Remembering the Good Old Days
- Steely_D - Apr 19, 2024 - 2:08am
Ask an Atheist
- Steely_D - Apr 19, 2024 - 1:55am
The Obituary Page
- kurtster - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:45pm
TV shows you watch
- kcar - Apr 18, 2024 - 9:13pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 18, 2024 - 8:25pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Trump
- rgio - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:46pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:20pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:15pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:42am
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:22am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Apr 18, 2024 - 7:58am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:39am
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 7:04pm
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 17, 2024 - 5:23pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2024 - 3:27pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Apr 17, 2024 - 2:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- dischuckin - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:29pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Russia
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:14pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Ukraine
- kurtster - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:05am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:38am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 9:08pm
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:56am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Republican Party
- Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:59am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
What Did You See Today?
- Steely_D - Apr 13, 2024 - 6:42am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000
- gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
Joe Biden
- black321 - Apr 11, 2024 - 7:43am
New Song Submissions system
- MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
Caching to Apple watch quit working
- email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting?
- black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
Sonos
- rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet
- gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
And the good news is....
- thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
How do I get songs into My Favorites
- Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
Why is Mellow mix192kbps?
- dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
Musky Mythology
- haresfur - Apr 6, 2024 - 7:11pm
China
- R_P - Apr 6, 2024 - 11:19am
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 5, 2024 - 12:45pm
Vega4 - Bullets
- nirgivon - Apr 5, 2024 - 11:50am
Environment
- thisbody - Apr 5, 2024 - 9:37am
How's the weather?
- geoff_morphini - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- Babylon - Apr 5, 2024 - 8:37am
|
Index »
Entertainment »
Movies »
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ... 9, 10, 11 Next |
Alafia
Location: the dojo Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:49am |
|
maryte wrote: Noble? No, just trying to live by some kind of ethical standards. Isn't that at least part of the definition of "nobility"?
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:49am |
|
smokinsean wrote:
...sometimes morality and ethics go out the window when you only got twenty bucks to by shoes socks AND underwear for yourself or a child...just sayin'...
We happen to have some pretty good Goodwill stores, which will maked that $20 bucks go a lot further *and* helps the community.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:47am |
|
smokinsean wrote:
...how noble to go w/out...
Noble? No, just trying to live by some kind of ethical standards.
|
|
Sean-E-Sean
Location: Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:47am |
|
dionysius wrote:
Even in small-town Texas, where Wal-Mart has pretty much put most competition out of business, there are alternatives. I know people in these towns who will drive a distance to put money in a neighbor's pocket, not Sam Walton's. Small groceries and producer co-ops in small towns do okay business, and would do even better if more people kicked the Wal-Mart habit. If people realized what their money was buying in a Wal-Box, many, even most, would refuse to spend it there. The social costs of Wal-Mart, even in a local economy (forget about the macroeconomy for the moment) vastly outweigh any small advantage in price or convenience the shopper gets there.
...sometimes morality and ethics go out the window when you only got twenty bucks to by shoes socks AND underwear for yourself or a child...just sayin'...
|
|
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:46am |
|
smokinsean wrote:
...how noble to go w/out...
Even in small-town Texas, where Wal-Mart has pretty much put most competition out of business, there are alternatives. I know people in these towns who will drive a distance to put money in a neighbor's pocket, not Sam Walton's. Small groceries and producer co-ops in small towns do okay business, and would do even better if more people kicked the Wal-Mart habit. If people realized what their money was buying in a Wal-Box, many, even most, would refuse to spend it there. The social costs of Wal-Mart, even in a local economy (forget about the macroeconomy for the moment) vastly outweigh any small advantage in price or convenience the shopper gets there.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:45am |
|
aflanigan wrote:Perhaps you do, if you are very judicious in what you buy and how much you spend there. From what I have read and seen firsthand, you can find some bargains at stores like Walmart, but I think a lot of people mistakenly assume that virtually everything they lay their hands on in Walmart will be a good bargain, better than the value they could get elsewhere. That assumption is I believe an important aspect of Walmart's business model. I saw the same mentality at Price Club (now Costco) when it first opened in our neighborhood; people would fill their carts with all kinds of goods and staples, and it was apparent that they hadn't really done their homework to find out if the price they were paying was lower than what they would have paid elsewhere. It used to be called a "loss leader"; Walmart's version of selective pricing to induce consumers to purchase under the false assumption that they are likely to find a good value on any item purchased in the store is called "opening price point". The goal is the same; to lead consumers into making false assumptions regarding the competitiveness of a store's prices across the breadth of their offerings. See HEREand HERE I must say, I used to shop at WM because their Health & Beauty Aids were much cheaper than anywhere. And of course, I picked up other stuff while I was there, so it worked.
|
|
Alafia
Location: the dojo Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:41am |
|
aflanigan wrote:Perhaps you do, if you are very judicious in what you buy and how much you spend there. From what I have read and seen firsthand, you can find some bargains at stores like Walmart, but I think a lot of people mistakenly assume that virtually everything they lay their hands on in Walmart will be a good bargain, better than the value they could get elsewhere. That assumption is I believe an important aspect of Walmart's business model. I saw the same mentality at Price Club (now Costco) when it first opened in our neighborhood; people would fill their carts with all kinds of goods and staples, and it was apparent that they hadn't really done their homework to find out if the price they were paying was lower than what they would have paid elsewhere.It used to be called a "loss leader"'; Walmart's version of selective pricing to induce consumers to purchase under the false assumption that they are likely to find a good value on any item purchased in the store is called "opening price point". The goal is the same; to lead consumers into making false assumptions regarding the competitiveness of a store's prices across the breadth of their offerings. See HEREand HERE I have memories of seeing the same behaviors, on the few visits I've made to such places. My old boss used to call it "going broke saving money", people buying massive amounts of unnecessary s**t, simply because they believed it was such a bargain.
|
|
Sean-E-Sean
Location: Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:39am |
|
maryte wrote: No kids, but I've never had a ton of money and have, at times, done without instead of shopping with those jackals.
...how noble to go w/out...
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:38am |
|
arsenault wrote:however, i save a ton of cash when i shop there...
Perhaps you do, if you are very judicious in what you buy and how much you spend there. From what I have read and seen firsthand, you can find some bargains at stores like Walmart, but I think a lot of people mistakenly assume that virtually everything they lay their hands on in Walmart will be a good bargain, better than the value they could get elsewhere. That assumption is I believe an important aspect of Walmart's business model. I saw the same mentality at Price Club (now Costco) when it first opened in our neighborhood; people would fill their carts with all kinds of goods and staples, and it was apparent that they hadn't really done their homework to find out if the price they were paying was lower than what they would have paid elsewhere. It used to be called a "loss leader"; Walmart's version of selective pricing to induce consumers to purchase under the false assumption that they are likely to find a good value on any item purchased in the store is called "opening price point". The goal is the same; to lead consumers into making false assumptions regarding the competitiveness of a store's prices across the breadth of their offerings. See HEREand HERE
|
|
Rod
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:36am |
|
dionysius wrote:For all the reasons stated, and more, Maryte and I do not shop at Wal-Mart. Ever. We vote with our dollars, and I will not cast a ballot for this business model. Predatory capitalism at its archetypal robber-baronialest.
Buy local. Buy (whenever possible) green. Buy from the producer. Buy from producer co-ops. Remember, YOU are the "demand" they talk about. Use capitalism against Wal-Mart.
I also refuse to shop there. I did stop in once to use the bathroom, and in that case, I'm proud of my contribution to the chain. I understand there are those who can not afford to not shop there and I certainly don't fault them. Walmart is the perfect example of the heartless corporate machine. Absolutely no concern for their employees, or for laying local Mom & Pop businesses to waste in their quest for the bottom line; maximum profit. Excactly, Dio! Buy locally whenever possible!
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:36am |
|
smokinsean wrote:...heh...how many people in here who have kids and not a ton of money boycott wal-mart?...
No kids, but I've never had a ton of money and have, at times, done without instead of shopping with those jackals.
|
|
Sean-E-Sean
Location: Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:31am |
|
...heh...how many people in here who have kids and not a ton of money boycott wal-mart?...
|
|
Southern_Boy
Location: On my way to the beach Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:22am |
|
dionysius wrote:For all the reasons stated, and more, Maryte and I do not shop at Wal-Mart. Ever. We vote with our dollars, and I will not cast a ballot for this business model. Predatory capitalism at its archetypal robber-baronialest.
Buy local. Buy (whenever possible) green. Buy from the producer. Buy from producer co-ops. Remember, YOU are the "demand" they talk about. Use capitalism against Wal-Mart.
Same reason I don't have Comcast Cable. And never will. They own all the entertainment media. (ok, maybe not all, but a lot) Edit: And there's very little competition.
|
|
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:15am |
|
For all the reasons stated, and more, Maryte and I do not shop at Wal-Mart. Ever. We vote with our dollars, and I will not cast a ballot for this business model. Predatory capitalism at its archetypal robber-baronialest.
Buy local. Buy (whenever possible) green. Buy from the producer. Buy from producer co-ops. Remember, YOU are the "demand" they talk about. Use capitalism against Wal-Mart.
|
|
Danimal174
Location: Upstate South Carolina Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 9:07am |
|
MayBaby wrote:What Scott said and I'll add "BDB for the American Role Model !!" I agree. Great post, BDB.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 8:48am |
|
BillnDollarBaby wrote:The stuff that goes around about WalMart, pro and con is very interesting to me. These were both interesting articles. I made the decision to not shop at WalMart anymore because of a few things...
...while things may be peachy as the gentleman in this article describes, after coming from an area with a regular (now converted to a super), a super and a distribution center, I heard more than my fair share of stories about the labor abuses that go on in these facilities: keeping hours just below FT to avoid insurance, promises of shifts and schedules broken, pressure to "narc" on your fellow "team members," skipped breaks, forced OT, the list goes on. The behavior among employees that is fostered is one of cut-throat selfishness: eat or be eaten. These aren't vague ideas I read in an article. These are real happenings relayed to me from people I know. And to the last one, every single one expressed that they were only working there out of desperation. They had lost jobs and couldn't find anything else or were retired and needed just a little bit to supplement their incomes and didn't have any other skills. Some of them won't even shop in their own stores unless they absolutely have to do so, regardless of the discount, because they hate the place so much. Do some research. The average WalMart employee cannot afford health insurance for themselves, let alone their families.
...even if their labor practices were decent in more places than not at WalMart, which I doubt, the way they run their business is extremely damaging to the global economy, and more specifically to the American economy. How many US laborers didn't work so that someone could buy a cheaper doo-hicky at WalMart made overseas? How many laborers in other countries worked in sub-standard facilites for sub-standard wages to produce that cheap doo-hicky so some American could save a buck? There are repurcussions for all of us, from their business model. Until we demand that our retailers purchase wares only from companies with proven labor practices, shopping at places like this only perpetuates the slave labor that is rampant in many countries. Even buying American doesn't always guarantee fair labor. There are sweatshops here, just like every where else in the world. The retailer has to take a stand and close the demand for the low priced items. As long as "cheap" places like WalMart place the demand, some unscroupulous bastard will provide the supply at the cost of human beings. I can't be the only one who remembers the Kathy Lee clothing fiasco. I used to try to buy American at all times. Now I focus more on spending money with retailers that do not have a reputation for labor abuse. Its not a perfect system and I am positive that I have inadvertently bought an item that I personally wouldn't approve of, but I do my best.
...The Waltons, the wealthiest family in the WORLD, are some of the most self-serving donors to charity in the world. Up until recently, they donated very little to anything and now that they finally do make donations after a lot of exterior pressure, they choose highly self-serving interests more often than not. Some will argue that it is their money to do with as they wish, but deep down we all know that is just wrong. Look at Warren Buffet. Look at Bill and Melinda Gates. Look at Bono. Now tell me which uber-wealthy folks garner more respect from you? The facts are these: You can't take it with you when you die. You can't humanly spend the volume of money they possess. Why not do something for others with your fortune. Especially since that fortune was built on the backs of your minimum wage employees? Sam Walton wrote, in Made in America, he didn't believe in giving "any undeserving stranger a free ride." Nor did he believe in being generous with company profits. "We feel very strongly," he wrote, "that Wal-Mart really is not, and should not be, in the charity business." Money that Wal-Mart donated to charity, he reasoned, would only come out of the pockets of "either our shareholders or our customers." But apparently he had no issue with his family living like kings, while his employees struggle to provide their families with the most basic of needs.
It's all well and good to bargain shop and save a few bucks. For most of us, its a necessity. I do it. My husband could win an Olympic medal in it. I'm not sure, but I don't think he's ever paid full price for anything. But bargain shopping on the backs of other American and non-American workers will only come back to hurt all of us. BDH and I are on an extremely tight budget: I haven't worked full-time in two years and we currently have an 18 year old boy living with us (yeah, they do eat as much as the jokes would lead you to believe). I have always done our "paper and supply" shopping... TP, paper towels, cleaning supplies, most of the non-food stuff and I always did it at WalMart because they were the cheapest. Through smart shopping, reasonable expectations and self-control, our budget has not increased a penny since I made the decision to stop shopping at WalMart.
I feel the same way as you do, and I have given up shopping at WalMart. When I was a paint rep for glidden I used to go into WalMarts and heard the same thing from the employees, although K-Mart was much worse. I swear, most of K-Mart's employees must live in halfway houses.
|
|
MayBaby
Location: Savannah, Georgia Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 8:39am |
|
What Scott said and I'll add "BDB for the American Role Model !!"
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 6:08am |
|
BillnDollarBaby wrote:The stuff
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2009 - 5:55am |
|
The stuff that goes around about WalMart, pro and con is very interesting to me. These were both interesting articles. I made the decision to not shop at WalMart anymore because of a few things...
...while things may be peachy as the gentleman in this article describes, after coming from an area with a regular (now converted to a super), a super and a distribution center, I heard more than my fair share of stories about the labor abuses that go on in these facilities: keeping hours just below FT to avoid insurance, promises of shifts and schedules broken, pressure to "narc" on your fellow "team members," skipped breaks, forced OT, the list goes on. The behavior among employees that is fostered is one of cut-throat selfishness: eat or be eaten. These aren't vague ideas I read in an article. These are real happenings relayed to me from people I know. And to the last one, every single one expressed that they were only working there out of desperation. They had lost jobs and couldn't find anything else or were retired and needed just a little bit to supplement their incomes and didn't have any other skills. Some of them won't even shop in their own stores unless they absolutely have to do so, regardless of the discount, because they hate the place so much. Do some research. The average WalMart employee cannot afford health insurance for themselves, let alone their families.
...even if their labor practices were decent in more places than not at WalMart, which I doubt, the way they run their business is extremely damaging to the global economy, and more specifically to the American economy. How many US laborers didn't work so that someone could buy a cheaper doo-hicky at WalMart made overseas? How many laborers in other countries worked in sub-standard facilites for sub-standard wages to produce that cheap doo-hicky so some American could save a buck? There are repurcussions for all of us, from their business model. Until we demand that our retailers purchase wares only from companies with proven labor practices, shopping at places like this only perpetuates the slave labor that is rampant in many countries. Even buying American doesn't always guarantee fair labor. There are sweatshops here, just like every where else in the world. The retailer has to take a stand and close the demand for the low priced items. As long as "cheap" places like WalMart place the demand, some unscroupulous bastard will provide the supply at the cost of human beings. I can't be the only one who remembers the Kathy Lee clothing fiasco. I used to try to buy American at all times. Now I focus more on spending money with retailers that do not have a reputation for labor abuse. Its not a perfect system and I am positive that I have inadvertently bought an item that I personally wouldn't approve of, but I do my best.
...The Waltons, the wealthiest family in the WORLD, are some of the most self-serving donors to charity in the world. Up until recently, they donated very little to anything and now that they finally do make donations after a lot of exterior pressure, they choose highly self-serving interests more often than not. Some will argue that it is their money to do with as they wish, but deep down we all know that is just wrong. Look at Warren Buffet. Look at Bill and Melinda Gates. Look at Bono. Now tell me which uber-wealthy folks garner more respect from you? The facts are these: You can't take it with you when you die. You can't humanly spend the volume of money they possess. Why not do something for others with your fortune. Especially since that fortune was built on the backs of your minimum wage employees? Sam Walton wrote, in Made in America, he didn't believe in giving "any undeserving stranger a free ride." Nor did he believe in being generous with company profits. "We feel very strongly," he wrote, "that Wal-Mart really is not, and should not be, in the charity business." Money that Wal-Mart donated to charity, he reasoned, would only come out of the pockets of "either our shareholders or our customers." But apparently he had no issue with his family living like kings, while his employees struggle to provide their families with the most basic of needs.
It's all well and good to bargain shop and save a few bucks. For most of us, its a necessity. I do it. My husband could win an Olympic medal in it. I'm not sure, but I don't think he's ever paid full price for anything. But bargain shopping on the backs of other American and non-American workers will only come back to hurt all of us. BDH and I are on an extremely tight budget: I haven't worked full-time in two years and we currently have an 18 year old boy living with us (yeah, they do eat as much as the jokes would lead you to believe). I have always done our "paper and supply" shopping... TP, paper towels, cleaning supplies, most of the non-food stuff and I always did it at WalMart because they were the cheapest. Through smart shopping, reasonable expectations and self-control, our budget has not increased a penny since I made the decision to stop shopping at WalMart.
|
|
arsenault
Location: long beach cali USandA Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2009 - 10:29pm |
|
i understand the hostility to the wm.. however, i save a ton of cash when i shop there... as i do when i go to the 99c only store... its low end..but effectively raises your wage by decreasing your cost of living.. as does shopping in ethnic supermarkets in southern california...
33c per lb roma tomatoes vs $1.98 in regular supermarkets.... what would you shop?
if you are at the top it doesn't matter if you are on a budge...it makes a diff...
|
|
|