[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Manbird - Aug 14, 2022 - 2:14pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Aug 14, 2022 - 1:31pm
 
RPeep News You Should Know - islander - Aug 14, 2022 - 1:17pm
 
Trump - kcar - Aug 14, 2022 - 12:20pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Aug 14, 2022 - 11:34am
 
Fix My Car - GeneP59 - Aug 14, 2022 - 10:45am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Aug 14, 2022 - 10:38am
 
Wordle - daily game - kcar - Aug 14, 2022 - 9:55am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - acaciascapes - Aug 14, 2022 - 9:20am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Aug 14, 2022 - 8:44am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - oldviolin - Aug 14, 2022 - 7:55am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Aug 14, 2022 - 7:55am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Aug 14, 2022 - 7:41am
 
DARWIN AWARDS! - POST YOUR NOMINATION! - Coaxial - Aug 13, 2022 - 5:03pm
 
China - R_P - Aug 13, 2022 - 3:29pm
 
Brian Eno - R_P - Aug 13, 2022 - 1:23pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Aug 13, 2022 - 11:15am
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Aug 13, 2022 - 8:38am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Coaxial - Aug 13, 2022 - 7:03am
 
Health Care - miamizsun - Aug 13, 2022 - 6:37am
 
Sweet horrible irony. - miamizsun - Aug 13, 2022 - 6:32am
 
What is the meaning of this? - oldviolin - Aug 12, 2022 - 3:33pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Aug 12, 2022 - 12:59pm
 
Abiogenesis! - R_P - Aug 12, 2022 - 12:02pm
 
PASS THE BEER - kcar - Aug 12, 2022 - 11:33am
 
It's the economy stupid. - rgio - Aug 12, 2022 - 9:06am
 
What's Precious and Sacred to Islam? - Red_Dragon - Aug 12, 2022 - 8:38am
 
Floyd forum - Proclivities - Aug 12, 2022 - 8:12am
 
Today in History - sunybuny - Aug 12, 2022 - 6:46am
 
So... what's been happening here lately? - sunybuny - Aug 12, 2022 - 5:44am
 
Time to lawyer up! - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:52pm
 
Climate Change - Red_Dragon - Aug 11, 2022 - 5:11pm
 
Ukraine - black321 - Aug 11, 2022 - 2:31pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Proclivities - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:35am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Aug 11, 2022 - 10:04am
 
How to Use RP? - kcar - Aug 11, 2022 - 9:53am
 
Republican Party - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Aug 11, 2022 - 9:20am
 
Got Road Rage? - Red_Dragon - Aug 11, 2022 - 8:12am
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Aug 11, 2022 - 7:52am
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Aug 11, 2022 - 5:53am
 
>>>>>>Knitted - Antigone - Aug 11, 2022 - 2:37am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 10, 2022 - 9:34pm
 
India - Red_Dragon - Aug 10, 2022 - 4:36pm
 
godnarb: the Lunchurch - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 10, 2022 - 11:24am
 
Peace - thisbody - Aug 10, 2022 - 8:59am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - black321 - Aug 10, 2022 - 7:01am
 
Derplahoma! - sunybuny - Aug 10, 2022 - 6:02am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - GeneP59 - Aug 9, 2022 - 4:37pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - KurtfromLaQuinta - Aug 9, 2022 - 4:19pm
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - robin2 - Aug 9, 2022 - 11:47am
 
RPeeps who would have a sense of humor if they were not s... - miamizsun - Aug 9, 2022 - 10:14am
 
Things that make you happy - GeneP59 - Aug 9, 2022 - 8:47am
 
unusual time signatures - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 9, 2022 - 8:26am
 
Best/worst white reggae/ska/rcksteady - thisbody - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:54am
 
More reggae, less Marley please - thisbody - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:48am
 
Media Bias - Red_Dragon - Aug 9, 2022 - 6:34am
 
Things Forgotten. - Steely_D - Aug 8, 2022 - 10:24pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Aug 8, 2022 - 7:28pm
 
Cheney, Dick - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 8, 2022 - 10:36am
 
Joe Biden - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 8, 2022 - 10:18am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Aug 8, 2022 - 9:56am
 
Food - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 8, 2022 - 9:56am
 
John Lennon's Jukebox - thisbody - Aug 8, 2022 - 4:55am
 
Portishead S. O. S. - geoff_morphini - Aug 7, 2022 - 10:43pm
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Aug 7, 2022 - 6:51pm
 
Ridiculous or Funny Spam - Steely_D - Aug 7, 2022 - 10:47am
 
Tech & Science - Red_Dragon - Aug 6, 2022 - 3:17pm
 
The Abortion Wars - black321 - Aug 6, 2022 - 8:39am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - BlueHeronDruid - Aug 5, 2022 - 8:37pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Aug 5, 2022 - 12:58pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Aug 5, 2022 - 10:09am
 
Least Successful Phishing Scams - geoff_morphini - Aug 5, 2022 - 9:19am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - miamizsun - Aug 5, 2022 - 7:09am
 
Favorite Flags - Proclivities - Aug 5, 2022 - 6:33am
 
Afghanistan - Red_Dragon - Aug 5, 2022 - 5:29am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Supreme Court: Who's Next? Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 37, 38, 39  Next
Post to this Topic
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 10:14pm



 kurtster wrote:

Just imagining the things CNN is saying about her ...

you know ... all that Handmaid's Tale stuff that everyone was talking about.  
{#Arrowd}
 

Not as much Handmaid’s Tale as Straw Man
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 8:58pm

 R_P wrote:
 kurtster wrote:
Just imagining the things CNN is saying about her ...
 
What was that about living rent-free in your head?
 
Nope, not e v e n close. 

You really think that I take CNN seriously ?  Even for a minute ?  Seriously ?

Just mocking CNN's followers sheeple ...
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 8:43pm

 kurtster wrote:
Just imagining the things CNN is saying about her ...
 
What was that about living rent-free in your head?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 8:08pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


 kurtster wrote:
Probably the least qualified nominee for SCOTUS ever, right ?

Not worthy enough to preside over a Kangaroo Court.

Has a fake photo - op type family.  The black kids are just props.

Works without notes, too.  Probably can't read.
 
Who are you even talking to? Are they in the room with you right now?

 
Just imagining the things CNN is saying about her ...

you know ... all that Handmaid's Tale stuff that everyone was talking about.  {#Arrowd}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 7:51pm

Notre Dame calendars show more events not listed on Amy Coney Barrett's Senate paperwork
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 7:43pm



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Who are you even talking to? Are they in the room with you right now?

 




ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 7:39pm



 kurtster wrote:
Probably the least qualified nominee for SCOTUS ever, right ?

Not worthy enough to preside over a Kangaroo Court.

Has a fake photo - op type family.  The black kids are just props.

Works without notes, too.  Probably can't read.
 
Who are you even talking to? Are they in the room with you right now?

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 7:36pm

Probably the least qualified nominee for SCOTUS ever, right ?

Not worthy enough to preside over a Kangaroo Court.

Has a fake photo - op type family.  The black kids are just props.

Works without notes, too.  Probably can't read.
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 14, 2020 - 4:53pm

Senator Kennedy, obviously, hails from Louisiana.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 1:31pm



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:




The important question is Why would her confirmation be "glorious"? Supreme Court appointments should be boring AF and reassuring in that. 
 

If they went about their business and it was unemotional - even rational - then it would alienate their reactive, hysterical, vengeful base.
You know, the ones who think there's some benefit to the nation to "own the libs."

(Spoiler: it just means they're looking for an ego boost by feeling like they're bigger and stronger, since they can't compete in any other way)
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:50pm



 KarmaKarma wrote:

 

The important question is Why would her confirmation be "glorious"? Supreme Court appointments should be boring AF and reassuring in that. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:48pm



 KarmaKarma wrote:


 
Republicans are only playing with the rules as inherited from Reid's term.  They didn't change the rules, Harry Reid & his Dem majority did.  Why should Republicans give back what Reid handed them?  

Court packing isn't right either, but the Democrats are threatening it - if they win.  Many Dem voters understand that court packing also isn't right.  Court packing is not necessarily a guaranteed vote getter - Dems are once again playing with fire.

 
what part of right (and wrong for that matter) do you not understand? 

KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:44pm



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 KarmaKarma wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 

Hahahahahaha!

Blame Harry Reid.


Can't say he and the Dems weren't warned that his actions would come back to haunt them.
 

Indeed, but it still doesn't make it right, does it?
 
Republicans are only playing with the rules as inherited from Reid's term.  They didn't change the rules, Harry Reid & his Dem majority did.  Why should Republicans give back what Reid handed them?  

Court packing isn't right either, but the Democrats are threatening it - if they win.  Many Dem voters understand that court packing also isn't right.  Court packing is not necessarily a guaranteed vote getter - Dems are once again playing with fire.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:37pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 R_P wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 
Or, with possible obstruction, so impossible.
 
Other countries seem to manage it

 
Indeed, they do.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:34pm



 KarmaKarma wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 

Hahahahahaha!

Blame Harry Reid.


Can't say he and the Dems weren't warned that his actions would come back to haunt them.
 

Indeed, but it still doesn't make it right, does it?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:30pm



 R_P wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 
Or, with possible obstruction, so impossible.

 

Other countries seem to manage it

KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:28pm



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 

Hahahahahaha!

Blame Harry Reid.


Can't say he and the Dems weren't warned that his actions would come back to haunt them.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:15pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
 
Or, with possible obstruction, so impossible.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:10pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 

why on earth don't the two main parties agree on the need for a majority vote for each new member to the SC?  Like 75%? It would make life so easy. 
KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Oct 13, 2020 - 12:05pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
Since 1969 Democratic presidents have appointed 4 Supreme Court justices, Republican presidents have appointed 15 (4 of them by presidents who lost the popular vote).

Who's "packing" the court?
 


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 37, 38, 39  Next