[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Canada - R_P - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:39pm
 
Stream stopping at promo - lannydevaney - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:51pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:41pm
 
We need some new car names - kcar - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:32pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - triskele - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:55pm
 
R&R Hall of Fame Show - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:53pm
 
What the hell OV? - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:51pm
 
Trump - hayduke2 - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:39pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jan 17, 2020 - 4:15pm
 
DIY - cc_rider - Jan 17, 2020 - 3:27pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - ptooey - Jan 17, 2020 - 3:26pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jan 17, 2020 - 12:53pm
 
war is a racket - haresfur - Jan 17, 2020 - 12:47pm
 
how do you feel right now? - SeriousLee - Jan 17, 2020 - 12:43pm
 
Mellow stream - jarro - Jan 17, 2020 - 11:45am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:22am
 
The war on funk is over! - rhahl - Jan 17, 2020 - 8:25am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:30am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2020 - 4:40am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 16, 2020 - 8:20pm
 
What makes you smile? - Coaxial - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:14pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 2:21pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - success - Jan 16, 2020 - 1:46pm
 
Fix My Car - cc_rider - Jan 16, 2020 - 1:22pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:39am
 
Regarding cats - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:11am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jan 16, 2020 - 10:43am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:07am
 
Music Videos - sirdroseph - Jan 16, 2020 - 4:24am
 
I'm a Dem. Which Republican would you recommend I vote for? - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
Stuff I like - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 5:07pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:43pm
 
Private messages in a public forum - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:19pm
 
Impeachment Time: - kurtster - Jan 15, 2020 - 3:38pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 2:57pm
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - piratesbaseball44 - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:23pm
 
Books - R_P - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:03pm
 
Anti-War - westslope - Jan 15, 2020 - 11:58am
 
Breaking News - buddy - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:34am
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - Red_Dragon - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:34am
 
Drinking Establishments - Coaxial - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:00am
 
LOVIN The ONION - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 15, 2020 - 6:59am
 
Star wars with a twist - sirdroseph - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:17am
 
Things You Thought Today - sirdroseph - Jan 15, 2020 - 2:21am
 
Iran - R_P - Jan 14, 2020 - 8:08pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 14, 2020 - 3:01pm
 
Photography Chat - haresfur - Jan 14, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Internet Speed Test - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2020 - 11:33am
 
audio codec - BillG - Jan 14, 2020 - 10:33am
 
Are you ready for some football? - Coaxial - Jan 14, 2020 - 5:18am
 
Name My Band - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2020 - 5:05am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Jan 14, 2020 - 12:16am
 
Guns - R_P - Jan 13, 2020 - 9:01pm
 
Sweet horrible irony. - R_P - Jan 13, 2020 - 2:31pm
 
Amazing animals! - kurtster - Jan 13, 2020 - 2:24pm
 
OUR CATS!! - jahgirl8 - Jan 13, 2020 - 2:12pm
 
help me - jahgirl8 - Jan 13, 2020 - 1:50pm
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2020 - 1:49pm
 
Big Brother - success - Jan 13, 2020 - 8:59am
 
Things Women Should Not Be Allowed to Do - success - Jan 13, 2020 - 8:14am
 
Posting pictures - RabbitEars - Jan 13, 2020 - 7:53am
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Jan 13, 2020 - 5:18am
 
Tartaria And The Mud Floods - success - Jan 13, 2020 - 4:30am
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - gvajda - Jan 13, 2020 - 4:01am
 
The Obituary Page - westslope - Jan 13, 2020 - 3:03am
 
Band Names !!! - sirdroseph - Jan 13, 2020 - 2:58am
 
Android App not working on cellular? - jarro - Jan 12, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - SeriousLee - Jan 12, 2020 - 4:37pm
 
TED Talks - Red_Dragon - Jan 12, 2020 - 2:51pm
 
Films you're excited about. - islander - Jan 12, 2020 - 2:18pm
 
Iraq - R_P - Jan 12, 2020 - 1:27pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jan 12, 2020 - 12:35pm
 
RP App for Android - rtrt - Jan 12, 2020 - 12:15pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Red_Dragon - Jan 12, 2020 - 9:12am
 
Class in America - sirdroseph - Jan 12, 2020 - 9:11am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Trump Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 710, 711, 712 ... 725, 726, 727  Next
Post to this Topic
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 4:08pm

 RichardPrins wrote: 
Two Corinthians walk into a bar...
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 4:05pm

#bibletrumping
via
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 4:00pm

 kurtster wrote:
Live listen ... starts @ 6.00 EST or about 5 minutes from now.  Palin is supposed to be there to announce her support.  Palin supported Cruz in his Senate campaign in Texas.

Just last night I heard Clinton adviser and supporter, Democrat Doug Schon say that he could vote for Trump, especially since Hillary just declared that she would be Obama's 3rd term.  Something big is happening.

   

I think she is conspiring to get Cruz nominated. Her support for Trump isn't exactly a compelling argument for him.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 3:04pm

 Steely_D wrote:

At least we know the clown car fits two.

Alternate joke: So do we now call her Eva Braun? 

 
Yeah.  

Maybe Trump will give California back to Mexico as punishment to both Calif and Mexico ...
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 3:01pm

 kurtster wrote:
Live listen ... starts @ 6.00 EST or about 5 minutes from now.  Palin is supposed to be there to announce her support.  Palin supported Cruz in his Senate campaign in Texas.
 
At least we know the clown car fits two.

Alternate joke: So do we now call her Eva Braun? 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 2:55pm

Live listen ... starts @ 6.00 EST or about 5 minutes from now.  Palin is supposed to be there to announce her support.  Palin supported Cruz in his Senate campaign in Texas.

Just last night I heard Clinton adviser and supporter, Democrat Doug Schon say that he could vote for Trump, especially since Hillary just declared that she would be Obama's 3rd term.  Something big is happening.

 


rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 1:26pm

This is going to make a big difference in conservative Iowa.






 







meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 12:14pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

{#Shifty}

 

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 12:13pm

 rotekz wrote:
(...) Her daughter certainly wants it. (...)
 
{#Shifty}
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 11:55am


John Wayne's family endorsed Trump today and rumors are swirling that Sarah Palin will do the same. Her daughter certainly wants it.






http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/19/2811600/

WINTERSET, Iowa — 2016 GOP frontrunner and billionaire Donald Trump secured the endorsement of the family of legendary movie star John Wayne—at Wayne’s birthplace.

Aissa Wayne, John Wayne’s daughter, joined Trump at a podium inside the small museum in her father’s hometown here. She said:

Welcome to the John Wayne birthplace. Now, this is the place in Iowa where legends are made. Now we have somebody that I want to welcome personally here to the birthplace of John Wayne, and that is Mr. Donald Trump. Hopefully, for America, he will be the next president of the United State. The reason I am here to support Mr. Trump is because America needs help. We need a strong leader and we need someone like Mr. Trump with leadership qualities, someone with courage, someone that’s strong like John Wayne. And I’ll tell you what, if John Wayne were still here, he’d be standing right here instead of me. So with that, I just want you to welcome Mr. Donald Trump.

 



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 11:27am

Donald Trump is running as Christianity’s savior. And it might work. - The Washington Post

(...) And so, today the Post and the New York Times both weigh in with big reported pieces that ponder one of the most interesting subplots of the 2016 presidential contest: Why are evangelical voters apparently so drawn to The Donald, who has been married three times, wants to deport millions, favors a religious test for entry into the U.S., and regularly boasts about his spectacular wealth (and pretty much everything else about himself, too)?

The Times talks to dozens of evangelicals in multiple states and answers the question this way:

In dozens of interviews with evangelical voters in 16 states, from every region of the country outside the Northeast, those supporting Mr. Trump sounded a familiar refrain: that his heart was in the right place, that his intentions for the country were pure, that he alone was capable of delivering to a troubled country salvation in the here and now….

For many others, Mr. Trump speaks the truth and mirrors what they are feeling: fevered anger at President Obama, distress about the economy and fear that terrorists could pose as Syrian refugees to infiltrate the American heartland. Rather than recoiling from his harsh language about immigrants and insults of people he dislikes, these voters said Mr. Trump was merely being honest.

All this has deeply puzzled some evangelical leaders. The Post quotes one evangelical leader describing Trump as a “thrice married owner of casinos with strip clubs,” and adding that he is “the most immoral and ungodly man to ever run for President of the United States.”

But even if Trump is not a very good Christian in the eyes of some evangelical leaders, the Times interviews with evangelical voters suggest that Trump’s personal morality may not matter much to them. Instead, Trump’s success among evangelical voters may be rooted in the fact that, more than any other GOP candidate, Trump is able to speak to their sense of being under siege. Trump somehow conveys that he understands on a gut level that both Christianity and the country at large are under siege, and what’s more, he is not constrained by politically correct niceties from saying so and proposing drastic measures to reverse this slide into chaos and godlessness. (...)
Cruz haz a sad...
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2016 - 2:10am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

I prefer Kelly:
 

 This is factual straight up for me (obviously we won't build the wall before society collapses).  Doesn't have anything to do with genetics or skin color, for me personally this is hard, cold on the ground facts. I have long ago made a decision to stay away from all metro highly populated areas as much as possible and not go anywhere near large cities if I can help it.  This is my personal choice to have a peaceful and safe life for me and my family.  You can call it what you will, I just call it nothing but a good idea.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 5:49pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

You're in denial/denier mode. Isn't that what you usually do? {#Mrgreen}

 
Nope.  I got it right.  

You're just speculating.  My reading comprehension is pretty good.  {#Mrgreen}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 5:07pm

 kurtster wrote:
Nope.  I got it right.  

Altemeyer is not cited in the original article.  My reading comprehension is pretty good.

You are projecting.  Isn't that what voyeurs do ?
 
You're in denial/denier mode. Isn't that what you usually do? {#Mrgreen}
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 4:21pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
 

More specifically: Right-wing authoritarianism
Although Altemeyer has continually updated the scale, researchers in different domains have tended to lock-in on particular versions. For example in the social psychology of religion, the 1992 version of the scale is still commonly used. In addition, the length of the earlier versions (30 items) led many researchers to develop shorter versions of the scale. Some of those are published but many researchers simply select a subset of items to use in their research; a practice that Altemeyer strongly criticizes. (...)

According to research by Altemeyer, right-wing authoritarians tend to exhibit cognitive errors and symptoms of faulty reasoning. Specifically, they are more likely to make incorrect inferences from evidence and to hold contradictory ideas that result from compartmentalized thinking. They are also more likely to uncritically accept insufficient evidence that supports their beliefs, and they are less likely to acknowledge their own limitations.


 
Nope.  I got it right.  

Altemeyer is not cited in the original article.  My reading comprehension is pretty good.

You are projecting.  Isn't that what voyeurs do ?
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 4:03pm

 kurtster wrote:

kurtster wrote:
Really ?

my poll asked a set of four simple survey questions that political scientists have employed since 1992 to measure inclination toward authoritarianism. These questions pertain to child-rearing: whether it is more important for the voter to have a child who is respectful or independent; obedient or self-reliant; well-behaved or considerate; and well-mannered or curious. Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian.

and from that we get this ? (...)


Nope, I got it right.  The goal of the questions are ... to measure inclination toward authoritarianism.

Pardon me for forgetting to highlite the first bolded.  My reading comprehension is pretty good.

Also in this case, what I get out of it is more important than what you get out of it cuz I have a vote in the matter.  You're just a voyeur in this.

More specifically: Right-wing authoritarianism
Although Altemeyer has continually updated the scale, researchers in different domains have tended to lock-in on particular versions. For example in the social psychology of religion, the 1992 version of the scale is still commonly used. In addition, the length of the earlier versions (30 items) led many researchers to develop shorter versions of the scale. Some of those are published but many researchers simply select a subset of items to use in their research; a practice that Altemeyer strongly criticizes. (...)

According to research by Altemeyer, right-wing authoritarians tend to exhibit cognitive errors and symptoms of faulty reasoning. Specifically, they are more likely to make incorrect inferences from evidence and to hold contradictory ideas that result from compartmentalized thinking. They are also more likely to uncritically accept insufficient evidence that supports their beliefs, and they are less likely to acknowledge their own limitations.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 3:51pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Your quoted bit says: "Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian."

We're talking respondents, i.e. people, not regimes. It's not my problem if you can't read properly.

 
kurtster wrote:
Really ?

my poll asked a set of four simple survey questions that political scientists have employed since 1992 to measure inclination toward authoritarianism. These questions pertain to child-rearing: whether it is more important for the voter to have a child who is respectful or independent; obedient or self-reliant; well-behaved or considerate; and well-mannered or curious. Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian.

and from that we get this ? (...)



Nope, I got it right.  The goal of the questions are ... to measure inclination toward authoritarianism.

Pardon me for forgetting to highlite the first bolded.  My reading comprehension is pretty good.

Also in this case, what I get out of it is more important than what you get out of it cuz I have a vote in the matter.  You're just a voyeur in this.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 3:31pm

 kurtster wrote:
Nope.  I got it right.  

Or you need to be more clear and speak up yourself about what your post means and what your take away is.
 
Your quoted bit says: "Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian."

We're talking respondents, i.e. people, not regimes. It's not my problem if you can't read properly.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 3:27pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

You picked the wrong type of authoritarian.

 
Nope.  I got it right.  

Or you need to be more clear and speak up yourself about what your post means and what your take away is.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2016 - 3:23pm

 kurtster wrote:
Really ?

my poll asked a set of four simple survey questions that political scientists have employed since 1992 to measure inclination toward authoritarianism. These questions pertain to child-rearing: whether it is more important for the voter to have a child who is respectful or independent; obedient or self-reliant; well-behaved or considerate; and well-mannered or curious. Respondents who pick the first option in each of these questions are strongly authoritarian.

and from that we get this ? (...)

 
You picked the wrong type of "authoritarian".
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 710, 711, 712 ... 725, 726, 727  Next