[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
 
Breaking News - Steely_D - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10am
 
Ukraine - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:36am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 27, 2024 - 10:58pm
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 27, 2024 - 8:52pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 7:40pm
 
Trump - kurtster - Mar 27, 2024 - 7:38pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Mar 27, 2024 - 5:08pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Wordle - daily game - JrzyTmata - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:04pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - miamizsun - Mar 27, 2024 - 2:44pm
 
NY Times Strands - rgio - Mar 27, 2024 - 2:14pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Mar 27, 2024 - 8:23am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Mar 27, 2024 - 7:51am
 
Motivational Office Cliches... - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - miamizsun - Mar 26, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
Israel - R_P - Mar 26, 2024 - 12:24pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 12:04pm
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Mar 26, 2024 - 12:02pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
 
Food - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 7:30pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 25, 2024 - 6:56pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
 
China - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
 
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b... - jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and... - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
Orbiting Earth - oldviolin - Mar 24, 2024 - 9:42am
 
Basketball - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
 
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers - sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:29pm
 
Can you afford to retire? - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - blt - Mar 21, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 21, 2024 - 7:11am
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Proclivities - Mar 20, 2024 - 9:33am
 
2024 Elections! - Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
 
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App - jarro - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:15am
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
 
Irony 101 - Proclivities - Mar 19, 2024 - 6:02am
 
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great" - miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
 
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone - Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
 
Damn Dinosaurs! - oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
Great guitar faces - skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Despots, dictators and war criminals - R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
 
Uploading Music - dischuckin - Mar 18, 2024 - 11:55am
 
Media Matters - thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
 
NASA & other news from space - miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
 
MEALTICKET - drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
 
Apple Computer - GeneP59 - Mar 16, 2024 - 12:02pm
 
Environment - R_P - Mar 16, 2024 - 11:18am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43  Next
Post to this Topic
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


We're also going to do away with arcane permitting rules that require people to have a grid connection too right?  There have been incentives and subsidies for all the traditional sources for decades to force their adoption. We now know (we knew then too) that there are substantial issues with those sources, but they were there supporting the right politicians, so the rules were made. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:59am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


Hmm, not having solar i wasnt aware there were zoning issues...though not surprised as trying to add even a 10x12 deck requires months of paperwork and thousands of $. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:58am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


now you're talking.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:56am

 black321 wrote:
Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills?

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:52am

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:45am

 Lazy8 wrote:

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.


ok, when I have time, I'll look into the energy budget of windmills. I do know they are technically challenging and high maintenance. But I am still surprised at the sheer scale of wind energy output. I live here and it is not like the entire landscape is littered with the damn things, not more than any other major infrastructure.

I know you hate the distortion of government incentives (for good reason) but renewables are certainly not the only energy sector to have benefited from them. Nuclear, coal and oil & gas have too over the years. 

Anyways,  a cursory look at solar shows that a panel assuming an  average daily generation of 2kW will have produced more power than was needed to build it within the first 1000 hours of operation and will keep running pretty well maintenance free for years to come.   Sounds like a winning formula to me.

So it's not all chasing windmills or unicorns.
And the oil&gas lobby has been strangely quiet on the opportunity cost of their particular business for, how long now, um, maybe forever. It is not just climate change, but land use, air quality, radiation in the tailings, environmental impact, high fatality and accident rates, etc. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:39am

Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills? 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:31am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload.

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 9:16pm

 haresfur wrote:


One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 


tbh, 20 years ago as the whole wind thing was starting to stoke investor interest here (because of tax breaks) I was thinking, yeah, good to have, but, you know, unicorns. 

I am actually surprised  that so much of Germany's power now comes from renewables. Never thought it would happen at that scale or so quickly. 
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 4:18pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 



One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 3:15pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.


of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 2:24pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 11:08am

 Lazy8 wrote:

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 8:54am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The German energy charts are fascinating.  

Renewables are really making a massive impact with the share of coal constantly declining. And this was a week at the end of winter/beginning of spring. 
The cloudy days of no wind are still the issue (see March 20) But otherwise,  renewables are performing brilliantly. Now all we need is more pumped storage to cover those gaps.

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 1:32am

The German energy charts are fascinating.  

Renewables are really making a massive impact with the share of coal constantly declining. And this was a week at the end of winter/beginning of spring. 
The cloudy days of no wind are still the issue (see March 20) But otherwise,  renewables are performing brilliantly. Now all we need is more pumped storage to cover those gaps.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2024 - 12:08pm

 islander wrote:


Germany has some interesting power things going. They were very creative and went after some novel ideas. Most of them have been pretty successful. The idea of a widely distributed production grid is a really solid idea if you have the back end to manage it (and they do). 

We see some pretty scary DIY too, but I'm generally impressed by most peoples enthusiasm for the ideas. I do wish there were less 'kookery' and conspiratorial thinking in the space, but
it is what it is.  I also wish the DIY crews weren't heavily overlapped with the generally the anti-establishment/anti-elite education set. It makes it really hard to get people to sit down and do the initial math, and understand what is underlying the systems they are putting together (Why am I not getting 100 Watts of power when I put a 100W light bulb over my solar panel?). 

20K is about right for a moderately sized household (depends on how big those 23 panels are and what fun widgets they put on the system). For that to be a 20 year payoff would mean his electric bills would be under a $100 a month.  And within 20 years, he will probably need a battery replacement.  


That's interesting, thanks. And kind of confirms what I was suspecting. 
In terms of ROI it is kind of hard to beat these DIY "balcony power plant" solutions. Maybe four panels instead of two (which would equal 8KW on a good day) . That would probably cover all the low-end appliances and have a bit left over for the high-end devices (oven, washing machine, etc.) provided, of course you wash/bake bread when the sun shines. For 4k upfront investment, it's worth a try. 

I helped him bolt it onto his house and was seriously impressed that you just needed to plug this thing into a normal socket and not worry about anything else. Like, is that it? srsly?

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2024 - 7:41am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


The government (here in Germany) has changed the laws for precisely that reason. They have made it dead easy to put up a couple of panels on your balcony and just plug the inverter into one of your local house sockets. My neighbour invested less than €2k for two panels and an inverter. It also has a nifty app with it for you to monitor your power production. I know nothing about how power actually flows within the house, but the theory is you need to draw less from the town supply and any excess gets put into the national grid (they get it for free). On a good day he says he gets 4kWh out of it. I am waiting to see his power bill after a year to see how much he actually has saved. My instinct says adding a battery would be the way to go, but that adds a huge amount to the bill.

Another neighbour freaked at the DIY jobs and signed a contract with a proper solar outfit for 20k (about 23 panels and battery) but they haven't got around to building it yet. I reckon it's going to take him about 20 years to pay that off. 



Germany has some interesting power things going. They were very creative and went after some novel ideas. Most of them have been pretty successful. The idea of a widely distributed production grid is a really solid idea if you have the back end to manage it (and they do). 

We see some pretty scary DIY too, but I'm generally impressed by most peoples enthusiasm for the ideas. I do wish there were less 'kookery' and conspiratorial thinking in the space, but
it is what it is.  I also wish the DIY crews weren't heavily overlapped with the generally the anti-establishment/anti-elite education set. It makes it really hard to get people to sit down and do the initial math, and understand what is underlying the systems they are putting together (Why am I not getting 100 Watts of power when I put a 100W light bulb over my solar panel?). 

20K is about right for a moderately sized household (depends on how big those 23 panels are and what fun widgets they put on the system). For that to be a 20 year payoff would mean his electric bills would be under a $100 a month.  And within 20 years, he will probably need a battery replacement.  
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Mar 21, 2024 - 11:51am

Solar panel prices to remain low for up to two years, says industry exec

China produces 80% of the globe's solar panels.  Economies of scale matter.   This is important for addressing Anthropogenic climate disruption, assuming that actually matters.

Or should the USA continue to demonize China in a pathetic attempt to divert attention from its own atrocious human rights record in Greater Israel and the Mid-East in general?   

Perhaps the USA should push a wimpy ally like Canada to arrest another executive of an important Chinese multinational company?   Recall that Huawei had business dealings with Iran, a country that opposes the Israeli nation building project built on ethnic cleansing and terrorism.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 21, 2024 - 11:44am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


A friend of mine here in town is a tinkerer and started installing solar 10 or 12 years ago. He's down to about 5% from the City now, net, sells his overage to the grid. Pays the connection fee for the same reason as you. The city is part of a consortium of city-owned power grids that's managed by a board appointed by the various city councils but operates independently—and now that board is proposing to go to a sell all/buy all policy, where all power generated must be sold to the grid at wholesale and bought at retail. So that would push the solar savings down from 95% to maybe 35%. So of course my friend told the city he'd just buy a generator to cover the few times when demand spikes, and get off the grid. Of course there's a law on the books that says all houses in town must be on the grid so he's pretty sure that if it comes to that, he'll fight.



I knew someone in a similar situation. They basically disconnected from the grid, but maintained a small ~5 watt power load. It was small enough to not add much cost to the monthly minimum. But it also forced the utility to maintain the connection to their demark, and made them send a bill and other internal support stuff. Basically just made themself a nuisance. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 21, 2024 - 11:32am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


A friend of mine here in town is a tinkerer and started installing solar 10 or 12 years ago. He's down to about 5% from the City now, net, sells his overage to the grid. Pays the connection fee for the same reason as you. The city is part of a consortium of city-owned power grids that's managed by a board appointed by the various city councils but operates independently—and now that board is proposing to go to a sell all/buy all policy, where all power generated must be sold to the grid at wholesale and bought at retail. So that would push the solar savings down from 95% to maybe 35%. So of course my friend told the city he'd just buy a generator to cover the few times when demand spikes, and get off the grid. Of course there's a law on the books that says all houses in town must be on the grid so he's pretty sure that if it comes to that, he'll fight.



The government (here in Germany) has changed the laws for precisely that reason. They have made it dead easy to put up a couple of panels on your balcony and just plug the inverter into one of your local house sockets. My neighbour invested less than €2k for two panels and an inverter. It also has a nifty app with it for you to monitor your power production. I know nothing about how power actually flows within the house, but the theory is you need to draw less from the town supply and any excess gets put into the national grid (they get it for free). On a good day he says he gets 4kWh out of it. I am waiting to see his power bill after a year to see how much he actually has saved. My instinct says adding a battery would be the way to go, but that adds a huge amount to the bill.

Another neighbour freaked at the DIY jobs and signed a contract with a proper solar outfit for 20k (about 23 panels and battery) but they haven't got around to building it yet. I reckon it's going to take him about 20 years to pay that off. 

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43  Next