Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:06pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:41pm
Breaking News
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:22pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
Wordle - daily game
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:00am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:29am
Radio Paradise Comments
- pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Trump
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 25, 2024 - 6:56pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 3:48pm
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Uploading Music
- dischuckin - Mar 18, 2024 - 11:55am
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
We need to be aware of what just happened in Indiana
|
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next |
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 15, 2019 - 1:35am |
|
This could have been avoided if the strip clubs were open later
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 13, 2015 - 8:21pm |
|
PRopaganda will fix this...Indiana Hires PR Firm To Rebuild Image After 'Religious Freedom' Fiasco The state of Indiana has hired a public relations firms to strengthen its image as “a welcoming place to live, visit and do business.” The ‘damage control’ is occurring just weeks after a national outcry over its discriminatory religious freedom bill. National criticism descended upon Indiana after its Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) – before it was revised – was understood to have allowed businesses to discriminate against gay, lesbian and transgender customers on religious grounds. The bill incurred national condemnation, with state governors in Connecticut and New York, as well as the mayor of Washington, DC, banning state-funded travel barring revisions to the law. The New York firm Porter Novelli was retained by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC) to support ongoing public relations initiatives to continue strengthening Indiana’s global brand reputation. (...)
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 7:01pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Far from the South where one must assume this picture was taken.
The picture was taken in 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 6:41pm |
|
This might help our resident sinistrophobic denier(s) gain some understanding*... Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).<1><2><3> It can be expressed as antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, or hatred, may be based on irrational fear, and is sometimes related to religious beliefs.<4> Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as discrimination and violence on the basis of sexual orientations that are non-heterosexual.<1><2> According to the 2010 Hate Crimes Statistics released by the FBI National Press Office, 19.3 percent of hate crimes across the United States "were motivated by a sexual orientation bias."<5> Moreover, in a Southern Poverty Law Center 2010 Intelligence Report extrapolating data from fourteen years (1995–2008), which had complete data available at the time, of the FBI's national hate crime statistics found that LGBT people were "far more likely than any other minority group in the United States to be victimized by violent hate crime."<6> (...) *Not holding my breath.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 6:24pm |
|
kurtster wrote: This is it. I'll be done after this. The lunch counter picture without a caption is a cop out, not an answer. Pretend I was blind and couldn't see the picture, and then we can pretend that the answer is typed in Braille so I can "read" the actual words articulating what is. No one is willing or able to articulate why the two situations are identical. I have gone to great lengths to discuss the real merits and differences. All I get back is well you know its wrong or should know its wrong. Instead of it causes actual harm because ______. No one has filled in the blank. A picture is worth a thousand words, they say. I say the situations are remarkably similar in many ways. You state that no one really needs pizza or cake, so the customers aren't really being denied anything worth protesting about. I post a photo of the lunch counter. You can't make a connection, that's your own blinders. I'm not pretending: you are blind if you can't see it. The people in the lunch counter photo aren't there to get their electricity turned on or to pay their water bills. They're there to have a burger and a Coke. Nothing any of them really needed, yet it was a valid protest in your eyes. You say you have gone to great lengths to discuss "the real merits and differences." I say you're gyrating like a dervish to try to gin up some difference between the two.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 3:16pm |
|
islander wrote: So your argument is that we should have laws that allow discrimination? Or that policies that are discriminatory are okay if they are are encouraged by a law? Or that it's okay to have discriminatory policies in some places as long as you operate one non-discriminatory outlet somewhere?
I really haven't been able to follow anything you've spouted in a couple of pages now. But please keep it up, nothing like having you tear down your own silly arguments.
This is it. I'll be done after this. The lunch counter picture without a caption is a cop out, not an answer. Pretend I was blind and couldn't see the picture, and then we can pretend that the answer is typed in Braille so I can "read" the actual words articulating what is. No one is willing or able to articulate why the two situations are identical. I have gone to great lengths to discuss the real merits and differences. All I get back is well you know its wrong or should know its wrong. Instead of it causes actual harm because ______. No one has filled in the blank. I've offered the actual harm amounts to inconvenience. I'll go even farther and say that it could also hurt feelings and hurt the self esteem of the rejected individual. But do these pass the test of real harm sufficient for a legal remedy ? And on the bolded. You're full of sh*t to even go there. I said kurtster wrote: But the bus thing was not a policy. It was the law.
The lunch counter situation was encouraged by the law.
And i ate at a few Woolworth's lunch counters in California in the same time. No black only areas there.
The picture illustrates a situation in a specific time and place. I said that I ate at a Woolworth's lunch counter at the same time in a different place. Far from the South where one must assume this picture was taken. I am old enough to have traveled through the South and actually see the "colored only" signs on restrooms at gas stations, water fountains and other places. How you get that I approve of discrimination in the way you state is beyond me. I never saw a colored only sign in California back in the 50's or 60's. The local laws affected local policies is my point. Because it happens one place does not make it universal. Sorry you aren't able to figure that one out without help. Have a nice day or I'll sue your sorry ass ...
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 1:32pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: RichardPrins wrote:So you are (still) saying these ("religious freedom") laws are needed to specifically protect Christian bigots? kurtster wrote:Yes, because Islamic bigots get a free pass. I guess I missed that exchange; I haven't been looking in here that regularly. Anyhow, carry on - don't make a mess and turn off the lights and the coffee-maker when you're leaving.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:59pm |
|
Proclivities wrote:I don't think Kurt was arguing those points - you may be wandering into a scarecrow field there. I think he was trying to point out the differences between those policies and practices of refusing services fifty years ago and the ones of today. I'm not saying I agree with his assessments, but I doubt he is condoning discriminatory laws or policies. RichardPrins wrote:So you are (still) saying these ("religious freedom") laws are needed to specifically protect Christian bigots? kurtster wrote:Yes, because Islamic bigots get a free pass.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:40pm |
|
islander wrote: So your argument is that we should have laws that allow discrimination? Or that policies that are discriminatory are okay if they are are encouraged by a law? Or that it's okay to have discriminatory policies in some places as long as you operate one non-discriminatory outlet somewhere?
I really haven't been able to follow anything you've spouted in a couple of pages now. But please keep it up, nothing like having you tear down your own silly arguments.
I don't think Kurt was arguing those points - you may be wandering into a scarecrow field there. I think he was trying to point out the differences between those policies and practices of refusing services fifty years ago and the ones of today. I'm not saying I agree with his assessments, but I doubt he is condoning discriminatory laws or policies.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:31pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:The lunch counter segregation was just Woolworth's store policy. So the picture was taken on Feb. 1, 1960. Wikipedia says: De jure segregation, sanctioned or enforced by force of law, was stopped in the United States by federal enforcement of a series of Supreme Court decisions after Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. Of course de facto bigots unfortunately continue to exist.
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:30pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote: Socialist is in the F***ing name!.
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:29pm |
|
kurtster wrote: But the bus thing was not a policy. It was the law.
The lunch counter situation was encouraged by the law.
And i ate at a few Woolworth's lunch counters in California in the same time. No black only areas there.
So your argument is that we should have laws that allow discrimination? Or that policies that are discriminatory are okay if they are are encouraged by a law? Or that it's okay to have discriminatory policies in some places as long as you operate one non-discriminatory outlet somewhere? I really haven't been able to follow anything you've spouted in a couple of pages now. But please keep it up, nothing like having you tear down your own silly arguments.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:23pm |
|
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:17pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: The lunch counter segregation was just Woolworth's store policy.
But the bus thing was not a policy. It was the law. The lunch counter situation was encouraged by the law. And i ate at a few Woolworth's lunch counters in California in the same time. No black only areas there.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 12:02pm |
|
kurtster wrote: There were laws on the books that required these situations to exist. This is not the same, not even close.
The lunch counter segregation was just Woolworth's store policy.
|
|
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 11:57am |
|
RichardPrins wrote: You mean like the laws that have been enacted to prohibit same-sex marriage and now "religious freedom restoration" laws that allow bigots to sue if they feel someone has impinged on their religious conscience?
It's rather amusing to see a Teabagger defend government laws for the religious.
exactly. thank goodness for you and Scott. All i need to do is react to Hitler vids.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 11:55am |
|
kurtster wrote:There were laws on the books that required these situations to exist. (...) You mean like the laws that have been enacted to prohibit same-sex marriage and now "religious freedom restoration" laws that allow bigots to sue if they feel someone has impinged on their religious conscience? It's rather amusing to see a Teabagger defend more government laws for the religious.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 11:55am |
|
meower wrote:Shut down the thread!
|
|
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 11:54am |
|
Shut down the thread!
|
|
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2015 - 11:52am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: If anything, I see bigots and hypocrites trying to enact legislation that says they can continue to behave badly, only they've doubled down on the gambit that by calling that bad behavior essential to their "religion," they will get a pass.
|
|
|