[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

MacOS app - gtufano - Nov 19, 2019 - 1:39am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Nov 19, 2019 - 1:00am
 
Alexa for Germany - Bibaboffel - Nov 18, 2019 - 9:43pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - islander - Nov 18, 2019 - 9:31pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - buddy - Nov 18, 2019 - 8:35pm
 
Trump Lies - buddy - Nov 18, 2019 - 8:31pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Nov 18, 2019 - 6:47pm
 
I want an iPhone!!! - kcar - Nov 18, 2019 - 4:26pm
 
Pie? Bah. Cake? Feh. Pudding? - Manbird - Nov 18, 2019 - 3:34pm
 
Israel - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 3:25pm
 
Thorium Power - miamizsun - Nov 18, 2019 - 3:14pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - miamizsun - Nov 18, 2019 - 3:01pm
 
Bolivia - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 2:58pm
 
The War on Happiness - miamizsun - Nov 18, 2019 - 2:35pm
 
Impeachment Time: - miamizsun - Nov 18, 2019 - 2:22pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 1:46pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 12:39pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 12:23pm
 
Movie Recommendation - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 18, 2019 - 11:59am
 
NETFLIX - Steely_D - Nov 18, 2019 - 11:46am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Nov 18, 2019 - 11:00am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 18, 2019 - 10:01am
 
The Groovy Mix - MoonDweazel - Nov 18, 2019 - 9:25am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Nov 18, 2019 - 8:53am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Nov 18, 2019 - 7:08am
 
The Last Shadow Puppets - Proclivities - Nov 18, 2019 - 6:43am
 
Need a Cell Phone Geek - Jonathon - Nov 18, 2019 - 5:37am
 
How much is your monthly cellphone bill? - Manbird - Nov 17, 2019 - 7:37pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jarro - Nov 17, 2019 - 4:10pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Nov 17, 2019 - 9:49am
 
Anti-War - westslope - Nov 17, 2019 - 9:13am
 
Bad Restaurant Promos - Proclivities - Nov 17, 2019 - 7:14am
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - SeriousLee - Nov 17, 2019 - 6:21am
 
Regarding dogs - haresfur - Nov 16, 2019 - 11:55pm
 
Fires - haresfur - Nov 16, 2019 - 11:40pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Isabeau - Nov 16, 2019 - 2:02pm
 
Coffee - SeriousLee - Nov 16, 2019 - 12:50pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Nov 16, 2019 - 12:15pm
 
Name My Band - Coaxial - Nov 16, 2019 - 10:25am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Nov 16, 2019 - 10:01am
 
Race in America - R_P - Nov 16, 2019 - 9:49am
 
Bad News / Good News - Proclivities - Nov 16, 2019 - 5:43am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Proclivities - Nov 16, 2019 - 4:41am
 
Two sexes or ? Gender as a non-binary concept - R_P - Nov 15, 2019 - 5:17pm
 
If I was Oldv I'd.....to keep from freezing. - Manbird - Nov 15, 2019 - 3:04pm
 
The death penalty on trial? - miamizsun - Nov 15, 2019 - 3:02pm
 
Things that piss me off - Antigone - Nov 15, 2019 - 2:29pm
 
Canada - R_P - Nov 15, 2019 - 1:17pm
 
Photos you haven't taken of other people... - Proclivities - Nov 15, 2019 - 1:07pm
 
Know your memes - Red_Dragon - Nov 15, 2019 - 12:59pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Nov 15, 2019 - 12:33pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Nov 15, 2019 - 12:32pm
 
Great drummers - miamizsun - Nov 15, 2019 - 12:24pm
 
How we see work - SeriousLee - Nov 15, 2019 - 11:46am
 
Trump - westslope - Nov 15, 2019 - 10:40am
 
Sweet horrible irony. - Red_Dragon - Nov 15, 2019 - 10:19am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Nov 15, 2019 - 10:00am
 
Guns - black321 - Nov 15, 2019 - 8:16am
 
Women in the World - Isabeau - Nov 15, 2019 - 6:16am
 
I like cheese - miamizsun - Nov 15, 2019 - 4:36am
 
We need to be aware of what just happened in Indiana - haresfur - Nov 15, 2019 - 1:35am
 
How To Be Politically Correct, A Primer - R_P - Nov 14, 2019 - 8:13pm
 
Race/Ethnicity-Genetics Connection - R_P - Nov 14, 2019 - 3:46pm
 
New Music - miamizsun - Nov 14, 2019 - 3:03pm
 
charity link - rmgman - Nov 14, 2019 - 2:13pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Nov 14, 2019 - 9:56am
 
Economix - Lazy8 - Nov 14, 2019 - 8:29am
 
Where are the 80's? - Proclivities - Nov 14, 2019 - 8:08am
 
Things You Thought Today - Steely_D - Nov 14, 2019 - 7:51am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - Proclivities - Nov 14, 2019 - 7:07am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Nov 14, 2019 - 6:46am
 
What Makes You Sad? - Egctheow - Nov 14, 2019 - 2:01am
 
Puzzle it - Manbird - Nov 13, 2019 - 3:54pm
 
RP starts randomly in Android - jarro - Nov 13, 2019 - 3:38pm
 
More reggae, less Marley please - rhahl - Nov 13, 2019 - 12:28pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Trump Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 695, 696, 697 ... 706, 707, 708  Next
Post to this Topic
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 10:44pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Trump Youth...



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 4:49pm

Trump Youth...

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 9:34am

 kurtster wrote:

   Seeings how your an open border guy an all

 
You're confusing me with a libertarian. I'm a pragmatist.

I'm all for keeping out dangerous criminals. That's why we have a thorough and reasonably effective screening process for refugees.

As for immigrants from Mexico, if we build the wall as Trump suggests, we will prevent the net emigration back to Mexico from the US that has been occurring, resulting in more of them being in the US than would be here if we don't build a wall. But don't worry, a lower percentage of them are criminals compared to your fellow illegal descendants of anchor babies, so keeping them on this side of the wall should benefit us with respect to crime. Indeed, we have waves of immigration that have occured to thank for lower crime rates. Only problem is, immigrants who stay often start families, and after a generation or two of pumping out "native born" illegal Americans, their descendants (being natives) would be expected to be more crimey. We could pass a law to require vasectomy as a prerequisite for citizenship, but eventually that would drive population down so much we would have even more problems with filling job openings, and would have to expand work visa programs, I imagine.
Coaxial

Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 5:59am

 rotekz wrote:

I'm an RP listener that likes Trump. Is there a reason I shouldn't be here? 

 
Just curious...You certainly can be anywhere you want to be but in my mind if you like Trump then you are in the dark. Have a great day I'm done here.{#Cheers}
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 5:56am

 Coaxial wrote:

Then why are you here?

 
I'm an RP listener that likes Trump. Is there a reason I shouldn't be here? 
Coaxial

Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 5:52am

 rotekz wrote:

As if the Trump machine would concern itself with the RP forum. {#Roflol}  

 
Then why are you here?
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 5:50am

 Coaxial wrote:

It's nice that you work for the Trump machine but you are pretty much pissing in the wind around here. {#Good-vibes}

 
As if the Trump machine would concern itself with the RP forum. {#Roflol}  
Coaxial

Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 5:32am

 rotekz wrote:
The Republican establishment plans to rob Trump at the RNC by engineering a brokered convention that ultimately leads to a Hillary win. They would rather trade with Hillary than lose power and influence with Trump who will refuse their money.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/14/would-a-brokered-convention-stop-donald-trump/

 
It's nice that you work for the Trump machine but you are pretty much pissing in the wind around here. {#Good-vibes}
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 1:21am

The Republican establishment plans to rob Trump at the RNC by engineering a brokered convention that ultimately leads to a Hillary win. They would rather trade with Hillary than lose power and influence with Trump who will refuse their money.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/14/would-a-brokered-convention-stop-donald-trump/
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2016 - 12:13am

Another great Scott Adams blog post that discusses Trump's charisma and how consistent behaviour patterns can overcome a perceived lack of empathy in some voters minds.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/137221841136/charisma-vs-danger-master-persuader-series

 


rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 11:43pm

Uh-oh. It looks like New York is not too enamoured with Cruz' comment about Trump supporters. 



 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 7:26pm

"The police are the most mistreated people in this country."
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 3:55pm

 rotekz wrote:
At the 2015 general election the pollsters got it completely wrong. It destroyed their reputations. Yet you have linked a Telegraph news story that is based on these pre-election polls. The news story and predictions within have no credibility now. 

It may very well have been wrong, but we don't know because we don't have the actual numbers. There was a decline from 2005 to 2010 in Labour votes (68%) among migrants and it may have persisted. Or it may not have.
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 3:47pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

I didn't say they preferred Tory, merely that the Tories won and that migrants were moving away from Labour. Indecisiveness, along with the rest of the electorate, would have to mean less loyalty to Labour, no?

 
At the 2015 general election the pollsters got it completely wrong. It destroyed their reputations. Yet you have linked a Telegraph news story that is based on these pre-election polls. The news story and predictions within have no credibility now.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 3:30pm

 aflanigan wrote:

So I take it that you will not mind us all referring to you as an illegal American?

 
Sure, why not.  I bet that most are thinking of me as a nazi since I support Trump based on what has been posted earlier.

Doesn't change the issue however.   Seeings how your an open border guy an all, I bet that you have long ago removed all the locks on your doors to show support for that cause.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 3:14pm

 rotekz wrote:
The part you quoted was not from the conclusion section and cannot be described as the conclusion of the report. Also crucial part of your quoted section is as follows:
There is no evidence that BAME support is shifting decisively in the direction of a different political party. Rather, many BAME voters are now as unsure about which way to vote as the rest of the electorate.
It is a prediction of INDECISIVENESS and nothing more.

There is no evidence or data to show that migrants now prefer to vote Tory.
 
You're right, it was from patterns and intentions, just before the conclusion. I didn't say they preferred Tory, merely that the Tories won and that migrants were moving away from Labour. Indecisiveness, along with the rest of the electorate, would have to mean less loyalty to Labour on their part, no?
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 3:09pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

No, I already pointed out that the report reached a different conclusion then you did. I did not and would not say they no longer vote for Labour. The majority probably still does, but the report, once again, makes the case that the trend is away from Labour. The tables (as well as the list of minority MPs) already showed there is some (limited) variety.

Well, the BBC does make up stuff on occasion, but that's not really relevant here.

 
The part you quoted was not from the conclusion section and cannot be described as the conclusion of the report. Also the crucial part of your quoted section is as follows:
There is no evidence that BAME support is shifting decisively in the direction of a different political party. Rather, many BAME voters are now as unsure about which way to vote as the rest of the electorate.
It is a prediction of INDECISIVENESS and nothing more.

There is no evidence or data to show that migrants now prefer to vote Tory. 


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 2:52pm

 rotekz wrote:
The first two sets of data were from the report that YOU linked. Are you trying to say your report is no good? The BBC report used 2010 election data. Do you accuse the BBC of making stuff up? The fourth set of data came from the electoral commission after the 2005 election. Again are you trying to say they got it wrong? This smacks of desperation.

Now. Produce 2015 data that shows migrants no longer vote Labour. Until you do the figures that we have are those of the 2005 and 2010 general election that show migrants overwhelmingly voting for Labour. If you are going to say they no longer do you have to back it up with figures that show it.
 
No, I already pointed out that the report reached a different conclusion then you did. I did not and would not say they no longer vote for Labour. The majority probably still does, but the report, once again, makes the case that the trend is away from Labour. The tables (as well as the list of minority MPs) already showed there is some (limited) variety.

Well, the BBC does make up stuff on occasion, but that's not really relevant here.
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 2:44pm

 aflanigan wrote:

So you consider a single photo which may well have been photoshopped as comprehensive data to establish the voting habits of a certain class of people?

EDIT: Richard caught this as well.{#Arrowu}
 
They were screenshots of the report that Richard himself linked in the first place. Read it.
rotekz

rotekz Avatar



Posted: Jan 14, 2016 - 2:44pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

I might have missed it, but what was your (cold) hard data? Surely not the article by "Migrant Watch"? Or, for that matter, the tables from the report that conclude that there is a trend away from Labour among migrants?

The main winners in the elections were UKIP (like Trump, not likely to be supported by migrants) and the SNP. Big losers: LibDems, and Labour in Scotland (likely due to the SNP).

Until we have data for 2015, your air is as hot as mine.

 
The first two sets of data were from the report that YOU linked. Are you trying to say your report is no good? The BBC report used 2010 election data. Do you accuse the BBC of making stuff up? The fourth set of data came from the electoral commission after the 2005 election. Again are you trying to say they got it wrong? This smacks of desperation.

Now. Produce 2015 data that shows migrants no longer vote Labour. Until you do the figures that we have are those of the 2005 and 2010 general election that show migrants overwhelmingly voting for Labour. If you are going to say they no longer do you have to back it up with figures that show it.

 
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 695, 696, 697 ... 706, 707, 708  Next