[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Republican Party - kcar - May 12, 2021 - 11:13pm
 
Protest Songs - kurtster - May 12, 2021 - 9:30pm
 
New Music - R_P - May 12, 2021 - 8:50pm
 
Bitcoin - kurtster - May 12, 2021 - 8:42pm
 
Bad News / Good News - ScottFromWyoming - May 12, 2021 - 8:08pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - oldviolin - May 12, 2021 - 8:03pm
 
What other *streams* are you listening too? - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 7:45pm
 
Electronic Music - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 7:25pm
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 6:55pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - May 12, 2021 - 6:47pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 6:38pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 6:25pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - kurtster - May 12, 2021 - 6:02pm
 
Classical Music - Manbird - May 12, 2021 - 5:20pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 12, 2021 - 5:00pm
 
songs that ROCK! - oldviolin - May 12, 2021 - 4:55pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - May 12, 2021 - 4:51pm
 
Steven Wilson - westslope - May 12, 2021 - 3:52pm
 
R&R Hall of Fame Show - haresfur - May 12, 2021 - 3:35pm
 
COVID-19 - kurtster - May 12, 2021 - 3:32pm
 
Billie Eilish on the cover of Vogue - westslope - May 12, 2021 - 3:32pm
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - steeler - May 12, 2021 - 3:04pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - May 12, 2021 - 2:51pm
 
Elbow - R_P - May 12, 2021 - 12:35pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 12, 2021 - 12:26pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - May 12, 2021 - 12:10pm
 
Today in History - cc_rider - May 12, 2021 - 10:33am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - May 12, 2021 - 10:03am
 
Last gas price paid? - Proclivities - May 12, 2021 - 9:27am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - May 12, 2021 - 9:21am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - May 12, 2021 - 7:09am
 
RP on Bluesound Node 2i (in the UK) - Dan888 - May 12, 2021 - 5:48am
 
Trump Lies™ - R_P - May 11, 2021 - 9:11pm
 
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism - oldviolin - May 11, 2021 - 7:56pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - May 11, 2021 - 7:40pm
 
Military Matters - Red_Dragon - May 11, 2021 - 4:55pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - May 11, 2021 - 9:55am
 
Things You Thought Today - GeneP59 - May 11, 2021 - 8:48am
 
Dear BillG, - GeneP59 - May 11, 2021 - 8:38am
 
How big are the shirts? - Proclivities - May 11, 2021 - 8:28am
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - kurtster - May 11, 2021 - 8:00am
 
Favorite Quotes - black321 - May 11, 2021 - 7:10am
 
Cell Phone Hell - Red_Dragon - May 11, 2021 - 6:28am
 
What is the meaning of this? - rhahl - May 11, 2021 - 5:53am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - Manbird - May 10, 2021 - 7:59pm
 
Guns - R_P - May 10, 2021 - 4:47pm
 
Australia and New Zealand Music - haresfur - May 10, 2021 - 4:01pm
 
Good afternoon from the UK - Dan888 - May 10, 2021 - 10:25am
 
Jazz - Ohmsen - May 10, 2021 - 9:12am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2021 - 7:30am
 
Music documentaries - Ohmsen - May 10, 2021 - 7:21am
 
Any exotic birds in your back yard? - sunybuny - May 10, 2021 - 7:07am
 
What the hell OV? - GeneP59 - May 10, 2021 - 6:59am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - rhahl - May 10, 2021 - 6:40am
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - May 10, 2021 - 6:29am
 
RP via Bluesound - Lagging - Dan888 - May 10, 2021 - 5:12am
 
Breaking News - oldviolin - May 9, 2021 - 9:47pm
 
Latin Music - rhahl - May 9, 2021 - 5:27pm
 
Black lives matter .... to white police? - kurtster - May 9, 2021 - 3:48pm
 
Race in America - Coaxial - May 9, 2021 - 1:39pm
 
How's the weather? - JrzyTmata - May 9, 2021 - 10:58am
 
Got Road Rage? - Red_Dragon - May 9, 2021 - 8:08am
 
Surfing! - Proclivities - May 9, 2021 - 6:51am
 
Predictions - sirdroseph - May 9, 2021 - 6:21am
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 8, 2021 - 8:53pm
 
how do you feel right now? - GeneP59 - May 8, 2021 - 3:44pm
 
Automobile Repair - westslope - May 8, 2021 - 9:52am
 
Tomato Gardens - GeneP59 - May 8, 2021 - 9:32am
 
The war on funk is over! - miamizsun - May 8, 2021 - 8:23am
 
2020 Elections - miamizsun - May 8, 2021 - 7:39am
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - NeilBlanchard - May 7, 2021 - 10:16pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - May 7, 2021 - 12:50pm
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - May 7, 2021 - 11:45am
 
Tech & Science - R_P - May 6, 2021 - 11:48pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 6, 2021 - 9:01pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Trump Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 972, 973, 974, 975, 976  Next
Post to this Topic
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 27, 2015 - 10:03am

 n4ku wrote:

That's how Ronald Reagan was elected way back when. He promised to make America great again.

 
I'm voting for the guy (or gal) that promises to make Christmas start after Thanksgiving again. 
n4ku

n4ku Avatar



Posted: Aug 27, 2015 - 9:59am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
We know his goal is to make America great again — it’s on his hat. And we see it every time he’s on TV.

 
That's how Ronald Reagan was elected way back when. He promised to make America great again.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 27, 2015 - 9:58am

Political Operatives Abandon Koch Network For Donald Trump
Maybe a Koch/Koch 2016 ticket is what's needed?
A libertarian wet dream
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 26, 2015 - 10:10am


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Aug 26, 2015 - 10:01am

We know his goal is to make America great again — it’s on his hat. And we see it every time he’s on TV.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 26, 2015 - 5:49am

 Lazy8 wrote:
It just hit me—who Donald Trump reminds me of.

Silvio Berlusconi...without all the class.

 
I was kinda thinking T Roosevelt, based on his rhetoric, that is ...
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 9:08pm

It just hit me—who Donald Trump reminds me of.

Silvio Berlusconi...without all the class.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 12:01pm


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 11:43am

 kurtster wrote:
This was brand new back then ... but you'll have to take my word on that, too, cuz I don't believe it myself ...

 

 
You should take it back. It has holes in it.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 11:40am

 aflanigan wrote:

What, you don't believe anecdotes of the older generation? For shame!!

 

 
Well I had to walk 10 miles to school in the snow and it was uphill both ways ...

We had no cassette recorders, cam corders, innernet, gopro, wikipedia, drones and cell phone cameras back then to document the minutiae of the times, so you'll just have to take my word for it.  {#Snooty}

This was brand new back then ... but you'll have to take my word on that, too, cuz I don't believe it myself ...

 
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 10:46am

 Steely_D wrote:

I could tell a 1st hand story of my experience with something and then contend that it should be policy. In fact, I think many people do.
But that's not how any of us would want things decided.

There's no harm in wanting facts about things that are measurable. 

 
What, you don't believe anecdotes of the older generation? For shame!!

 
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 25, 2015 - 10:32am

 kurtster wrote:

I responded to your general recollections which were ok when you wrote them with my general recollections which are now under scrutiny even though islander generally found it to be true regarding my thought that most (not all) of our 'amazing infrastructure' was built by the boomer generation in the 70's and 80's.  Eh ?  Then I make an observation that based on my experiences, The lesson learned by me at least, is that newer is not always better ... and it always costs more when the .gov is involved.  That is targeted, too. Its a personal observation, not a fact nor offered as a fact.  Prove me wrong on that.  Take it apart.  Don't simply dismiss it.

that was being nice, now I'll go kurtster just so no one is disappointed ...

I can say that I was born in yada, and lived (so far) under US pres's from Truman to Obama and made the list from memory.  But with the way y'all are working it, unless I showed my birth certificate and a linked list of all the POTUS's from the National Archives, it would only be anecdotal, and therefore meaningless in our little Ivy League debating society we have here, right ?  This is where I say Fy'all , and the horses you rode in on.

How do I know that islander saw a whale on one of his cruises through the sound unless he shows me a certified picture of the whale and a picture of him taking his whale picture.

Meanwhile through this all, no one has bothered to comment on my documented fact that the first section of high speed choo choo train in California costs $100 million per mile to build.  That cost bothers no one ?  That is my example of .gov gone bananas.  Do I need to find a peer reviewed article to say that is just plain nuts to make it a valid conclusion ?  If y'all don't have a problem with fucking train tracks costing a fucking $100 million per mile, than there is no point in talking to any of yous.  Y'all are fucking nuts too.

and to islander, let's go back to ignoring each other and save your fucking pixie dust stash for yourself.  I tried being nice and civil with you and as usual, it gets me nowhere.  You just play your silly little games, just like Richard does.  Fuck you and goodnight.
edit: yeah so what.  The US population in 1970 was 203 million in 1990 it was 248 million.  That's a growth of 25% in 20 years.  Infrastructure is more than roads and bridges.  In those years most of the nuclear power plants were built.  The suburbs were built to accommodate the population growth and urban flight.  That's new cities, roads, bridges, power grid and utility expansion and housing, lot's of new tract homes, millions upon millions of them.  Now here is a little fact that most all of yous don't know.  When Obama says you didn't build that, the government did ... bullshit.  You know who pays for all the roads in the new housing tracts ?  The developer.  They must pay for and build the roads to city code and then turn them over (read give at no charge) to the cities upon completion.  The cities don't pay for the roads, or the sewer and water gas and electric installation, the developer and utilities do.  The cities get to maintain the roads once they take possession of them.  But they are spared the primary expense of building them.   The only thing I had to look up was the populations I cited.  The rest I knew from being there and being the child of an architect / developer.  Its true.  Go ahead and look it up.  This only reinforces my position that the boomer generation built most of our present infrastructure in the 70's and 80's.  

Its lots more than freeways and whatnot.  Maybe most of the major dams were built by the 60's, but now the greenies want to tear them down and destroy that infrastructure so the rivers can run wild again, depriving millions of drinking water and power, not to mention the devastation caused by seasonal flooding.  Until 1970, most people lived in large urban areas with ancient, antiquated and compacted infrastructure.  Yes we had a massive infrastructure expansion in the 70's and 80's.  Little more since on the scale of those decades.  Now its just trying to keep it working, and that effort has been failing miserably.

 



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 11:45pm

 Steely_D wrote:

I could tell a 1st hand story of my experience with something and then contend that it should be policy. In fact, I think many people do.
But that's not how any of us would want things decided.

There's no harm in wanting facts about things that are measurable. 

 
I responded to your general recollections which were ok when you wrote them with my general recollections which are now under scrutiny even though islander generally found it to be true regarding my thought that most (not all) of our 'amazing infrastructure' was built by the boomer generation in the 70's and 80's.  Eh ?  Then I make an observation that based on my experiences, The lesson learned by me at least, is that newer is not always better ... and it always costs more when the .gov is involved.  That is targeted, too. Its a personal observation, not a fact nor offered as a fact.  Prove me wrong on that.  Take it apart.  Don't simply dismiss it.

that was being nice, now I'll go kurtster just so no one is disappointed ...

I can say that I was born in yada, and lived (so far) under US pres's from Truman to Obama and made the list from memory.  But with the way y'all are working it, unless I showed my birth certificate and a linked list of all the POTUS's from the National Archives, it would only be anecdotal, and therefore meaningless in our little Ivy League debating society we have here, right ?  This is where I say Fy'all , and the horses you rode in on.

How do I know that islander saw a whale on one of his cruises through the sound unless he shows me a certified picture of the whale and a picture of him taking his whale picture.

Meanwhile through this all, no one has bothered to comment on my documented fact that the first section of high speed choo choo train in California costs $100 million per mile to build.  That cost bothers no one ?  That is my example of .gov gone bananas.  Do I need to find a peer reviewed article to say that is just plain nuts to make it a valid conclusion ?  If y'all don't have a problem with fucking train tracks costing a fucking $100 million per mile, than there is no point in talking to any of yous.  Y'all are fucking nuts too.

and to islander, let's go back to ignoring each other and save your fucking pixie dust stash for yourself.  I tried being nice and civil with you and as usual, it gets me nowhere.  You just play your silly little games, just like Richard does.  Fuck you and goodnight.
edit: yeah so what.  The US population in 1970 was 203 million in 1990 it was 248 million.  That's a growth of 25% in 20 years.  Infrastructure is more than roads and bridges.  In those years most of the nuclear power plants were built.  The suburbs were built to accommodate the population growth and urban flight.  That's new cities, roads, bridges, power grid and utility expansion and housing, lot's of new tract homes, millions upon millions of them.  Now here is a little fact that most all of yous don't know.  When Obama says you didn't build that, the government did ... bullshit.  You know who pays for all the roads in the new housing tracts ?  The developer.  They must pay for and build the roads to city code and then turn them over (read give at no charge) to the cities upon completion.  The cities don't pay for the roads, or the sewer and water gas and electric installation, the developer and utilities do.  The cities get to maintain the roads once they take possession of them.  But they are spared the primary expense of building them.   The only thing I had to look up was the populations I cited.  The rest I knew from being there and being the child of an architect / developer.  Its true.  Go ahead and look it up.  This only reinforces my position that the boomer generation built most of our present infrastructure in the 70's and 80's.  

Its lots more than freeways and whatnot.  Maybe most of the major dams were built by the 60's, but now the greenies want to tear them down and destroy that infrastructure so the rivers can run wild again, depriving millions of drinking water and power, not to mention the devastation caused by seasonal flooding.  Until 1970, most people lived in large urban areas with ancient, antiquated and compacted infrastructure.  Yes we had a massive infrastructure expansion in the 70's and 80's.  Little more since on the scale of those decades.  Now its just trying to keep it working, and that effort has been failing miserably.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 9:35pm

 kurtster wrote:

Most usually means more than half.

No on the bolded.  I can say that on my 21st Bday I bought a brand new 1973 VW Bus for $3700 right off the car carrier at the dealer.  18 months later, it had 58,000 miles on it, having traveled from coast to coast to coast to the Canadian border in it.  I once figured that by my mid 30's I had driven a million miles.  So I got to witness the growth of the Interstate system by driving it.  By the end of the 70's most of the two digit highways were done.  In the 80's most of the 3 digit highways (the connectors and beltways) were done.

I can tell you about the SF bay area in the 50's and 60's and remember the San Rafael Bay bridge being completed sometime in the early 60's and riding the ferries before that all around the bay area.  There were only 3 bridges until then ( the Oakland / SF, the GG and the San Mateo and no tunnels like BART's under the bay.  Down south around LA, there were a few freeways, but I - 5 was still on the drawing board.  There was a pontoon bridge we had to cross from Long Beach proper to get to the Navy Yard there.   It was an adventure to cross during low tide ...   LA still had street cars on rails.     Funny how they ripped them all out and 50 years later, they're putting them back.  But that is what government does, declares something obsolete, destroys it, replaces it and later comes up with a new idea to put street cars back in place, at a cost magnitudes greater than if they had just maintained and improved on the existing stuff.  But there is more money to be spread around destroying and building and destroying and repeating the cycle endlessly.  Kinda like what is happening to our health care system.

The lesson learned by me at least, is that newer is not always better ... and it always costs more when the .gov is involved.

Oh and speaking of trains ... the cost of the SF to LA high speed rail line is $100 million dollars per mile.  That is a real deal, right ?  And I can back up that number if pressed.  I did post a reference to that several years ago ...

see here ... the distance between Merced to Fresno is 60 miles, you do the math ...

But the report also reveals that significant obstacles remain before the agency can complete its $6 billion "initial construction segment" from Merced to north of Bakersfield using a mix of federal stimulus and transportation funds and state bond money;

 



 
I don't see privatisation as a solution to the cost - especially since government will always be involved in one way or another. We have a curious system of 'public-private partnerships' here. Say the government wants to build a tunnel under most of Melbourne. They throw in a bunch of money and get a big company or consortium to raise the rest of the capital and then build and run the system as a toll way. This is supposed to use the efficiency of the private sector but in actuality it incentivises corruption on a huge scale and is in actuality just a really bad form of deficit spending.

The only potential for competition efficiency is in the original bid process. See above on incentivising corruption. But there are so many assumptions and contingencies necessary on infrastructure projects that no company could afford to take on all the risk and they a) inflate the risk so their profits go up and b) make the government cover as many problems as possible. So that means that cost over-runs that have to be covered at least in part by the government are the norm. When the project is complete the government is stuck with some ongoing costs like police enforcement of tolls. Rather than paying off bonds (eventually) the taxpayers who use the road have to pay tolls in perpetuity. The government can say they have a balance budget and only low debt but that's only because they have sold the mortgage house to someone else and we are all left renting with wealth accumulating in the hands of the big banks, etc.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 9:12pm

 islander wrote:

Okay, got it.

 
1st hand is not valid, eh ?  Never is with y'all.  Great conversation stopper ...

So you're ok with spending $100 million per mile for a freaking train ?

love to be on that train when it derails at 200 mph cuz an earthquake shreds the tracks ...
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 9:06pm

 kurtster wrote:

Most usually means more than half.

No on the bolded.  
 
Okay, got it.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 8:40pm

 islander wrote:

I was going to call bunk on this, but after a bit of googling it's a lot less clear. I can't find much on construction of miles by year or decade.  It started in 1956 and took 35 years (although still being extended), so 70's and 80's would cover more than half - so I guess it depends on how you define "most".  

I am more curious now though, got any good reference beyond wiki and the very vague federal FAQs I found?

 
Most usually means more than half.

No on the bolded.  I can say that on my 21st Bday I bought a brand new 1973 VW Bus for $3700 right off the car carrier at the dealer.  18 months later, it had 58,000 miles on it, having traveled from coast to coast to coast to the Canadian border in it.  I once figured that by my mid 30's I had driven a million miles.  So I got to witness the growth of the Interstate system by driving it.  By the end of the 70's most of the two digit highways were done.  In the 80's most of the 3 digit highways (the connectors and beltways) were done.

I can tell you about the SF bay area in the 50's and 60's and remember the San Rafael Bay bridge being completed sometime in the early 60's and riding the ferries before that all around the bay area.  There were only 3 bridges until then ( the Oakland / SF, the GG and the San Mateo and no tunnels like BART's under the bay.  Down south around LA, there were a few freeways, but I - 5 was still on the drawing board.  There was a pontoon bridge we had to cross from Long Beach proper to get to the Navy Yard there.   It was an adventure to cross during low tide ...   LA still had street cars on rails.     Funny how they ripped them all out and 50 years later, they're putting them back.  But that is what government does, declares something obsolete, destroys it, replaces it and later comes up with a new idea to put street cars back in place, at a cost magnitudes greater than if they had just maintained and improved on the existing stuff.  But there is more money to be spread around destroying and building and destroying and repeating the cycle endlessly.  Kinda like what is happening to our health care system.

The lesson learned by me at least, is that newer is not always better ... and it always costs more when the .gov is involved.

Oh and speaking of slush funds trains ... the cost of the SF to LA high speed rail line is $100 million dollars per mile.  That is a real deal, right ?  And I can back up that number if pressed.  I did post a reference to that several years ago ...

see here ... the distance between Merced to Fresno is 60 miles, you do the math ...

But the report also reveals that significant obstacles remain before the agency can complete its $6 billion "initial construction segment" from Merced to north of Bakersfield using a mix of federal stimulus and transportation funds and state bond money;

 




islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 8:06pm

 Steely_D wrote:

I'm not sure that infrastructure shouldn't be maintained by a government to ensure the safety and well-being of its populace. I certainly have no interest in driving the Costco Turnpike and getting home to Electricity by Target. Maybe you wouldn't call that cronyism - maybe it's just capitalism - but I don't see a difference in the end result.

 
Infrastructure is exactly the kind of grand scale public good projects the government is good at. Sure there is a bit of waste and occasional corruption, but not a lot more (maybe not even any more) than there is in private projects - you just never here about those because private shareholder don't get news coverage. Support of the public commons is what government does well, and is where it should focus. 
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 8:02pm

 kurtster wrote:

Or expecting to be CEO's coming straight out of college with useless degrees in the humanities.  I'm not knocking the humanities, just saying that they don't lead to jobs that are going to make one wealthy, let alone independent.  The sense of entitlement leads to these unreal expectations.  They want to be paid for just showing up.

I basically agree with your generational explanation.  I would only disagree with your thoughts as to when this 'amazing infrastructure' was built.  It was built mostly in the 70's and 80's by the boomer generation.  I remember my first trip to school in Florida in the fall of 1970 driving down from Philly to Melbourne, Fla and there was only 10 miles of I - 95 built in the state of Georgia at the time.  When we left California in Nov of 68 to move to Philly, there were no Interstates, we took US 66 all the way to OK City and kept going on other US federal highways.  But this is a very small point.  This amazing infrastructure is in shambles for a myriad of reasons. This infrastructure built only 30 years ago is rotting and near worthless.  We had a stimulus that was supposed to pay for its rebuilding.  6 years later, there's no improvement to speak of.  

Oh and what did Josh Ernest say today in response to being asked about what was behind the single largest drop of the DOW in history ?  He said we need to spend invest in more infrastructure in order to make things better as his answer.  Infrastructure is liberal speak for a slush fund for cronyism ...

 

 
I was going to call bunk on this, but after a bit of googling it's a lot less clear. I can't find much on construction of miles by year or decade.  It started in 1956 and took 35 years (although still being extended), so 70's and 80's would cover more than half - so I guess it depends on how you define "most".  

I am more curious now though, got any good reference beyond wiki and the very vague federal FAQs I found?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 24, 2015 - 7:54pm

 Steely_D wrote:

I worry that, since we need legit infrastructure improvement (water, power, highway, information) that having it tagged with a political "side" will prevent it from happening.
To me, it's a neutral non-partisan thing.

Should we entrust the functionality of our nation to the government (insert usual "they're incompetent" rant) and if not, then it's gotta be private and likely for-profit.
Who pays for those services? Typically the people that use the service, frequently as they use the service.

So the country roads that we use every once in a while will never be profitable, and will be abandoned or poorly maintained by people who don't have the machinery to do repairs and maintenance.
Folks who don't have a significant income won't get power lines, since they can't pay for them.

I'm not sure that infrastructure shouldn't be maintained by a government to ensure the safety and well-being of its populace. I certainly have no interest in driving the Costco Turnpike and getting home to Electricity by Target. Maybe you wouldn't call that cronyism - maybe it's just capitalism - but I don't see a difference in the end result.

 
Roads are an excellent example of how things don't work.  The gas taxes are diverted to pay for other things that fewer people use that cannot support themselves, like buses and bicycle paths, while the roads crumble and bridges collapse and people die as a direct result.  What goes into the pot for one promised purpose does not come out for that promised purpose.  Now if it did, I would have a different view, but it doesn't and that is why I feel the way I do about it.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 972, 973, 974, 975, 976  Next