[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

RadioParadise FAQ List Submission - JICAMARCA - Aug 17, 2022 - 10:37am
 
Republican Party - kcar - Aug 17, 2022 - 10:28am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Aug 17, 2022 - 10:08am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Aug 17, 2022 - 9:52am
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Aug 17, 2022 - 9:44am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Aug 17, 2022 - 8:54am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - oldviolin - Aug 17, 2022 - 8:48am
 
XPRIZE & Singularity University - miamizsun - Aug 17, 2022 - 8:41am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Aug 17, 2022 - 7:15am
 
Wordle - daily game - marko86 - Aug 17, 2022 - 7:11am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - ptooey - Aug 17, 2022 - 7:03am
 
Cheney, Dick - sunybuny - Aug 17, 2022 - 6:22am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Aug 17, 2022 - 6:08am
 
Russia - miamizsun - Aug 17, 2022 - 5:44am
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - miamizsun - Aug 17, 2022 - 5:14am
 
Joe Biden - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Aug 16, 2022 - 10:50pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - R_P - Aug 16, 2022 - 7:19pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Aug 16, 2022 - 6:28pm
 
The Obituary Page - Antigone - Aug 16, 2022 - 5:33pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - haresfur - Aug 16, 2022 - 4:02pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Aug 16, 2022 - 2:29pm
 
The Hat Project - kcar - Aug 16, 2022 - 2:20pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Aug 16, 2022 - 10:06am
 
Live FLAC support in Sonos API - alistair.bill - Aug 16, 2022 - 9:33am
 
Ukraine - Red_Dragon - Aug 16, 2022 - 4:37am
 
What Did You Do Today? - Steely_D - Aug 15, 2022 - 7:55pm
 
Fix My Car - Bill_J - Aug 15, 2022 - 7:50pm
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Aug 15, 2022 - 6:42pm
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - oldviolin - Aug 15, 2022 - 9:31am
 
Interesting Words - Steely_D - Aug 15, 2022 - 8:19am
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - Manbird - Aug 14, 2022 - 8:40pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Aug 14, 2022 - 3:36pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Manbird - Aug 14, 2022 - 2:14pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Aug 14, 2022 - 1:31pm
 
RPeep News You Should Know - islander - Aug 14, 2022 - 1:17pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Aug 14, 2022 - 11:34am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - acaciascapes - Aug 14, 2022 - 9:20am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Aug 14, 2022 - 8:44am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Aug 14, 2022 - 7:55am
 
DARWIN AWARDS! - POST YOUR NOMINATION! - Coaxial - Aug 13, 2022 - 5:03pm
 
China - R_P - Aug 13, 2022 - 3:29pm
 
Brian Eno - R_P - Aug 13, 2022 - 1:23pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Aug 13, 2022 - 11:15am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Coaxial - Aug 13, 2022 - 7:03am
 
Health Care - miamizsun - Aug 13, 2022 - 6:37am
 
Sweet horrible irony. - miamizsun - Aug 13, 2022 - 6:32am
 
What is the meaning of this? - oldviolin - Aug 12, 2022 - 3:33pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Aug 12, 2022 - 12:59pm
 
Abiogenesis! - R_P - Aug 12, 2022 - 12:02pm
 
PASS THE BEER - kcar - Aug 12, 2022 - 11:33am
 
It's the economy stupid. - rgio - Aug 12, 2022 - 9:06am
 
What's Precious and Sacred to Islam? - Red_Dragon - Aug 12, 2022 - 8:38am
 
Floyd forum - Proclivities - Aug 12, 2022 - 8:12am
 
So... what's been happening here lately? - sunybuny - Aug 12, 2022 - 5:44am
 
Time to lawyer up! - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:52pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Proclivities - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:35am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:04am
 
How to Use RP? - kcar - Aug 11, 2022 - 9:53am
 
Got Road Rage? - Red_Dragon - Aug 11, 2022 - 8:12am
 
>>>>>>Knitted - Antigone - Aug 11, 2022 - 2:37am
 
India - Red_Dragon - Aug 10, 2022 - 4:36pm
 
godnarb: the Lunchurch - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 10, 2022 - 11:24am
 
Peace - thisbody - Aug 10, 2022 - 8:59am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - GeneP59 - Aug 9, 2022 - 4:37pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 9, 2022 - 4:19pm
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - robin2 - Aug 9, 2022 - 11:47am
 
RPeeps who would have a sense of humor if they were not s... - miamizsun - Aug 9, 2022 - 10:14am
 
Things that make you happy - GeneP59 - Aug 9, 2022 - 8:47am
 
unusual time signatures - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 9, 2022 - 8:26am
 
Best/worst white reggae/ska/rcksteady - thisbody - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:54am
 
More reggae, less Marley please - thisbody - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:48am
 
Media Bias - Red_Dragon - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:34am
 
Things Forgotten. - Steely_D - Aug 8, 2022 - 10:24pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Aug 8, 2022 - 7:28pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Aug 8, 2022 - 9:56am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The Abortion Wars Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Post to this Topic
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 6, 2022 - 8:39am

citizens in one conservative state reject abortion bans,  
and politicians in another pass laws to ban.  
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 6, 2022 - 7:55am

Indiana Gilead
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2022 - 11:39am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
What's the matter with Kansas?
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 3, 2022 - 7:34am

What a pleasant surprise...
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 19, 2022 - 1:36pm

 Steely_D wrote:

This is not how democracy is supposed to work.


Our chief danger.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 19, 2022 - 3:50am

 thisbody wrote:


Seems you're lying to yourself as your media prompt you to keep going. Otherwise, it'd be hard to stand, I suppose.
What's "falling apart" in your eyes has never been there, me tends to think, radically.


You don't look very radical to me, more like confused.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 18, 2022 - 4:11pm

@RBReich : Thanks to the filibuster, 41 Senate Republicans representing just 21% of the country are blocking abortion rights, clean energy, health care, and basic investments supported by the vast majority of Americans. This is not how democracy is supposed to work.
thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: Mars
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 4:28pm

 Steely_D wrote:
Seriously that post makes no sense. You’re just mad, bro. Enjoy.

While I might be somewhat off-topic... really? - So, tell us, what is it the world needs from America right now? It shouldn't be hard for you to tell, as you are such a superior MAGA nation, of course...
My madness seems to serve me, as the days of Coca-Cola and Rock'n'Roll have gone by.
So, what will be next from your beloved ministry of democratic marketing? - Will it be "Duck And Cover", again?

Meanwhile... to call you back to reality:
Have you had an abortion? The border guard in California asks the Australian woman on her way to Canada during the stopover.
California! Not Alabama!
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 4:11pm

 thisbody wrote:


Seems you're lying to yourself as your media prompt you to keep going. Otherwise, it'd be hard to stand, I suppose.
What's "falling apart" in your eyes has never been there, me tends to think, radically.


Seriously that post makes no sense. You’re just mad, bro. Enjoy.


thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: Mars
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 4:06pm

 Steely_D wrote:
This has got nothing to do with most Americans, so your screed is nonsense. 

There are some Americans who are against abortion or whatever, and their strategies have included infiltrating positions of power to change/create/rescind laws allowing abortion that most people want.
This doesn’t mean that society isn’t free, or that it’s now â€œa bunch” of fundamentalists (a vague term at best). It does mean that there are that sort of people - a minority - who did a dance around the complacent, and fooled the naive, and managed to pull some levers that they hope will force others into doing what they want.

That requires action. All the folks who feel differently need to recognize their numbers, protest and vote and say out loud what they believe in so the minority opinion doesn’t control the nation. But your Chicken Little garment-rending about how it’s all falling apart…well, it just means you need to go decaf.


Seems you're lying to yourself as your media prompt you to keep going. Otherwise, it'd be hard to stand, I suppose.
What's "falling apart" in your eyes has never been there, me tends to think, radically.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 3:16pm

 thisbody wrote:

... and please, spare me comments starting with, "This has got nothing to do with X, Y, Z."

Umrika is shapeshifting herself, far too quickly for that one, and Umrikans (most likely) haven't begun noticing this yet, as ever-proud they were born to save the world from anything undemocratic by implying very undemocratic means to other nations.

The question of abortion can only arise in a free society. Umrika has successfully shown, they are not that. Instead, they are made to be a bunch of fundamentalists, with true monetary and power intentions hidden behind a religious veil.


This has got nothing to do with most Americans, so your screed is nonsense. 

There are some Americans who are against abortion or whatever, and their strategies have included infiltrating positions of power to change/create/rescind laws allowing abortion that most people want.
This doesn’t mean that society isn’t free, or that it’s now â€œa bunch” of fundamentalists (a vague term at best). It does mean that there are that sort of people - a minority - who did a dance around the complacent, and fooled the naive, and managed to pull some levers that they hope will force others into doing what they want.

That requires action. All the folks who feel differently need to recognize their numbers, protest and vote and say out loud what they believe in so the minority opinion doesn’t control the nation. But your Chicken Little garment-rending about how it’s all falling apart…well, it just means you need to go decaf.



thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: Mars
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 12:33pm

 Steely_D wrote:
Interesting opinion piece in the NYT today where this same idea is referenced obliquely - but there’s an excellent distinction between conscientious objectors (who won’t provide what the patient wants out of conscience, so deniers of what someone’s entitled to) versus conscientious providers (who break the law to give the patient what they need, regardless). 

FTA: The American legal regime that governs medical conscience is broken. 
While conscientious providers find virtually no refuge in the conscience clauses that are codifiedin almost every state, refusers are protected almost categorically. And just about all of these conscience laws are reserved for denials of care. 
Conscientious refusers are often shielded from being fired, disciplined, held liable or found guilty for violating standards of care and endangering patients, even in serious ways. 
Conscientious refusers usually don’t have to tell patients about their options, or help them to access care elsewhere. 

But few protections exist for doctors who have equally conscientious reasons to provide abortions.

The middle ages are here again!

Could be Pakistan, or Afghanistan, or Iran. Not to mention Saudi Arabia, as today's ever more popular heads-off regime, shapeshifting from failed to friendliest state ever! - It is because, y'all know, sanctions we imposed are must!


... and please, spare me comments starting with, "This has got nothing to do with X, Y, Z."

Umrika is shapeshifting herself, far too quickly for that one, and Umrikans (most likely) haven't begun noticing this yet, as ever-proud they were born to save the world from anything undemocratic by imposing quite undemocratic means on other nations.

The question of abortion can only arise in a free society. Umrika has successfully shown, they are not that. Instead, they are made to be a bunch of fundamentalists, with true monetary and power intentions hidden behind a religious veil. More interested in selfish financial, and power gains.
(Lowest chakra, base of spine. Spirituality=None, whatsoever. Completely materialistic society, as we've known for long, and not interested in the interests of other living beings. Egotistical to the utmost...)


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 17, 2022 - 10:52am

 Steely_D wrote:

It would take a lot, but I’d suggest that ALL women’s health care providers should just go about their business, without modification. What happens next? Prosecution (tying up the courts), imprisonment (really?), loss of license (more likely) and then - what happens to women’s health care in general in the nation? Not that it’s already great.

But just like police have to give up on arresting EVERYONE that takes a toke in states where it’s illegal, if provision of abortion is so widespread that it’s impossible to enforce the law practically…



Interesting opinion piece in the NYT today where this same idea is referenced obliquely - but there’s an excellent distinction between conscientious objectors (who won’t provide what the patient wants out of conscience, so deniers of what someone’s entitled to) versus conscientious providers (who break the law to give the patient what they need, regardless). 

FTA: The American legal regime that governs medical conscience is broken. 
While conscientious providers find virtually no refuge in the conscience clauses that are codifiedin almost every state, refusers are protected almost categorically. And just about all of these conscience laws are reserved for denials of care. 
Conscientious refusers are often shielded from being fired, disciplined, held liable or found guilty for violating standards of care and endangering patients, even in serious ways. 
Conscientious refusers usually don’t have to tell patients about their options, or help them to access care elsewhere. 

But few protections exist for doctors who have equally conscientious reasons to provide abortions.


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jul 15, 2022 - 7:48am

Texas conservatives have a plan to get around DAs who won't enforce abortion laws
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jul 12, 2022 - 11:45am

 rgio wrote:

To me, the follow-up study done a few years ago provides strong support for the original assertions.  It's possible that the numbers benefit from a coincidence of timing and other policies, norms, etc... but it's hard to completely ignore a very high correlation using decades of data.  


Agreed.

In order for people to live well, be at least moderately 'successful' in life, the amount of human capital that must be invested in one individual is bigger than at any other time in human history.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2022 - 11:05am

 R_P wrote:
To me, the follow-up study done a few years ago provides strong support for the original assertions.  It's possible that the numbers benefit from a coincidence of timing and other policies, norms, etc... but it's hard to completely ignore a very high correlation using decades of data.  

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 12, 2022 - 10:58am

 westslope wrote:
John R. Lott Jr. was one who did not see a correlation.  From what I recall, some of his work debunked later on.  Was it bad data or bad modelling, I do not recall off hand.  

In passing, Lott, Jr. was a highly polarizing figure in the economics profession.

He has been touted in the Guns thread in the past...

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jul 12, 2022 - 10:49am

 R_P wrote:
John R. Lott Jr. was one who did not see a correlation.  From what I recall, some of his work was debunked later on.  Was it bad data or bad modelling, I do not recall off hand.  

In passing, Lott, Jr. was a highly polarizing figure in the economics profession. 


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jul 12, 2022 - 10:47am

 rgio wrote:

.....  
As an aside: I worked on a project in a prior life with Levitt and their work was ridiculously priced, and ultimately delivered no value.  Good work if you can get it.

Yeah, celebrity can be a bad criteria for hiring economic consultants.  Or engaging anybody.

In my discussions with those who consult,  often the clients have absolutely no clue and don't even know what questions to ask.  

Not surprising.  47% of American voters voted for Marxist-Keynesian fiscal policy in the last presidential election.  Most financial pundits have no idea as to what demand and supply actually means in economics. Most use those terms as if they were synonyms for consumption and production.  

Annual 'balanced budgets' are what 'real people' want.  Macroeconomists never recommend annual balanced budgets.   

Here in Canada, our previous economics-educated prime minister Stephan Harper was popular with the people because he did the exact opposite of what the professional economic policy consensus would have prescribed on a number of issues.

I often run into private sector entrepreneurs who delude themselves into thinking they know a lot about economics.  They do not. 

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 11, 2022 - 6:50pm

 westslope wrote:

Is everybody here familiar with the literature that examines the effect of legalized abortion on crime?   

Steven Levitt at University of Chicago is one of the better known proponents.  He co-authored the book Freakonomics.  


Some see a correlation, some don't.

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next