[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Trump - kcar - Jul 18, 2019 - 2:18am
 
Flower Pictures - yuel - Jul 18, 2019 - 12:52am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Jul 18, 2019 - 12:19am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jul 17, 2019 - 8:28pm
 
Slide Show Sync - BillG - Jul 17, 2019 - 7:11pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jul 17, 2019 - 4:42pm
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 17, 2019 - 4:08pm
 
What Browser do you use & why? - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2019 - 3:11pm
 
Favorite Computer Utilities - Mac - kcar - Jul 17, 2019 - 3:04pm
 
Tech & Science - miamizsun - Jul 17, 2019 - 1:15pm
 
Travel Tips. - black321 - Jul 17, 2019 - 11:19am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2019 - 8:55am
 
The Masked... - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2019 - 8:47am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2019 - 8:33am
 
The Obituary Page - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2019 - 7:45am
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Jul 17, 2019 - 6:26am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Jul 17, 2019 - 6:23am
 
What Makes You Sad? - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2019 - 4:39am
 
MusicBee -- music client - gvajda - Jul 17, 2019 - 1:08am
 
Outstanding Covers - buddy - Jul 16, 2019 - 8:30pm
 
Coffee - sunybuny - Jul 16, 2019 - 11:46am
 
New Music - R_P - Jul 16, 2019 - 11:05am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 16, 2019 - 10:41am
 
TED Talks - Proclivities - Jul 16, 2019 - 9:58am
 
Best guitarists - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2019 - 9:25am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2019 - 9:08am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 16, 2019 - 7:07am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Egctheow - Jul 16, 2019 - 5:57am
 
Books - sirdroseph - Jul 16, 2019 - 5:34am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 15, 2019 - 10:05pm
 
Posting pictures - haresfur - Jul 15, 2019 - 4:18pm
 
Fix My Car - SeriousLee - Jul 15, 2019 - 3:03pm
 
Plugin RP for Volumio - dpozzi - Jul 15, 2019 - 1:14pm
 
FLAC Streaming - dpozzi - Jul 15, 2019 - 1:13pm
 
The Dog House - westslope - Jul 15, 2019 - 10:10am
 
Vinyl for old timer - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 15, 2019 - 9:11am
 
UK stream - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 15, 2019 - 7:21am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Jul 15, 2019 - 4:04am
 
Immigration - haresfur - Jul 14, 2019 - 10:52pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jul 14, 2019 - 11:25am
 
Climate Change - miamizsun - Jul 14, 2019 - 11:15am
 
Democratic Party - westslope - Jul 14, 2019 - 9:24am
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - SeriousLee - Jul 14, 2019 - 6:27am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jul 13, 2019 - 10:33pm
 
Pence - R_P - Jul 13, 2019 - 5:56pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2019 - 4:42pm
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - miamizsun - Jul 13, 2019 - 2:52pm
 
You might be getting old if...... - Egctheow - Jul 13, 2019 - 2:01pm
 
Protest Songs - rhahl - Jul 13, 2019 - 12:02pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 13, 2019 - 11:50am
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - SeriousLee - Jul 13, 2019 - 11:34am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2019 - 11:24am
 
When Yesterday's Over - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 13, 2019 - 4:54am
 
David Gilmour's guitars on auction last month - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 13, 2019 - 3:03am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - black321 - Jul 12, 2019 - 11:21am
 
FLAC stream - redwoodcat - Jul 12, 2019 - 10:33am
 
Once upon a time... - Proclivities - Jul 12, 2019 - 8:19am
 
Today in History - islander - Jul 12, 2019 - 6:31am
 
The Groovy Mix - Coaxial - Jul 11, 2019 - 7:03pm
 
Bear! - Coaxial - Jul 11, 2019 - 6:54pm
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - BillG - Jul 11, 2019 - 4:33pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2019 - 3:30pm
 
Football, soccer, futbol, calcio... - black321 - Jul 11, 2019 - 2:16pm
 
Things that piss me off - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 11, 2019 - 1:37pm
 
Dancing Bananas !!! - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2019 - 11:19am
 
Great album covers - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 11, 2019 - 10:17am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2019 - 9:43am
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2019 - 7:33am
 
What music does your cat/dog like - or hate? - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 11, 2019 - 3:19am
 
Gardeners Corner - Steely_D - Jul 10, 2019 - 8:44pm
 
Music Videos - anders_s - Jul 10, 2019 - 3:34pm
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Jul 10, 2019 - 1:50pm
 
People Whose Names Make You Snort - Copenhagen_Cat - Jul 10, 2019 - 1:11pm
 
More reggae, less Marley please - R_P - Jul 10, 2019 - 11:18am
 
Canada - R_P - Jul 10, 2019 - 11:11am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » American Oil Strikes Again
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 18, 2019 - 2:20am



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
 
Pasted:  The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation. By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.

Conceptually sound.  Nevertheless, the solution calls for increasing green taxes on consumers.  Americans do not want that.  Americans of all partisan inclinations.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:30pm



 kurtster wrote:

how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
 
Knock yourself out.
 

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 8:39pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
Prodigal_SOB

Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:51am

 Red_Dragon wrote:

we don't need no education....

 
  twenty years of schoolin' and they put you on the day shift ....
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:41am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
we don't need no education....
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:34am

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 2, 2019 - 9:56am



 kurtster wrote:

That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

.......


 
All wrong.   But I understand your reaction as American policy elites and special interests are constantly misleading and manipulating American adult voters.

I would like to also apologize for using the term perceived the way economists use it when talking about the incidence of price or cost changes.    The lovely thing about excise taxes (taxes on volumes) is that they can be very, very transparent. 

To understand how high excise taxes would protect the US economy from oil price shocks, open up a spreadsheet and simulate what happens when a positive oil price shock drives up the price of gasoline by trying several different levels of excise taxes.    It is rather straight forward math.  If a big chunk of the retail price of gasoline/diesel is made of a fixed, constant excise tax the overall increase in retail prices following a spike in oil prices is muted.

In addition, a far higher excise tax on these deadly, polluting fuels would presumably lead to lower consumption of these fuels.   

Ideally, the higher retail prices would induce Americans into spending less time in an automobile, car-pooling, using public transport and best of all self-propelling either by walking or using a bicycle.  Hopefully that might arrest the obesity epidemic which is nothing but a big negative for social-economic outcomes.

Ideally, the higher retail prices would discourage Americans from living in low-density far flung suburbs.  You know, the kind that has killed hundreds of your fellow citizens in the past few years due to wildfire in semi-arid forests.

The problem with dirty air is that what you cannot see can still sicken you and kill you.  Given the the COPD epidemic, much higher excise taxes on dirty fuel should improve health outcomes and save American lives.

American economists have been advocating high excise taxes on gasoline and diesel for a very long time.  Governments in other rich OECD countries have listened, but not American governments.  



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 7:32pm

 westslope wrote:
Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 

 
That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

State Gasoline Tax Rates as of July 2018

The state with the highest gas taxes in the US is Pennsylvania @ 77.1¢ per gallon.  The lowest is Alaska @ 33.05¢ per gallon.  The current untaxed NY RBOB spot gas price is $1.4322 per gallon.  In Ohio our tax is 46.41¢  I just filled up tonight for $1.869 per gallon.  Hmmm, I got a good deal tonight when you add the spot price and our total state and federal tax together and get $1.8963. 

You want me to pay another $2 per gallon or so just so I can feel better ? 

Please explain to me how this works.  I bet those in California and Pennsylvania and a couple other states might be even more interested in your answer. 

USA National Gas Station Price Heat Map


Also do not forget that the total cost of the fuel gets added on to every other price we pay for everything.  My food and clothing become more expensive for example with these higher transportation costs added in.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:55pm



 kurtster wrote:
......

The key is energy independence. 
We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


 

Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:44pm

 kurtster wrote:
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.

Uhuh, sure thing, Mr. Dunning-Kruger. You's real smart aight!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:35pm

 R_P wrote:
 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.

 
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:24pm

 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:16pm

 R_P wrote:
So naïve. Go back to school! 

 
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:07pm

 kurtster wrote:
It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price.

So naïve. Go back to school! 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 3:46pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins?

It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?

 
That is the same as cutting down the old growth forest in NorCal and shipping that timber to Japan for their special built timber frame homes.  That timber does not stay here.  I agree with you on that.

The situation in the valley with the farmers draining the aquifer is bad.  That is mostly the result of the diversion of water to protect the Delta Smelt up around Sacto.  California's water situation is a downright mess for so many reasons.  Too many for here.

The key is energy independence.  We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:54am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Agreed that Peak Oil theorists have been wrong.  I fully expect global oil production and consumption to continue to steadily grow for the next half a century.

Point of fact:  The USA still imports more oil than it exports though could change in a few years time.   The USA is making a good business of importing oil and exporting refined products.

Trump has made it easier for oil and gas exploration and production companies to flair natural gas so that measure alone will encourage oil production growth.  Apparently the COPD epidemic and carbon emissions in the USA are not a concern.   Neither are boom and bust resource economics.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:02am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins? It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 5:04am

 R_P wrote:


 
Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:38am



 R_P wrote:

 

i recognize those costumes

aren't those government employees?

and aren't they just following orders?

as usual, people in charge, with the monopoly on violence are seeking to help with the redistribution of resources?

so sayeth bolton!
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 31, 2019 - 8:38pm