Red_Dragon wrote: 
You are clueless.  It makes total sense to me.  Iran is almost toast.  If you don't ask, you don't get.  This is common sense 101.

I'll go on record right now supporting using the MOB's on Iran's nuclear facility.  To not do so would make everything else pointless.

I have heard that the ayatollah is looking to split and find sanctuary in another country.

I have seen video of the evacuation of Tehran.  Looks like what you see for a hurricane.  All in one direction. 

People are listening, the leaders (those still alive) are losing their grasp of the country.

This is not the beginning of WW III.  This is the prevention.

Trump is demanding the "unconditional surrender" of a country we are not at war with. He's a complete idiot.

 black321 wrote:

It's still a grift.

flip, flop... lather, rinse, repeat

 Red_Dragon wrote:

actually, phones are currently exempt.

 Red_Dragon wrote:

The best corruption with the biggliest grift.

 VV wrote:

Stuffed on Trump Steaks and bathing in Trump Water while flying on Trump Airlines on his way to classes at Trump University.

The grifts never end...

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Nope, he's too busy scrounging together all his cash to buy up all the Trump mobile phones he can get his hands on. Gonna stash 'em away with along with the cases of Trump bibles he previously bought because both are gonna double in value over the next three years.

 Red_Dragon wrote:

Conspiracy theory:  He's found a magic character he can use to prevent replies.  

Alternate conspiracy: an AI has taken over the forum and is preventing replies when they aren't worth it.

Likely reality: He puts so much cut & paste garbage the editor barfs it up on reply. 

For some reason, "reply" is non-functional on your latest post, kurt.

However, nice tangent. Now, can you simply answer the question I asked?

Interlude

 maryte wrote: 
Show me where you have shed even a single tear for those killed by illegals.

.
        

 kurtster wrote:
I see you found the new George W. Trump bandwagon to jump on.

 Red_Dragon wrote:

Well, Lord Dampnut has failed to show even an iota of empathy or even common decency about the Hortman assassination - so isn't that a kind of success in Trumpland?   

 kurtster wrote:

Can he fail at anything for you?

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
You're not fooling anyone bubba.  If Trump took out "the Supreme Leader" you would indeed be pissed off at Trump for doing it.

Trump cannot succeed at anything as far as you are concerned.  You support the ayatollah before you would support Trump, for anything.

 kurtster wrote:

Let me explain it to you like you're in fifth grade, Skippy. The post isn't about Iran's "Supreme Leader", it's about Trump making a threatening jackass of himself in front of the entire world. Hence the name of the thread: "Trump".

 steeler wrote:

For a while there, it was sounding as though the US was actively involved in the attack. But somehow this sounds more credible:

Wow. Trump rushed to take credit for Israel's strike on Iran and to escalate the U.S. role in the war because he like the way it was covered on Fox News.

— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) 17 June 2025 at 19:28