Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.
as i understand it one of the wrinkles is that micron pulled out of an IPO three days before scheduled
someone in power probably felt slighted/upset so micron gets investigated
probably more nuanced than that
there are legit analyses/conversations regarding this and similar topics
the china power project is pretty good (listen/read here)
or paul triolo's work too (over at csis) he has a twitter account that pings some tech news as well
regards
Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.
Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.
The state of US education? More worried about guns, genitals and historical correctness.
so you post an article about the activity of science articles submitted
and i agree it is good that this is happening
i also agree with the article you posted that cooperation benefits all involved
and what do you post in response?
did you read the article you posted?
and if you did read it, the above is what you took away?
is this really your best objective assessment of what was written?
regards
Caroline Wagner, a science and policy researcher at the Ohio State University in Columbus, who has published research1 suggesting that China has overtaken the United States on top-cited papers, says that, when measured on âsimple bibliometrics like productivity and citations, China has outperformed expectationsâ.
She adds, however, that it still âsignificantly trailsâ behind other nations âin its capacity to absorb and apply knowledgeâ, and that the impact of the decline in its research collaborations with some major countries, such as the United States, remains uncertain.
This, Wagner says, âportends ill for domestic progress. Numerous scholars have demonstrated that Chinaâs most-cited works are produced in collaboration with other nations, particularly the United States.â
At a time of intense partisan polarization, bashing China is one issue on which both parties canât get enough. Republicans sense that Chinaâs rise â and the supposed American decline that accompanies it â serves as a useful political weapon against President Joe Biden.
âThe second thing thatâs happening, and thatâs more concerning for me,â Michael Brenes, Non-Resident Fellow at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft, âis that the Biden administration is pursuing a policy where it believes the China threat can be served to revive or renew American democracy and American foreign policy, in a post war on terror era.â Meaning, he added, that everything from domestic renewal to industrial policy to foreign policymaking is being justified on that basis. (...)
The way in which this is being framed caters to the most hawkish members in Congress, according to Brenes. But heâs not confident that the trend will be reversed anytime soon, because targeting a common enemy is âjust too convenient for politicians in the United States, particularly at the moment where weâre getting concerned about the anxiety of American power, and concerned about the future of American dominance and hegemony.â
