[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

NY Times Strands - maryte - Dec 24, 2025 - 9:18am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - black321 - Dec 24, 2025 - 9:09am
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:59am
 
Trump - black321 - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:49am
 
Apple IOS app - Gomer - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:39am
 
Wordle - daily game - maryte - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:26am
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:06am
 
Just thoughts from a broad - kurtster - Dec 24, 2025 - 8:01am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Dec 24, 2025 - 7:47am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Dec 24, 2025 - 7:45am
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - GeneP59 - Dec 24, 2025 - 7:29am
 
Oil, Gas Prices & Other Crapola - kurtster - Dec 24, 2025 - 12:52am
 
(Big) Media Watch - kurtster - Dec 24, 2025 - 12:41am
 
Can we have the old app (8.3.0) back please? - ncollingridge - Dec 23, 2025 - 9:43pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Steely_D - Dec 23, 2025 - 9:12pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Dec 23, 2025 - 9:05pm
 
Australia and New Zealand Music - Coaxial - Dec 23, 2025 - 6:54pm
 
The Obituary Page - Steely_D - Dec 23, 2025 - 6:02pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Dec 23, 2025 - 5:13pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 23, 2025 - 4:02pm
 
CarPlay lost with v9 of the App - famepot - Dec 23, 2025 - 1:40pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Dec 23, 2025 - 1:14pm
 
December 2025 Photo Theme: STREET SCENES - oldviolin - Dec 23, 2025 - 1:13pm
 
Tesla Will Add Apple CarPlay - famepot - Dec 23, 2025 - 12:46pm
 
Russia - R_P - Dec 23, 2025 - 11:39am
 
First World Problems - Proclivities - Dec 23, 2025 - 9:46am
 
Bad language lyrics - chuck.h.johnson - Dec 23, 2025 - 8:27am
 
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App - BenHM3 - Dec 23, 2025 - 7:38am
 
Get the old app back - jimmyvail - Dec 23, 2025 - 6:42am
 
Latin Music - marko86 - Dec 23, 2025 - 5:45am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - olivertwist - Dec 23, 2025 - 4:33am
 
New App -no favourites - Kicking_Up_Dust - Dec 23, 2025 - 4:06am
 
You might be getting old if...... - SeriousLee - Dec 23, 2025 - 2:12am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - GeneP59 - Dec 22, 2025 - 8:20pm
 
For Jrzy! - Red_Dragon - Dec 22, 2025 - 4:45pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - Red_Dragon - Dec 22, 2025 - 4:35pm
 
Best Funk ? - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 3:05pm
 
Surveillance - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 2:49pm
 
Venezuela - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 2:26pm
 
Name My Band - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 2:18pm
 
Troll's Den - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 2:11pm
 
Israel - R_P - Dec 22, 2025 - 2:00pm
 
Jam! (why should a song stop) - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 1:43pm
 
Post your favorite 'You Tube' Videos Here - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 1:29pm
 
Prog Rockers Anonymous - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 1:20pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 12:58pm
 
Krautrock - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 12:45pm
 
BACK TO THE 80's - Honnie - Dec 22, 2025 - 12:36pm
 
Cinema - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 12:32pm
 
Britain - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 12:22pm
 
Live Music - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 11:51am
 
Five best albums of all time - lovehonk - Dec 22, 2025 - 11:41am
 
Jazz Jazz - joxmox - Dec 22, 2025 - 11:03am
 
Living in America - joxmox - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:57am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - joxmox - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:21am
 
Grumpy Old Men - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:11am
 
TWO WORDS - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:06am
 
J.D. Vance - Steely_D - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:03am
 
Recommendation for Funk Fans - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 10:01am
 
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK! - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 9:58am
 
Rock mix / repitition - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 9:31am
 
Rock Rock - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 9:24am
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 8:47am
 
Introducing Funkatized - mannixj - Dec 22, 2025 - 7:27am
 
By jimminy! Cricket! - Jiggz - Dec 21, 2025 - 9:09pm
 
Beer - Steely_D - Dec 21, 2025 - 3:12pm
 
China - R_P - Dec 21, 2025 - 2:01pm
 
Republican Party - ColdMiser - Dec 21, 2025 - 1:35pm
 
Are you ready for some football? - SeriousLee - Dec 21, 2025 - 1:26pm
 
Spambags on RP - Proclivities - Dec 21, 2025 - 5:39am
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - haresfur - Dec 21, 2025 - 1:45am
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - Dec 20, 2025 - 8:06pm
 
African radio - jimmyvail - Dec 20, 2025 - 1:41pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Dec 20, 2025 - 12:59pm
 
Hello lover... - joxmox - Dec 20, 2025 - 12:26pm
 
Index » Internet/Computer » The Web » Economix Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 218, 219, 220  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 10, 2025 - 2:08pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 19, 2025 - 3:51pm

⬇️

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 17, 2025 - 7:53pm


rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2025 - 10:49am

This is somewhere between fantasy and delusion....



The price of everything is going up.  Energy prices were a huge issue in the NJ election...and not because they're going down.

Prices were going down under Biden...and then Trump deployed the tariffs.

Trump is a babbling fool when talking about economic policy, and nobody in his party dares to engage.   They are going to get hammered next November... because 2026 is going to be painful.





black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 6, 2025 - 7:46am

 R_P wrote:



Looking deeper...this mostly reflects AMZN's 3rd party sellers - small retailers who sell on Amzn. Obviously they are the most to be impacted by tariffs, rising costs. Interesting though most of the AMZN increase was before the tariffs went into place. Regardless, the days of Amzn being a price leader are long gone...they are all about convenience. 
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 5, 2025 - 3:37pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 3, 2025 - 7:16pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 25, 2025 - 6:09pm


Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 23, 2025 - 9:53am

The New Buzzword That’s Scaring China


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 22, 2025 - 5:35pm

Glibertarian 🤡 meets reality, calls sugar daddy


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 12:13pm

 black321 wrote:

per that article, it is trending up a bit to about 43% but down from 65% in the 90s


I had recently read somewhere about how there are fewer municipalities which have efficient recycling programs in place than there were 20-30 years ago.  Apparently costs for recycling have dramatically increased in some areas and some municipalities can't afford it as part of their infrastructure or just decide to cut it out for other reasons.  Not just for aluminum, but for paper, glass, and plastics as well.  Though I don't think very much plastic gets recycled, domestically or shipped off elsewhere.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 9:53am

 rgio wrote:

Given that only a tiny percentage of cans are recycled now...

per that article, it is trending up a bit to about 43% but down from 65% in the 90s

rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 9:47am

 black321 wrote:
right, even though burned off, those labels can contaminate the aluminum and apparently could even confuse the recycling facility into thinking the can is plastic.
possible win/win to have the brewery use labels that are easily removed and returnable...or switch to paper labels, which are less of a problem.

This is a problem the can companies will fix if it's worth doing.

When COVID hit, they changed their pricing/ordering to require much larger custom orders.  From memory, it went from 10,000 cans to 100,000 cans if you wanted "printed cans".  That drove all of the mid-sized brewers to the stickers that only micros used.

Given that only a tiny percentage of cans are recycled now...it's sort of a "who cares" issue.  If can producers star looking for advantage in recycling... they'd find a solution.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 9:40am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Most micro beer cans these days have thick plasticky or mylar labels glued on, which in some cases causes problems. So anyway you can peel those off and should, probably.



right, even though burned off, those labels can contaminate the aluminum and apparently could even confuse the recycling facility into thinking the can is plastic.
possible win/win to have the brewery use labels that are easily removed and returnable...or switch to paper labels, which are less of a problem.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 9:32am

 black321 wrote:

Obviously not chubby's intent, but perhaps something good can come out of the tariff nonsense. 

America Doesn’t Have an Aluminum Shortage. It’s Just Sitting in Your Garbage.

  • The impact of President Trump’s 50% tariff on imported aluminum can be reduced by increased recycling, according to executives and analysts.
  • U.S. aluminum prices have hit a record relative to global prices, affecting beverage and auto companies, like Molson Coors and Ford.
  • To reduce reliance on imports, the U.S. could improve recycling habits and build more recycling plants.

CASSOPOLIS, Mich.—The way around President Trump’s 50% tariff on imported aluminum might be sitting in your garbage.

But Americans will have to do a lot more recycling, metals executives and analysts say, for the U.S. to break its reliance on imported aluminum. Even with such a high trade barrier, they give long odds to a domestic smelting revival.

“Recycling is the answer,” said Duncan Pitchford, who leads Norsk Hydro’s NHY 0.95%increase; green up pointing triangle upstream aluminum business in the U.S. “The metal is already here.”

https://www.wsj.com/finance/co...



Most micro beer cans these days have thick plasticky or mylar labels glued on, which in some cases causes problems. So anyway you can peel those off and should, probably.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2025 - 9:24am

Obviously not chubby's intent, but perhaps something good can come out of the tariff nonsense. 

America Doesn’t Have an Aluminum Shortage. It’s Just Sitting in Your Garbage.

  • The impact of President Trump’s 50% tariff on imported aluminum can be reduced by increased recycling, according to executives and analysts.
  • U.S. aluminum prices have hit a record relative to global prices, affecting beverage and auto companies, like Molson Coors and Ford.
  • To reduce reliance on imports, the U.S. could improve recycling habits and build more recycling plants.

CASSOPOLIS, Mich.—The way around President Trump’s 50% tariff on imported aluminum might be sitting in your garbage.

But Americans will have to do a lot more recycling, metals executives and analysts say, for the U.S. to break its reliance on imported aluminum. Even with such a high trade barrier, they give long odds to a domestic smelting revival.

“Recycling is the answer,” said Duncan Pitchford, who leads Norsk Hydro’s NHY 0.95%increase; green up pointing triangle upstream aluminum business in the U.S. “The metal is already here.”

https://www.wsj.com/finance/co...







R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 22, 2025 - 3:42pm



rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 22, 2025 - 1:33pm

 Proclivities wrote:

Well, I guess they do publish relatively truthy stuff on occasion.  I had read that ten-year CBO projection elsewhere but the top of the tweet seems pretty accurate as well: as you (and everyone should) know, American consumers ultimately pay those tariffs, despite what Trump - and even Lutnick - claim.  Of course, last week, Trump even claimed that â€œTrillions of dollars are being taken in on tariffs”.


Appreciating that Trump is firing people who publish numbers he doesn't like...

From the CBO page:

As of August 19, we estimate that the effective tariff rate for goods imported into the United States has increased by about 18 percentage points when measured against 2024 trade flows. We project that increases in tariffs implemented during the period from January 6, 2025, to August 19 will decrease primary deficits (which exclude net outlays for interest) by $3.3 trillion if the higher tariffs persist for the 2025‒2035 period. By reducing the need for federal borrowing, those tariff collections will also reduce federal outlays for interest by an additional $0.7 trillion. As a result, the changes in tariffs will reduce total deficits by $4.0 trillion altogether.

So they are taking credit for both the payment, and the interest avoided by making the payment.   That's like buying something with your credit card, and claiming you saved money because you paid off the balance.

The details aren't yet available (September release), but like Trumps tax cuts in term #1, there is surely some very healthy economic growth driving the tariff revenues. When prices go up, consumption goes down....but somehow these miraculous tariffs only raise revenue and fix trade imbalances.

There is no way the numbers work....but "the best people" are now in charge of the reporting, so what could possibly go wrong?
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 22, 2025 - 1:13pm

 R_P wrote:

Please point out what's wrong with the tweet regardless of the source.

Tariffs will lower deficits by $4 trillion over a decade, CBO says

Well, I guess they do publish relatively truthy stuff on occasion.  I had read that ten-year CBO projection elsewhere but the top of the tweet seems more accurate: as you (and everyone should) know, American consumers ultimately pay those tariffs, despite what Trump - and even Lutnick - claim.  Of course, last week, Trump even claimed that “Trillions of dollars are being taken in on tariffs”.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 22, 2025 - 12:41pm

 Proclivities wrote:
Ah yes, Leading Report.

Please point out what's wrong with the tweet regardless of the source.

Tariffs will lower deficits by $4 trillion over a decade, CBO says


Also read some Chomsky so you'll know that most approved (corporate) sources are problematic in one way or another.
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 218, 219, 220  Next