[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

2020 Elections - westslope - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:20pm
 
Trump - westslope - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:08pm
 
Bluesound Sound Dropouts - BillG - Sep 24, 2020 - 12:02pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - pigtail - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:28am
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:20am
 
Language - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:12am
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - black321 - Sep 24, 2020 - 7:24am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Sep 24, 2020 - 6:00am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - sunybuny - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Film & Video Production - rgio - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Quotes: Your Favorite Comedians - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:07am
 
Questions. - whatshisname - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:10pm
 
American Justice - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
Your favourite conspiracy theory? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
*** PUNS *** ASTRONOMY - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:24pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:22pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:33pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:21pm
 
The Obituary Page - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:56am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Red_Dragon - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
how do you feel right now? - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
WikiLeaks - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Favorite Quotes - Coaxial - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Race in America - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:06am
 
The American Dream - kcar - Sep 22, 2020 - 11:49pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Sep 22, 2020 - 10:07pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 22, 2020 - 9:16pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:50pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Sep 22, 2020 - 4:04pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
Brazil - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 22, 2020 - 7:49am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:29pm
 
Things I'd LIKE to find at my house. - Antigone - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:31pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Steely_D - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:13pm
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - DianaLipka - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Best Song Comments. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Trolls at RP - Steely_D - Sep 20, 2020 - 4:41pm
 
Facebook Tips - Ohmsen - Sep 20, 2020 - 2:37pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 12:34pm
 
Environment - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:16am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 7:29am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - miamizsun - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Republican Party - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:14am
 
FLAC Streaming - gsbaronnier - Sep 20, 2020 - 3:24am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 4:57pm
 
How's the weather? - Antigone - Sep 19, 2020 - 3:48pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 2:17pm
 
TV shows you watch - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2020 - 12:57pm
 
China - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 11:07am
 
Thank you, Bug. - miamizsun - Sep 19, 2020 - 6:53am
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - Sep 19, 2020 - 6:04am
 
Canada - R_P - Sep 18, 2020 - 7:37pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Sep 18, 2020 - 6:20pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - miamizsun - Sep 18, 2020 - 1:59pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 11:05am
 
Private messages in a public forum - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 10:21am
 
honk if you think manbird and OV are one and the same ent... - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 10:14am
 
Buddy's Haven - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 9:14am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 8:10am
 
Drop the Puck! NHL Lockout Ends! - black321 - Sep 18, 2020 - 6:06am
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Sep 18, 2020 - 5:26am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 9:04pm
 
Signs o' the Apocalypse in the news... - Steely_D - Sep 17, 2020 - 6:57pm
 
Soliciting ideas to bring about a more humane world - miamizsun - Sep 17, 2020 - 5:06pm
 
Rock Movies/Documentaries - Steely_D - Sep 17, 2020 - 1:39pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:57am
 
What are you listening to now? - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:53am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:49am
 
Index » Internet/Computer » The Web » Economix Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 16, 2020 - 11:56pm

The 'free market' manifesto that broke America and led to Trumpism
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Location: Valhalla
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 20, 2020 - 11:13am

Rabobank: The Response To The Fed's Minutes Make You Feel Many People Are Gargling The Bong Water

"We have to explain to the public far better why we are buying the assets of cash-rich mega companies that does nothing to help struggling SMEs and those on Main Street who can’t borrow, and which also exacerbates both irrevocable market and real economy distortions, such as it is."


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 5:07am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
 

so kelton, keen and the like are out?

maybe inet

not sure where you are or who you may want to connect with

i need clues

look out your window and tell me what you see

peace
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 2:55am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
 
Sorry, the only economist I know is on the other side of the bench.
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 2:29am



 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 17, 2020 - 7:42am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
 
if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 11:57pm

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
 
{#Lol}
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 1:25pm



 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 6:37am

 rexi wrote:
Are there any (monetary) economists who hang out here who would be interested in reading a paper?
 

not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 2:06am

Are there any (monetary) economists who hang out here who would be interested in reading a paper?
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2020 - 2:32am



 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

 

The article is neither about targeting inequality nor about eliminating it. Economic modelling / theorizing is about finding simplified (=modelled) mechanisms, to the extent that they exist, which can help explain and predict human behaviour and subsequent outcomes of commercial / material interactions.

Equilibrium theory, which you might think of as a mathematical version of the famous 'invisible hand', is a common such model. It predicts that a 'free market' will tend reach a stable state (=equilibrium) if an economy is fulfills certain criteria (perfect competition). Under such conditions, inequality is the result of differing capabilities of the agents involved. Or, it is the result of some friction or imperfection in the Competition department. Policy is then about managing those imperfections. But the message is clear, if things were perfect, as the model envisions, then the world would be, at least potentially, a better place. 

This new model (there are many others) now suggests that maybe this hands-off idea of perfection is nonsense. At least it is mathematically perfectly feasible to argue that a system of sequential trades may not be self-equilibrating at all. The important distinction between these two models, as I see it, is that, in the latter, trades takes place sequentially in time. So it makes a difference whether you win or lose the first toss. A x 1.2 x 0.8 =/= A x 0.8 x 1.2. In equilibrium models, all trade takes place in an instant of time, or outside of time, if you like. Changes to the system, and thus a dynamism over time, are introduces by adding 'random shocks' to an otherwise static system. Of Course, both are just models to which one must then add that awful imperfection called reality.

Now, when you say targeting inequality is a bad idea, you have to be aware of what your underlying assumption is. Do you assume that, if, say no redistributive tax is levied, outcomes will reflect the actual virtue of the economic agents involved? In that case you're in line with the equilibrium models mentioned above. Or, do you assume that, without redistribution, outcomes may be pretty much arbitrary and depend a lot on when and where you happend to be born, how much you inherited, and a bunch of other happenstances? In that case, you are more in line with the latter model.

The question is, which model has more predictive power? Which can be made to fit better with reality? And can not redistributing really be qualified as not targeting an outcome? If you see someone struggling in the water, do you intervene or not? That depends on what you think is happening. If the person is in the act of drowning, then non-intervention is the act of targeting death. If, however, you assume that bodies have a natural tendency to stay float and each individual may choose freely whether to S splash about frantically, then, whatever the outcome, non-intervention might be considered an act of granting the swimmer his freedom of expression, the outcome of which is fair by definiton. If he dies, he had it coming... In either case, you are targeting something based on your belief of what's 'actually' going on.


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 12:41pm

 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

 
It is not about targeting inequality. It is about keeping the wheel in balance.

Given that every modern nation has some form of redistribution of wealth I think the historical record is on our side on this one. Moreover, those countries that do it wisely are also among the best performers globally and that is not even factoring in softer factors like social cohesion, quality of life, crime rates, etc.

I would love to see what relative GDP per capita would look like if you stripped off the top percentile of each country's population.
I suspect that those countries with a more socially oriented welfare policy would outperform those countries pursuing more "free market" models. 
 
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 11:52am



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 10:36am

 westslope wrote:
Please name me one economy in the world with no "inequality".  
 
err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 8:55am

Please name me one economy in the world with no "inequality".  


rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 12:24am


Is Inequality Inevitable?

Wealth naturally trickles up in free-market economies, model suggests



(…)

If you simulate this economy, a variant of the yard sale model, you will get a remarkable result: after a large number of transactions, one agent ends up as an “oligarch” holding practically all the wealth of the economy, and the other 999 end up with virtually nothing. It does not matter how much wealth people started with. It does not matter that all the coin flips were absolutely fair. It does not matter that the poorer agent's expected outcome was positive in each transaction, whereas that of the richer agent was negative. Any single agent in this economy could have become the oligarch—in fact, all had equal odds if they began with equal wealth. In that sense, there was equality of opportunity. But only one of them did become the oligarch, and all the others saw their average wealth decrease toward zero as they conducted more and more transactions. To add insult to injury, the lower someone's wealth ranking, the faster the decrease.


This outcome is especially surprising because it holds even if all the agents started off with identical wealth and were treated symmetrically. Physicists describe phenomena of this kind as “symmetry breaking” <see The Physics of Inequality below>. The very first coin flip transfers money from one agent to another, setting up an imbalance between the two. And once we have some variance in wealth, however minute, succeeding transactions will systematically move a “trickle” of wealth upward from poorer agents to richer ones, amplifying inequality until the system reaches a state of oligarchy.

(...)

We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality.

The mathematical models also call attention to the enormous extent to which wealth distribution is caused by symmetry breaking, chance and early advantage (from, for example, inheritance). And the presence of symmetry breaking puts paid to arguments for the justness of wealth inequality that appeal to “voluntariness”—the notion that individuals bear all responsibility for their economic outcomes simply because they enter into transactions voluntarily—or to the idea that wealth accumulation must be the result of cleverness and industriousness. It is true that an individual's location on the wealth spectrum correlates to some extent with such attributes, but the overall shape of that spectrum can be explained to better than 0.33 percent by a statistical model that completely ignores them. Luck plays a much more important role than it is usually accorded, so that the virtue commonly attributed to wealth in modern society—and, likewise, the stigma attributed to poverty—is completely unjustified.



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 10, 2020 - 2:16pm

"We should abandon the WTO and work with free nations to build a new international system that actually puts American workers first"


U.S. finalizing federal contract ban for companies that use Huawei, others
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 24, 2020 - 2:24pm

The Jobs We Need
Over the past four decades, American workers have suffered a devastating loss of economic power, manifest in their wages, benefits and working conditions. The annual economic output of the United States has almost tripled, but, with the help of policymakers from both political parties, the wealthy hoarded the fruits.

In the nation’s slaughterhouses, the average worker in 1982 made $24 an hour in inflation-adjusted dollars, or $50,000 a year. Today the average meatpacker processes significantly more meat — and makes less than $14 an hour.

The hundreds of thousands of home health care aides, often female, often minorities, who care for a nation of aging baby boomers rarely receive paid time to care for their own families.

Even in the high-flying technology sector, companies have found ways to leave their workers behind. More than half of the people who work for Google do not actually work for Google. They are classified as contractors, which means they do not need to be treated as employees. (...)

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 19, 2020 - 3:35pm

U.S. Ranked Worst for Workers’ Rights Among Major Economies
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 27, 2020 - 10:40am

Human capital stock
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200  Next