[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jan 19, 2022 - 6:14am
 
Wordle - daily game - marko86 - Jan 19, 2022 - 5:53am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 19, 2022 - 5:30am
 
COVID-19 - Red_Dragon - Jan 19, 2022 - 5:23am
 
Britain - Red_Dragon - Jan 19, 2022 - 4:57am
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Jan 19, 2022 - 4:26am
 
Russia - miamizsun - Jan 19, 2022 - 4:25am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Manbird - Jan 18, 2022 - 7:28pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jan 18, 2022 - 6:14pm
 
What happened to Radio Paradise? - ScottN - Jan 18, 2022 - 4:10pm
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - black321 - Jan 18, 2022 - 3:10pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Jan 18, 2022 - 2:36pm
 
New Music - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2022 - 2:35pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2022 - 1:25pm
 
Beer - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2022 - 12:59pm
 
A lot of 'obscure' repetition lately? - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2022 - 12:49pm
 
Pictures that are total crap - Manbird - Jan 18, 2022 - 12:44pm
 
Germany - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jan 18, 2022 - 12:33pm
 
Coffee - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 10:20am
 
Bowie fans, check this out - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 10:10am
 
Floyd forum - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 9:37am
 
Prog Rockers Anonymous - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 9:32am
 
North Korea - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 8:57am
 
How's the weather? - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2022 - 8:42am
 
Italy - Ohmsen - Jan 18, 2022 - 8:41am
 
Patrick Watson should play on RP - jsricher - Jan 18, 2022 - 8:39am
 
Food Democracy - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2022 - 4:16am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2022 - 3:57am
 
The Obituary Page - kurtster - Jan 17, 2022 - 8:30pm
 
Thank you, RP! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 17, 2022 - 8:16pm
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Jan 17, 2022 - 1:30pm
 
Something for my fellow hippies. - haresfur - Jan 17, 2022 - 12:22pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - oldviolin - Jan 17, 2022 - 12:20pm
 
World Music - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 17, 2022 - 11:07am
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Jan 17, 2022 - 10:00am
 
Sunrise, Sunset - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 17, 2022 - 6:50am
 
Religion - kurtster - Jan 17, 2022 - 12:12am
 
What Did You See Today? - Steely_D - Jan 16, 2022 - 8:26pm
 
volcano! - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jan 16, 2022 - 11:56am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Jan 15, 2022 - 10:22pm
 
Climate Change - helenofjoy - Jan 15, 2022 - 1:21pm
 
See This Film - islander - Jan 15, 2022 - 11:34am
 
Florida - Red_Dragon - Jan 15, 2022 - 9:28am
 
Hard Core Trivia - Manbird - Jan 14, 2022 - 4:51pm
 
Who is that guy? - Manbird - Jan 14, 2022 - 3:36pm
 
Yes - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2022 - 2:48pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jan 14, 2022 - 2:30pm
 
New RP listener - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2022 - 1:36pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - Jan 14, 2022 - 12:44pm
 
Think About It - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2022 - 11:45am
 
Media Matters - Red_Dragon - Jan 14, 2022 - 11:38am
 
let it spin!! - oldviolin - Jan 14, 2022 - 10:46am
 
Is Wikipedia Objective? - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2022 - 10:17am
 
Remembering the Good Old Days - Steely_D - Jan 14, 2022 - 8:23am
 
Ukraine - black321 - Jan 14, 2022 - 8:11am
 
OUR CATS!! - sunybuny - Jan 14, 2022 - 5:52am
 
Baseball, anyone? - rgio - Jan 14, 2022 - 5:01am
 
Those Lovable Policemen - Lazy8 - Jan 13, 2022 - 9:46pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jan 13, 2022 - 9:44pm
 
Automotive Lust - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2022 - 3:12pm
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Jan 13, 2022 - 10:30am
 
Terrorist Watch! - Ohmsen - Jan 13, 2022 - 10:26am
 
WTF??!! - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 13, 2022 - 10:12am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - fractalv - Jan 12, 2022 - 8:16pm
 
What the hell OV? - Manbird - Jan 12, 2022 - 3:39pm
 
What is the meaning of this? - Manbird - Jan 12, 2022 - 3:37pm
 
Trump - Steely_D - Jan 12, 2022 - 1:57pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - Ohmsen - Jan 12, 2022 - 5:36am
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - miamizsun - Jan 12, 2022 - 5:00am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jan 11, 2022 - 6:52pm
 
• • • Things Magicians Exclaim • • •  - Red_Dragon - Jan 11, 2022 - 6:37pm
 
Word of the Day - miamizsun - Jan 11, 2022 - 5:19pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - miamizsun - Jan 11, 2022 - 5:09pm
 
Batman Begins - Manbird - Jan 11, 2022 - 3:50pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jan 11, 2022 - 12:45pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Race in America Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 70, 71, 72  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2022 - 6:14pm

More than 1,700 congressmen once enslaved Black people. This is who they were, and how they shaped the nation.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 3, 2022 - 4:42am

well this is a bit surprising...
i doubt anyone will go back and look at this now
kmele foster interviews amy cooper and discusses with bari weiss 
foster was especially enlightened after he listened to the entire 911 call
i decided to listen to the podcast in the background while working
turns out christian cooper has initiated this kind of confrontation before

The Real Story of “The Central Park Karen”

New evidence comes to light. And Amy Cooper breaks her silence.

 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 2, 2022 - 2:48pm

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Dec 10, 2021 - 2:05pm

Black Lives Matter stands with Jussie Smollett after verdict, but Don Lemon does not

Well, at least the members of BLM and Trump supporters have something in common.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 10, 2021 - 1:32pm

Could have also put this in the What Makes You Laugh...HA!

Black Lives Matter is still standing with Jussie Smollett after the actor was convicted Thursday of staging a racist, homophobic attack and lying to police about it.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Dec 6, 2021 - 12:10pm

 kurtster wrote:

You're missing my point which is purely about a definition.  I am not advocating for boycotts or anything else if that is what you think was my point.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter is doing just that.
.
Black Lives Matter calls for month-long boycott of 'white companies' during the holiday season to support 'Black Xmas' and end 'White-supremacist-capitalism'

Not particularly impressed with Black Lives Matter. That said, I fully support the notion that oppressed visible minorities have an inherent right to hurt their own.   Maybe BLM would like to bring Robert Mugabe back from the grave to help make Black people in North America suffer? 

The BLM trash in Toronto recently got involved in a debate that saw the Green Party of Canada implode.   The spokesperson for BLM (Canada) expressed support for the anti-Semitic ethnic cleansing of the Holy Lands. 

Fellow anti-Arab terrorists in North America should rejoice at this source of political support for a greater and more glorious Israel with its lovely discourse of cultural superiority.

After that, it is hard not to think of BLM Canada as just more vocal racist trash.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 6, 2021 - 11:47am

“It’s an allegation as old as America — a sex-crazed Black man accused of attacking a white woman — and it came in Shelby County, the jurisdiction with the most recorded lynchings in the state’s history and a disproportionate number of death sentences.”

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 2, 2021 - 11:19am


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 2, 2021 - 7:13am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
I understand your point entirely. ,

 so any marginalised groups should either shut up or leave.
 
That is not my point.

You cannot have a meaningful conversation without first agreeing on definitions used in the conversation.

Conflate away and prevent a meaningful discussion from happening.

I give up.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 2, 2021 - 6:41am

 kurtster wrote:

You're missing my point which is purely about a definition.  I am not advocating for boycotts or anything else if that is what you think was my point.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter is doing just that.
.
Black Lives Matter calls for month-long boycott of 'white companies' during the holiday season to support 'Black Xmas' and end 'White-supremacist-capitalism'


I understand your point entirely. Which is to state that the US is not racist by definition, so any marginalised groups should either shut up or leave.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 2, 2021 - 5:53am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Which is all well and good, but wonderfully beside the point. 

The issue here is to get everyone on board, including marginalised groups. All of the semantic bullshit going on between members of the dominant culture as to whether they or their systems are racist or discriminatory under their own definitions and which definitions apply is all well and good but is not going to do anything to get marginalised groups on board, if all you want them to do at the end of the day is suck it up and shut up anyway.

It gets worse when the institutions are designed to be fair and equal but are demonstrably exercised in ways that are not. Then your credibility is shot so you can talk till you are blue in the face.

Not very helpful. 
 
You're missing my point which is purely about a definition.  I am not advocating for boycotts or anything else if that is what you think was my point.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter is doing just that.
.
Black Lives Matter calls for month-long boycott of 'white companies' during the holiday season to support 'Black Xmas' and end 'White-supremacist-capitalism'
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 2, 2021 - 1:23am

 kurtster wrote:

What people do is different from what they are.

Discrimination by what people do is perfectly legal.  Boycotts for example.

Fail.  Try again.
 
Which is all well and good, but wonderfully beside the point. 

The issue here is to get everyone on board, including marginalised groups. All of the semantic bullshit going on between members of the dominant culture as to whether they or their systems are racist or discriminatory under their own definitions and which definitions apply is all well and good but is not going to do anything to get marginalised groups on board, if all you want them to do at the end of the day is suck it up and shut up anyway.

It gets worse when the institutions are designed to be fair and equal but are demonstrably exercised in ways that are not. Then your credibility is shot so you can talk till you are blue in the face.

Not very helpful. 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 8:37pm

 R_P wrote:
ethnic: of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic, or cultural origin or background  kurtster wrote:

In the USA for those paying attention, discrimination by race is prohibited by law.  Discrimination using cultural differences is not.

 
What people do is different from what they are.

Discrimination by what people do is perfectly legal.  Boycotts for example.

Fail.  Try again.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 8:22pm

ethnic: of or relating to large groups of people classed according to common racial, national, tribal, religious, linguistic, or cultural origin or background

 kurtster wrote:

In the USA for those paying attention, discrimination by race is prohibited by law.  Discrimination using cultural differences is not.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 7:38pm

 Red_Dragon wrote:
 R_P wrote:

ACLU: pure pinko, lefty bullshit. 
 
Fail, again.

You two are quite lacking in your abilities to differentiate between culture and ethnicity. 

You are trying to conflate two completely different things in order to justify your claims.
.
cul·ture

noun
1.
the arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively.
"20th century popular culture"
Similar: the arts, the humanities, intellectual achievement(s), intellectual activity, literature, music, painting, philosophy
2.
the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group.

Racial and Ethnic Categories

In 1997, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued the Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. See, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards. These standards are commonly used for federal data collection purposes, not only in the decennial census, but also in household surveys, on administrative forms (e.g., school registration and mortgage lending applications), and in medical and clinical research. The revised standards contain five minimum categories for race: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White. There are two categories for ethnicity: "Hispanic or Latino" and "Not Hispanic or Latino."

Definitions for Racial and Ethnic Categories

The Revisions to OMB Directive 15 defines each racial and ethnic category as follows:

American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.

Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Black or African American. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Terms such as "Haitian" or "Negro" can be used in addition to "Black or African American."

Hispanic or Latino. A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. The term, "Spanish origin," can be used in addition to "Hispanic or Latino."

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

White. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

The categories and definitions provide a common language to promote uniformity and comparability of data on race and ethnicity. Moreover, federal agencies have a continuing commitment to monitor the operation of its review and award processes to detect, and deal appropriately with, any instances of real or apparent inequities. All analyses conducted on race and ethnicity report aggregate statistical findings and do not identify individuals.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 10:03am

 R_P wrote:

ACLU: pure pinko, lefty bullshit. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 9:48am

 kurtster wrote:

In the USA for those paying attention, discrimination by race is prohibited by law.  Discrimination using cultural differences is not.


Nope.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 6:57am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
So all my argument is about is how to come up with a shared vision, let's just say basic agreement on fundamental rights that we all respect. Some kind of pan-cultural accord. 
All this is about is listening to the voices of other cultures (and their biases) and also owning up to your own so as to facilitate that accord.  All too frequently the dominant culture automatically assumes it has universality because it is the dominant one. While understandable, that is simply wrong and won't get us anywhere towards a universal accord.
 
how do we define that? or how do we define fundamental rights?

on a broad moral and ethical level the challenge we have is dealing with authoritarians/dictators

should those in power be able to edit and control information to push an agenda or dangerous belief system?

clearly if we look around we see differing definitions of the same words/rhetoric (intentional political/religious distortions?)

people in power and seeking more power over peaceful people, exercising higher claims by force, coercion or the threat of violence on another's life, freedom and property (the most basic human rights)
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 1, 2021 - 12:46am

 kurtster wrote:
Before I address some individual thoughts it seems that there has been a conflation of racism and cultural bias made.  They are two distinctly different things.  People of the same race may and do have many different cultures.  To infer that one certain culture is exclusive to one race is racist in itself.

In the USA for those paying attention, discrimination by race is prohibited by law.  Discrimination using cultural differences is not.

To the melting pot, it is the act of all races embracing one set of cultural norms.  A commonality or society with a legal framework as in the case of the USA.

There is no country on this planet that is more diverse than the USA.  Individuals may express variations of a culture they embrace as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.  It may offend others, but if that is all it does and does not impose anything else other than discomfort then the offended should yield gracefully and live and let live.  Being offended gives no one a right to physically act on it.  They may be offensive in return but that is fair.  Inciting others to be offended (or hate) as the originally offended is / are and to act out on it is crossing a line however, imho.  Isn't this how freedom of religion is supposed to work ?

But back to the conflation of race and culture.  I believe that they need to be considered separately in order to discuss the issues of race properly.  
 
Hey, some good points Kurtster!

re conflation of racism and cultural bias, scroll back where I talk of two different kinds of racism. The "Type 2" is what you would call cultural bias and you are not wrong, it is, in effect, merely cultural bias, but one frequently tied to national and racial identity so that you can't cleanly separate the two. 

Note that none of the arguments I am using are pejorative or moral. This discussion arose from Westslope's comment that we need a shared vision for all to buy into and my reply that that also needs to be as elastic as possible to allow a lot of wiggle room for individual liberties. (BTW this also includes wiggle room for other cultural identities.) 

So all my argument is about is how to come up with a shared vision, let's just say basic agreement on fundamental rights that we all respect. Some kind of pan-cultural accord. 
All this is about is listening to the voices of other cultures (and their biases) and also owning up to your own so as to facilitate that accord.  All too frequently the dominant culture automatically assumes it has universality because it is the dominant one. While understandable, that is simply wrong and won't get us anywhere towards a universal accord.

but if that is all it does and does not impose anything else other than discomfort then the offended should yield gracefully and live and let live.
hmm, now wouldn't that be a good idea.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2021 - 7:36pm

Before I address some individual thoughts it seems that there has been a conflation of racism and cultural bias made.  They are two distinctly different things.  People of the same race may and do have many different cultures.  To infer that one certain culture is exclusive to one race is racist in itself.

In the USA for those paying attention, discrimination by race is prohibited by law.  Discrimination using cultural differences is not.

To the melting pot, it is the act of all races embracing one set of cultural norms.  A commonality or society with a legal framework as in the case of the USA.

There is no country on this planet that is more diverse than the USA.  Individuals may express variations of a culture they embrace as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.  It may offend others, but if that is all it does and does not impose anything else other than discomfort then the offended should yield gracefully and live and let live.  Being offended gives no one a right to physically act on it.  They may be offensive in return but that is fair.  Inciting others to be offended (or hate) as the originally offended is / are and to act out on it is crossing a line however, imho.  Isn't this how freedom of religion is supposed to work ?

But back to the conflation of race and culture.  I believe that they need to be considered separately in order to discuss the issues of race properly.  
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 70, 71, 72  Next