[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

What Are You Going To Do Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:43pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
NY Times Strands - maryte - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Is it wrong to not want to listen to music I don't unders... - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:13pm
 
Wordle - daily game - maryte - Aug 31, 2024 - 3:00pm
 
Trump - islander - Aug 31, 2024 - 2:51pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Aug 31, 2024 - 2:39pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Aug 31, 2024 - 2:34pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Aug 31, 2024 - 1:32pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Steely_D - Aug 31, 2024 - 10:41am
 
Today in History - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 31, 2024 - 9:58am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Aug 31, 2024 - 9:02am
 
Outstanding Covers - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:25am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:20am
 
New Music - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:20am
 
Other Medical Stuff - miamizsun - Aug 31, 2024 - 7:16am
 
Immigration - sirdroseph - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:48am
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Aug 31, 2024 - 4:44am
 
Jam! (why should a song stop) - kurtster - Aug 30, 2024 - 10:54pm
 
Stills - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 30, 2024 - 4:06pm
 
August 2024 Photo Theme - Transportation - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 30, 2024 - 4:03pm
 
The Obituary Page - rgio - Aug 30, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
OUR CATS!! - Beaker - Aug 30, 2024 - 2:32pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Aug 30, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Proclivities - Aug 30, 2024 - 12:08pm
 
China - R_P - Aug 30, 2024 - 11:21am
 
Kamala Harris - islander - Aug 30, 2024 - 10:21am
 
Creepy - Proclivities - Aug 30, 2024 - 10:06am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Aug 30, 2024 - 8:17am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Aug 30, 2024 - 6:35am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Aug 30, 2024 - 4:11am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - haresfur - Aug 29, 2024 - 9:24pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 29, 2024 - 8:13pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Aug 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Aug 29, 2024 - 6:36pm
 
The RANT Forum - haresfur - Aug 29, 2024 - 5:03pm
 
Graphic Designers Must Go! - Beaker - Aug 29, 2024 - 3:01pm
 
What did you have for lunch? - miamizsun - Aug 29, 2024 - 11:51am
 
Israel - R_P - Aug 29, 2024 - 11:32am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - amsinc_mail - Aug 29, 2024 - 7:05am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Aug 29, 2024 - 6:17am
 
Russia - sirdroseph - Aug 28, 2024 - 5:00pm
 
Electronic Music - thisbody - Aug 28, 2024 - 2:37pm
 
BACK TO THE 80's - thisbody - Aug 28, 2024 - 2:16pm
 
Britain - Red_Dragon - Aug 28, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
*ATTENTION*: Security Warning - sirdroseph - Aug 28, 2024 - 6:01am
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Aug 28, 2024 - 5:16am
 
Free and Fair Elections! - Red_Dragon - Aug 27, 2024 - 7:33pm
 
Whataboutism! - oldviolin - Aug 27, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - Aug 27, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Facebook Group for RP - buddy - Aug 27, 2024 - 3:22pm
 
Canada - Beaker - Aug 27, 2024 - 3:13pm
 
Poetry Forum - buddy - Aug 27, 2024 - 2:52pm
 
What Did You See Today? - haresfur - Aug 27, 2024 - 2:28pm
 
Beers are Dying - black321 - Aug 27, 2024 - 12:54pm
 
France - R_P - Aug 27, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - kcar - Aug 27, 2024 - 10:53am
 
NASA & other news from space - GeneP59 - Aug 27, 2024 - 9:06am
 
Roon support - rjborley - Aug 27, 2024 - 7:03am
 
Can't Stream RP - zigzag - Aug 27, 2024 - 1:30am
 
Synchronization - david21 - Aug 26, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - dischuckin - Aug 26, 2024 - 11:00am
 
Tim Walz - Beaker - Aug 26, 2024 - 10:05am
 
What did you have for dinner? - Antigone - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:29pm
 
Hello from Germany - thisbody - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:24pm
 
Agents of TRUTH - thisbody - Aug 25, 2024 - 1:17pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Aug 25, 2024 - 8:53am
 
Cambodians singers are doing well ! - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 24, 2024 - 9:37pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Aug 24, 2024 - 1:40pm
 
Tripping - kurtster - Aug 23, 2024 - 11:15pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 23, 2024 - 4:12pm
 
Song Title not updating on m3u Stream on Mac OS - iMac - dryan67 - Aug 23, 2024 - 12:14pm
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2024 - 9:08am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - ColdMiser - Aug 23, 2024 - 7:34am
 
Index » Regional/Local » Elsewhere » Russia Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 33, 34, 35  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2024 - 6:38am

The war junkies are already drooling. Ready for their next shot.

So magnanimous too.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2024 - 6:28am

 thisbody wrote:
Former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg:
“The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition to not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second-class membership. We rejected that. So, he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders. He has got the exact opposite.”

To repeat, he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.

Further evidence here.

Just sayin'.


Again, you need to add context. 

As Kaja Kallas keeps saying. The Russian negotiating strategy is to 
1. Demand something that is not yours
2. Set ultimatums and threats
3. Not budge an inch in the ensuing negotiations
because
4. there will always be someone in the west who is weak enough to grant your concessions and you come away with more than you had at the beginning.

This is precisely what Putin is doing here:
"He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second-class membership. We rejected that. "

I mean since 1997? c'mon.
thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: terrestrial (only lately)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2024 - 5:40am

Former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg:
“The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition to not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second-class membership. We rejected that. So, he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders. He has got the exact opposite.”

To repeat, he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.

Further evidence here.

Just sayin'.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2024 - 3:38am

 thisbody wrote:
 
perhaps a little more historical background would help:
Thus, Gorbachev went to the end of the Soviet Union assured that the West was not threatening his security and was not expanding NATO. Instead, the dissolution of the USSR was brought about by Russians (Boris Yeltsin and his leading advisory Gennady Burbulis) in concert with the former party bosses of the Soviet republics, especially Ukraine, in December 1991. The Cold War was long over by then. The Americans had tried to keep the Soviet Union together (see the Bush “Chicken Kiev” speech on August 1, 1991). NATO’s expansion was years in the future, when these disputes would erupt again, and more assurances would come to Russian leader Boris Yeltsin.
thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: terrestrial (only lately)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2024 - 2:27am


Beaker

Beaker Avatar

Location: Your safe space


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 10:33pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
  quite.   Plus it's absolute bullshit. Putin's terms for a negotiated settlement are well-known and anyone with a finger and an internet connection can find them.



NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 10:19pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

Sorry Vlad—you wee totally provoked. Our bad.

Kill whoever you need to.



  quite.   Plus it's absolute bullshit. Putin's terms for a negotiated settlement are well-known and anyone with a finger and an internet connection can find them.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 3:56pm

 R_P wrote:

Chomsky continued, "Of course, it was provoked. Otherwise, they wouldn't refer to it all the time as an unprovoked invasion. By now, censorship in the United States has reached such a level beyond anything in my lifetime. Such a level that you are not permitted to read the Russian position. Literally. Americans are not allowed to know what the Russians are saying. Except, selected things. So, if Putin makes a speech to Russians with all kinds of outlandish claims about Peter the Great and so on, then, you see it on the front pages. If the Russians make an offer for a negotiation, you can't find it. That's suppressed. You're not allowed to know what they are saying. I have never seen a level of censorship like this."

Regarding his views of the possible future scenarios, Chomsky said that "the war will end, either through diplomacy or not. That's just logic. Well, if diplomacy has a meaning, it means both sides can tolerate it. They don't like it, but they can tolerate it. They don't get anything they want, they get something. That's diplomacy. If you reject diplomacy, you are saying: 'Let the war go on with all of its horrors, with all the destruction of Ukraine, and let's let it go on until we get what we want.'"

By 'we,' Chomsky was referring to Washington, which simply wants to "harm Russia so severely that it will never be able to undertake actions like this again. Well, what does that mean? It's impossible to achieve. So, it means, let's continue the war until Ukraine is devastated. That's US policy."

Most of this is not obvious to western audiences simply because rational voices are "not allowed to talk" and because "rationality is not permitted. This is a level of hysteria that I have never seen, even during the Second World War, which I am old enough to remember very well."

While an alternative understanding of the devastating war in Ukraine is disallowed, the West continues to offer no serious answers or achievable goals, leaving Ukraine devastated and the root causes of the problem in place. "That's US policy," indeed.
Did The West Provoke The Ukraine War? Sorry, That Question Has Been Cancelled

Sorry Vlad—you wee totally provoked. Our bad.

Kill whoever you need to.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 1:27pm

Chomsky continued, "Of course, it was provoked. Otherwise, they wouldn't refer to it all the time as an unprovoked invasion. By now, censorship in the United States has reached such a level beyond anything in my lifetime. Such a level that you are not permitted to read the Russian position. Literally. Americans are not allowed to know what the Russians are saying. Except, selected things. So, if Putin makes a speech to Russians with all kinds of outlandish claims about Peter the Great and so on, then, you see it on the front pages. If the Russians make an offer for a negotiation, you can't find it. That's suppressed. You're not allowed to know what they are saying. I have never seen a level of censorship like this."

Regarding his views of the possible future scenarios, Chomsky said that "the war will end, either through diplomacy or not. That's just logic. Well, if diplomacy has a meaning, it means both sides can tolerate it. They don't like it, but they can tolerate it. They don't get anything they want, they get something. That's diplomacy. If you reject diplomacy, you are saying: 'Let the war go on with all of its horrors, with all the destruction of Ukraine, and let's let it go on until we get what we want.'"

By 'we,' Chomsky was referring to Washington, which simply wants to "harm Russia so severely that it will never be able to undertake actions like this again. Well, what does that mean? It's impossible to achieve. So, it means, let's continue the war until Ukraine is devastated. That's US policy."

Most of this is not obvious to western audiences simply because rational voices are "not allowed to talk" and because "rationality is not permitted. This is a level of hysteria that I have never seen, even during the Second World War, which I am old enough to remember very well."

While an alternative understanding of the devastating war in Ukraine is disallowed, the West continues to offer no serious answers or achievable goals, leaving Ukraine devastated and the root causes of the problem in place. "That's US policy," indeed.
Did The West Provoke The Ukraine War? Sorry, That Question Has Been Cancelled
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 12:18pm

on a less two-dimensional note.. did the US try to exploit the weakness of the Russian Empire post 1990 to foster democratic revolutions in former Soviet satellite states? Of course it did.
The question is not if or why it tried. The question is why did the colour revolutions become so popular locally and why did every satellite state that could slip the surly bonds of Russian brotherhood immediately do so? 

The more pertinent question would be why did the Americans and the collective west fail so miserably at reaching out to these states, Russia included. 

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 11:56am

 R_P wrote:

US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev (2004)


Neocolonialist regime change and nation building were kind of in vogue at the time.



Das ist Blödsinn Margherita!
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 8:02am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The “color revolutions” that so alarmed Putin were, after all, the
manifestations of those countries daring to choose the West, or, rather
the way of life, governance and values the West represented, over
Moscow.

US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev (2004)


Neocolonialist regime change and nation building were kind of in vogue at the time.

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 7:36am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
that fits in nicely with this piece from Snyder on strongman rule which people like you seem to fall for

Also kind of apposite, given how Chomsky's quote applies to Putin best of all. 

If all you have is a hammer...

The obvious and correct context for his quote is climate change.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 4:10am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
great twitter feed pulling apart the NATO-is-a-threat bullshit






If it were the threat of an expanding NATO, it has backfired. Finland shares an 800-mile border with Russia.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 26, 2024 - 3:59am

great twitter feed pulling apart the NATO-is-a-threat bullshit


Putin has always been more concerned about the loss of control over Russia’s perceived sphere of influence than about a NATO threat to Russia. Putin’s actual issue with NATO and the West has been that they offered an alternative path to countries that Putin thought fell in Russia’s self-declared sphere of influence. The “color revolutions” that so alarmed Putin were, after all, the manifestations of those countries daring to choose the West, or, rather the way of life, governance and values the West represented, over Moscow.
...Putin had effectively blocked Ukrainian accession to the alliance by the time he launched his full-scale invasion— clear evidence that Russian fears of imminent Ukrainian NATO membership did not drive the invasion.





NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2024 - 11:11pm

 thisbody wrote:







that fits in nicely with this piece from Snyder on strongman rule which people like you seem to fall for


Also kind of apposite, given how Chomsky's quote applies to Putin best of all. 
thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: terrestrial (only lately)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2024 - 9:02pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:




R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2024 - 4:33pm

 haresfur wrote:
Hey, not all Russians...

But, with regard to their current government, I'm glad we agree on that

You picked up a new trick from kurtster...
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2024 - 4:29pm

 R_P wrote:

They're fuckin' evil!!!1!1!!!!



Hey, not all Russians...

But, with regard to their current government, I'm glad we agree on that
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2024 - 11:51am

When Putinism lies in ruins, Russians will remember the fearless moral clarity of this prison letter from Darya Kozyreva, a medical student first expelled from university and then arrested for her antiwar actions.

'Russia is wrapped in a heavy, impenetrable cocoon, a cocoon of silence. How many crimes the Putin dictatorship has committed, how many foreign cities it has seized and devastated, how many killings and tortures it has meted out, and the response to all these outrages is a deafening silence.

Many prefer not to know what is happening, to close their eyes and stop listening. Many deceive themselves, wishing to be deceived - after all it is so easy to believe blindly what the television says, even if it is broadcasting the most monstrous lies.

But many know perfectly well what this vile regime is doing. They endure the burden of their dissent, their outrage, their anger. And all the same, they are silent.

Just as any crime is committed with somebody's tacit consent, so any dictatorship is maintained thanks to the people's silence. A colossus with feet of clay will be worthless if all the dissenters speak out.

But they are silent.

One person thinks that everything has been decided, and that there is no reason for them, a minor figure, to get mixed up in this. Another hopes that others will say everything - but those others also find excuses to remain silent.

The real reason for this silence is human fear, visceral fear. No dictatorship can make everyone believe in it - therefore it constantly resorts to fear, its first and last instrument for subjugating the people.

Germans in the era of Hitler obediently shouted 'Heil,' understanding the consequences of disobedience; Soviet people in the era of Stalin were afraid to whisper in their own kitchens for fear of being denounced. The steamroller of repression doesn't need to crush every dissenter, just a few demonstrative examples, and the rest will gag their own mouths.

The absurdity of Putinist repression has reached such heights that any trifle can become a pretext for persecution - and no one knows what one can say. The criminal in the Kremlin is satisfied; that's exactly what he needs. As long as everyone is silent, his own skin will be safe.

That is precisely why one cannot stay silent. No, human fear is understandable: it is very difficult to risk one's position, one's future, one's freedom. To say nothing of the fact that many have families - for these people, the fear is doubled. But will it be easier for these families to live under a dictatorship, under tightening screws, behind an iron curtain?

A dictatorship can continue to wreak its atrocities, its lawlessness, as long as it feels strength and power. Nothing will change as long as everyone remains submissively silent.

So perhaps the time has come to start speaking?

Everyone who can speak, must speak. The individuals who dared to speak up are now too few to move anything. Everyone must speak, who does not agree with the Moscow regime. Individuals can easily be put behind bars for their words, because they are individuals. But there are not enough prisons for everyone, for all the dissenters in Russia. Even if the regime builds just as many especially for them.

When, having overcome fear, everyone begins to speak out, it will time for Putin's gang to be afraid.

No evil lasts for ever, any dictatorship will inevitably collapse. It can collapse of its own weight, like the USSR, or thanks to the uprising of the people.

Don't let this dictatorship live any longer than it can. Speak out, people!
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 33, 34, 35  Next