[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Movie Recommendation - miamizsun - May 28, 2020 - 3:46pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 28, 2020 - 3:26pm
 
COVID-19 - ScottFromWyoming - May 28, 2020 - 3:09pm
 
Covid-19 hits home at RP - haresfur - May 28, 2020 - 2:42pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - May 28, 2020 - 2:13pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Proclivities - May 28, 2020 - 1:25pm
 
Canada - R_P - May 28, 2020 - 12:52pm
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - islander - May 28, 2020 - 11:29am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Steely_D - May 28, 2020 - 10:59am
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - BillG - May 28, 2020 - 8:09am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - May 28, 2020 - 7:56am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - May 28, 2020 - 5:52am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - May 28, 2020 - 5:21am
 
Trump - kcar - May 28, 2020 - 2:45am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 28, 2020 - 12:55am
 
What Did You Do Today? - whatshisname - May 27, 2020 - 11:40pm
 
Favorite Books from Your Youth - kcar - May 27, 2020 - 9:20pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - May 27, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - May 27, 2020 - 7:38pm
 
Reinstock '05 Link Repository - AliGator - May 27, 2020 - 7:18pm
 
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 5:19pm
 
Photos you have taken of yourself - n4ku - May 27, 2020 - 4:14pm
 
Way Cool Video - miamizsun - May 27, 2020 - 3:02pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - miamizsun - May 27, 2020 - 3:00pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 2:56pm
 
Shuttle, ISS and other Real Space Ships - islander - May 27, 2020 - 2:22pm
 
Hong Kong - Red_Dragon - May 27, 2020 - 1:47pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 1:40pm
 
Overheard - miamizsun - May 27, 2020 - 1:30pm
 
Race in America - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 1:15pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 1:13pm
 
Economix - R_P - May 27, 2020 - 10:40am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - May 27, 2020 - 10:07am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - May 27, 2020 - 10:00am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - May 27, 2020 - 8:52am
 
Books - Proclivities - May 27, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Resume stream vs. jump to live - pclancey - May 27, 2020 - 7:22am
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - BillG - May 27, 2020 - 6:10am
 
Squirrels Just Want To Have Fun! - R_P - May 26, 2020 - 6:05pm
 
Unable to stream via Echo 8 - Jonmarvin - May 26, 2020 - 5:08pm
 
Australia and New Zealand Music - haresfur - May 26, 2020 - 4:22pm
 
Trump Lies - haresfur - May 26, 2020 - 3:43pm
 
Well, DUH!! - Red_Dragon - May 26, 2020 - 3:27pm
 
Happy Birthday To Me! - kcar - May 26, 2020 - 1:42pm
 
FLAC Streaming - Ohewitt - May 26, 2020 - 10:48am
 
Environment - R_P - May 26, 2020 - 9:38am
 
New Song Submissions system - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 25, 2020 - 6:52pm
 
Tech & Science - Steely_D - May 25, 2020 - 2:54pm
 
UK Heos Denon not available - Patienceman - May 25, 2020 - 1:50pm
 
2020 Elections - sirdroseph - May 25, 2020 - 12:40pm
 
Sonos - toomanyollys - May 25, 2020 - 11:02am
 
HELP! Sound Cutting out problem - BillG - May 25, 2020 - 10:17am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - May 25, 2020 - 9:53am
 
Phine Phound Photographs - haresfur - May 24, 2020 - 9:28pm
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - haresfur - May 24, 2020 - 2:35pm
 
Tidal / Spotify - Steely_D - May 24, 2020 - 1:05pm
 
RP App problems on iPod? - jtessier1841 - May 24, 2020 - 9:52am
 
In My Room - buddy - May 23, 2020 - 5:34pm
 
Interesting or Weird Cover Versions - Coaxial - May 23, 2020 - 1:29pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - May 23, 2020 - 12:27pm
 
Google Home NOT compatible?? - d_m_g_3 - May 23, 2020 - 9:32am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - May 22, 2020 - 9:22pm
 
Shall We Dance? - buddy - May 22, 2020 - 9:09pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - May 22, 2020 - 8:48pm
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - oldviolin - May 22, 2020 - 3:05pm
 
New Music - R_P - May 22, 2020 - 12:49pm
 
Sunrise, Sunset - Coaxial - May 22, 2020 - 11:05am
 
Weird Science stories - Red_Dragon - May 22, 2020 - 8:37am
 
How's the weather? - Proclivities - May 22, 2020 - 8:00am
 
Play the Blues - sirdroseph - May 22, 2020 - 5:52am
 
Dropouts on Bluesound PulseFlex2i - nieroster - May 22, 2020 - 2:01am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - gtufano - May 21, 2020 - 11:46pm
 
Attention Class! Time for Geography - haresfur - May 21, 2020 - 10:08pm
 
Automotive Lust - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 21, 2020 - 9:30pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - May 21, 2020 - 2:56pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Brexit Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post to this Topic
Coaxial

Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 18, 2019 - 5:55am

 miamizsun wrote:
didn't the people vote to leave the eu already?

or was that fake news?
 

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 18, 2019 - 5:06am

didn't the people vote to leave the eu already?

or was that fake news?
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 10, 2019 - 3:43pm

Brexit: chants of 'shame' as suspension of parliament descends into chaos
Five-week suspension begins with shouts, singing and signs reading ‘silenced’

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 6, 2019 - 12:44pm


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 6, 2019 - 10:50am


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 30, 2019 - 9:21am


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2019 - 7:53am

 miamizsun wrote:


busy day for me

a few coffee thoughts

handing over power and giving up control to (unaccountable and unelected) bureaucrats sounds like a really bad idea

a recipe for high powered political capture and corruption

how does one disagree or say no to destructive policy?

top down centralized planning has a dark side

top down centralized force

can't these countries come up with a basic trading framework without sacrificing sovereignty?

in a sense it reminds me of what china is doing or accused of doing 

forging some sort of alliance in the name of progress that commits them (via political agreements) to china through debt

controlling currency and debt is a way for a banking entity to take over a country without firing a shot

peace

 
 
I'd say you're wrong (or I misled you) on almost all points.

1. The final decisions are still made by elected representatives who are accountable.  The bureaucrats are there (like in every government around the world) to hammer out the nuts and bolts and do the leg work
2. You can say no to destructive EU policy but you might not want to. For example, many left wing voters, particularly in Greece and other southern nations, think fiscal prudence (austerity) is a destructive policy and nearly left the EU on account of it, but decided not to as they realized they are better off in than out.
3. This is centralized government, not centralized planning which smacks of a command economy. The private sector is very robust in many European countries and boasts manyl world-beaters in their respective fields.
4. The central legal framework has actually freed up some border zones from oppressive national governments. The Irish problem disappeared in large part due to the open border. The Basques and Catalans can entertain the thought of independence in a way that they wouldn't be able to if Spain were not part of the EU.  I wouldn't be surprised if Scotland leaves the UK and returns to the EU.
5. As I stated, what saves the EU is the pluralism and consensus politics. Too many people are involved for nepotism or other forms of corruption.
6. The EU involves huge transfers from the net contributors (high GDP nations) to net takers (low GDP nations). It is the opposite of debt bondage. 

The one point that does have some validity is that the one currency benefits net exporters like Germany whose national currency would otherwise appreciate in response to their trading surplus to the detriment of net importers. This is offset to some extent by the system of transfers. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2019 - 6:02am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
As a governing institution, the EU is a huge behemoth of civil servants and politicians who come together to hammer out generally rational comprises about how they can create consensus and then put this into law. In each case multiply this with the complexity of about twenty different languages and the plurality of views and national interests and factor in the doctrine of at least trying to find consensus on every issue and you'll get some idea of how complex this is.

And given that most national law is ultimately made by EU political institutions, it is astonishing how little of it enters the public discussion until it gets passed down to the various national assemblies who enact "implementing regulations" that basically translate EU law into national law, quite often after the horse has bolted.
 

busy day for me

a few coffee thoughts

handing over power and giving up control to (unaccountable and unelected) bureaucrats sounds like a really bad idea

a recipe for high powered political capture and corruption

how does one disagree or say no to destructive policy?

top down centralized planning has a dark side

top down centralized force

can't these countries come up with a basic trading framework without sacrificing sovereignty?

in a sense it reminds me of what china is doing or accused of doing 

forging some sort of alliance in the name of progress that commits them (via political agreements) to china through debt

controlling currency and debt is a way for a banking entity to take over a country without firing a shot

peace

 

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2019 - 2:21am



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Being a boilerplate for internationalism is only half the story. The other half is the amazing strength of the often unseen institutions that make that international cooperation function. 

There is a lot of antagonism towards the EU from neoliberals, like Rees-Moog who view the EU as some gigantic protectionist racket. The unfortunate thing is that such charges are not entirely without justification. 

As a governing institution, the EU is a huge behemoth of civil servants and politicians who come together to hammer out generally rational comprises about how they can create consensus and then put this into law. In each case multiply this with the complexity of about twenty different languages and the plurality of views and national interests and factor in the doctrine of at least trying to find consensus on every issue and you'll get some idea of how complex this is.

And given that most national law is ultimately made by EU political institutions, it is astonishing how little of it enters the public discussion until it gets passed down to the various national assemblies who enact "implementing regulations" that basically translate EU law into national law, quite often after the horse has bolted.

However, after dissing it like this, I actually think living in the EU is fantastic, precisely because of the plurality of views and the consensus-driven politics.. There is an awful lot of really good law that sets out to protect individuals and consumers, the general data protection regulation, being perhaps the most visible recent example. 

Other laws are a ban on genetically modified produce. The EU does not allow hormone-treated beef to be imported, from Australia for instance, or chlorinated chicken from the States, etc. 

Whether you see these as protectionist rackets to shore up vested EU interests or genuinely good laws to protect your average consumer is often just a matter of personal opinion and/or political affiliation.

Without a doubt, large companies (not just US companies) would like to break into the EU market, a) because it is huge and b) because they can easily undercut EU prices due to the various practices they have to raise yields/lower costs etc. that are banned here. But to do this, they need someone to come along and break open the massive amount of legislation that keeps the whole thing intact. Hence Brexit.

No wonder this is a highly charged issue. Trump put his foot in it this week, by saying the NHS would also be on the table in any trade deal between the US and the UK, although there is evidence he didn't actually know what the NHS was at the time. Nevertheless, that slip of the tongue made many people realize what is actually at stake here.

 


 
Thanks Noenz!  Gives us an objective on the ground synopsis!

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 2:31pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
(...) Trump put his foot in it this week, by saying the NHS would also be on the table in any trade deal between the US and the UK, although there is evidence he didn't actually know what the NHS was at the time. Nevertheless, that slip of the tongue made many people realize what is actually at stake here.

He/they know(s). (May '18)

Profit Over People.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 2:05pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?

I think we do have a dog in that fight, it's just that Trump is rooting for the other dog.

The EU is the flagship project of internationalists, and they have become everybody's favorite booggiemen. Until Trump got elected your political party paid at least lip service to supporting trade barriers and such; NAFTA passed over strident Democratic opposition, as did fast-tracking the TPP negotiations. At least as long as a Republican was in the White House.

Don't look for rational reasons here, this is chest-thumping demagoguery.

 
Being a boilerplate for internationalism is only half the story. The other half is the amazing strength of the often unseen institutions that make that international cooperation function. 

There is a lot of antagonism towards the EU from neoliberals, like Rees-Moog who view the EU as some gigantic protectionist racket. The unfortunate thing is that such charges are not entirely without justification. 

As a governing institution, the EU is a huge behemoth of civil servants and politicians who come together to hammer out generally rational comprises about how they can create consensus and then put this into law. In each case multiply this with the complexity of about twenty different languages and the plurality of views and national interests and factor in the doctrine of at least trying to find consensus on every issue and you'll get some idea of how complex this is.

And given that most national law is ultimately made by EU political institutions, it is astonishing how little of it enters the public discussion until it gets passed down to the various national assemblies who enact "implementing regulations" that basically translate EU law into national law, quite often after the horse has bolted.

However, after dissing it like this, I actually think living in the EU is fantastic, precisely because of the plurality of views and the consensus-driven politics.. There is an awful lot of really good law that sets out to protect individuals and consumers, the general data protection regulation, being perhaps the most visible recent example. 

Other laws are a ban on genetically modified produce. The EU does not allow hormone-treated beef to be imported, from Australia for instance, or chlorinated chicken from the States, etc. 

Whether you see these as protectionist rackets to shore up vested EU interests or genuinely good laws to protect your average consumer is often just a matter of personal opinion and/or political affiliation.

Without a doubt, large companies (not just US companies) would like to break into the EU market, a) because it is huge and b) because they can easily undercut EU prices due to the various practices they have to raise yields/lower costs etc. that are banned here. But to do this, they need someone to come along and break open the massive amount of legislation that keeps the whole thing intact. Hence Brexit.

No wonder this is a highly charged issue. Trump put his foot in it this week, by saying the NHS would also be on the table in any trade deal between the US and the UK, although there is evidence he didn't actually know what the NHS was at the time. Nevertheless, that slip of the tongue made many people realize what is actually at stake here.

 


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 12:43pm

steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?

I think we do have a dog in that fight, it's just that Trump is rooting for the other dog.

The EU is the flagship project of internationalists, and they have become everybody's favorite booggiemen. Until Trump got elected your political party paid at least lip service to supporting trade barriers and such; NAFTA passed over strident Democratic opposition, as did fast-tracking the TPP negotiations. At least as long as a Republican was in the White House.

Don't look for rational reasons here, this is chest-thumping demagoguery.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 11:43am



 steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). .....
 
The easy answer is tribalism.  Pure and simple.   Ethno-nationalism might be a more accurate label.


Though, frankly, most of us should be familiar with the Trump persona by now.  Brexit means a weaker isolated UK and thus a partner that can be bullied and intimidated in trade negotiations for the apparent benefit of Americans.

A united EU including Britain is simply too formidable.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 11:10am

 steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?
�4��

 

if i were trying to figure out what may be behind trump's interest in brexit , i'd probably start with influences like steve bannon

or any other people around trump (or in his circle) that shape policy and/or philosophical position

i suspect bannon is hugely influential in the china negotiations as well

regards

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 9:55am



 steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?






�4��
 
Because weakening Europe is a priority of Putin and he has convinced Trump it is a good thing

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 8:46am

 steeler wrote:
I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?


�4��

 
It does have to do with the overriding theme of nationality and sovereignty of nations.  The EU is the antithesis of that and Trump and his nationalist followers in US and Europe are antagonistic towards the existence of the EU in the first place especially Belgium and Germany the true power behind it.  This is part and parcel of the bigger worldwide struggle against the so called "New World Order" which most would think is a grand conspiracy on the face of it, but just like everything else in the universe is much more complex and has some reality based in it.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Jun 5, 2019 - 8:36am

I have been puzzled for quite a while regarding why Trump has been vocal in advocating for Great Britain to leave the European Union (Brexit). Can anyone explain to me why this is an issue one way or the other for the United States? Is this just part of Trump's "nationalism" theme — everyone should go it alone? It would seem to me that a U.S. President would not take a stance on such an issue, saying that it is something for the people of Great Britain to decide. I just cannot figure out why the U.S. has a dog in that particular fight. Anyone?






�4��
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 2, 2019 - 7:49pm


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 1, 2019 - 6:58pm

Best MPs reactions as semi-naked climate protesters disrupt Brexit debate

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 1, 2019 - 4:52am

i haven't really followed the nuttery surrounding this issue

let me guess

(central) bankers win again?

this has to be confusing/conflicting for the mmt crowd


Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next