[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Bob Dylan - Steely_D - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:58pm
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:41pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - haresfur - Jul 24, 2021 - 9:59pm
 
COVID-19 - kcar - Jul 24, 2021 - 7:15pm
 
The Future is here! - Red_Dragon - Jul 24, 2021 - 4:58pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - Manbird - Jul 24, 2021 - 2:40pm
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Jul 24, 2021 - 1:51pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jul 24, 2021 - 12:41pm
 
Getting disconnected/paused at bumper time - coding_to_music - Jul 24, 2021 - 11:41am
 
Drones - Prodigal_SOB - Jul 24, 2021 - 11:37am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 24, 2021 - 11:24am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:19am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:18am
 
Webcasting rates going up again cry - kenmo - Jul 24, 2021 - 9:56am
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 6:14am
 
The War On You - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:25am
 
Media Bias - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:16am
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:09am
 
Joe Biden - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:02am
 
Live Music - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 4:39am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 24, 2021 - 3:53am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Jul 23, 2021 - 8:07pm
 
TV shows you watch - haresfur - Jul 23, 2021 - 7:58pm
 
Beer - sirdroseph - Jul 23, 2021 - 7:36pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - sirdroseph - Jul 23, 2021 - 6:55pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jul 23, 2021 - 4:14pm
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Jul 23, 2021 - 12:06pm
 
Eric Clapton plays the devil's music - oldviolin - Jul 23, 2021 - 11:48am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jul 23, 2021 - 11:01am
 
The War on Women - rhahl - Jul 23, 2021 - 7:16am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Jul 23, 2021 - 6:32am
 
Agents of TRUTH - sirdroseph - Jul 23, 2021 - 6:08am
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - Jul 22, 2021 - 7:21pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - oldviolin - Jul 22, 2021 - 6:48pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - haresfur - Jul 22, 2021 - 4:32pm
 
New Music - R_P - Jul 22, 2021 - 10:58am
 
War on Drugs (again) - sirdroseph - Jul 22, 2021 - 7:46am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jul 22, 2021 - 6:57am
 
China - rhahl - Jul 22, 2021 - 6:56am
 
Your Current Crush - Manbird - Jul 21, 2021 - 4:31pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2021 - 3:58pm
 
how do you feel right now? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 21, 2021 - 6:03am
 
Real Life vs. the Internet - miamizsun - Jul 21, 2021 - 5:49am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 21, 2021 - 5:30am
 
Favorite Quotes - whatshisname - Jul 20, 2021 - 10:29pm
 
Grammar Police Rap Sheet - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 20, 2021 - 12:48pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Jul 20, 2021 - 11:25am
 
Poetry Forum - Manbird - Jul 20, 2021 - 10:32am
 
Remembering Duane Allman - Ohmsen - Jul 20, 2021 - 9:52am
 
What are you listening to now? - Ohmsen - Jul 20, 2021 - 9:43am
 
A motivational quote - Ohmsen - Jul 20, 2021 - 9:18am
 
Think About It - sirdroseph - Jul 20, 2021 - 8:31am
 
The Legacy of Woodstock - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 20, 2021 - 7:19am
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Jul 20, 2021 - 5:28am
 
Women and music - sirdroseph - Jul 20, 2021 - 5:25am
 
Pickin' & Grinnin' - sirdroseph - Jul 20, 2021 - 5:18am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - sirdroseph - Jul 20, 2021 - 5:13am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - sirdroseph - Jul 20, 2021 - 4:38am
 
Stream Quality - MiMa - Jul 20, 2021 - 12:57am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2021 - 10:26pm
 
In My Room - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2021 - 10:17pm
 
Hello all! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 19, 2021 - 9:23pm
 
Match Point - Proclivities - Jul 19, 2021 - 8:26pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - Red_Dragon - Jul 19, 2021 - 7:36pm
 
Trump - hayduke2 - Jul 19, 2021 - 4:08pm
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - rhahl - Jul 19, 2021 - 4:01pm
 
Movie rental suggestions & reviews - Netflix or Blockbuster - Red_Dragon - Jul 19, 2021 - 11:57am
 
Music To Get A Haircut To - Proclivities - Jul 19, 2021 - 7:44am
 
Ok, this REALLY Ooogs me out! Very 1984 or Gattica-like. Eww - sirdroseph - Jul 19, 2021 - 6:44am
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Jul 19, 2021 - 6:05am
 
Guilty Pleasures.... - Red_Dragon - Jul 18, 2021 - 6:55pm
 
Make Love not War - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2021 - 3:12pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2021 - 2:06pm
 
Tech & Science - GeneP59 - Jul 18, 2021 - 1:50pm
 
How's the weather? - GeneP59 - Jul 18, 2021 - 1:47pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Republican Party Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 214, 215, 216  Next
Post to this Topic
kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: May 17, 2021 - 5:11pm

 kurtster wrote:


Really ?  Not only are you dictating who can say what around here, you are also using whataboutism to justify it.

This is the Republican Party thread, right ?  HB is of interest to repubs and an embarrassment to you.

My advice to you would be to take a chill pill and stay out of this thread since it seems to bother you so much that you have to tell people what is okay to discuss in here.


Who here besides you cares about Hunter Biden? His business dealings and behavior were investigated and reported on before Joe officially announced that he was running for president.

Hunter is no embarrassment to me or the Democratic party. He had a rough childhood. He didn't handle it well as an adult. Apparently he's growing up.

You might as well be complaining about Roger Clinton. Hunter wasn't and isn't relevant to the Dems or the GOP.

If you want to talk about embarrassments and the GOP, let's talk about Trump and his deadly incompetence. You sure are awfully quiet about all those people who died of Covid because of Trump's lies—a number of epidemiologists have estimated it was around 400k. 

And hey, what about the insurrection that Trump whipped up at the Capitol building? Would you like to talk about that and the GOP's delusional insistence that the election was rigged?

westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 17, 2021 - 4:59pm

So would somebody kindly tell us/remind us why the Russians 'invaded' the Crimea again?     What was the reason for the Russian-speaking citizens of the Ukraine to take up arms?

Was it worth the sanctions against Russia?    Billions of dollars of Exxon Mobil investment dried up.    What for?    




R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 17, 2021 - 4:15pm

 haresfur wrote:
You are saying the problem is that a story that has been spun into a "scandal" with no basis should have been spread more widely so some people would have believed it and changed their vote. So basically, the problem is that the fake-news didn't gain enough traction? Nah, that wouldn't matter, and I see no reason why Hunter Biden's business  reflects on Joe. On the other hand we have plenty of evidence that Rudy was trying to manipulate the story and spread a false narrative to hurt Biden. Would it matter to you if this was true?

Bannon/Giuliani's fake news October surprise didn't pan out (like the last time) and now some people haz a sad. Perhaps try winning with an actual platform that has merit.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: May 17, 2021 - 3:59pm

 kurtster wrote:


I saw the 8% number quite a few times, but that was a while ago.  I went with the lowest number that I had seen / heard.

Here try this one ...

Media's hiding of Hunter Biden scandal robbed Trump of clear win: Poll

Would it matter to you if this was true ? 


You are saying the problem is that a story that has been spun into a "scandal" with no basis should have been spread more widely so some people would have believed it and changed their vote. So basically, the problem is that the fake-news didn't gain enough traction? Nah, that wouldn't matter, and I see no reason why Hunter Biden's business  reflects on Joe. On the other hand we have plenty of evidence that Rudy was trying to manipulate the story and spread a false narrative to hurt Biden. Would it matter to you if this was true?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: May 17, 2021 - 3:41pm

 kcar wrote:

Really, it's time to STFU about Hunter Biden. Ivanka and Jared's graft and conflicts of interest make him look insignificant. 


Really ?  Not only are you dictating who can say what around here, you are also using whataboutism to justify it.

This is the Republican Party thread, right ?  HB is of interest to repubs and an embarrassment to you.

My advice to you would be to take a chill pill and stay out of this thread since it seems to bother you so much that you have to tell people what is okay to discuss in here.

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: May 17, 2021 - 9:05am

 kcar wrote:


I wouldn't call Ivanka's those deals "charity." 

Really, it's time to STFU about Hunter Biden. Ivanka and Jared's graft and conflicts of interest make him look insignificant. 



Of course you're right. It is not charity, but graft, corruption, and nepotism, with a side of good old-fashioned theft.
c.


kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: May 17, 2021 - 8:56am

 cc_rider wrote:
Those deals are actually 'charity'. They are not qualified to actually DO anything, so just set 'em in a corner with a shiny object.
c.





I wouldn't call Ivanka's those deals "charity." 

Really, it's time to STFU about Hunter Biden. Ivanka and Jared's graft and conflicts of interest make him look insignificant. 

Jared and Ivanka made up to $640 million in the White House

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172 million and $640 million in outside income while working in the White House, according to an analysis of financial disclosures by CREW. It is impossible to tell the exact amount as the income is sometimes reported in broad ranges and cover four months of income before Ivanka Trump officially joined her father’s administration and nearly one month before Jared Kushner joined.

Both Kushner and Trump announced they would not take a salary while working for the government in an attempt to shut down nepotism concerns. While their supporters marked this as a public sacrifice, the massive amount of money they made on the side undercuts that argument, as government salaries would have been less than 1% of their income.



The Vanity Fair article below quotes the CREW report (as shown by the boxed text):

    JARED AND IVANKA MADE UP TO $640 MILLION WHILE WORKING IN WASHINGTON, OR 457,142 STIMULUS CHECKS

    One major factor in their outside profits came from Ivanka Trump’s ownership stake in the Trump Hotel in D.C., just blocks from the White House and the locus of influence peddling in the Trump administration. Before business slowed down due to the pandemic, the couple paid a combined 23 visits to the hotel. All told, Ivanka made more than $13 million from the hotel since 2017.… The hotel was far from Ivanka Trump’s only controversial source of income while working in the White House. In 2018, Ivanka announced she was shutting down her namesake brand, and she later filed a disclosure with the government that “ll operations of the business ceased on July 31, 2018.” But discovered that she still made up to $1 million from it in 2019 despite the fact that she claimed it no longer existed.

    In what would become the defining scandal of her time in office, in October 2018 Ivanka’s brand won 16 new trademarks from the Chinese government, including for voting machines. These approvals came about three months after Ivanka announced that her brand was shutting down, and mark the largest number of new Chinese trademarks she received in a single month during the Trump presidency. Six months after the company officially shut down, it received a new trademark to sell the Ivanka brand in Canada. In all, CREW found at least 28 foreign trademarks approved for Ivanka Trump while in the White House.


    Other major sources of income for the couple came from Kushner’s real estate holdings, which got a nice boost through a tax break the first daughter reportedly personally pushed for:

    worked on the Trump administration’s implementation of the Opportunity Zones program in 2018, apparently violating conflict of interest law in the process. At the same time that Ivanka was working on Opportunity Zones, Jared owned a significant financial stake in a company called Cadre which offers investment vehicles under the Opportunity Zones program. When Trump and Kushner entered the administration, Kushner’s stake in Cadre was valued between $5 million and $25 million. The value would rise to $25 million to $50 million. Kushner originally failed to disclose his ownership in Cadre. Despite the fact that the top White House ethics official determined at one point that it was “reasonably necessary” for him to divest from Cadre in order to do his job at the White House, he never did.



    Lazy8

    Lazy8 Avatar

    Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 17, 2021 - 8:39am

     kurtster wrote:
    I saw the 8% number quite a few times, but that was a while ago.  I went with the lowest number that I had seen / heard.

    Here try this one ...

    Media's hiding of Hunter Biden scandal robbed Trump of clear win: Poll

    Would it matter to you if this was true ? 

    Ah, Media Research Center again, this time claiming 4.6% rather than 17%.

    Did you read the article? It claimed that 36% of Biden voters were unaware of the story. That means 64% were aware of it, pretty good penetration for a story being kept under wraps.

    If it were true no, it wouldn't bother me. Mainstream gutter politics as usual. Incumbent parties and their media allies failing to get their oppo out does not cause me to lose sleep.

    You know what does? Biden continuing Trump's China antagonism and trade policy. I can't see a nickel's worth of difference between the two.


    cc_rider

    cc_rider Avatar

    Location: Bastrop
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 17, 2021 - 7:56am

     kcar wrote:

    And yes, as others here have pointed out: if you're so upset about Hunter getting a position at Burisma, where is your outrage over there deals Ivanka and Jared scored for themselves?

    Those deals are actually 'charity'. They are not qualified to actually DO anything, so just set 'em in a corner with a shiny object.
    c.



    kcar

    kcar Avatar



    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 6:42pm

    And yes, as others here have pointed out: if you're so upset about Hunter getting a position at Burisma, where is your outrage over there deals Ivanka and Jared scored for themselves?
    kcar

    kcar Avatar



    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 6:38pm

     kurtster wrote:


    I saw the 8% number quite a few times, but that was a while ago.  I went with the lowest number that I had seen / heard.

    Here try this one ...

    Media's hiding of Hunter Biden scandal robbed Trump of clear win: Poll

    Would it matter to you if this was true ? 


    What scandal? What hiding?

    Hunter Biden got paid to be on the board of Burisma Holdings. He was hardly the first relation of a prominent politician to get a cushy job without any real qualifications.

    The mainstream press investigated this. IIRC the FBI and other govt agencies investigated this. There was no scandal to uncover. We've been over and over this.

    As for voters not being aware of Hunter Biden... Where the f$#k were they? Trump couldn't stop talking about Hunter and Joe and Ukraine and China. Giuliani babbled about big revelations coming. Hunter's laptop was supposed to blow things open.

    As for the poll you point to I'm deeply skeptical of its credibility. I can't imagine a significant number of Biden voters can even remember Hunter at this point.

    Trump lost because he botched the handling of Covid and contributed to the deaths of 400,000 more Americans than should have died with more competent government response. Hunter Biden had nothing to do with it.
    rgio

    rgio Avatar

    Location: West Jersey
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 6:24pm

     kurtster wrote:


    I saw the 8% number quite a few times, but that was a while ago.  I went with the lowest number that I had seen / heard.

    Here try this one ...

    Media's hiding of Hunter Biden scandal robbed Trump of clear win: Poll

    Would it matter to you if this was true ? 


    I won't vote for his re-election .... once you show me the evidence.


    BTW - the optics are bad....but he didn't do anything the Trump kids weren't out doing with the Chinese patents and overseas money.    One difference, Hunter never got paid from the campaign funds raised.
    kurtster

    kurtster Avatar

    Location: where fear is not a virtue
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 6:00pm

     Lazy8 wrote:

    That 8% number seems oddly specific...and unlikely. So I went googling for it. Didn't find it, but I found various mouth-foaming sources claiming other fanciful figures.  One in 6 (17%) (Media Research Center, a right-wing think tank), 10% (Donald F#cking Trump, pulled out of whatever orifice he gets stats from) but no one claiming your particular random number.

    So which orifice did this come from? Just curious, it's not going to make me...do anything in particular.

    While you're doing your (ahem) research maybe look this up: how many Trump voters would have changed their votes after the Jan. 6th riots?


    I saw the 8% number quite a few times, but that was a while ago.  I went with the lowest number that I had seen / heard.

    Here try this one ...

    Media's hiding of Hunter Biden scandal robbed Trump of clear win: Poll

    Would it matter to you if this was true ? 
    Lazy8

    Lazy8 Avatar

    Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 9:18am

     kurtster wrote:
    yes.  Already have I thought.  Is what it is.

    So while there are simple numbers above that we agree on ... try this

    Regarding the election as I mentioned earlier, based on polling 8% of Biden voters would have changed their votes had they known about the Hunter Biden story before the election.  The story as we know was censored into oblivion by the media powers that be, to prevent the information being seen as much as possible in order to manipulate the vote.

    Now is 8% of 82 million enough to swing the election the other way ?  How about as little as 5% ?

    That 8% number seems oddly specific...and unlikely. So I went googling for it. Didn't find it, but I found various mouth-foaming sources claiming other fanciful figures.  One in 6 (17%) (Media Research Center, a right-wing think tank), 10% (Donald F#cking Trump, pulled out of whatever orifice he gets stats from) but no one claiming your particular random number.

    So which orifice did this come from? Just curious, it's not going to make me...do anything in particular.

    While you're doing your (ahem) research maybe look this up: how many Trump voters would have changed their votes after the Jan. 6th riots?
    westslope

    westslope Avatar

    Location: BC sage brush steppe


    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 8:12am

     kurtster wrote:


    .....
    Regarding the election as I mentioned earlier, based on polling 8% of Biden voters would have changed their votes had they known about the Hunter Biden story before the election.  The story as we know was censored into oblivion by the media powers that be, to prevent the information being seen as much as possible in order to manipulate the vote.

    ........

    kurtster, do you not have any interest in American politics evolving beyond tabloid-style gutter, sensationalist politics?  Why do you treat your fellow Americans like they are so naive, so shallow, so gullible, so stupid? 

    The Democrats also pounded mercilessly on an unsavoury connection between President Trump and Russia.  The Democrats made up all kinds of nonsense.  You and your fellow Trump supporters opened these floodgates of political mendacity.  Actually you did not open the floodgates, you simply took them to new heights.

    The racist baiting of the Chinese by Trump was totally over the top.   And it was effective, even self-styled North American progressives believed the lies about Chinese industrial policy.

    The Muslim ban?   Remember the American Sikhs who were murdered because they looked like Semitic rag heads?  That is on you and your Trump movement kurtster.

    I know it is hard.  You and other Americans have been socialized into glorifying ethnic cleansing terrorism from a very early age.  The USA would not exist today without ethnic cleansing terrorism.   That explains in part your broad multi-partisan blank-cheque support for the thuggish anti-Semitic Israeli nation building project. 

    As killing grandchildren and grandparents and stealing resources at the point of a gun (or aerial bombing) is bound to be controversial for society that PRETENDS to follow Judeo-Christian ethics and morals, is it a surprise that everybody gravitates to political mendacity with heavy doses of historical revisionism and narratives that deliberately talk around the issues?  


    kurtster

    kurtster Avatar

    Location: where fear is not a virtue
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 16, 2021 - 12:13am

     Lazy8 wrote:

    For the record: 82 million > 75 million, right?

    Does this mean you're acknowledging that Trump lost by 7 million votes?


    yes.  Already have I thought.  Is what it is.

    So while there are simple numbers above that we agree on ... try this

    Regarding the election as I mentioned earlier, based on polling 8% of Biden voters would have changed their votes had they known about the Hunter Biden story before the election.  The story as we know was censored into oblivion by the media powers that be, to prevent the information being seen as much as possible in order to manipulate the vote.

    Now is 8% of 82 million enough to swing the election the other way ?  How about as little as 5% ?
    westslope

    westslope Avatar

    Location: BC sage brush steppe


    Posted: May 15, 2021 - 1:08am

     kurtster wrote:

    Dismiss / ignore the thoughts of 75 million people at your own peril.



    Agreed.  Treating politics as a sporting like winner takes all game is a really bad idea.


    Lazy8

    Lazy8 Avatar

    Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 14, 2021 - 10:45pm

     kurtster wrote:
    I don't know what broad light is cast on the 82 million, but we know that the 82 million (at the very least) view the 75 million as deplorable and irredeemable.

    For the record: 82 million > 75 million, right?

    Does this mean you're acknowledging that Trump lost by 7 million votes?
    R_P

    R_P Avatar



    Posted: May 14, 2021 - 10:08pm

    The point is being the proxy (100% of you democrats believed or 82 million think) of what those poor ignored folks out there like to think.

    Then there is the general problem of viewing large groups as monolithic...

    kurtster

    kurtster Avatar

    Location: where fear is not a virtue
    Gender: Male


    Posted: May 14, 2021 - 9:57pm

     R_P wrote:

    I'd say that's broad enough and a good example...



    You mean this ?


    But then of course 100% of you democrats were told by your party leaders and media pundits and believed that there was no way in hell that we would have a successful vaccine by the end of 2020.


    I would just say that it was a true statement at the time, based upon my observations.  Ok, maybe 99% ...

    or is there another part you refer to ?
    Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 214, 215, 216  Next