Ask an Atheist
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 19, 2024 - 12:07am
The Obituary Page
- kurtster - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:45pm
TV shows you watch
- kcar - Apr 18, 2024 - 9:13pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 18, 2024 - 8:25pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Trump
- rgio - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:46pm
Remembering the Good Old Days
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:28pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:20pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:15pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:42am
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:22am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Apr 18, 2024 - 7:58am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:39am
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 7:04pm
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 17, 2024 - 5:23pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2024 - 3:27pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Apr 17, 2024 - 2:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- dischuckin - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:29pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Russia
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:14pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Ukraine
- kurtster - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:05am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:38am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 9:08pm
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:56am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Republican Party
- Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:59am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
What Did You See Today?
- Steely_D - Apr 13, 2024 - 6:42am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000
- gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
Joe Biden
- black321 - Apr 11, 2024 - 7:43am
New Song Submissions system
- MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
Caching to Apple watch quit working
- email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting?
- black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
Sonos
- rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet
- gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
And the good news is....
- thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
How do I get songs into My Favorites
- Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
Why is Mellow mix192kbps?
- dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
Musky Mythology
- haresfur - Apr 6, 2024 - 7:11pm
China
- R_P - Apr 6, 2024 - 11:19am
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 5, 2024 - 12:45pm
Vega4 - Bullets
- nirgivon - Apr 5, 2024 - 11:50am
Environment
- thisbody - Apr 5, 2024 - 9:37am
How's the weather?
- geoff_morphini - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- Babylon - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 705, 706, 707 ... 1140, 1141, 1142 Next |
meower
Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 9:48am |
|
pigtail wrote: Good for you. Glad to hear some veterans are getting what they need. More often than not, y'all are left as an after thought. I hope his so called fixes stretch to include those suffering from PTSD and other mentally debilitating ailments as well. I deal with those poor souls on a daily basis and the administration doesn't pay nearly enough for the amount of care needed. Good luck with your upcoming surgery and rehab afterward. Remember....tip your caregiver. They work hard for less than a living wage in most states. Oh and by the way, most of them are immigrants. Americans don't like doing that kinda work.
Veteran's family benefits SUCK. I can tell some stories if you'd like.
|
|
pigtail
Location: Southern California Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 9:40am |
|
spammer wrote:Hatred?Hmm.Can't see anyone constantly posting hatred around here. You know,this horrible evil Trump guy has fixed the VA to the point where I'm getting life changing surgery that will allow me to be able to play the guitar again for more than 10 minutes. Due to the changes he's made since the former failed administration,I will be back on my feet and able to walk to the voting booth for him if he chooses to run again. Good for you. Glad to hear some veterans are getting what they need. More often than not, y'all are left as an after thought. I hope his so called fixes stretch to include those suffering from PTSD and other mentally debilitating ailments as well. I deal with those poor souls on a daily basis and the administration doesn't pay nearly enough for the amount of care needed. Good luck with your upcoming surgery and rehab afterward. Remember....tip your caregiver. They work hard for less than a living wage in most states. Oh and by the way, most of them are immigrants. Americans don't like doing that kinda work.
|
|
spammer
Location: Bokey's Basement(he doesn't feed us)
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 8:12am |
|
Beaker wrote: I kinda think China might be thinking about a nearby land war that costs far fewer resources and gets them the largest fresh water lake in the world(hint-not in Korea or some porn stars panties). Because there are a lot of Chinese people and their water supply sucks. Sorry,you're a poster that actually makes sense,so I thought I'd just chip in.
|
|
VV
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 8:00am |
|
Beaker wrote: I think you meant to say: Thanks Mike Pompeo Given his track history, I doubt Trump had much direct involvement in the release. Probably just apprised of the developments as they went along. It did happen on his watch so he get points for that. At least his administration was able to accomplish something.
|
|
spammer
Location: Bokey's Basement(he doesn't feed us)
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 7:53am |
|
kurtster wrote:Hatred, who has it ? I'm glad I got my cancer before Obama destroyed my primo employer paid health insurance coverage.with Obamacare. Hatred?Hmm.Can't see anyone constantly posting hatred around here. You know,this horrible evil Trump guy has fixed the VA to the point where I'm getting life changing surgery that will allow me to be able to play the guitar again for more than 10 minutes. Due to the changes he's made since the former failed administration,I will be back on my feet and able to walk to the voting booth for him if he chooses to run again.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 7:30am |
|
Red_Dragon wrote:If a cure for cancer had been found on Obama's watch, Trump and the Republicans wouldn't let it be used. Their hatred has completely unhinged them.
Hatred, who has it ? I'm glad I got my cancer before Obama destroyed my primo employer paid health insurance coverage.with Obamacare.
|
|
Coaxial
Location: Comfortably numb in So Texas Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 7:13am |
|
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 7:06am |
|
Beaker wrote: Since words that come out of Trump's mouth are only marginally less war-bonered than what Bolton spews and therefore I dismiss those quotes, I don't find much in that article that could be construed as supporting your position.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 6:01am |
|
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 4:59am |
|
this i think touches on on some salient points and hopefully is (and should be) a teachable moment for those unaware of the systemic problems and unintended consequences the evolution and expansion of bureaucratic government power versus civil rights (another casualty mainly fueled by senseless wars and political fear) in five minutes or so you can understand the concept/methodology peace "If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" Donald Trump once said. He may be about to find out.
As Robert Mueller's investigation continues into possible collusion between the Trump administration and Russians seeking to influence the 2016 election, I've got some free legal advice for the president of the United States: Don't talk to this guy voluntarily and, if subpoenaed, take the Fifth like a dime-store mafioso without batting an eye. I write as a non-lawyer and as a non-fan, non-hater of Donald Trump. I write as someone who is seriously worried about the ways in which law enforcement routinely screws people not by catching them red-handed in a crime but by nailing them on things that are criminal-adjacent rather than the crime itself. I write as someone deeply concerned about factions within the government using largely uncontrollable powers to dispatch enemies. If there's one thing even more foolish than a lawyer who takes himself as a client, it's anyone who freely talks to law enforcement when they can avoid it (which Trump can). As defense attorney, former federal prosecutor, and influential legal blogger Ken White wrote recently at Reason: When the feds interview a subject or target, their goal is not mere information-gathering or fact-finding or "clearing a few things up." Their goal is the hunt....
The purpose of the "hunt" is to catch witnesses in a lie that may or may not really matter much to the larger issue at hand but will count enough to underwrite a conviction for, well, lying to law enforcement. That's what Trump associate George Papadopoulos got nailed for, and Michael Flynn too. Back in the day, that's what cost Martha Stewart her freedom (contrary to popular wisdom, her jail time had nothing to do with insider trading and more to do with defending herself in public). Once you've got someone on lying, obstructing justice, or anything else, you can then flip them to move up the pyramid to catch Mr. Big. Who in this case is Donald Trump. When special counsels or FBI agents ask questions of one of these powerful people, they are not fact-finding. They've already done their homework. They've already gathered facts—almost certainly many more facts than the interviewee knows. They are asking questions the answers to which they can already prove, hoping that the interviewee will tell a provable lie, and thus commit a crime, or at least lock themselves into a feckless story that ties their hands later. The law that makes it a crime to lie to federal investigators does not require the lie to fool the investigators for a nanosecond. A lie must be "material" to be criminal, but that only means that the lie is the kind of statement that could conceivably influence the government, not one that actually did. The FBI can roll up with irrefutable proof of something, ask the target a question hoping for a lie, collect the lie they wanted, and reap a felony conviction.
Recall too that in the end it was Bill Clinton's lying and attempts to circumvent legal prosecution that got him into his most serious legal (though not political) trouble. There's no way to play nice with federal investigators and Trump has more leverage than any other person in America to push back and not participate, at least not voluntarily.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 4:44am |
|
If a cure for cancer had been found on Obama's watch, Trump and the Republicans wouldn't let it be used. Their hatred has completely unhinged them.
|
|
VV
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 3:36am |
|
Beaker wrote: Heads exploded? Good one
|
|
VV
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 3:20am |
|
kcar wrote: VV wrote:Seems that Trump is only good at exiting agreements... not entering into new ones. Entering new agreements takes work and negotiating skills that Trump doesn’t possess
I‘m anxious to see how the North Korea talks pan out but I’m not expecting much to come from it.
" I’m not expecting much to come from it."
You right not to expect much. Two days ago on this thread I posted an excerpt and link to this NYT piece on the near-impossibility of being able to verify that North Korea had gotten rid of its nuclear weapons. Verifying the End of a Nuclear North Korea ‘Could Make Iran Look Easy’While there is no question Iran hid much of its weapons-designing past, North Korea has concealed programs on a far larger scale and built an arsenal of 20 to 60 nuclear warheads — compared with none in Iran. In fact, the Iran inspections, the I.A.E.A. says, have gone on without a hitch in the past two years, though it is a far smaller, comparatively easier effort....Four years ago, the RAND Corporation, which often conducts studies for the Defense Department, estimated that finding and securing the North’s weapons of mass destruction if the nation fell apart — or into any situation in which it might be hostile to inspection — could require up to 273,000 troops. That is far more than the peak of the American occupying force in Iraq.... Everyone agrees that such a program of disarmament would involve the North’s surrendering its nuclear arms. But American intelligence agencies have vastly differing estimates of the size of the arsenal, be it the C.I.A.’s assessment of around 20 nuclear weapons or the Defense Intelligence Agency’s estimate of about 60. That means it is possible that inspectors would never know for sure if they had found everything. All this presupposes some form of disarmament agreement can be reached. I’m skeptical that it even that it gets that far.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 2:05am |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 9, 2018 - 1:40am |
|
Beaker wrote:
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
May 8, 2018 - 11:29pm |
|
Beaker wrote: Yeppers. Pretty much the way I see things. Hubris revenge is a dish best served cold ... . . Sidebar: Does Rosenstein even realize he is a co conspirator to Trump's alleged obstruction of justice over firing Comey ? What's even funnier is that by definition a POTUS cannot obstruct justice by simply firing someone. But everybody else can ...
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
May 8, 2018 - 10:35pm |
|
kcar wrote:Spare me your lame advice. You are the LAST person on these boards to scold anyone about not reading or responding to others’ posts. “You seem intent on refuting something I never claimed: that the investigation into Trump's...everything is outside the scope of the law. It's not. My objection isn't that all this is illegal, but that it's well within the law.” I never implied that was your claim. You apparently believe that existing laws give the FBI too much power. You have repeatedly claimed that the FBI abuses its powers and implied that it acts without restraint or oversight. You have stated that the Mueller investigation is a prime example of such overreach. HERE is a strong sign of the limits of Mueller’s power: the story of federal judge TS Ellis voicing doubt about the motivations of federal prosecutors in pursuing a fraud case against Paul Manafort for actions that don’t seem related to Trump’s campaign and possible collusion with Russians. Manafort’s attorney Kevin Downey argued that the investigation into Manafort’s Ukrainian activities started years ago and that therefore special counsel Mueller should not be involved in that investigation. Ellis has the power to detach Mueller from that investigation if he agrees with Downey. Downey is trying to limit Mueller’s power over Manafort. Judge Ellis is listening to Downey and may grant his requests. Does that strike you as sign of Bob Mueller having unfettered power? No, it strikes me as completely beside the point. My main objection is to the tactic of interrogation gotcha, combined with offering leniency in one case to get the goods in another. And my objection isn't just in this case but to these tactics in general. This isn't some theoretical thing Mueller might do that he's being restrained from doing, he's already done it. You'll probably counter with yet another cut&paste screed about the Trump investigation; this will also be beside the point. I'd object to this tactic—where the investigation creates the crime that gets prosecuted—if they were applied to anybody. As far as Trump and his henchmen go, well...it couldn't happen to a better set of targets. But it shouldn't happen at all, to anyone. As VV has pointed out, you are conflating all sorts of cases together. I don’t think anyone on these boards with a shred of common sense is willing to wander into a conversation with you about the supposedly corrupt and impenetrable thicket of federal criminal law and federal agencies and how apparently Trump is doomed because the federal criminal law bureaucracy has a secret mission to take down Trump. Harvey Silverglate may believe that, but with all due respect to miamizsun, I think Harvey is a nutjob.
Steeler and I asked you to SPECIFY what about the Mueller investigation struck you as “heavy-handed” (that’s the term YOU used) or outside the law. You as usual failed to provide the details. Instead as VV stated, “You are casting your net wider than ever and are conflating the original premise which was that what Mueller is doing has parallels to what other normal unfortunate people are facing in the US on a frequent basis.” That is your MO. You fail to back up your claims with evidence and make ever-larger sweeping generalizations. So I went back and reviewed the thread. No, you and Steeler didn't ask me to SPECIFY anything, but I'll be happy to provide some examples. Rather than cut&paste them they'll be in links to try and keep the length of this post down. The list that miamiszun posted is also to the point. The Martha Stewart case is an obvious example; Comey brags about taking her down in his book. Contrary to popular perception she was never convicted of insider trading; her conviction was for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators. The securities fraud case against her was thrown out. As serious as all this sounds it's pretty easy to get yourself in this kind of trouble, as the link a few paragraphs above demonstrates. That article has a somewhat lighthearted tone but the issue is deadly serious; here's a more somber presentation. It also has more examples. I guess I could dig up more but life is short and I've had too busy a week to put much more effort into arguing on the internet, and despite you making such an effort to make it a congenial exchange of views! And btw dismissing someone as a nutjob is an effective way of expressing contempt but doesn't count as an actual rebuttal. Honestly, it was a pleasure to rebut your unfounded claims of politicized cronyism during Obama’s bailout of the Big Three. You clearly had no idea what you were talking about, but just kept doubling down on wilder and stupider claims.
You make these sweeping claims and then pretend that a response to you was too long for you to read (boo f%#&in' hoo) or that your responders missed some big point you made (“Am I writing in Slovenian?”). Don’t blame others for your failure to articulate and support your claims: that’s YOUR failure. Over and over again. This is like the “Ask the Libertarian” thread all over again where you couldn’t answer even the most basic questions about libertarianism. So of course I went and checked, and I couldn't find any of these " basic questions about libertarianism." There was a lively (and until you chimed in) civil discussion of the concept of rights, but no questions. Maybe you could list those in that same topic and I'll try to answer them to your satisfaction, if such a thing is possible.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
May 8, 2018 - 10:20pm |
|
R_P wrote:Le marais c'est moi
if you say so
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
May 8, 2018 - 9:00pm |
|
Le marais c'est moi
|
|
kcar
|
Posted:
May 8, 2018 - 8:09pm |
|
VV wrote:Seems that Trump is only good at exiting agreements... not entering into new ones. Entering new agreements takes work and negotiating skills that Trump doesn’t possess
I‘m anxious to see how the North Korea talks pan out but I’m not expecting much to come from it.
" I’m not expecting much to come from it."
You right not to expect much. Two days ago on this thread I posted an excerpt and link to this NYT piece on the near-impossibility of being able to verify that North Korea had gotten rid of its nuclear weapons. Verifying the End of a Nuclear North Korea ‘Could Make Iran Look Easy’While there is no question Iran hid much of its weapons-designing past, North Korea has concealed programs on a far larger scale and built an arsenal of 20 to 60 nuclear warheads — compared with none in Iran. In fact, the Iran inspections, the I.A.E.A. says, have gone on without a hitch in the past two years, though it is a far smaller, comparatively easier effort....Four years ago, the RAND Corporation, which often conducts studies for the Defense Department, estimated that finding and securing the North’s weapons of mass destruction if the nation fell apart — or into any situation in which it might be hostile to inspection — could require up to 273,000 troops. That is far more than the peak of the American occupying force in Iraq.... Everyone agrees that such a program of disarmament would involve the North’s surrendering its nuclear arms. But American intelligence agencies have vastly differing estimates of the size of the arsenal, be it the C.I.A.’s assessment of around 20 nuclear weapons or the Defense Intelligence Agency’s estimate of about 60. That means it is possible that inspectors would never know for sure if they had found everything.
|
|
|