[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

ONE WORD - oldviolin - Jan 19, 2020 - 4:00pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - Antigone - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:56pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:41pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:37pm
 
We need some new car names - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:29pm
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:12pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:58pm
 
Name My Band - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:47pm
 
TWO WORDS - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:40pm
 
THREE WORDS - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:39pm
 
FOUR WORDS - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:37pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:31pm
 
Internet Addict?? - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:20pm
 
A welcome from Poland - mactyt - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:19pm
 
Surfing! - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:11pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:16pm
 
Impeachment Time: - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:37pm
 
Economix - R_P - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:25pm
 
2020 Elections - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:23pm
 
Music News - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:09pm
 
Fix My Car - westslope - Jan 19, 2020 - 11:46am
 
Tartaria And The Mud Floods - buzz - Jan 19, 2020 - 11:02am
 
Movie Recommendation - islander - Jan 19, 2020 - 10:39am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - agmonaco1 - Jan 19, 2020 - 9:10am
 
RP and Sonos - stefcolonna - Jan 19, 2020 - 9:01am
 
Aliens, Aliens! - success - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:52am
 
Climate Change - success - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:13am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - KarmaKarma - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
Democratic Party - KarmaKarma - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:29pm
 
war is a racket - westslope - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:29pm
 
DIY - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 2:26pm
 
Palestine - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:48am
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:40am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:28am
 
Vinyl vs CD - SeriousLee - Jan 18, 2020 - 10:40am
 
Documentaries - sirdroseph - Jan 18, 2020 - 9:17am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Coaxial - Jan 18, 2020 - 9:14am
 
Automotive Lust - islander - Jan 18, 2020 - 7:20am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 7:11am
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 6:28am
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - islander - Jan 18, 2020 - 6:18am
 
UK stream - mike_barr - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:51am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:42am
 
Canada - R_P - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:39pm
 
Stream stopping at promo - lannydevaney - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:51pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:41pm
 
R&R Hall of Fame Show - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:53pm
 
What the hell OV? - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:51pm
 
how do you feel right now? - SeriousLee - Jan 17, 2020 - 12:43pm
 
Mellow stream - jarro - Jan 17, 2020 - 11:45am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:22am
 
The war on funk is over! - rhahl - Jan 17, 2020 - 8:25am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:30am
 
What makes you smile? - Coaxial - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:14pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 2:21pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:39am
 
Regarding cats - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:11am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:07am
 
Music Videos - sirdroseph - Jan 16, 2020 - 4:24am
 
I'm a Dem. Which Republican would you recommend I vote for? - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
Stuff I like - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 5:07pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:43pm
 
Private messages in a public forum - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:19pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 2:57pm
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - piratesbaseball44 - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:23pm
 
Books - R_P - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:03pm
 
Breaking News - buddy - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:34am
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - Red_Dragon - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:34am
 
Drinking Establishments - Coaxial - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:00am
 
LOVIN The ONION - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 15, 2020 - 6:59am
 
Star wars with a twist - sirdroseph - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:17am
 
Iran - R_P - Jan 14, 2020 - 8:08pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 14, 2020 - 3:01pm
 
Photography Chat - haresfur - Jan 14, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Republican Party Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 195, 196, 197  Next
Post to this Topic
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 11, 2020 - 9:43am

MITCH MCCONNELL RECEIVED DONATIONS FROM VOTING MACHINE LOBBYISTS BEFORE BLOCKING ELECTION SECURITY BILLS
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2019 - 9:04am

 Proclivities wrote: 
was it another politician?

because if it was...
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Dec 20, 2019 - 1:34pm



 Proclivities wrote:
 
Bevin's justification: There was no physical evidence of abuse and the girl's hymen was "intact."


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 20, 2019 - 1:27pm


From another article:

"..Let's just add one more horror: Now that he's a free man with a clean record, Micah Schoettle — who was convicted of raping a little girl multiple times over two years, starting when she was nine — doesn't have to register as a sex offender, and can apply to have his record expunged, because Matt Bevin has a medieval understanding of medicine."

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 18, 2019 - 7:41am



 haresfur wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

If that's what he's willing to give up for free, think about what Parnas is holding in reserve 
 


Yes!!   Why is Mitch McConnell Afraid of This Man?

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 18, 2019 - 7:37am



 kurtster wrote:
Dossier, Dossier, Dossier !!!! Â©
 

Squirrel! Squirrel! Squirrel!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 11, 2019 - 9:23pm

Dossier, Dossier, Dossier !!!! ©
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 11, 2019 - 5:23pm

The GOP Is Now The Party Of Putin
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:55pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

If that's what he's willing to give up for free, think about what Parnas is holding in reserve 
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:40pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

I think Elmore Leonard wrote this book.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:03pm

Exclusive: Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden
Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 1:18pm



 black321 wrote:


 Isabeau wrote:


 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 

 

I personally dont like them...but thats the usual response to excuse his behavior. 
 
I'm truly grateful, after all these years, for being able to legitimately post the 'moon' emoticon to a post.  I can die now.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: A sunset in the desert
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 10:50am



 Isabeau wrote:


 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 

 

I personally dont like them...but thats the usual response to excuse his behavior. 
Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 10:35am



 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 



black321

black321 Avatar

Location: A sunset in the desert
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 8:35am



 Isabeau wrote:


 KarmaKarma wrote:
 
So you support a porn star payoff lie, going limp in front of Putin at Helsinki, the adolescent name-calling, the misogyny, the vitriol thrown about at the rallies, Trump's ignorance regarding Frederick Douglass and the boundaries of Colorado, the magic marker hurricane path, the making fun of a disabled reporter, the comment of "shithole" countries, family nepotism in his administration, a skeleton 'acting' cabinet where people are leaving in droves, screwing over farmers, not bringing back manufacturing or coal jobs (auto plants are still closing), the Trump businesses and hotels making money via the presidency and state visits, and the desertion of our allies in Syria? 


No defense of the indefensible, so here comes the squirrel pointing to Hillary or Obama, in 3, 2, 1 ...

 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 6:59am



 KarmaKarma wrote:
 
So you support a porn star payoff lie, going limp in front of Putin at Helsinki, the adolescent name-calling, the misogyny, the vitriol thrown about at the rallies, Trump's ignorance regarding Frederick Douglass and the boundaries of Colorado, the magic marker hurricane path, the making fun of a disabled reporter, the comment of "shithole" countries, family nepotism in his administration, a skeleton 'acting' cabinet where people are leaving in droves, screwing over farmers, not bringing back manufacturing or coal jobs (auto plants are still closing), the Trump businesses and hotels making money via the presidency and state visits, and the desertion of our allies in Syria? 


No defense of the indefensible, so here comes the squirrel pointing to Hillary or Obama, in 3, 2, 1 ...

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 4:02am



 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
 

That's how I sees it though the motivation and background of the whistle blower will be met with much suspicion if nothing comes from it.  Now if Trump really did commit an impeachable offense, then it is moot, the whistle blower did a great service to our country regardless of motivation.  We shall see.  Maybe we are all not considering a completely different angle here in the big picture.  Is Trump's master plan to pull the curtain off of everything and pull everyone down with him?  The way things are going looks like in Washington, "they are all going to die a little in that war."   Both parties look bad and will be badly damaged when the dust is cleared on this one and I for one think this is ultimately a good thing for our country.   Will Trump's legacy be that he was the domino that set forth the eventual demise of the two party duopoly as we know it?

KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 4:18pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
 
Trump's "whistleblower" will be yet another failed attempt by the Dems to skewer Trump.  This so-called whistle-blower is a gross fraud in itself, being lapped up by culpable and colluding senior officials of an opposition party that is all-in on trying anything, anything at all, to take out Trump.  That this person is a fraud, is obvious to those who have been provided all the facts.  That would be those who do NOT watch MSDNC, CNN, & other blatantly biased sources.  They will fail. Again.  And in doing so, will set the bar for malicious prosecutions once again so low that future political and law courses will study the damage their actions have done to society - and the political process.  Not to mention the precedent they have set that will no doubt be used against them.  Dems have not yet met a rake they don't like ... stepping on.  The idiot party.  Truly. Don't Dem voters ever get tired of getting sold yet another pack of lies and false hopes by the fraudulent media malpracticers?   Asking for a friend.

As for Snowden, he deserves nothing less than a short rope and a long drop.  Only in this country are we willing to allow such wanton destruction of national secrets and call it "whistleblowing".  Had Snowden done this while working on behalf of a less democratic nation, say, oh, China, he would have been seized and disappeared long ago.  The only thing keeping him above ground now is his high profile and name recognition. He's already worn out his welcome elsewhere on this planet, and has apparently voiced the idea that he'd like to come home and face the consequences.  

2013: The damage done by Snowden's Treason
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/snowdens-treason-9020

A comment from a Sept 13-2019 article: "Snowden said it helped that Russia viewed him as useful publicity." 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2019/sep/13/edward-snowden-interview-whistleblowing-russia-ai-permanent-record
Snowden misunderstood.  Russia, and others (like China) view him as a useful idiot.  Big difference.

Killing this treasonous shitstain now would be of questionable value. It might light aflame again the news cycle of damaging stories and give the rabble something more to rabble-on about.  It would also give kooks like Bernie Three Sheds more ammo to spew in his delusional quest to be relevant.  

About the only good that could come of killing Snowden now would be to serve as a warning to others what fate awaits them.  Of course... this country was not the only one harmed by Snowden's treasonous revelations.  Another country, with sufficient interest, or willingness, to do the work that needs to be done on the very unofficial behest of .... well, there you go.  Plausible deniability.

But wtf do I, a stupid deplorable from flyover country know. 

It's voters and commentators like blue checkmark Kyle here, who are setting the tone for the American future.  God help us.





Wikipedia: "Kyle Edward Kulinski is an American political commentator, and the co-founder of Justice Democrats. He is the host and producer of The Kyle Kulinski Show on his channel Secular Talk, an affiliate of The Young Turks network. He is a social democrat, and a registered Democrat in New York state. "




Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 10:17am

islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 7:50am



 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
So yes there is a little ambiguity. But it's also clear that he had options. I can understand his reluctance to use them, and I can see the reasoning he came up with for his actions. But it strains credibility to say that protections simply don't cover contractors, or that he had no other options.

The law should protect me, and maybe it does, but I know that the administration in power and its current rivals for power will use every tool at their disposal to crush me like a bug. If I go thru legal channels here's what I can expect:

1. I'm reporting a crime to the people who committed it or the people who funded and authorized it. My complaint will never reach the ears of anyone inclined to stop it.

2. Those people will retaliate...harshly. At very least, assuming they stick to the letter of the law, the NSA will find a pretext to cancel the contract with the company I work for and I'll be out of a job, but still forbidden to disclose what was happening...and would continue to happen.

3. Let's say I decide to fight that retaliation under the whistleblower statute. The evidence I need for my defense is classified and I won't be given access to it. If I have the resources to appeal my case all the way to the Supreme Court I might eventually prevail, but the people responsible will suffer no consequences at all.

Options? Yeah, he had options, but all but the one he chose would silence him and the crimes he exposed would continue. He did the right thing.

Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option. 

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 195, 196, 197  Next