Bad Poetry
- oldviolin - Jan 28, 2023 - 10:19pm
The strange tale of KFAT
- oldviolin - Jan 28, 2023 - 8:57pm
Things You Thought Today
- Steely_D - Jan 28, 2023 - 7:42pm
Sunrise, Sunset
- islander - Jan 28, 2023 - 6:25pm
What Did You Do Today?
- Bill_J - Jan 28, 2023 - 6:24pm
The Obituary Page
- haresfur - Jan 28, 2023 - 4:58pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Jan 28, 2023 - 3:57pm
Wordle - daily game
- Manbird - Jan 28, 2023 - 3:55pm
Today in History
- Isabeau - Jan 28, 2023 - 1:39pm
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- Isabeau - Jan 28, 2023 - 1:34pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Jan 28, 2023 - 1:00pm
Economix
- R_P - Jan 28, 2023 - 12:07pm
Guns
- R_P - Jan 28, 2023 - 10:57am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- geoff_morphini - Jan 28, 2023 - 7:43am
Music Requests
- Ralf - Jan 28, 2023 - 7:39am
last.fm-scrobbling
- hans-juergen - Jan 28, 2023 - 12:25am
Immigration
- westslope - Jan 27, 2023 - 4:13pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- Steely_D - Jan 27, 2023 - 3:39pm
Linking to "What's Playing"
- fraenki - Jan 27, 2023 - 2:18pm
What Makes You Cry :) ?
- black321 - Jan 27, 2023 - 12:42pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- GeneP59 - Jan 27, 2023 - 10:19am
The Monks of Zagorsk
- cathyetsylvain - Jan 27, 2023 - 9:16am
Having a Bad Day???
- GeneP59 - Jan 26, 2023 - 8:27pm
Living in America
- Red_Dragon - Jan 26, 2023 - 8:16pm
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul
- GeneP59 - Jan 26, 2023 - 7:53pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Steely_D - Jan 26, 2023 - 4:58pm
Things I Saw Today...
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 26, 2023 - 4:56pm
Trump
- haresfur - Jan 26, 2023 - 3:59pm
OUR CATS!!
- Isabeau - Jan 26, 2023 - 3:02pm
Oil, Gas Prices & Other Crapola
- black321 - Jan 26, 2023 - 12:44pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Jan 26, 2023 - 12:20pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Jan 26, 2023 - 10:07am
21st century technology
- black321 - Jan 26, 2023 - 9:44am
Florida
- black321 - Jan 26, 2023 - 7:10am
The end of the world
- miamizsun - Jan 26, 2023 - 6:38am
Joe Biden
- kcar - Jan 25, 2023 - 9:21pm
Love is...
- Isabeau - Jan 25, 2023 - 6:03pm
Least Successful Phishing Scams
- Proclivities - Jan 25, 2023 - 6:35am
Poetry Forum
- ScottN - Jan 25, 2023 - 5:12am
a thank you for the team
- guy-wernher - Jan 25, 2023 - 3:05am
Are you ready for some football?
- GeneP59 - Jan 24, 2023 - 5:45pm
COVID-19
- thisbody - Jan 24, 2023 - 3:41pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jan 24, 2023 - 11:30am
Todd Rundgren
- Steely_D - Jan 24, 2023 - 11:08am
Republican Party
- ScottFromWyoming - Jan 24, 2023 - 8:35am
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge?
- miamizsun - Jan 24, 2023 - 6:44am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- JrzyTmata - Jan 24, 2023 - 5:14am
Surfing!
- thisbody - Jan 24, 2023 - 2:15am
::odd but intriguing::
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 23, 2023 - 9:00pm
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT
- miamizsun - Jan 23, 2023 - 3:09pm
Way Cool Video
- miamizsun - Jan 23, 2023 - 2:00pm
Russia
- cc_rider - Jan 23, 2023 - 8:14am
NOT Main Mix
- ScopPics - Jan 23, 2023 - 4:25am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- GeneP59 - Jan 22, 2023 - 9:14am
News of the Weird
- Bill_J - Jan 20, 2023 - 7:51pm
Breaking News
- ScottFromWyoming - Jan 20, 2023 - 2:57pm
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!)
- R_P - Jan 20, 2023 - 1:48pm
The Bucket List
- miamizsun - Jan 20, 2023 - 10:38am
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Jan 20, 2023 - 10:02am
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- haresfur - Jan 19, 2023 - 8:14pm
What music have you paid real money for recently?
- kurtster - Jan 19, 2023 - 7:30pm
Twitter's finest moment
- westslope - Jan 19, 2023 - 7:03pm
Tidal / Spotify
- bigbargain - Jan 19, 2023 - 2:33pm
Is there any GOOD news out there?
- black321 - Jan 19, 2023 - 2:06pm
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc)
- Steely_D - Jan 19, 2023 - 11:17am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jan 19, 2023 - 11:13am
Covers that are better than the original
- ScottFromWyoming - Jan 19, 2023 - 9:01am
Wardrobe malfunction
- miamizsun - Jan 19, 2023 - 8:42am
Climate Change
- miamizsun - Jan 19, 2023 - 8:26am
Name My Band
- islander - Jan 19, 2023 - 7:58am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jan 18, 2023 - 4:25pm
Happy holidays, everyone!
- Manbird - Jan 18, 2023 - 1:49pm
Switching 'channel' in app
- phil_the_blues - Jan 18, 2023 - 11:58am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- GeneP59 - Jan 18, 2023 - 8:57am
Martin Luther King day
- cc_rider - Jan 18, 2023 - 8:14am
|
Index »
Internet/Computer »
The Web »
Economix
|
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 207, 208, 209 Next |
R_P


|
Posted:
Jan 28, 2023 - 12:07pm |
|
|
|
phineas


|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 6:17pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
Really ? Neither of these two that you mention as well as most other big box outfits do not have unionized workers.
Well said!
/s
|
|
Steely_D

Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 4:50pm |
|
kurtster wrote:This bailout is also just as bad as the student loan bailout, which is currently being fought out in the courts.
Making it a complete bailout was an idiotic idea. How would you NOT get pushback from the loan companies? They should've presented forgiveness of student loan interest and that might've gotten through without such a fuss.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 4:49pm |
|
kurtster wrote:The Central States Pension Fund based here in Cleveburg ( Jackie Presser ?), or it used to be, was used as a slush fund for all kinds of activities including funding organized crime. The Teamsters hierarchy over the years has done more for themselves than the rank and file.
Skimming, I thought this was another Trump topic with the Trump Organization convicted of skirting taxes by providing for themselves in illegal ways. Guess that teaches me to not read closely. Carry on.
|
|
R_P


|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 4:46pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
This bailout will only encourage more bad behaviour as others have mentioned.
Appeasement!
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 4:37pm |
|
islander wrote: Edit to add: We should pay for this by taxing Amazon/Walmart/ other major retailers who have made trillions of dollars in no small part by utilizing these workers. Really ? Neither of these two that you mention as well as most other big box outfits do not have unionized workers. Former Teamster here. Remember Jimmy Hoffa ? The Central States Pension Fund based here in Cleveburg ( Jackie Presser ?), or it used to be, was used as a slush fund for all kinds of activities including funding organized crime. The Teamsters hierarchy over the years has done more for themselves than the rank and file. This bailout will only encourage more bad behaviour as others have mentioned. This bailout is also just as bad as the student loan bailout, which is currently being fought out in the courts.
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 1:21pm |
|
islander wrote:
There's the bingo square right there ^^^^^^
too bad there is little apatite for government regulation/oversight. But again, we are all for privatizing profits when things are good and socializing losses when it comes to PPP loans and other politically connected bailouts (again, disclosure: I got a small PPP loan and it was eventually forgiven - it covered about 30% of the salaries of my employees when there was no work being done and they weren't let go).
With people living much longer, we really need to look at the way we structure work and retirement funding. There are some serious crisis items looming for the current and future generations. We have the resource to fix this, but we have to be smarter and stop worshipping billionaires. If someone has accumulated a billion dollars, then you've benefitted greatly from our system and you owe something back to it. If you've accumulated 10 billion, you've probably exploited our system and or people and you really owe something back.
I can see it two ways.
One, you increase the funding requirements, or two, you improve the disclosure requirements.
The accounting is there, you can track it easily each year, though this is beyond the understanding of most employees. I would argue for better disclosure to employees so they understand the risks to their pensions...but under no situation should the public be held accountable for their failure. It's the same political fumble as the student loan forgiveness.
Outside of private/gov employment and public unions, pension or defined benefit plans virtually don't exist.
As for the rest, I certainly support an extremely progressive estate state, once you get above a certain threshold of $x million. Put the $ back in the pot.
|
|
islander

Location: Seattle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 1:05pm |
|
black321 wrote:
To Islander - the PBGC is not intended to be an insurer, but a safety net to provide some protection when plans fail (companies go bankrupt).
To Lazy - I'm not 100% certain, but I don't think it was the union that did the contributing/investing, but a multiemployer plan, where various cos with union workers contribute to the same plan...until the plan fails.
Larger issue is it's was bad policy to allow these private pension schemes to be so drastically underfunded, and then have the public fund it when it fails.
There's the bingo square right there ^^^^^^
too bad there is little apatite for government regulation/oversight. But again, we are all for privatizing profits when things are good and socializing losses when it comes to PPP loans and other politically connected bailouts (again, disclosure: I got a small PPP loan and it was eventually forgiven - it covered about 30% of the salaries of my employees when there was no work being done and they weren't let go).
With people living much longer, we really need to look at the way we structure work and retirement funding. There are some serious crisis items looming for the current and future generations. We have the resource to fix this, but we have to be smarter and stop worshipping billionaires. If someone has accumulated a billion dollars, then you've benefitted greatly from our system and you owe something back to it. If you've accumulated 10 billion, you've probably exploited our system and or people and you really owe something back.
|
|
islander

Location: Seattle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 12:53pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
So...a union invested poorly and wound up with an underfunded pension fund, and that's all the fault of companies that (in general) had nothing whatsoever to do with the problem:
1. Don't have unionized workforces
2. Don't have pensionsâthey use defined contribution (401K) retirement plans rather than defined benefit (pension) plans
...and the part that bothers you about the bailout is that the beneficiaries are no longer political allies?
Well, there's a whole problem in how our retirement systems are set up and where the responsibility/accountability (or lack thereof) is, but that's not what my comment was about. A lot of people who are relying on a pension are likely to be disappointed and left with little recourse or resource. So yeah, that is one of the places where I think it is appropriate for government to step up and help their citizens. Should also come with reform of the pension systems and retirement systems as well, but I can't tell how far into fantasy land we want to go so I'll stop at 'try to minimize human suffering'.
While the companies I mentioned don't have unionized work forces, they do rely on a lot of unionized labor - longshoremen who handle goods at import, teamsters (mentioned directly in the article) for distribution/warehousing/etc. Walmart also famously relies on various strategies to indirectly get government subsidies as well (underpaying people so they get public assistance). These companies and their owners (yes, I'm an owner too, I hold both WMTt and AMZ) make a lot of profit and are happy to collect subsidies and anything else they can get in their favor. So when things go bad I have no problem asking them to kick in. Again, unlikely. The .gov will just tag this to the ongoing tab and we'll all wind up paying for it it drips and drabs.
The political affiliation isn't the part that bothers me. It's the raw hypocrisy of people who say "no socialism" and "I got by with no help from anyone else" who then are the first one with their hand out with the slightest crisis. These people never care about an issue until it affects them personally. And yes, this tends to be one side politically much more than the other. I would hesitate to call the democrats my ally, but if that's the choice I have to make to support the little guy over the giant corporations (who have already had their share of bailouts), then sure put me down for less human suffering.
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 10:23am |
|
To Islander - the PBGC is not intended to be an insurer, but a safety net to provide some protection when plans fail (companies go bankrupt).
To Lazy - I'm not 100% certain, but I don't think it was the union that did the contributing/investing, but a multiemployer plan, where various cos with union workers contribute to the same plan...until the plan fails.
Larger issue is it's was bad policy to allow these private pension schemes to be so drastically underfunded, and then have the public fund it when it fails.
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 9:36am |
|
islander wrote:I think this is the right thing to do. But it is especially ironic, as most of the beneficiaries of these policies are against 'socialism' and any government 'handouts' for people who are not them. Pretty typical "I don't care until it affects me personally" politics.
Edit to add: We should pay for this by taxing Amazon/Walmart/ other major retailers who have made trillions of dollars in no small part by utilizing these workers.
So...a union invested poorly and wound up with an underfunded pension fund, and that's all the fault of companies that (in general) had nothing whatsoever to do with the problem:
1. Don't have unionized workforces
2. Don't have pensionsâthey use defined contribution (401K) retirement plans rather than defined benefit (pension) plans
...and the part that bothers you about the bailout is that the beneficiaries are no longer political allies?
|
|
islander

Location: Seattle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 9:05am |
|
black321 wrote:
Disagree.
Pensions are backstopped by PBGC, which is funded with "insurance" payments by those paying into pensions, but it's not 100%.
The rules that allow these pensions to become so massively underfunded were allowed because cos lobbied for them, and now taxpayers pick up the tab...in the so called inflation reduction act.
and not like the last admin was any better...which also subsidized underfunded plans, and allowed the can to be kicked further down the road.
p.s., are you implying most union workers are conservative/republicans?
If the PBGC were sufficient this wouldn't be a 36 billion dollar issue.
Not all union workers, but I'd bet a substantial portion that are teamsters are.
https://www.npr.org/2016/03/07...
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 8:06am |
|
islander wrote:
I think this is the right thing to do. But it is especially ironic, as most of the beneficiaries of these policies are against 'socialism' and any government 'handouts' for people who are not them. Pretty typical "I don't care until it affects me personally" politics.
Edit to add: We should pay for this by taxing Amazon/Walmart/ other major retailers who have made trillions of dollars in no small part by utilizing these workers.
Disagree.
Pensions are backstopped by PBGC, which is funded with "insurance" payments by those paying into pensions, but it's not 100%.
The rules that allow these pensions to become so massively underfunded were allowed because cos lobbied for them, and now taxpayers pick up the tab...in the so called inflation reduction act.
and not like the last admin was any better...which also subsidized underfunded plans, and allowed the can to be kicked further down the road.
p.s., are you implying most union workers are conservative/republicans?
|
|
islander

Location: Seattle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 7:50am |
|
black321 wrote:
On the one hand, regulators turn a blind eye to these schemes, until they get in trouble, and then a bailout.
Might as well go all-in and nationalize everything
Biden to announce federal bailout for troubled union pension fund
WASHINGTON â President Joe Biden on Thursday will join labor leaders to announce a federal bailout for a pension fund largely benefiting Teamster workers and retirees.
The $36 billion for the Central States Pension Fund will prevent benefits from being cut more than in half for more than 350,000 truck drivers, warehouse workers, construction workers and others, according to the White House.
- The bailout was made possible by the American Rescue Plan Act, the $1.9 trillion package passed last year in response to the pandemic.
- Financially struggling multiemployer pension plans can apply to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for assistance.
- Before the act passed, more than 200 pension plans were on pace to become insolvent in the near term, according to the White House. Now, those plans are projected to remain solvent through at least 2051.
- The $36 billion for the Central Pension Fund is the biggest boost from the program, and the largest ever federal financial assistance for troubled pension funds, according to the White House.
What's about to happen
Teamster workers and retirees will join Biden and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh at a White House event announcing the assistance. Biden has said heâs goal is to be âthe most pro-union presidentâ in U.S. history. He held the first public event of his presidential campaign at a Teamsters hall in Pittsburgh in 2019.
Critics, like George Mason Universityâs Charles Blahous, say the bailouts encourage âmore of the irresponsible behavior that got pensions into trouble in the first place.â
Who is being helped?
Most states have workers or retires expected to benefit. The states with the most beneficiaries are:
- Michigan: 40,300
- Ohio: 39,900
- Missouri: 27,800
- Illinois: 25,000
- Texas: 22,500
- Wisconsin: 21,900
- Indiana: 19,600
- Minnesota: 19,300
- Florida: 18,700
- Tennessee: 14,200
I think this is the right thing to do. But it is especially ironic, as most of the beneficiaries of these policies are against 'socialism' and any government 'handouts' for people who are not them. Pretty typical "I don't care until it affects me personally" politics.
Edit to add: We should pay for this by taxing Amazon/Walmart/ other major retailers who have made trillions of dollars in no small part by utilizing these workers.
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2022 - 7:43am |
|
On the one hand, regulators turn a blind eye to these schemes, until they get in trouble, and then a bailout.
Might as well go all-in and nationalize everything
Biden to announce federal bailout for troubled union pension fund
WASHINGTON â President Joe Biden on Thursday will join labor leaders to announce a federal bailout for a pension fund largely benefiting Teamster workers and retirees.
The $36 billion for the Central States Pension Fund will prevent benefits from being cut more than in half for more than 350,000 truck drivers, warehouse workers, construction workers and others, according to the White House.
- The bailout was made possible by the American Rescue Plan Act, the $1.9 trillion package passed last year in response to the pandemic.
- Financially struggling multiemployer pension plans can apply to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for assistance.
- Before the act passed, more than 200 pension plans were on pace to become insolvent in the near term, according to the White House. Now, those plans are projected to remain solvent through at least 2051.
- The $36 billion for the Central Pension Fund is the biggest boost from the program, and the largest ever federal financial assistance for troubled pension funds, according to the White House.
What's about to happen
Teamster workers and retirees will join Biden and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh at a White House event announcing the assistance. Biden has said heâs goal is to be âthe most pro-union presidentâ in U.S. history. He held the first public event of his presidential campaign at a Teamsters hall in Pittsburgh in 2019.
Critics, like George Mason Universityâs Charles Blahous, say the bailouts encourage âmore of the irresponsible behavior that got pensions into trouble in the first place.â
Who is being helped?
Most states have workers or retires expected to benefit. The states with the most beneficiaries are:
- Michigan: 40,300
- Ohio: 39,900
- Missouri: 27,800
- Illinois: 25,000
- Texas: 22,500
- Wisconsin: 21,900
- Indiana: 19,600
- Minnesota: 19,300
- Florida: 18,700
- Tennessee: 14,200
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 2, 2022 - 4:07pm |
|
Those who have are spending their cash
Bentley CEO: âNever seen spending patternsâ like this before with luxury consumerPras Subramanian·Senior ReporterWed, November 2, 2022 at 10:24 AM For British luxury automaker Bentley (VOW.DE), 2022 may leave a strong 2021 in the dust.
Through the first nine months of 2022, Bentley reported record operating profit of â¬575 million ($577,129,608), more than double the amount from a year ago. The previous full-year record high for operating profit was â¬389 million ($383,651,250.00). Revenue through the first nine months came in at â¬2.490 billion ($2,455,762,500.00), a jump of 28% from a year ago.
For Bentley CEO Adrian Hallmark, the results are astonishing because the automaker only increased sales of cars by 3%, yet profitability soared.
âThe exciting part for me is that we've doubled the profit year to date, with only a 3% increase in , and that's all about quality of margin,â Hallmark says to Yahoo Finance. âIt's all about these higher price cars with more personalization, order bank driven, not stock build driven; and we've got the right formula, and we're going to be ruthless about maintaining that pool.â "I've been in this industry and in this sector for nearly 28 years. I've never seen spending patterns like it and not just in Bentley,â
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 2, 2022 - 10:09am |
|
rexi wrote:
jeez, just saw this
been a subscriber to capitalisn't for a while
because luigi...
|
|
rexi

Location: Zurich, Switzerland 
|
Posted:
Oct 31, 2022 - 6:34am |
|
|
|
R_P


|
|
haresfur

Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Oct 26, 2022 - 12:40am |
|
westslope wrote:
The Russian economy has suffered. Wealth has suffered. The Russian economy will likely suffer for years, possibly decades to come.
As an aside, please do note that not all Russians wanted this war. Think of the subcultures in the USA and other rich western countries that have opposed war or the nuclear arms race and one finds the same subcultures in Russia.
The important point from the perspective of the welfare of Europeans and North Americans is that Russia can economically last for a very long time. That has to be part of the strategic calculation on the part of US-lead NATO going forward. Any illusions of a quick, inexpensive military victory in Ukraine should be dismissed or assigned an extremely low probability of materializing.
This conflict could easily escalate with conventional weapons alone into highly destructive and risky directions.
Yeah, well Putin seems to long for the days of the cold war. Last one took around 40 years. That's his choice until someone figures out how to get rid of him, provided someone as bad doesn't take his place. Putin could fix this easily but he won't.
Obama ignored Russian aggression in Crimea and that just lead to aggression in the rest of Ukraine. The alternatives appear to be either Russia takes over Ukraine and probably the rest of Eastern Europe or support Ukrainian self-determination, even if it means digging in for the long haul. Yeah, it is dangerous but so are the other options.
|
|
|