Got pulled over by the State Boys in Blue last night on the way home after watching the Bruins Game. He looked like he was still in high school. Said I was doing 80 in a 55mph zone which if Iâm correct is a 65mph zone. He said donât do that.
Let me go with a verbal warning.
He must have felt bad for you after having to watch THAT Bruins game
Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at Gender:
Posted:
May 1, 2024 - 9:04am
Got pulled over by the State Boys in Blue last night on the way home after watching the Bruins Game. He looked like he was still in high school. Said I was doing 80 in a 55mph zone which if Iâm correct is a 65mph zone. He said donât do that.
Let me go with a verbal warning.
I thought those were belonging to your department. You're showing - once again - how ready you are for a topic's discussion. (Not at all.)
On top, your idea of software security must be utterly vague, if at all existent.
I bet you have a job in software-marketing where cocaine-induced hallucinations are the(!) daily happenstance.
The government running everything? On which type of OS? You must be living in a fantasy...
A solution to me would look like this: Taking software vendors (such as Microsoft, Google & Apple) responsible for their open walls, i.e. security flaws. Of course, this also counts for cloud-based software services of any kind.
You seem to have no idea, how fucking qickly the software market would change then!
It's only a problem if you have a solution. I'm all for diversifying risk down from 85% market share... just tell me how you want to do it.
At some point, all IT is a national security threat. If the government took over all of the MS government servers... would the security threat change? Would you feel better with the government running everything?
I look forward to your insightful solution.
The government running everything? On which type of OS? You must be living in a fantasy...
A solution to me would look like this: Taking software vendors (such as Microsoft, Google & Apple) responsible for their open walls, i.e. security flaws. Of course, this also counts for cloud-based software services of any kind.
You seem to have no idea, how fucking qickly the software market would change then!
It's only a problem if you have a solution. I'm all for diversifying risk down from 85% market share... just tell me how you want to do it.
At some point, all IT is a national security threat. If the government took over all of the MS government servers... would the security threat change? Would you feel better with the government running everything?
Your intellectual capacity seems really mean. Where did I blame M$ in all this context? I guess you're reacting without any substantial grey matter of yours involved, as usual. I blamed the NYT for exploiting this issue appearing on the field of open source in favor of M$!
All else I said can be verified easily via statistics and M$'s policies & tariffs.
I won't argue any further with any happy idiot M$ user, much less corporate or governmental incompetenzo.
You're right...sorry... NY Times in support of Microsoft...so by default you're blaming Microsoft.
Not that you have an axe to grind using the abbreviation M$
Nothing is verified. Your last link for Microsoft "failures" was 2 days old...but related to issues last summer.
You could have said "I have no idea, but blaming Microsoft just feels good".
Your intellectual capacity seems really mean. Where did I blame M$ in all this context? I guess you're reacting without any substantial grey matter of yours involved, as usual. I blamed the NYT for exploiting this issue appearing on the field of open source in favor of M$!
All else I said can be verified easily via statistics and M$'s policies & tariffs.
I won't argue any further with any happy idiot M$ user, much less corporate or governmental incompetenzo.
1. Re: XZ Utils (what happened so far without putting it to use for any propaganda, unlike NYT & other media outlets try to do for their sponsors i.e. M$...)
2. Re: Microsoft & the IT security misery which I mentioned (here: only one single latest event, among gazillions of em over time...)
In case you need to know more, you just have to study the subject, which isn't hidden or apocryph at all, as it's all online.
You could have said "I have no idea, but blaming Microsoft just feels good".
1. Re: XZ Utils (what happened so far without putting it to use for any propaganda, unlike NYT & other media outlets try to do for their sponsors i.e. M$...)
2. Re: Microsoft & the IT security misery which I mentioned (here: only one single latest event, among gazillions of em over time...)
In case you need to know more, you just have to study the subject, which isn't hidden or apocryph at all, as it's all online.
What a smokescreen lobbying for Microsoft, the company responsible for lacking (or completely missing) data-security on a worldwide scale!
The upstream Linux related bug was fixed by the open source community within one day. - Who uses Windows and Outlook and Active Directory is slave to the company (MS) and their bugs which enable 98% of computer hacks worldwide and most often aren't fixed at all. Instead, MS is gaining by putting the fault on their users. What a complete hoot.
Nice try, NYT.
Hard to know if this is a perspective shared by others, since itâs not a topic I understand. Anyone else want to tell me more?
The thing I find intriguing is that Microsoft is paying someone to work on PostgreSQL, which competes with Microsoft's SQLserver - the biggest for-pay database manager. It's like they want to tap into the opensource world to give them ideas or something.
This guy seems to have prevented worldwide financial catastrophe, seriously. Gift article
What a smokescreen lobbying for Microsoft, the company responsible for lacking (or completely missing) data-security on a worldwide scale!
The upstream Linux related bug was fixed by the open source community within one day. - Who uses Windows and Outlook and Active Directory is slave to the company (MS) and their bugs which enable 98% of computer hacks worldwide and most often aren't fixed at all. Instead, MS is gaining by putting the fault on their users. What a complete hoot.
This guy seems to have prevented worldwide financial catastrophe, seriously. Gift article.
Did One Guy Just Stop a Huge Cyberattack?
A Microsoft engineer noticed something was off on a piece of software he worked on. He soon discovered someone was probably trying to gain access to computers all over the world.
The thing I find intriguing is that Microsoft is paying someone to work on PostgreSQL, which competes with Microsoft's SQLserver - the biggest for-pay database manager. It's like they want to tap into the opensource world to give them ideas or something.
