[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Oldest Rock song on RP - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:43pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Irony 101 - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
Breaking News - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:58am
 
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App - pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - newwavegurly - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:48am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:46am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
 
Wordle - daily game - rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:00am
 
Ukraine - Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:41am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:29am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:44am
 
Trump - rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Outstanding Covers - thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 7:40pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Mar 27, 2024 - 5:08pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
 
Motivational Office Cliches... - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - miamizsun - Mar 26, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
Israel - R_P - Mar 26, 2024 - 12:24pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
 
Food - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 25, 2024 - 6:56pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
 
China - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
 
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b... - jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and... - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
Orbiting Earth - oldviolin - Mar 24, 2024 - 9:42am
 
Basketball - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
 
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers - sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
 
Can you afford to retire? - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
 
2024 Elections! - Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
 
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great" - miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
 
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone - Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
 
Damn Dinosaurs! - oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
Great guitar faces - skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Despots, dictators and war criminals - R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
 
Uploading Music - dischuckin - Mar 18, 2024 - 11:55am
 
Media Matters - thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
 
NASA & other news from space - miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
 
MEALTICKET - drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » Africa/Middle East » Five questions non-Muslims would like answered Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 10, 11, 12  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 3:50pm

 kurtster wrote:
In case you haven't noticed, they are backing up their hysterical fear-mongering statements with hysterical fear-mongering deeds.

They walk their talk, unlike everyone else.  You still refuse to recognize jihad and the goal of a Caliphate for what they are.  Did you forget that they knocked off the bank in Mosul picking up a cool half a billion in cash plus a nice stash of American weapons ?  And they further finance themselves with selling Iraqi oil to the tune of a couple of million bucks a day ?  Then they have a small thing going with kidnapping and ransoming.  These guys are not boy scouts.  That and they work social media better than Obama, who is supposed to be the propaganda master of social media of all time.

While Obama states that only one tenth of one percent share these views that is still well over 1 million.  Now if we accept the more widely accepted number of ten percent, that's at least 10 million.

Y'all can think in terms of percentages.  In this case, 1 million of anything is not a small group of people.  10 million is more than the world's standing armies combined.  

I do see another side having an annual budget that's getting closer to a cool trillion dollars (got investments?) and that's killed thousands upon thousands of Muslims in the Middle East, Africa, (whether directly or indirectly by pliant henchmen) and probably more as we speak... Oh wait, that's your side. {#Mrgreen}



At ease, fearful patriot!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 3:38pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Their hysterical fear-mongering statements are about as credible as your own. Two sides of the same coin. Tweedledee and Tweedledumb.

 
In case you haven't noticed, they are backing up their hysterical fear-mongering statements with hysterical fear-mongering deeds.

They walk their talk, unlike everyone else.  You still refuse to recognize jihad and the goal of a Caliphate for what they are.  Did you forget that they knocked off the bank in Mosul picking up a cool half a billion in cash plus a nice stash of American weapons ?  And they further finance themselves with selling Iraqi oil to the tune of a couple of million bucks a day ?  Then they have a small thing going with kidnapping and ransoming.  These guys are not boy scouts.  That and they work social media better than Obama, who is supposed to be the propaganda master of social media of all time.

While Obama states that only one tenth of one percent share these views that is still well over 1 million.  Now if we accept the more widely accepted number of ten percent, that's at least 10 million.

Y'all can think in terms of percentages.  In this case, 1 million of anything is not a small group of people.  10 million is more than the world's standing armies combined. 

Stick to global warming ... percentages are more fun there. {#Wink} 

eff the bastids ... I mean really ...

 


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 3:06pm

 kurtster wrote:
(...)  While ISIS is trying to draw the USA into a ground war on their turf, they are not stopping and waiting to be engaged.  They have many fronts, not just one as your quote myopically states.  ISIS has stated that they are going after Rome (and Europe) by means of launching their assault by sea from Libya.  We are witnessing the early stages of the re enactment of the Moorish (Islamic) invasion of Europe which brought about the Crusades as the response to that invasion. (...)
 
Don't forget the babies thrown from incubators...

Their hysterical fear-mongering statements are about as credible as your own. Two sides of the same coin. Tweedledee and Tweedledumb.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 2:25pm

 aflanigan wrote:

Here's a quote for you:



the risks of escalation are enormous. The biggest proponent of an American invasion is the Islamic State itself. The provocative videos, in which a black-hooded executioner addresses President Obama by name, are clearly made to draw America into the fight. An invasion would be a huge propaganda victory for jihadists worldwide: irrespective of whether they have givenbaya’a to the caliph, they all believe that the United States wants to embark on a modern-day Crusade and kill Muslims. Yet another invasion and occupation would confirm that suspicion, and bolster recruitment. Add the incompetence of our previous efforts as occupiers, and we have reason for reluctance. The rise of ISIS, after all, happened only because our previous occupation created space for Zarqawi and his followers. Who knows the consequences of another botched job?

Given everything we know about the Islamic State, continuing to slowly bleed it, through air strikes and proxy warfare, appears the best of bad military options. Neither the Kurds nor the Shia will ever subdue and control the whole Sunni heartland of Syria and Iraq—they are hated there, and have no appetite for such an adventure anyway. But they can keep the Islamic State from fulfilling its duty to expand. And with every month that it fails to expand, it resembles less the conquering state of the Prophet Muhammad than yet another Middle Eastern government failing to bring prosperity to its people.

The humanitarian cost of the Islamic State’s existence is high. But its threat to the United States is smaller than its all too frequent conflation with al-Qaeda would suggest.





 

We are going to find out the consequences of another botched job.  The one in Libya.  

While you will surely agree that Iraq and Afghanistan are clearly all Bush 43's doing, will you also agree that Libya is Obama's all by himself ?

We went into Libya on a phony premise of genocide.  That seems to be the democrats excuse for going to war in the same thought that the republicans use WMD's as their excuse.

Here's what all you bleeding hearts have to get over:

Stability is a good thing, even if it is maintained by some despot.  Everyone says that ISIS only exists now because Bush went in and took out Hussein and left a power vacuum behind.  Well in Libya, we had Qadaffy on a leash and he was keeping things cool and stable, his threats to the world at large diminished.  Then along came the Arab Spring and Obama got this grand idea that we could help things along and promote the outlandish idea of self determination through the Arab world.  Didn't we just learn the hard way in Iraq that this idea is a non starter ?  What history has shown is that peaceful and respectful self determination has a 1 in 100 chance of working ?  Especially in cultures that are only a few steps out of tents and the Middle Ages ?

And Egypt, another Obama / Arab Spring enterprise.  First Mubarek was our guy and then he wasn't and then he was and then he wasn't.  Obama had to do this dance to cover his favoritism of the Muslim Brotherhood.  He had to pretend to reluctantly endorse the MB, inspite of his full on approval of them from the get go.  We all know what happened in Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood and they have since been harshly dealt with and outlawed again as was before the Arab Spring.  Yet Obama still welcomes the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House with open arms.  Fortunately, IMO, Egypt survived Obama's intentions.

We cannot eliminate all the despots in the world, no matter how noble our intentions.  Its up to those living under them to deal with them, in their own way and especially in the case of the Arab world, without interference or support from Christian interlopers.  If they don't get around to dealing with it, we the Western World must accept it.

And here is where your quote gets it wrong.  While ISIS is trying to draw the USA into a ground war on their turf, they are not stopping and waiting to be engaged.  They have many fronts, not just one as your quote myopically states.  ISIS has stated that they are going after Rome (and Europe) by means of launching their assault by sea from Libya.  We are witnessing the early stages of the re enactment of the Moorish (Islamic) invasion of Europe which brought about the Crusades as the response to that invasion.

So using the logic of its all Bush's fault in Iraq and Afghanistan, this is all Obama's fault for fucking up Libya.  And yes, it is soley Obama's fault, because it was made quite clear at the time that it could not have been done without the help and support of the USA because Europe did not have the military means or might to deconstruct Libya and take out Qadaffy.

No wonder Obama is so fixated on the Crusades.  He seems to be taking the side of the Moors in this re enactment.


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 12:15pm

 aflanigan wrote:
My definition of pragmatic is not really consistent with neoconservative approaches to dealing with terrorist groups, be it Al-Qaeda or ISIS or Boko Haram. (...)
 
Pragmatism ultimately relies on realistic desirable outcomes, as opposed to outcomes that are quite amenable to wishful thinking. Recent history has borne this delusional thinking out sufficiently. However, there is the tendency to repeat the same thing again and again, while expecting different results, often accompanied with more special pleading (bad press, not long/fierce enough, etc.)
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 12:12pm

 aflanigan wrote:
I can definitely imagine empathy being a learned trait among homo sapiens. Having experienced the pain of grabbing a hot stove, for example, I can empathize with someone who makes the same mistake. As our kids were growing, they seemed to be able to develop the capacity for empathy without such obvious cues. Was it genetics taking hold, or being more receptive to the grown up idea of imagining what it felt like to be in someone else's shoes?

You're empathetic to someone else being burned on a hot stove because you care, and you know it hurts. The stove taught you that, but it didn't teach you to make the leap of feeling someone else's pain.

So yeah, the genetics thing.


ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 12:04pm

 aflanigan wrote:

I can definitely imagine empathy being a learned trait among homo sapiens
 
And yet there are plenty of grownups who seem to be still working on it...
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 11:59am

 aflanigan wrote:
I can definitely imagine empathy being a learned trait among homo sapiens. Having experienced the pain of grabbing a hot stove, for example, I can empathize with someone who makes the same mistake. As our kids were growing, they seemed to be able to develop the capacity for empathy without such obvious cues. Was it genetics taking hold, or being more receptive to the grown up idea of imagining what it felt like to be in someone else's shoes?
 
We, and other species, can put ourselves (vicariously) in the place of others without having to experience the pain or pleasure first hand. We have the evolved hardware at our disposal to do that. There are studies of very young infants, without the obvious experience, that show such innate responses. Ultimately the behaviour must be based on brain architecture that supports such behaviour (if the hardware is partly faulty you get expected aberrant behaviour, though you might get that too with indoctrination to override the innate).

PS: We can often still go on to decide/verify and put our tongue to the cold metal to see if it really sticks... {#Wink}
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 11:49am

 Lazy8 wrote:
 aflanigan wrote:
I think you are right. I believe there is recent work suggesting a genetic basis for altruism, which is an aspect of morality, no?

Not familiar with this, and a lot of the evolutionary behavior models are built out of nothing more than blue sky so I haven't paid attention to the field in general.

I'd imagine there is a genetic basis for empathy tho, as there seem to be very few who don't posses it, and it doesn't appear to be a learned trait in them.

 
I can definitely imagine empathy being a learned trait among homo sapiens. Having experienced the pain of grabbing a hot stove, for example, I can empathize with someone who makes the same mistake. As our kids were growing, they seemed to be able to develop the capacity for empathy without such obvious cues. Was it genetics taking hold, or being more receptive to the grown up idea of imagining what it felt like to be in someone else's shoes?
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 11:46am

 Beaker wrote:

Are you suggesting an alternate to a pragmatic strategy to deal with ISIS?  If so, name it.

And stay on topic: specifically ISIS.  Or do you support #JobsForISIS per the wack job Marie Harf deputy spokesbot for State aka a very good impersonation of an SNL skit? 

 
My definition of pragmatic is not really consistent with neoconservative approaches to dealing with terrorist groups, be it Al-Qaeda or ISIS or Boko Haram.

The invasion of Iraq, a wasteful and costly strategic military failure, as a strategic/political response to Al Qaeda's attacks on the US Cole, 9/11, and the WTC bombing of 1993 was not my idea of a sensible and realistic attempt to weaken or destroy Bin Laden's organization. At best it was an emotionally driven response to provocation. Switching from focusing on Afghanistan to Iraq based on a changing parade of justifications to sway public opinion (with nonexistent WMD finally being settled on) revealed a policy approach (viz Cheney's one percent doctrine) that was not only disconnected from reality but devoid of sense, as subsequent events proved.

Here's a quote for you:



the risks of escalation are enormous. The biggest proponent of an American invasion is the Islamic State itself. The provocative videos, in which a black-hooded executioner addresses President Obama by name, are clearly made to draw America into the fight. An invasion would be a huge propaganda victory for jihadists worldwide: irrespective of whether they have givenbaya’a to the caliph, they all believe that the United States wants to embark on a modern-day Crusade and kill Muslims. Yet another invasion and occupation would confirm that suspicion, and bolster recruitment. Add the incompetence of our previous efforts as occupiers, and we have reason for reluctance. The rise of ISIS, after all, happened only because our previous occupation created space for Zarqawi and his followers. Who knows the consequences of another botched job?

Given everything we know about the Islamic State, continuing to slowly bleed it, through air strikes and proxy warfare, appears the best of bad military options. Neither the Kurds nor the Shia will ever subdue and control the whole Sunni heartland of Syria and Iraq—they are hated there, and have no appetite for such an adventure anyway. But they can keep the Islamic State from fulfilling its duty to expand. And with every month that it fails to expand, it resembles less the conquering state of the Prophet Muhammad than yet another Middle Eastern government failing to bring prosperity to its people.

The humanitarian cost of the Islamic State’s existence is high. But its threat to the United States is smaller than its all too frequent conflation with al-Qaeda would suggest.





Another link for you:

On the Impossibility of Fighting ISIS


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 9:36am

 aflanigan wrote:
I think you are right. I believe there is recent work suggesting a genetic basis for altruism, which is an aspect of morality, no?

Not familiar with this, and a lot of the evolutionary behavior models are built out of nothing more than blue sky so I haven't paid attention to the field in general.

I'd imagine there is a genetic basis for empathy tho, as there seem to be very few who don't posses it, and it doesn't appear to be a learned trait in them.
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 9:27am

 Lazy8 wrote:
aflanigan wrote:
So the first question that pops into my head is, is this innate morality genetic or learned behavior? I mean from the standpoint of how it originated when we evolved into homo sapiens. Is it something we're genetically wired to do? Or did we learn it, say, by mimicking other species?

Given its ubiquitous nature it has to have a genetic component.

 
I think you are right. I believe there is recent work suggesting a genetic basis for altruism, which is an aspect of morality, no?
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2015 - 9:24am

 Beaker wrote:


 people like me with pragmatic views to this problem. 
 
Your comment made me wonder if the word "pragmatic" carries a different connotation in Canada.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 2:20pm


Mushroom clouds! Muslims! Muesli bars!
 Beaker wrote:
Perhaps we need a fence.  On one side, there's people like me with pragmatic psychopathic views to this problem.  On the other side ... you and your head in sand ilk can hang out.  Darwin, etc.
 
FYT. Yes, a fence wouldn't hurt. {#Mrgreen}
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 2:18pm

aflanigan wrote:
So the first question that pops into my head is, is this innate morality genetic or learned behavior? I mean from the standpoint of how it originated when we evolved into homo sapiens. Is it something we're genetically wired to do? Or did we learn it, say, by mimicking other species?

Given its ubiquitous nature it has to have a genetic component.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 12:52pm




jadewahoo

jadewahoo Avatar

Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 12:33pm

 Proclivities wrote:

The unscheduled festivities are usually more fun:
?

 
All Hail BOB!
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 12:29pm

 jadewahoo wrote:

Bueno and gracias! Now, back to your regularly scheduled festivities...

 
The unscheduled festivities are usually more fun:
?


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 12:29pm

 aflanigan wrote:
So the first question that pops into my head is, is this innate morality genetic or learned behavior? I mean from the standpoint of how it originated when we evolved into homo sapiens. Is it something we're genetically wired to do? Or did we learn it, say, by mimicking other species?
 
Murder is a bit tricky, since its definition is usually unlawful killing (so there is the law part). There's plenty of killing that is considered lawful (capital punishment, war, euthanasia, animals, etc.) and morally acceptable (or not), and then some might consider unlawful killing ok (the means and the end).

I'd say morality is both innate and learned (you can't do that!). The innate part (based on biology in both shared genes and evolved body parts) likely existed before we became modern humans, and is to some extent found in other sentient species. Other forms of morality are taught/learned, though I wouldn't say by mimicry of other species, but first and foremost by cultural transmission of experience, and trial and error in general. We keep around what seems to work, and improve incrementally.

Some religious thought maintains that there was a specific point when morality was given to us via some sort of divine implant.
jadewahoo

jadewahoo Avatar

Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2015 - 12:24pm

 JrzyTmata wrote:

copy the embed code. paste in comment window, preview twice.

 
Bueno and gracias! Now, back to your regularly scheduled festivities...
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 10, 11, 12  Next