[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Looting & vandalism isn't protest - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 2:56pm
 
2020 Elections - westslope - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:20pm
 
Trump - westslope - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:08pm
 
Bluesound Sound Dropouts - BillG - Sep 24, 2020 - 12:02pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - pigtail - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:28am
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:20am
 
Language - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:12am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Sep 24, 2020 - 6:00am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - sunybuny - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Film & Video Production - rgio - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Quotes: Your Favorite Comedians - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:07am
 
Questions. - whatshisname - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:10pm
 
American Justice - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
Your favourite conspiracy theory? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
*** PUNS *** ASTRONOMY - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:24pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:22pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:33pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:21pm
 
The Obituary Page - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:56am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Red_Dragon - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
how do you feel right now? - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
WikiLeaks - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Favorite Quotes - Coaxial - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Race in America - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 12:06am
 
The American Dream - kcar - Sep 22, 2020 - 11:49pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Sep 22, 2020 - 10:07pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 22, 2020 - 9:16pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:50pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Sep 22, 2020 - 4:04pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
Brazil - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 22, 2020 - 7:49am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:29pm
 
Things I'd LIKE to find at my house. - Antigone - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:31pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Steely_D - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:13pm
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - DianaLipka - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Best Song Comments. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Trolls at RP - Steely_D - Sep 20, 2020 - 4:41pm
 
Facebook Tips - Ohmsen - Sep 20, 2020 - 2:37pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 12:34pm
 
Environment - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:16am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 7:29am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - miamizsun - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Republican Party - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:14am
 
FLAC Streaming - gsbaronnier - Sep 20, 2020 - 3:24am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 4:57pm
 
How's the weather? - Antigone - Sep 19, 2020 - 3:48pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 2:17pm
 
TV shows you watch - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2020 - 12:57pm
 
China - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 11:07am
 
Thank you, Bug. - miamizsun - Sep 19, 2020 - 6:53am
 
Things You Thought Today - Antigone - Sep 19, 2020 - 6:04am
 
Canada - R_P - Sep 18, 2020 - 7:37pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Sep 18, 2020 - 6:20pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - miamizsun - Sep 18, 2020 - 1:59pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 11:05am
 
Private messages in a public forum - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 10:21am
 
honk if you think manbird and OV are one and the same ent... - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 10:14am
 
Buddy's Haven - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 9:14am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2020 - 8:10am
 
Drop the Puck! NHL Lockout Ends! - black321 - Sep 18, 2020 - 6:06am
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Sep 18, 2020 - 5:26am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 9:04pm
 
Signs o' the Apocalypse in the news... - Steely_D - Sep 17, 2020 - 6:57pm
 
Soliciting ideas to bring about a more humane world - miamizsun - Sep 17, 2020 - 5:06pm
 
Rock Movies/Documentaries - Steely_D - Sep 17, 2020 - 1:39pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:57am
 
What are you listening to now? - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:53am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Sep 17, 2020 - 11:49am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » I'm a Dem. Which Republican would you recommend I vote for? Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Post to this Topic
jahgirl8

jahgirl8 Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2020 - 8:36pm



 FooledAgain wrote:

Shouldn't the Y be blue?

 
YES

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 8:28pm

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Well, Jon Huntsman is much more pro-life than Ron Paul is.  Huntsman is in favor of a federal "right-to-life" amendment that would be enforced at the federal level.  Paul is not.  So Rose, I'm sorry you voted for the most pro-life GOP candidate outside of perhaps Santorum.  

I do disagree with Paul on this issue and am strongly pro-choice.  But you have to look at the probabilities — what is Paul more able to accomplish, stopping war or stopping abortion?  As commander in chief, the former, by far!  

Look, among republicans the only candidate more pro-CHOICE than Paul is possibly Mitt Romney, but Mitt Romney will do and say anything to get elected so I don't really believe any of his past actions or statements.  All the others are explicitly more pro-life.  If you can vote in a GOP primary, I'd strongly advise voting for Paul...why not do that now, and then you can vote for Obama against him if you really are a single issue pro-choice voter.  

The media need to stop portraying Huntsman as a moderate and Paul an extremist.  Huntsman is "moderate" on far fewer issues than Paul is.  He's more extreme on abortion, on the NDAA, on the federal government's power, bombing Iran, and on the drug war (the real moderate position on the drug war is to stop jailing nonviolent "offenders").  I don't mind Huntsman, and yes he is a distant second to Paul among the rest of the GOP candidates, but let's be real about the guy.

 

Here's the difference: those other candidates are Republicans - I full well expect them to have those policy positions. Although Ron Paul is running under the *banner* of the Republicans, he professes to be a Libertarian. He can't have it both ways, although he has attempted to do so for years. He is NO Republican.  He is NO Libertarian.
GeneP59

GeneP59 Avatar

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday.
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 8:47pm


Lincoln!
FooledAgain

FooledAgain Avatar

Location: 43°40'N 79°20'W
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 4:34pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yes, the more and more I study the positions of all the candidates, the more and more I have decided to stop all this calculating of who is the most electable and if I vote for this guy who will it hurt and what not. I am just going to vote for the person that reflects my viewpoints on the issues and the hell with it!

                                                       GARY JOHNSON 2012

 
Shouldn't the Y be blue?

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 8:22am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

That's fine, just remember Johnson is a bit of a wash compared to Paul in my view.  He's more hawkish and not quite as good on ending the drug war or protecting civil liberties.  He wants to legalize marijuana and that's great.  But he only wants to "decriminalize" other drugs, and I'm not sure what that means.  

I do agree he is more liberal/libertarian than Paul on abortion, immigration, and gay marriage.  

 
It is all about personal priorities, I am extremely socially liberal especially in matters of individual freedoms and what happens in our bedrooms so Paul is a turnoff to me in that respect. I am only concerned about Marijuana in relation to the drug war and am perfectly content on the war against illicit drugs (cocaine, meth, heroin and so forth) which have absolutely no benefit to society and do tremendous harm (alcohol is on the fence with me because so many cannot use it responsibly). I do not think illicit drugs can be completely eradicated, but freeing up the tremendous resources presently consumed stopping Canibus use and distribution should allow for us to keep them under control not to mention freeing us all to use evolution's greatest gift to humanity with complete freedom.{#Cowboy} 

Edit: read this back to myself and noticed the frequent use of variations of the word "Freedom". Quite revealing in a Freudian kind of way of what is important to me.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:29am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Fair enough.  I like Gary a lot, maybe even more than Paul though I disagree with his "FairTax," and he supports Gitmo.  He got royally screwed in the GOP debates, no doubt.  But realistically Johnson is going to have a very hard time running as a 3rd party.  He'd actually have better odds staying in the GOP and hoping the other candidates become physically incapacitated or melt down.  

Unfortunately, 3rd parties are pariahs in the US.  I'd love to see a viable 3rd party here, but the establishment and the media just hate them and are out to destroy 3rd parties.  The US is not a true democracy or even a very good representative democracy.  There's too much of a mentality here that 3rd parties are nothing but "spoilers" — they are viewed in a negative light instead of a positive angle.  

 
Yes but the beauty of all that is that only we, the sheeple can affect that change and make it happen. The guns are not pointed at our heads disallowing a break from the parties.......yet. We still have a choice and I, for one am going to make it.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:22am

 LordBaltimore wrote:
Abortion has been the "white whale" of Republicans ever since Roe v. Wade.  Nobody can catch it or stop it.  If Reagan, Nixon, Ford, Newt Gingrich, and both George Bushes (the younger GWB having both branches of Congress to the GOP by the way) weren't able to eliminate abortion, Ron Paul certainly isn't going to accomplish it.  

 
That's because even the overwhelming majority of Catholic women in this country use some form of contraception.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:07am

 LordBaltimore wrote:
Oh, Huntsman also believes in a border fence, and Paul doesn't.  Again, Huntsman is more EXTREME on immigration than Dr. Paul is but the media still thinks of him as the moderate.  

Huntsman also wants to get rid of the mortgage interest tax deduction, and he supports means testing for social security.  

Ron Paul has explicitly stated on many occasions that while he would allow young people to opt out of Soc Sec, the benefits for current retirees are one of the LAST things he would ever cut as president, even though he believes it is technically unconstitutional he would still fund the program.  Again, another issue where Paul is MORE MODERATE than Huntsman.  

Rose, sorry I couldn't dig some more of this up about Huntsman before you voted, but hopefully it will help others see the truth about the guy.  I still find him the least offensive GOP candidate not named Ron Paul, but I'm starting to realize that the guy is very flawed and a lot more conservative than the media portrays him.  

I do agree with him on the China thing, and that's all well and good, but I'm not a fan of a guy who supports a border fence and is the most extremist GOP candidate on pro-life issues outside of Santorum.   

Also on another note, Gary Johnson is now running as a Libertarian.  I doubt he'll have much opposition for their nomination so again Ron Paul is probably the best choice for most progressives in the primary season, unless you want to make some sort of hopeless "statement" in the Democratic primary by voting for one of the other random candidates who are running against BO there.  

 
Yes, the more and more I study the positions of all the candidates, the more and more I have decided to stop all this calculating of who is the most electable and if I vote for this guy who will it hurt and what not. I am just going to vote for the person that reflects my viewpoints on the issues and the hell with it!

                                                       GARY JOHNSON 2012


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 6:42am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Well, Jon Huntsman is much more pro-life than Ron Paul is.  Huntsman is in favor of a federal "right-to-life" amendment that would be enforced at the federal level.  Paul is not.  So Rose, I'm sorry you voted for the most pro-life GOP candidate outside of perhaps Santorum.  

I do disagree with Paul on this issue and am strongly pro-choice.  But you have to look at the probabilities — what is Paul more able to accomplish, stopping war or stopping abortion?  As commander in chief, the former, by far!  

Look, among republicans the only candidate more pro-CHOICE than Paul is possibly Mitt Romney, but Mitt Romney will do and say anything to get elected so I don't really believe any of his past actions or statements.  All the others are explicitly more pro-life.  If you can vote in a GOP primary, I'd strongly advise voting for Paul...why not do that now, and then you can vote for Obama against him if you really are a single issue pro-choice voter.  

The media need to stop portraying Huntsman as a moderate and Paul an extremist.  Huntsman is "moderate" on far fewer issues than Paul is.  He's more extreme on abortion, on the NDAA, on the federal government's power, bombing Iran, and on the drug war (the real moderate position on the drug war is to stop jailing nonviolent "offenders").  I don't mind Huntsman, and yes he is a distant second to Paul among the rest of the GOP candidates, but let's be real about the guy.

 
A cross post about contraception legislation



marko86

marko86 Avatar

Location: North TX
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 11:18am

 Romulus wrote:

No I'm not, I'm not against regulating the banking industry and the Federal Reserve. Do we agree there? That the Fed should be transparent and regulated?

And Phil was no proponent of Austrian economics. He was simply a crook who pushed that repeal to replace it with some other fallacious bill that contained an Enron loophole to exploit. Guys like him have no principles or philosophies.. they're corruptible.
 
True that! Should also mention the his wife was and may still be, a lobbist for the banking industry. Funny how that work, huh.

I probably will caucus, here in texas for Ron Paul. not that I am a particualr proponent of his overall philosophy, but I give him credit for actually being consistent and true to his ideals. it will be Obama come the general though.
Romulus

Romulus Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 10:31am

 aflanigan wrote:


Thanks to the politicians I mentioned (such as Phil Gramm) who started buying into the Austrian economists' notion that we don't need regulation of financial institutions/markets.  You're making my case for me by citing the repeal of Glass/Steagal.

 
No I'm not, I'm not against regulating the banking industry and the Federal Reserve. Do we agree there? That the Fed should be transparent and regulated?

And Phil was no proponent of Austrian economics. He was simply a crook who pushed that repeal to replace it with some other fallacious bill that contained an Enron loophole to exploit. Guys like him have no principles or philosophies.. they're corruptible.

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 9:32am

 Romulus wrote:

Glass Steagal was repealed thanks to who?
 

Thanks to the politicians I mentioned (such as Phil Gramm) who started buying into the Austrian economists' notion that we don't need regulation of financial institutions/markets.  You're making my case for me by citing the repeal of Glass/Steagal.
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:48am

 miamizsun wrote:

{#Lol}

please send bum salve asap
 
nah, you don't believe in all that hocus pocus...{#Wink}

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:45am

 Beaker wrote:



We have that problem up here, with all of the parties!  None are totally devoid of loons.  
 
Absolutely true. No party, political or otherwise, is free of some crazies. But it seems like the GOP has been hijacked by its loonies. It seems like the nuttiest ones of the bunch are running the show. It's one thing to have a few outlying crackpots, that's to be expected. But to put them into leadership positions seems counter-productive.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:44am

 oldviolin wrote:
lots of pine trees and sand fleas too
 
{#Lol}

please send bum salve asap

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:42am

 miamizsun wrote:

listen sugar pants, i'm sure the touchy feely between us would be a mutual exchange
 
lots of pine trees and sand fleas too
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:41am

 Manbird wrote:

If it were up to me, I'd give you a titty twister, little mister.
 
Psh. Yeah, for a chocolate robot maybe. 

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:41am

 Manbird wrote:

If it were up to me, I'd give you a titty twister, little mister.

 
listen sugar pants, i'm sure the touchy feely between us would be a mutual exchange

Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: Oroville, Ca
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:37am

 miamizsun wrote:

Great! And thank you.

Would you use or initiate force against me, or authorize anyone on your behalf to use or initiate force against me for disagreeing with you?
 
If it were up to me, I'd give you a titty twister, little mister.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:15am

 hippiechick wrote:
Of course!
 
Great! And thank you.

Would you use or initiate force against me, or authorize anyone on your behalf to use or initiate force against me for disagreeing with you?


Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next