[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Oct 23, 2019 - 9:12am
 
Best Song Comments. - dischuckin - Oct 23, 2019 - 8:25am
 
Oops! - Proclivities - Oct 23, 2019 - 8:19am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Oct 23, 2019 - 7:45am
 
PANTS ON FIRE! - Red_Dragon - Oct 23, 2019 - 6:22am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Oct 23, 2019 - 6:15am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Oct 23, 2019 - 6:09am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - olivertwist - Oct 23, 2019 - 3:26am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - sirdroseph - Oct 23, 2019 - 2:24am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Oct 22, 2019 - 10:14pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2019 - 6:55pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2019 - 6:31pm
 
OUR CATS!! - westslope - Oct 22, 2019 - 6:22pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Oct 22, 2019 - 6:08pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Oct 22, 2019 - 4:45pm
 
Things You Thought Today - triskele - Oct 22, 2019 - 4:44pm
 
Canada - haresfur - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:46pm
 
electric duets and Rock Wiz - haresfur - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:38pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - rhahl - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:32pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Ohmsen - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:27pm
 
Speaking of Logos... - Ohmsen - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:24pm
 
Economix - miamizsun - Oct 22, 2019 - 3:03pm
 
Dying for Halloween Music to start! - Ohmsen - Oct 22, 2019 - 2:51pm
 
Beta Player on Android TV. - puntloos - Oct 22, 2019 - 2:12pm
 
Questions. - SeriousLee - Oct 22, 2019 - 1:04pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - SeriousLee - Oct 22, 2019 - 12:56pm
 
Interesting or Weird Cover Versions - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 22, 2019 - 12:37pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Oct 22, 2019 - 12:01pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2019 - 9:58am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2019 - 9:45am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2019 - 8:57am
 
Bad News / Good News - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 22, 2019 - 8:44am
 
Live Music - sirdroseph - Oct 22, 2019 - 6:46am
 
Suggestion: Americana Mix - sirdroseph - Oct 22, 2019 - 2:54am
 
Venezuela - R_P - Oct 22, 2019 - 1:19am
 
Bob Dylan - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2019 - 10:19pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2019 - 10:00pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2019 - 9:52pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 21, 2019 - 7:58pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Oct 21, 2019 - 4:12pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Ohmsen - Oct 21, 2019 - 4:01pm
 
Syria - Ohmsen - Oct 21, 2019 - 2:36pm
 
If Wishes Were Horses - katzendogs - Oct 21, 2019 - 1:06pm
 
Acoustic Guitar - R_P - Oct 21, 2019 - 12:55pm
 
Regarding dogs - miamizsun - Oct 21, 2019 - 10:58am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - lightfoot - Oct 21, 2019 - 10:17am
 
Nice set Bill.... - dischuckin - Oct 21, 2019 - 10:14am
 
Puzzle it - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2019 - 9:51am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Oct 21, 2019 - 9:35am
 
GHOST of HALLOWEEN, Past, Present, & Future - Proclivities - Oct 21, 2019 - 9:01am
 
RP Android app causing SystemUI to crash loop - BillG - Oct 21, 2019 - 8:53am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 21, 2019 - 8:30am
 
Democratic Party - Ohmsen - Oct 21, 2019 - 7:47am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - Ohmsen - Oct 21, 2019 - 7:32am
 
Music Videos - Proclivities - Oct 21, 2019 - 7:30am
 
The Global War on Terror - kurtster - Oct 20, 2019 - 6:45pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Oct 20, 2019 - 11:23am
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Oct 20, 2019 - 6:43am
 
If you are allowed to pack ten things to take to the Afte... - rashad - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:27pm
 
President Elizabeth Warren - haresfur - Oct 19, 2019 - 6:28pm
 
Tech & Science - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 4:05pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 3:40pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:50pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:33pm
 
Classical Music - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 2:19pm
 
Counting with Pictures - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:51am
 
Anti-War - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:43am
 
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •  - Ohmsen - Oct 19, 2019 - 10:29am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Oct 19, 2019 - 12:03am
 
New Music - R_P - Oct 18, 2019 - 11:45am
 
Room 3a - Proclivities - Oct 18, 2019 - 11:19am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - SeriousLee - Oct 18, 2019 - 9:08am
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 4:14am
 
The RANT Forum - miamizsun - Oct 18, 2019 - 4:02am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - SeriousLee - Oct 18, 2019 - 1:26am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » American Oil Strikes Again
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 18, 2019 - 2:20am



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
 
Pasted:  The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation. By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.

Conceptually sound.  Nevertheless, the solution calls for increasing green taxes on consumers.  Americans do not want that.  Americans of all partisan inclinations.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:30pm



 kurtster wrote:

how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
 
Knock yourself out.
 

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 8:39pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
Prodigal_SOB

Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:51am

 Red_Dragon wrote:

we don't need no education....

 
  twenty years of schoolin' and they put you on the day shift ....
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:41am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
we don't need no education....
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:34am

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 2, 2019 - 9:56am



 kurtster wrote:

That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

.......


 
All wrong.   But I understand your reaction as American policy elites and special interests are constantly misleading and manipulating American adult voters.

I would like to also apologize for using the term perceived the way economists use it when talking about the incidence of price or cost changes.    The lovely thing about excise taxes (taxes on volumes) is that they can be very, very transparent. 

To understand how high excise taxes would protect the US economy from oil price shocks, open up a spreadsheet and simulate what happens when a positive oil price shock drives up the price of gasoline by trying several different levels of excise taxes.    It is rather straight forward math.  If a big chunk of the retail price of gasoline/diesel is made of a fixed, constant excise tax the overall increase in retail prices following a spike in oil prices is muted.

In addition, a far higher excise tax on these deadly, polluting fuels would presumably lead to lower consumption of these fuels.   

Ideally, the higher retail prices would induce Americans into spending less time in an automobile, car-pooling, using public transport and best of all self-propelling either by walking or using a bicycle.  Hopefully that might arrest the obesity epidemic which is nothing but a big negative for social-economic outcomes.

Ideally, the higher retail prices would discourage Americans from living in low-density far flung suburbs.  You know, the kind that has killed hundreds of your fellow citizens in the past few years due to wildfire in semi-arid forests.

The problem with dirty air is that what you cannot see can still sicken you and kill you.  Given the the COPD epidemic, much higher excise taxes on dirty fuel should improve health outcomes and save American lives.

American economists have been advocating high excise taxes on gasoline and diesel for a very long time.  Governments in other rich OECD countries have listened, but not American governments.  



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 7:32pm

 westslope wrote:
Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 

 
That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

State Gasoline Tax Rates as of July 2018

The state with the highest gas taxes in the US is Pennsylvania @ 77.1¢ per gallon.  The lowest is Alaska @ 33.05¢ per gallon.  The current untaxed NY RBOB spot gas price is $1.4322 per gallon.  In Ohio our tax is 46.41¢  I just filled up tonight for $1.869 per gallon.  Hmmm, I got a good deal tonight when you add the spot price and our total state and federal tax together and get $1.8963. 

You want me to pay another $2 per gallon or so just so I can feel better ? 

Please explain to me how this works.  I bet those in California and Pennsylvania and a couple other states might be even more interested in your answer. 

USA National Gas Station Price Heat Map


Also do not forget that the total cost of the fuel gets added on to every other price we pay for everything.  My food and clothing become more expensive for example with these higher transportation costs added in.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:55pm



 kurtster wrote:
......

The key is energy independence. 
We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


 

Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:44pm

 kurtster wrote:
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.

Uhuh, sure thing, Mr. Dunning-Kruger. You's real smart aight!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:35pm

 R_P wrote:
 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.

 
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:24pm

 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:16pm

 R_P wrote:
So naïve. Go back to school! 

 
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:07pm

 kurtster wrote:
It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price.

So naïve. Go back to school! 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 3:46pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins?

It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?

 
That is the same as cutting down the old growth forest in NorCal and shipping that timber to Japan for their special built timber frame homes.  That timber does not stay here.  I agree with you on that.

The situation in the valley with the farmers draining the aquifer is bad.  That is mostly the result of the diversion of water to protect the Delta Smelt up around Sacto.  California's water situation is a downright mess for so many reasons.  Too many for here.

The key is energy independence.  We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:54am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Agreed that Peak Oil theorists have been wrong.  I fully expect global oil production and consumption to continue to steadily grow for the next half a century.

Point of fact:  The USA still imports more oil than it exports though could change in a few years time.   The USA is making a good business of importing oil and exporting refined products.

Trump has made it easier for oil and gas exploration and production companies to flair natural gas so that measure alone will encourage oil production growth.  Apparently the COPD epidemic and carbon emissions in the USA are not a concern.   Neither are boom and bust resource economics.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:02am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins? It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 5:04am

 R_P wrote:


 
Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:38am



 R_P wrote:

 

i recognize those costumes

aren't those government employees?

and aren't they just following orders?

as usual, people in charge, with the monopoly on violence are seeking to help with the redistribution of resources?

so sayeth bolton!
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 31, 2019 - 8:38pm