"These findings have important implications for public health and vaccination policy."
There is now a scientific consensus that vaccinations do not protect against infection with the omicron mutant. For young men under the age of 40, regardless of vaccination status, the risk of ending up in hell of damnation (ICU) because of a corona infection is minimal (almost zero). The thinking man under the age of 40 (possibly very active in sports) may now be wondering whether the overall balance of a vaccination is really positive for him in the end?
Anecdotal:
...my physician, whom I see monthly due to my illness told me, there never have been as many young men under the age of 30 who inexplicably died a sudden death, without any 'known cause', after being vaccinated against corona.
A friend's 16 y-o vaccinated nephew who, after competing in a soccer game went upstairs to rest, never made it back downstairs. This happened only six weeks ago.
so many things, but at least they put this part in bold:
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed . It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice."
A research group from Oxford University, which has been dealing with the side effects of Covid-19 vaccinations for some time, came to the conclusion in a study that for men under 40 the risk of heart muscle inflammation in connection with a corona infection is significantly higher for those who have been vaccinated than for the unvaccinated (more than 10x as high).
"These findings have important implications for public health and vaccination policy."
There is now a scientific consensus that vaccinations do not protect against infection with the omicron mutant. For young men under the age of 40, regardless of vaccination status, the risk of ending up in hell of damnation (ICU) because of a corona infection is minimal (almost zero). The thinking man under the age of 40 (possibly very active in sports) may now be wondering whether the overall balance of a vaccination is really positive for him in the end?
Anecdotal:
...my physician, whom I see monthly due to my illness told me, there never have been as many young men under the age of 30 who inexplicably died a sudden death, without any 'known cause', after being vaccinated against corona.
A friend's 16 y-o vaccinated nephew who, after competing in a soccer game went upstairs to rest, never made it back downstairs. This happened only six weeks ago.
Weird study (or I have yet to fully understand it).
Proportionately, a placebo subject is more likely to suffer adverse effects (AE) than a vaccinated subject. Strikes me as counterintuitive.
As for the public health policy implications, what are they? Hire a battery of counselors and psychologists to treat the vaccinated? Or pre-emptively send these professionals to the homes of the unvaccinated?
