[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Graphs, Charts & Maps - R_P - Oct 17, 2019 - 10:24am
 
Climate Change - westslope - Oct 17, 2019 - 10:15am
 
Trump - R_P - Oct 17, 2019 - 10:10am
 
Ideology and large breasts - westslope - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:57am
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:36am
 
KEF LS50 Wireless + Mac Mini + ? + RP FLAC = paradise - BillG - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:33am
 
sounds like... - Proclivities - Oct 17, 2019 - 9:25am
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - jarro - Oct 17, 2019 - 8:42am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Isabeau - Oct 17, 2019 - 8:07am
 
The Obituary Page - Isabeau - Oct 17, 2019 - 6:06am
 
Race in America - miamizsun - Oct 17, 2019 - 4:46am
 
Suggestion: Americana Mix - sirdroseph - Oct 17, 2019 - 1:34am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Oct 17, 2019 - 12:11am
 
Regarding dogs - kcar - Oct 16, 2019 - 10:20pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Prodigal_SOB - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:07pm
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - haresfur - Oct 16, 2019 - 3:52pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Oct 16, 2019 - 1:11pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 16, 2019 - 12:29pm
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 16, 2019 - 12:24pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 16, 2019 - 10:31am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2019 - 9:47am
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Oct 16, 2019 - 7:56am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Oct 16, 2019 - 7:13am
 
New Music - mary_strain - Oct 16, 2019 - 7:02am
 
Google Inc. - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:56am
 
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •  - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:50am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - meower - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:20am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2019 - 6:12am
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2019 - 4:23am
 
Favorite Quotes - sirdroseph - Oct 16, 2019 - 2:12am
 
MANBIRD: appropriate or not? Dicuss. - SeriousLee - Oct 15, 2019 - 6:35pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - SeriousLee - Oct 15, 2019 - 6:30pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - R_P - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:27pm
 
Visual DNA – Another fine time-waster .... - haresfur - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:00pm
 
David Bowie tribute show.... - Proclivities - Oct 15, 2019 - 1:54pm
 
Vintage Vinyl - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 15, 2019 - 12:43pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - GeneP59 - Oct 15, 2019 - 9:14am
 
Ask the Libertarian - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 15, 2019 - 8:26am
 
Syria - sirdroseph - Oct 15, 2019 - 8:24am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - miamizsun - Oct 15, 2019 - 6:21am
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - miamizsun - Oct 15, 2019 - 4:35am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:54pm
 
King Crimson - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:51pm
 
HomeKit HomePod AppleTV - Steely_D - Oct 14, 2019 - 3:33pm
 
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 1:12pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 12:43pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Oct 14, 2019 - 8:35am
 
'Til Death - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 7:54am
 
Immigration - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 14, 2019 - 7:24am
 
Anti-War - sirdroseph - Oct 14, 2019 - 7:04am
 
Political Humor Images - buzz - Oct 14, 2019 - 6:18am
 
Living in America - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 6:05am
 
When I need a Laugh I ... - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2019 - 5:27am
 
We are all hostages of 9/11 - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 1:14pm
 
Name My Band - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 10:25am
 
Thanks RP! - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 9:11am
 
Remembering the Good Old Days - FourFortyEight - Oct 13, 2019 - 8:25am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Oct 12, 2019 - 4:28pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - Oct 12, 2019 - 1:40pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Oct 12, 2019 - 10:44am
 
Eclectic mix not working - BillG - Oct 12, 2019 - 9:22am
 
Celebrity Deaths - miamizsun - Oct 12, 2019 - 7:07am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - haresfur - Oct 12, 2019 - 2:18am
 
RP is not available Echo - WestMidsMatt - Oct 12, 2019 - 1:57am
 
Roku Update Wishlist - BillG - Oct 11, 2019 - 7:36pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - buddy - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:41pm
 
Which Five Guests? - buddy - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:37pm
 
Top Lists - R_P - Oct 11, 2019 - 4:02pm
 
Canada - westslope - Oct 11, 2019 - 8:28am
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Isabeau - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:49am
 
Outstanding Covers - rhahl - Oct 10, 2019 - 6:22pm
 
5 words for Barack Obama - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 4:13pm
 
Tech & Science - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 4:06pm
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:47pm
 
Advertising Gone Mad - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:44pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » American Oil Strikes Again
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Jun 18, 2019 - 2:20am



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
 
Pasted:  The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation. By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.

Conceptually sound.  Nevertheless, the solution calls for increasing green taxes on consumers.  Americans do not want that.  Americans of all partisan inclinations.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:30pm



 kurtster wrote:

how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
 
Knock yourself out.
 

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 8:39pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
how convenient that the article mixes both real numbers paid out by the .gov and indirect costs but does not break down what these two numbers are.  That is a major omission of relevant data.

The study includes the negative externalities caused by fossil fuels that society has to pay for, not reflected in their actual costs. In addition to direct transfers of government money to fossil fuel companies, this includes the indirect costs of pollution, such as healthcare costs and climate change adaptation.

By including these numbers, the true cost of fossil fuel use to society is reflected.


yeah, so what are they ?
Prodigal_SOB

Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:51am

 Red_Dragon wrote:

we don't need no education....

 
  twenty years of schoolin' and they put you on the day shift ....
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:41am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.

 
we don't need no education....
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 17, 2019 - 9:34am

United States Spend Ten Times More On Fossil Fuel Subsidies Than Education

an International Monetary Fund study released last month shows that USD$5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017. The United States has spent more subsidizing fossil fuels in recent years than it has on defense or education.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 2, 2019 - 9:56am



 kurtster wrote:

That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

.......


 
All wrong.   But I understand your reaction as American policy elites and special interests are constantly misleading and manipulating American adult voters.

I would like to also apologize for using the term perceived the way economists use it when talking about the incidence of price or cost changes.    The lovely thing about excise taxes (taxes on volumes) is that they can be very, very transparent. 

To understand how high excise taxes would protect the US economy from oil price shocks, open up a spreadsheet and simulate what happens when a positive oil price shock drives up the price of gasoline by trying several different levels of excise taxes.    It is rather straight forward math.  If a big chunk of the retail price of gasoline/diesel is made of a fixed, constant excise tax the overall increase in retail prices following a spike in oil prices is muted.

In addition, a far higher excise tax on these deadly, polluting fuels would presumably lead to lower consumption of these fuels.   

Ideally, the higher retail prices would induce Americans into spending less time in an automobile, car-pooling, using public transport and best of all self-propelling either by walking or using a bicycle.  Hopefully that might arrest the obesity epidemic which is nothing but a big negative for social-economic outcomes.

Ideally, the higher retail prices would discourage Americans from living in low-density far flung suburbs.  You know, the kind that has killed hundreds of your fellow citizens in the past few years due to wildfire in semi-arid forests.

The problem with dirty air is that what you cannot see can still sicken you and kill you.  Given the the COPD epidemic, much higher excise taxes on dirty fuel should improve health outcomes and save American lives.

American economists have been advocating high excise taxes on gasoline and diesel for a very long time.  Governments in other rich OECD countries have listened, but not American governments.  



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 7:32pm

 westslope wrote:
Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 

 
That is it in a nutshell.  Perceptions.  Not reality.

A $2 a gallon price increase is a $2 gallon price increase, with or without excise and other taxes on top. 

How does the fuel consumer directly benefit back from the increased taxes ?  Fuel taxes already go for infrastructure development and maintenance with plenty getting siphoned off to pay for things like bike trails and to subsidize public transportation. 

So you think that if a price increase is a lesser percentage because the price is already inflated to the point where the true cost of the commodity is lost, then we should ignore the actual price increase and feel better about it only because the percentage increase is less than if it would be if the existing taxes on it weren't so high ?  Right.

State Gasoline Tax Rates as of July 2018

The state with the highest gas taxes in the US is Pennsylvania @ 77.1¢ per gallon.  The lowest is Alaska @ 33.05¢ per gallon.  The current untaxed NY RBOB spot gas price is $1.4322 per gallon.  In Ohio our tax is 46.41¢  I just filled up tonight for $1.869 per gallon.  Hmmm, I got a good deal tonight when you add the spot price and our total state and federal tax together and get $1.8963. 

You want me to pay another $2 per gallon or so just so I can feel better ? 

Please explain to me how this works.  I bet those in California and Pennsylvania and a couple other states might be even more interested in your answer. 

USA National Gas Station Price Heat Map


Also do not forget that the total cost of the fuel gets added on to every other price we pay for everything.  My food and clothing become more expensive for example with these higher transportation costs added in.


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:55pm



 kurtster wrote:
......

The key is energy independence. 
We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


 

Energy independence in post-nuclear weapons era is highly over-rated if downright silly.  Want to reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to external energy price shocks?   Triple your excise taxes on gasoline and diesel.  Expect major health benefits.  

As it stands the USA 'enjoy's the lowest excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels among the rich OECD countries.  That leaves the US economy vulnerable to global oil price shocks.  As excise taxes are  levied according to volume and thus remain constant over time, the price perceived by the consumer is far less volatile.  Easier to budget, easier to avoid recession. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:44pm

 kurtster wrote:
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.

Uhuh, sure thing, Mr. Dunning-Kruger. You's real smart aight!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:35pm

 R_P wrote:
 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.

 
Being born in Berkeley and living in Ca in general through the 50's and 60's gets me my poly sci degree by default and based upon unique life experiences there.  I lived it.  Didn't have to read about it in a book.

OTOH, if you find that nothing significant or unique was going in California back then you might disagree.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:24pm

 kurtster wrote:
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin} 

You're missing a degree in political science. Also, energy is but one important resource. Raw materials is another.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:16pm

 R_P wrote:
So naïve. Go back to school! 

 
What ?  For my Master's in Bidness ?  I just got my Bachelor's in bidness in 2007.  Are you buying ?  {#Cheesygrin}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:07pm

 kurtster wrote:
It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price.

So naïve. Go back to school! 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 3:46pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins?

It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?

 
That is the same as cutting down the old growth forest in NorCal and shipping that timber to Japan for their special built timber frame homes.  That timber does not stay here.  I agree with you on that.

The situation in the valley with the farmers draining the aquifer is bad.  That is mostly the result of the diversion of water to protect the Delta Smelt up around Sacto.  California's water situation is a downright mess for so many reasons.  Too many for here.

The key is energy independence.  We are now a major player on the world oil market in the short time that we were told by the previous administration that it was impossible to ever happen.  It is freeing us up as a country to change and reduce our involvement in foreign places and do less harm in compromising us and our standard of living by having to kowtow to foreign entities with the threat of cutting off our oil.  We can start calling our own shots again (and are) without the threat of upsetting those that we used to be dependent on for our oil needs.  We have so much oil that we can affect the world oil price. 

I still have faith that we will move away from petro energy just because its the right thing to do.  Alternatives will come on line and as their costs fall, we will shift to these new sources.  It will happen naturally and without bankrupting ourselves in the process.  Patience and faith is required.  When you stop and think about it, we've been using petroleum as our major energy source for only a 100 years or so, mostly in internal combustion engines.  These engines are being replaced slowly but surely with electric, which still are dependent on petro energy, but the shift is underway.  OTOH, the batteries for these vehicles have their own problems and disposal of them can be a real mess we are not prepared to deal with.  Nothing is easy.  There will always be a mess somewhere.  It's how we go about managing these messes is the real challenge.  NIMBY ?


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:54am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Agreed that Peak Oil theorists have been wrong.  I fully expect global oil production and consumption to continue to steadily grow for the next half a century.

Point of fact:  The USA still imports more oil than it exports though could change in a few years time.   The USA is making a good business of importing oil and exporting refined products.

Trump has made it easier for oil and gas exploration and production companies to flair natural gas so that measure alone will encourage oil production growth.  Apparently the COPD epidemic and carbon emissions in the USA are not a concern.   Neither are boom and bust resource economics.

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 10:02am



 kurtster wrote:

Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
 
Dude.
If it's a commodity we're killing ourselves and our environment to extract and refine, then shipping it overseas to countries whose environments aren't scarred by oil production, who really wins? It's like the California farmers draining the aquifer to grow alfalfa that we then send to China. Who thought that one through?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 5:04am

 R_P wrote:


 
Dude, that doesn't work anymore. 

We export more oil now that anyone else. 

Peak oil is an example of settled science that was wrong.

Ta'
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 1, 2019 - 4:38am



 R_P wrote:

 

i recognize those costumes

aren't those government employees?

and aren't they just following orders?

as usual, people in charge, with the monopoly on violence are seeking to help with the redistribution of resources?

so sayeth bolton!
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 31, 2019 - 8:38pm