Wordle - daily game
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Dec 4, 2023 - 10:12pm
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group
- Coaxial - Dec 4, 2023 - 8:44pm
Israel
- R_P - Dec 4, 2023 - 8:31pm
The Pogues
- garrettb - Dec 4, 2023 - 7:17pm
Did somebody hack RP ? (just kidding)
- bluegroper - Dec 4, 2023 - 5:35pm
Trump
- Red_Dragon - Dec 4, 2023 - 5:21pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Dec 4, 2023 - 4:51pm
Buddy's Haven
- oldviolin - Dec 4, 2023 - 4:44pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Dec 4, 2023 - 4:42pm
Chess
- Red_Dragon - Dec 4, 2023 - 4:16pm
As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country
- islander - Dec 4, 2023 - 4:02pm
Museum of Iconic Album Covers
- Proclivities - Dec 4, 2023 - 1:43pm
Today in History
- dischuckin - Dec 4, 2023 - 1:22pm
NYTimes Connections
- Steely_D - Dec 4, 2023 - 1:15pm
Picnic Games Suggestions
- Proclivities - Dec 4, 2023 - 1:02pm
December 2023 Photo Theme - Reflection
- Alchemist - Dec 4, 2023 - 12:30pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Dec 4, 2023 - 10:51am
Photos you haven't taken of yourself
- Beez - Dec 4, 2023 - 9:57am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- touille - Dec 4, 2023 - 9:19am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Beez - Dec 4, 2023 - 7:08am
New Music
- miamizsun - Dec 4, 2023 - 6:28am
Best guitarists
- thisbody - Dec 4, 2023 - 3:48am
Artificial Intelligence
- thisbody - Dec 4, 2023 - 2:53am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- Steely_D - Dec 3, 2023 - 11:40pm
Things You Thought Today
- Steely_D - Dec 3, 2023 - 11:38pm
Think About It
- miamizsun - Dec 3, 2023 - 12:49pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Dec 3, 2023 - 11:50am
What Puts You In the Christmas Mood?
- thisbody - Dec 3, 2023 - 10:58am
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou...
- dcameron - Dec 3, 2023 - 9:20am
The World IS Hunted
- Steely_D - Dec 2, 2023 - 11:20pm
November 2023 Photo Theme - Perspective
- MrDill - Dec 2, 2023 - 10:11am
2024 Elections!
- Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2023 - 9:16am
Musky Mythology
- Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2023 - 9:11am
Update playlist please
- hansotten - Dec 2, 2023 - 2:55am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 7:42pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- black321 - Dec 1, 2023 - 2:58pm
Fear of Flying
- Beaker - Dec 1, 2023 - 1:53pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Dec 1, 2023 - 9:35am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- GeneP59 - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:43am
The Obituary Page
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:34am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 8:13am
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 6:53am
Live Music
- thisbody - Dec 1, 2023 - 6:04am
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - Dec 1, 2023 - 3:04am
OUR CATS!!
- Red_Dragon - Nov 30, 2023 - 6:11pm
RightWingNutZ
- kcar - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:50pm
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 4:44pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- DrLex - Nov 30, 2023 - 2:00pm
JFK Assassination
- kurtster - Nov 30, 2023 - 12:46pm
Pogues!
- ScottFromWyoming - Nov 30, 2023 - 11:45am
FLAC stream crashes Sonos
- fbloemhof - Nov 30, 2023 - 10:32am
Download Manager IPhone problems
- RPnate1 - Nov 29, 2023 - 11:31am
RP On Windows Media Player?
- William - Nov 29, 2023 - 10:00am
RP Daily Trivia Challenge
- lily34 - Nov 29, 2023 - 8:44am
Animal Resistance
- lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 9:59am
The Dragons' Roost
- GeneP59 - Nov 28, 2023 - 8:59am
Economix
- black321 - Nov 28, 2023 - 7:38am
NY Times Spelling Bee
- lily34 - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:48am
New mix, what would you like to see ?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 28, 2023 - 6:27am
Tech - what makes RP sound so good?
- William - Nov 27, 2023 - 5:37pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Nov 27, 2023 - 1:32pm
Questions.
- miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:37am
♥ ♥ ♥ Vote For Pie ♥ ♥ ♥
- miamizsun - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:36am
iPad wake screen
- michaelmuller - Nov 27, 2023 - 10:11am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- Coaxial - Nov 27, 2023 - 9:36am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Nov 27, 2023 - 7:46am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 8:25pm
Happy Thanksgiving!
- Bill_J - Nov 26, 2023 - 5:58pm
Audio Problems
- uaerez - Nov 26, 2023 - 12:30pm
Shameless Band Promotion - West Coast Division
- sunybuny - Nov 26, 2023 - 11:56am
Guns
- Red_Dragon - Nov 26, 2023 - 10:45am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Nov 26, 2023 - 9:54am
AI Bill
- timothy_john - Nov 26, 2023 - 3:52am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Nov 25, 2023 - 8:07pm
Discussion Thread for the Meetup Meetup Topic
- Red_Dragon - Nov 25, 2023 - 2:02pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1042, 1043, 1044 ... 1096, 1097, 1098 Next |
VV

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 29, 2016 - 7:14am |
|
kurtster wrote: Alrighty, I read the article and am very familiar with Eugene Robinson, the author, as I now watch Morning Joe on a very regular basis lately. He's a good guy and I know where he is coming from.
I also read the entire transcript. No surprises or shocking revelations there at all, at least to anyone who has listened to Trump at length over the course of the entire campaign to date. For someone who has finally gotten around to actually listening or at least reading Trump for the first time, I can see where it might be disturbing. Mr Robinson, however, has studied Trump too much already to act as if he is surprised or shocked about anything that was said in the interview with the editorial board. I have listened to Mr Robinson at length on Trump and his shock is not genuine.
That said, who else that is running has sat down with the editorial board of the WaPost or NYT and had an at length on the record discussion with them or any other paper of their stature ? The answer is no one else. When that happens, then we can compare Q's and A's. Until then, all's that can be said is that Trump is the only one with the cajonés to actually sit down and face a less than friendly interrogation such as what he has done.
I have listened to all of the major candidates at length to hear in their own words without the interference / spin / filtering of pundits who tell me what I am supposed to hear them say. I don't have to rely on others to tell me what I am supposed to think. But then again, I have the time to do it and am genuinely interested.
I have already explained at length how and why I feel about Trump. No need to go over it again. But it has been formed by listening to him with suspicion and paying attention to his consistencies and inconsistencies. I have found that the former far outweighs the latter and that how he spoke and answered to the WaPost board is no different than what I have seen or heard myself before. But when viewed over a long period of time, one gets his drift and can read between the lines based upon his consistencies.
So let the other candidates show up and speak on the record and then we will have something worthy of conversation. Until then, only Trump has been brave enough to show up and take the heat, for better or worse. The remaining 4 candidates are cowards, until they show up and put it on the line. I'm not going to vote for a coward, no matter how nice or presidential they appear to be.
Trump embodies the definition of a coward. Only a coward would refuse to acknowledge John McCain as a war hero. He admires people who weren't "caught". What kind of juvenile asinine statement is that? In other words John McCain would have been a war hero in Trump's eyes if only he didn't have the misfortune of being caught? He never ceases to amaze in the depths of his stupidity and thoughtlessness. The one side of me wishes he would become president for the daily comic theater that would play out while the other side of me wonders (and shudders thinking) how many years it would take to repair the damage that he inflicted in his four year term.
|
|
Danimal174

Location: Upstate South Carolina Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 29, 2016 - 6:53am |
|
kurtster wrote: Alrighty, I read the article and am very familiar with Eugene Robinson, the author, as I now watch Morning Joe on a very regular basis lately. He's a good guy and I know where he is coming from.
I also read the entire transcript. No surprises or shocking revelations there at all, at least to anyone who has listened to Trump at length over the course of the entire campaign to date. For someone who has finally gotten around to actually listening or at least reading Trump for the first time, I can see where it might be disturbing. Mr Robinson, however, has studied Trump too much already to act as if he is surprised or shocked about anything that was said in the interview with the editorial board. I have listened to Mr Robinson at length on Trump and his shock is not genuine.
That said, who else that is running has sat down with the editorial board of the WaPost or NYT and had an at length on the record discussion with them or any other paper of their stature ? The answer is no one else. When that happens, then we can compare Q's and A's. Until then, all's that can be said is that Trump is the only one with the cajonés to actually sit down and face a less than friendly interrogation such as what he has done.
I have listened to all of the major candidates at length to hear in their own words without the interference / spin / filtering of pundits who tell me what I am supposed to hear them say. I don't have to rely on others to tell me what I am supposed to think. But then again, I have the time to do it and am genuinely interested.
I have already explained at length how and why I feel about Trump. No need to go over it again. But it has been formed by listening to him with suspicion and paying attention to his consistencies and inconsistencies. I have found that the former far outweighs the latter and that how he spoke and answered to the WaPost board is no different than what I have seen or heard myself before. But when viewed over a long period of time, one gets his drift and can read between the lines based upon his consistencies.
So let the other candidates show up and speak on the record and then we will have something worthy of conversation. Until then, only Trump has been brave enough to show up and take the heat, for better or worse. The remaining 4 candidates are cowards, until they show up and put it on the line. I'm not going to vote for a coward, no matter how nice or presidential they appear to be.
So, the argument could be made that Trump is so egotistical, he doesn't care what the fallout of the Post interview would be. He has previously said that he could shoot someone in the street and not lose voters; I don't think he'd be concerned about losing voters because he doesn't do well in an interview. That being said, the fact that he sat down for the interview doesn't make him more Presidential, in my eyes. Palin also sat down with Katie Couric back in the day; the result of that interview, much like this one, basically showed that the candidate in each case maybe should have thought better about the interview (or at least prepared better beforehand). Their lack of forethought about the implications of a bad interview and/or their decision to do so anyway paints a picture of someone who doesn't thoroughly think through items before moving ahead, not a characteristic I look for in a leader. Just my two cents, anyway.
|
|
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 29, 2016 - 5:50am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:Interesting, after listening to the WP tape I got a different picture of Trump altogether.
I actually started feeling sorry for the guy because I don't think he his going to like the job, assuming he get's elected. He's a doer, a businessman, a property developer. He likes clear decisions and people to act on them. He starts off by talking about nice marble finishes and how impressed he is by foreign airports. When he means make America great again, he's thinking building new stuff and employing people. Understandably, that's his job and where he is coming from. He talks from the shop floor and that is part of popular appeal.
But unfortunately politics is a minefield of different interest groups and Washington is probably the biggest minefield there is. He is going to have to negotiate his way through this and I just don't think he's cut out for it. He'll feel like a caged animal, or just throw in the towel. It's easy for him now to be provocative and make all these wild promises. But once he's in office he is going to have a lot of back-peddling to do. And he'll hate it.
Just take the defence industry. He says the US cannot afford to play this role in the world anymore. He's probably right but has he thought it through? Does he want other countries to fill the power vacuum when he cuts back the military budget (if that is what he means when other countries should pay more)? Will he withstand the lobbying of the defence industry itself- a huge employer? On the one hand he wants to restore a policy of isolationism, erect trade barriers and reverse the trade balance. On the other hand he talks as though the US will still have far more military power and economic influence than China.. But isolationism and global power and influence are two things that don't go together. So which one is he going to choose?
Absolutely astute
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 10:41pm |
|
Interesting, after listening to the WP tape I got a different picture of Trump altogether.
I actually started feeling sorry for the guy because I don't think he his going to like the job, assuming he get's elected. He's a doer, a businessman, a property developer. He likes clear decisions and people to act on them. He starts off by talking about nice marble finishes and how impressed he is by foreign airports. When he means make America great again, he's thinking building new stuff and employing people. Understandably, that's his job and where he is coming from. He talks from the shop floor and that is part of popular appeal.
But unfortunately politics is a minefield of different interest groups and Washington is probably the biggest minefield there is. He is going to have to negotiate his way through this and I just don't think he's cut out for it. He'll feel like a caged animal, or just throw in the towel. It's easy for him now to be provocative and make all these wild promises. But once he's in office he is going to have a lot of back-peddling to do. And he'll hate it.
Just take the defence industry. He says the US cannot afford to play this role in the world anymore. He's probably right but has he thought it through? Does he want other countries to fill the power vacuum when he cuts back the military budget (if that is what he means when other countries should pay more)? Will he withstand the lobbying of the defence industry itself- a huge employer? On the one hand he wants to restore a policy of isolationism, erect trade barriers and reverse the trade balance. On the other hand he talks as though the US will still have far more military power and economic influence than China.. But isolationism and global power and influence are two things that don't go together. So which one is he going to choose?
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 10:07pm |
|
porphyrius wrote:Check your new band name, that I thoughtfully posted for you.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 9:57pm |
|
The real world beats the myths and the wishful thinking every time...It is a recurring theme of Republicans in the United States that President Barack Obama is a weak leader. In Obama’s case, this is often linked to his failure to deploy US military force in distant trouble spots, even though the calamitous US experience from Vietnam to Iraq hardly suggests his caution is misplaced. The appeal of someone who very consciously projects an image of the strong leader is apparent in the support for the Republican frontrunner Donald Trump. The fact that his policies are a hodge-podge of wildly unrealistic aspirations – such as building a wall to keep Mexicans out of the US, and getting Mexico to pay for it – counts for less than Trump’s ability to persuade disillusioned conservative voters that his strong personality and mobilisation of their anger will somehow, in the words of his campaign, ‘Make America Great Again!’
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 9:34pm |
|
R_P wrote: Right. We will do better by following a committee of the weak and meek in a world full of bad people who don't play nice and fair and square. We're doing that right now and how's that working ? Yep. Follow them right into a world of serfdom and worse. Howze that go again, one man's strong leader is another man's false god ? Is that like one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter ? Seen this movie before. You can do better.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 9:24pm |
|
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 9:09pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:Donald Trump’s shocking ignorance, laid bare
"I have argued for many months that Trump should be taken seriously, that he has tapped into a legitimate anger and that he understands the Republican base far better than the party establishment does. I’ve had cordial conversations with him, on the telephone and in television studios, and I agree with those who say he should never be underestimated. So I’m not a reflexive Trump hater. I am, however, appalled at how little he knows — and truly frightened."
Alrighty, I read the article and am very familiar with Eugene Robinson, the author, as I now watch Morning Joe on a very regular basis lately. He's a good guy and I know where he is coming from. I also read the entire transcript. No surprises or shocking revelations there at all, at least to anyone who has listened to Trump at length over the course of the entire campaign to date. For someone who has finally gotten around to actually listening or at least reading Trump for the first time, I can see where it might be disturbing. Mr Robinson, however, has studied Trump too much already to act as if he is surprised or shocked about anything that was said in the interview with the editorial board. I have listened to Mr Robinson at length on Trump and his shock is not genuine. That said, who else that is running has sat down with the editorial board of the WaPost or NYT and had an at length on the record discussion with them or any other paper of their stature ? The answer is no one else. When that happens, then we can compare Q's and A's. Until then, all's that can be said is that Trump is the only one with the cajonés to actually sit down and face a less than friendly interrogation such as what he has done. I have listened to all of the major candidates at length to hear in their own words without the interference / spin / filtering of pundits who tell me what I am supposed to hear them say. I don't have to rely on others to tell me what I am supposed to think. But then again, I have the time to do it and am genuinely interested. I have already explained at length how and why I feel about Trump. No need to go over it again. But it has been formed by listening to him with suspicion and paying attention to his consistencies and inconsistencies. I have found that the former far outweighs the latter and that how he spoke and answered to the WaPost board is no different than what I have seen or heard myself before. But when viewed over a long period of time, one gets his drift and can read between the lines based upon his consistencies. So let the other candidates show up and speak on the record and then we will have something worthy of conversation. Until then, only Trump has been brave enough to show up and take the heat, for better or worse. The remaining 4 candidates are cowards, until they show up and put it on the line. I'm not going to vote for a coward, no matter how nice or presidential they appear to be.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 8:47pm |
|
 Instagram and Twitter posts indicate that at least a few people were able to snap photos of the headstone before it was removed "in accordance with the park's strict no-littering policy."
|
|
ScottN

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 8:01pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote: And, in his own words. I am baffled how even a committed Trump supporter cannot be very concerned after watching/reading his hour plus with The Post's editorial board. Shocking? Not sure it's shocking. Breathtaking ignorance, I'd say. I say that wishing we had a viable candidate coming from the Republicans. We clearly won't if Trump is their nominee.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 7:42pm |
|
Steely_D wrote: Baksheesh! gesundheit !! ...
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Dumbf*ckistan 
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 6:28pm |
|
|
|
rotekz


|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 3:46pm |
|
The Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Romney, Ryan, McConnell faction has united and is moving into high gear to steal the nomination from Trump. The immediate plan is an all out bid to deprive Donald Trump of victory – and the delegates – in Wisconsin. The Republicans are Already Stealing the Nomination from Trump
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 3:25pm |
|
Too little, too late, but hey, thanks for playing! - Last summer, I signed on as the Communications Director of the Make America Great Again Super PAC. … I'll say it again: Trump never intended to be the candidate. But his pride is too out of control to stop him now. You can give Trump the biggest gift possible if you are a Trump supporter: stop supporting him.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 1:10pm |
|
Steely_D wrote: It was the part where you make the distinction, and then say "I'm not going to quibble with this technicality."
OK. just trying to show that I was aware of the possibilities even if I didn't see the viability of the concepts. Sheesh,
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:49am |
|
aflanigan wrote: You do realize you are contradicting yourself within the same breath here.
Are you serious ? I mean really ? An empath is a creature capable of receiving emotional and physical sensations from outside sources. Empathetic means that one is capable of identifying the feelings and needs of other individuals. Empathy is the act. These are three distinctly different things. So what am I getting wrong ?
|
|
|