[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise - Coaxial - Dec 11, 2019 - 6:27pm
 
Trump - Lazy8 - Dec 11, 2019 - 5:55pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - Red_Dragon - Dec 11, 2019 - 5:26pm
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Dec 11, 2019 - 5:23pm
 
What makes you smile? - Red_Dragon - Dec 11, 2019 - 5:20pm
 
Finland - R_P - Dec 11, 2019 - 4:55pm
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - jtdenver - Dec 11, 2019 - 4:44pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Red_Dragon - Dec 11, 2019 - 3:47pm
 
Books read recently - haresfur - Dec 11, 2019 - 2:39pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Dec 11, 2019 - 1:54pm
 
Name My Band - Antigone - Dec 11, 2019 - 1:46pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Dec 11, 2019 - 1:19pm
 
FLAC Streaming - geeteaare - Dec 11, 2019 - 10:36am
 
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood? - buddy - Dec 11, 2019 - 9:59am
 
Environment - R_P - Dec 11, 2019 - 9:55am
 
What are you listening to now? - westslope - Dec 11, 2019 - 9:46am
 
RP on a loop via Alexa on Sonos - BillG - Dec 11, 2019 - 9:06am
 
Photos you haven't taken of other people... - Proclivities - Dec 11, 2019 - 8:58am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - islander - Dec 11, 2019 - 6:19am
 
Things that piss me off - islander - Dec 11, 2019 - 6:18am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Dec 11, 2019 - 5:03am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Dec 11, 2019 - 4:07am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - gtufano - Dec 11, 2019 - 12:39am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Dec 10, 2019 - 8:17pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Dec 10, 2019 - 4:16pm
 
RP forum post editing - westslope - Dec 10, 2019 - 1:53pm
 
Mars - Manbird - Dec 10, 2019 - 1:52pm
 
Afghanistan - westslope - Dec 10, 2019 - 1:48pm
 
Post your favorite 'You Tube' Videos Here - Manbird - Dec 10, 2019 - 1:29pm
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - Manbird - Dec 10, 2019 - 1:27pm
 
Strange & Cool Music - Proclivities - Dec 10, 2019 - 12:28pm
 
Critical Thought - miamizsun - Dec 10, 2019 - 8:34am
 
Evolution! - R_P - Dec 9, 2019 - 11:09pm
 
Automotive Lust - Red_Dragon - Dec 9, 2019 - 3:23pm
 
TV shows you watch - haresfur - Dec 9, 2019 - 3:15pm
 
This Just In - miamizsun - Dec 9, 2019 - 2:59pm
 
Tech & Science - miamizsun - Dec 9, 2019 - 2:57pm
 
Art Show - miamizsun - Dec 9, 2019 - 2:34pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - buddy - Dec 9, 2019 - 1:29pm
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - gvajda - Dec 9, 2019 - 7:43am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 8, 2019 - 6:13pm
 
Food - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 8, 2019 - 4:20pm
 
Winter time is here ! - miamizsun - Dec 8, 2019 - 8:20am
 
Today in History - miamizsun - Dec 8, 2019 - 8:19am
 
Economix - Lazy8 - Dec 7, 2019 - 8:32pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - Red_Dragon - Dec 7, 2019 - 6:20pm
 
What are you reading now? - miamizsun - Dec 7, 2019 - 12:40pm
 
Impeachment Time: - miamizsun - Dec 7, 2019 - 11:54am
 
Climate Change - miamizsun - Dec 7, 2019 - 11:42am
 
how do you feel right now? - Coaxial - Dec 7, 2019 - 7:52am
 
RP App for Android - jarro - Dec 7, 2019 - 2:22am
 
Things You Thought Today - triskele - Dec 6, 2019 - 4:36pm
 
FOUR WORDS - triskele - Dec 6, 2019 - 4:35pm
 
THREE WORDS - triskele - Dec 6, 2019 - 4:34pm
 
TWO WORDS - triskele - Dec 6, 2019 - 4:34pm
 
ONE WORD - triskele - Dec 6, 2019 - 4:33pm
 
What songs make you cry... - Red_Dragon - Dec 6, 2019 - 3:43pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - buddy - Dec 6, 2019 - 2:22pm
 
Republican Sulking Forum - buddy - Dec 6, 2019 - 1:16pm
 
Nice set Bill.... - buddy - Dec 6, 2019 - 12:46pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Dec 6, 2019 - 10:27am
 
Breaking News - Prodigal_SOB - Dec 6, 2019 - 8:43am
 
Maybe it's just the beer talking... - Proclivities - Dec 6, 2019 - 6:27am
 
FLAC Streaming Problem - BillG - Dec 6, 2019 - 3:34am
 
http://stream.radioparadise.com/aac-320 stream cutting out - BillG - Dec 6, 2019 - 3:33am
 
The Perfect Government - miamizsun - Dec 5, 2019 - 3:28pm
 
New Music - miamizsun - Dec 5, 2019 - 2:55pm
 
Infinite cat - kcar - Dec 5, 2019 - 1:45pm
 
The Wall - miamizsun - Dec 5, 2019 - 1:40pm
 
Democratic Party - miamizsun - Dec 5, 2019 - 1:37pm
 
Way Cool Video - miamizsun - Dec 5, 2019 - 6:54am
 
The Middle East - Red_Dragon - Dec 5, 2019 - 6:40am
 
Best Song Comments. - sunybuny - Dec 5, 2019 - 6:23am
 
Echoy voice overs - TheKing2 - Dec 5, 2019 - 1:13am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Dec 4, 2019 - 4:59pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » RIP R.E.M. Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Nov 9, 2019 - 10:25pm


ptooey

ptooey Avatar

Location: right behind you. no, over there.
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 15, 2011 - 1:16pm

Talk About Their Passion - fellow musicians on R.E.M.

Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 6:46pm

 bokey wrote:
There should be a rule that if your band is named REM, you don't get played on RP.
 
No!

Dreaming used to be an underlying theme of all R.E.M.'s songs. I don't know if this is still true.

I can't say I like everything they did, but I like a lot of it. 
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 5:26pm

There should be a rule that if your band is named REM, you don't get played on RP.


Antigone

Antigone Avatar

Location: A house, in a Virginian Valley
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:23am

 Lazy8 wrote:
When we see a 90 year old bluesman still playing the same tunes he played when radios had tubes we nod admiringly and thank him for keeping his traditions alive. When we see an old rock&roll musician playing oldies from 30 years back we say "how pathetic." Seems like there's a contradiction there.

The 90 year old guy probably didn't disappear from the face of the earth between the ages of 40 and 90, he kept plugging away at it. Rock&roll may have meaning for us that we associate with youth and rebellion, but that may just be us. When a musician writes a great song it's not just a great song for us, it's a great song for him. If he isn't tired of it I can't see a reason why a later generation shouldn't hear it straight from the source, like we did.

If you got what you paid for when you bought the record/ticket/download the musician doesn't owe you anything. S/he doesn't have to stay 20 years old and angry/sexy/agile. They went thru just as much as you did between that first album and now, and the people on stage bring all that with them. If that spoils it for you stay home. It's just a reminder that we're all hurtling toward Doom, chased by our demons and ex-wives and the ghosts of friends who didn't make it to rehab.

All a part of that rich pageant of life.

 



winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:13am

 Lazy8 wrote:
When we see a 90 year old bluesman still playing the same tunes he played when radios had tubes we nod admiringly and thank him for keeping his traditions alive. When we see an old rock&roll musician playing oldies from 30 years back we say "how pathetic." Seems like there's a contradiction there.

The 90 year old guy probably didn't disappear from the face of the earth between the ages of 40 and 90, he kept plugging away at it. Rock&roll may have meaning for us that we associate with youth and rebellion, but that may just be us. When a musician writes a great song it's not just a great song for us, it's a great song for him. If he isn't tired of it I can't see a reason why a later generation shouldn't hear it straight from the source, like we did.

If you got what you paid for when you bought the record/ticket/download the musician doesn't owe you anything. S/he doesn't have to stay 20 years old and angry/sexy/agile. They went thru just as much as you did between that first album and now, and the people on stage bring all that with them. If that spoils it for you stay home. It's just a reminder that we're all hurtling toward Doom, chased by our demons and ex-wives and the ghosts of friends who didn't make it to rehab.

All a part of that rich pageant of life.

 



sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:45am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Er, what?
 
Robert Johnson died age 27 

I'm stopping there since your post is nonsense. 

 

Good for you. Sorry to have wasted your time.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:36am

 Beaker wrote:
 

Misirlou - was released by Dick Dale & The Deltones in 1961. 

There is a great archive video of Dick playing this with his teenage son at the Seattle EMP. I saw it with my youngest.

When we got home he practiced that tune obsessively. He's getting pretty good at it.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:31am

 sirdroseph wrote:
Traditional Blues has always been played by older people
 
Er, what?
 
Robert Johnson died age 27 

I'm stopping there since your post is nonsense. 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:26am

 ptooey wrote:
 sirdroseph wrote:

I think you hit on it, there is a difference between blues and rock and roll. Traditional Blues has always been played by older people that have experienced much turmoil in their long lives and express it through the Blues, it actually seems strange to hear Mississippi Delta blues played by younger people. Also traditional blues musicians generally play the same songs so it is as it always was, not better or worse regardless of how long they have been doing it. Really it all comes down to the music though, if the music starts to sound formulaic and tired because this group has been continuously putting out music for 50 plus years, that seems like a natural progression. I mean how long can the same people stay together and sound fresh and new? That is quite a daunting task that precious few can pull off. It is not an indictment on the artist at all, it just is what it is. From the artists perspective though, you are correct they owe us nothing and can do whatever they want, just as I am allowed to think to myself that they look silly doing it.




Robert Johnson - possibly the founding member of the 27 club.

 
He was born old.

ptooey

ptooey Avatar

Location: right behind you. no, over there.
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:26am

 sirdroseph wrote:

I think you hit on it, there is a difference between blues and rock and roll. Traditional Blues has always been played by older people that have experienced much turmoil in their long lives and express it through the Blues, it actually seems strange to hear Mississippi Delta blues played by younger people. Also traditional blues musicians generally play the same songs so it is as it always was, not better or worse regardless of how long they have been doing it. Really it all comes down to the music though, if the music starts to sound formulaic and tired because this group has been continuously putting out music for 50 plus years, that seems like a natural progression. I mean how long can the same people stay together and sound fresh and new? That is quite a daunting task that precious few can pull off. It is not an indictment on the artist at all, it just is what it is. From the artists perspective though, you are correct they owe us nothing and can do whatever they want, just as I am allowed to think to myself that they look silly doing it.




Robert Johnson - possibly the founding member of the 27 club.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:22am

 Lazy8 wrote:
When we see a 90 year old bluesman still playing the same tunes he played when radios had tubes we nod admiringly and thank him for keeping his traditions alive. When we see an old rock&roll musician playing oldies from 30 years back we say "how pathetic." Seems like there's a contradiction there.

The 90 year old guy probably didn't disappear from the face of the earth between the ages of 40 and 90, he kept plugging away at it. Rock&roll may have meaning for us that we associate with youth and rebellion, but that may just be us. When a musician writes a great song it's not just a great song for us, it's a great song for him. If he isn't tired of it I can't see a reason why a later generation shouldn't hear it straight from the source, like we did.

If you got what you paid for when you bought the record/ticket/download the musician doesn't owe you anything. S/he doesn't have to stay 20 years old and angry/sexy/agile. They went thru just as much as you did between that first album and now, and the people on stage bring all that with them. If that spoils it for you stay home. It's just a reminder that we're all hurtling toward Doom, chased by our demons and ex-wives and the ghosts of friends who didn't make it to rehab.

All a part of that rich pageant of life.

 
I think you hit on it, there is a difference between blues and rock and roll. Traditional Blues has always been played by older people that have experienced much turmoil in their long lives and express it through the Blues, it actually seems strange to hear Mississippi Delta blues played by younger people. Also traditional blues musicians generally play the same songs so it is as it always was, not better or worse regardless of how long they have been doing it. Really it all comes down to the music though, if the music starts to sound formulaic and tired because this group has been continuously putting out music for 50 plus years, that seems like a natural progression. I mean how long can the same people stay together and sound fresh and new? That is quite a daunting task that precious few can pull off. It is not an indictment on the artist at all, it just is what it is. From the artists perspective though, you are correct they owe us nothing and can do whatever they want, just as I am allowed to think to myself that they look silly doing it.

superfido

superfido Avatar

Location: Sweden
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:19am

I can only say thank god, the whining is over.
ptooey

ptooey Avatar

Location: right behind you. no, over there.
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:14am

 Lazy8 wrote:
When we see a 90 year old bluesman still playing the same tunes he played when radios had tubes we nod admiringly and thank him for keeping his traditions alive. When we see an old rock&roll musician playing oldies from 30 years back we say "how pathetic." Seems like there's a contradiction there.

The 90 year old guy probably didn't disappear from the face of the earth between the ages of 40 and 90, he kept plugging away at it. Rock&roll may have meaning for us that we associate with youth and rebellion, but that may just be us. When a musician writes a great song it's not just a great song for us, it's a great song for him. If he isn't tired of it I can't see a reason why a later generation shouldn't hear it straight from the source, like we did.

If you got what you paid for when you bought the record/ticket/download the musician doesn't owe you anything. S/he doesn't have to stay 20 years old and angry/sexy/agile. They went thru just as much as you did between that first album and now, and the people on stage bring all that with them. If that spoils it for you stay home. It's just a reminder that we're all hurtling toward Doom, chased by our demons and ex-wives and the ghosts of friends who didn't make it to rehab.

All a part of that rich pageant of life.

 


sharkartist

sharkartist Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:14am

 sirdroseph wrote:


My whole take on this subject is they can do whatever they like, bands such as REM and the Stones have enough money where they are beyond market bearing principles so it doesn't matter whether people like or buy their music or not to determine whether they are able to continue. Now, if bands are interested in their legacy and what people think of them then they should listen to the critics and what people say about their latest works as well as listening with an objective ear and be honest with themselves as to whether they think it sounds fresh or creative. Also they should look in the mirror; old people playing rock music is generally not cool. That doesn't mean they should not play, they have free will and this is a free country they can do what they want.  They just need to be aware they will probably look silly being bloated and old playing hits from the 60s. That's a fact. Personally I really don't care what any of these bands do. If I like them I listen to them, if I don't, I don't. It is not my legacy.

 
Your points are well taken. And I must concur with you in that bloated rockers from generations past look silly up on stage playing music that was for all intents and purposes, the music of youth. 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:11am

When we see a 90 year old bluesman still playing the same tunes he played when radios had tubes we nod admiringly and thank him for keeping his traditions alive. When we see an old rock&roll musician playing oldies from 30 years back we say "how pathetic." Seems like there's a contradiction there.

The 90 year old guy probably didn't disappear from the face of the earth between the ages of 40 and 90, he kept plugging away at it. Rock&roll may have meaning for us that we associate with youth and rebellion, but that may just be us. When a musician writes a great song it's not just a great song for us, it's a great song for him. If he isn't tired of it I can't see a reason why a later generation shouldn't hear it straight from the source, like we did.

If you got what you paid for when you bought the record/ticket/download the musician doesn't owe you anything. S/he doesn't have to stay 20 years old and angry/sexy/agile. They went thru just as much as you did between that first album and now, and the people on stage bring all that with them. If that spoils it for you stay home. It's just a reminder that we're all hurtling toward Doom, chased by our demons and ex-wives and the ghosts of friends who didn't make it to rehab.

All a part of that rich pageant of life.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 9:41am

 sharkartist wrote:

This is one of those topics that I'm thoroughly interested in: when should a band hang up their rock 'n roll shoes? Being of the generation that witnessed rock coming out of its infancy and maturing into its rebelious and creative high-water mark, I've developed differing conclusions concerning different bands and the type of rock music that they created. I was never a rabid Stones fan but certainly dug their music, especially from the Beggar's Banquet to Exile era. I actually purchased their last studio effort but found they had little left to say and nothing new to spark my senses. I was a rabid Who fan however, but have sadly watched them decline into marketing desperados who are constantly looking for new ways to repackage and resell their past glories. They should have respectfully said goodbye with the passing of John Entwistle. I've always had the greatest respect for Led Zeppelin, for choosing to let their body of work and reputation remain intact and to call it over when they lost their amazing drummer, John Bonham.

As a moderately enthusiatic fan of R.E.M. I have a great respect for their body of work and think this was a timely and graceful way in which they announced their parting of ways. They too will enjoy a great reputation and contribution the the history of rock and perhaps will get back together to do a show or two in the future to take their fans back to special times in their lives. Cream did it as well as Zep and the Police and it was great.

On a local note, I've had the great pleasure of befriending a local band here from SLOtown called StillTime. Incredibly talented and gifted young players who released two excellent CDs and a tasteful collection of their early formative years as Cal Poly students all crammed into a mobile home. They toured the country and had a very great following but due to financial considerations of a six-piece band trying to compete in these troubling times, decided to move on with no regrets and again, leave behind a strong body of work for all of us grateful fans to listen to and feel the love of all those great gigs and the music they got on record.

In the end, I raise a glass and toast R.E.M. for their contribution to our lives and their decision to go out on top.

 

 

My whole take on this subject is they can do whatever they like, bands such as REM and the Stones have enough money where they are beyond market bearing principles so it doesn't matter whether people like or buy their music or not to determine whether they are able to continue. Now, if bands are interested in their legacy and what people think of them then they should listen to the critics and what people say about their latest works as well as listening with an objective ear and be honest with themselves as to whether they think it sounds fresh or creative. Also they should look in the mirror; old people playing rock music is generally not cool. That doesn't mean they should not play, they have free will and this is a free country they can do what they want.  They just need to be aware they will probably look silly being bloated and old playing hits from the 60s. That's a fact. Personally I really don't care what any of these bands do. If I like them I listen to them, if I don't, I don't. It is not my legacy.


sharkartist

sharkartist Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 9:17am

 oldslabsides wrote:

No apologies - I'm one of those die-hard Stones fans who still digs 'em.  It's better to burn out than to fade away...
 
This is one of those topics that I'm thoroughly interested in: when should a band hang up their rock 'n roll shoes? Being of the generation that witnessed rock coming out of its infancy and maturing into its rebelious and creative high-water mark, I've developed differing conclusions concerning different bands and the type of rock music that they created. I was never a rabid Stones fan but certainly dug their music, especially from the Beggar's Banquet to Exile era. I actually purchased their last studio effort but found they had little left to say and nothing new to spark my senses. I was a rabid Who fan however, but have sadly watched them decline into marketing desperados who are constantly looking for new ways to repackage and resell their past glories. They should have respectfully said goodbye with the passing of John Entwistle. I've always had the greatest respect for Led Zeppelin, for choosing to let their body of work and reputation remain intact and to call it over when they lost their amazing drummer, John Bonham.

As a moderately enthusiatic fan of R.E.M. I have a great respect for their body of work and think this was a timely and graceful way in which they announced their parting of ways. They too will enjoy a great reputation and contribution the the history of rock and perhaps will get back together to do a show or two in the future to take their fans back to special times in their lives. Cream did it as well as Zep and the Police and it was great.

On a local note, I've had the great pleasure of befriending a local band here from SLOtown called StillTime. Incredibly talented and gifted young players who released two excellent CDs and a tasteful collection of their early formative years as Cal Poly students all crammed into a mobile home. They toured the country and had a very great following but due to financial considerations of a six-piece band trying to compete in these troubling times, decided to move on with no regrets and again, leave behind a strong body of work for all of us grateful fans to listen to and feel the love of all those great gigs and the music they got on record.

In the end, I raise a glass and toast R.E.M. for their contribution to our lives and their decision to go out on top.

 


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 6:17am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Yeah. I think officially breaking up means they don't have to keep their schedules coordinated, even if they didn't have anything planned. They can cut their agent loose and not be so bothered with requests to appear, etc. I'm sure they'll play together again sometime.
 
Yeah, now they get to be an oldies act!
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 6:09am

 rachlan wrote:
Although the cynic in me thinks, here comes the reunion tours.
 
Yeah. I think officially breaking up means they don't have to keep their schedules coordinated, even if they didn't have anything planned. They can cut their agent loose and not be so bothered with requests to appear, etc. I'm sure they'll play together again sometime.
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next