via Twitter / Facebook: a historian now fighting for his country had a bit of rant (totally justified IMO):
...And in similar conditions, if not harder, there are now thousands of historians, writers, accountants, bankers, IT workers, teachers, designers and others in Ukraine, away from peaceful professions. They are killed from the 152th and from the point-in, they will fly bullets and vogi, cassette and phosphorous ammunition. Some of them are already dead. And someone will never return to their profession again because they burned out. But they all keep fighting. Because Ukraine is behind them. Because if they put their guns down, their parents will be killed, wives and daughters raped, and homes destroyed or confiscated.
And when by the mouths of politicians of France, Italy, Germany and other countries offer us to lay down arms, agree to the loss of territories, give Russia some security guarantees (absurd !!! Russia does not need any guarantees of security, it is its neighbors who need guarantees from their threat)... So I feel rage and deep disgust. Disgusting these worthless people who, through their prejudices or thanks to Putin's dirty money, are ready to condemn my country to absorption, to a slow and painful death. Disgust and rage at those who have enormous opportunities to help overcome a crisis but instead strive, knowingly or unknowingly, to deepen it. Because even the complete surrender of Ukraine will not solve the problems of world security. On the contrary, will push Russia to new zagarbanʹ.
We don't need suggestions to surrender. If you are not ready to fight with us against the said enemy, then help us with weapons, money, sanctions. We need a lot of things to defeat Russia and thus sharply reduce the level of the global crisis. But we have the main thing - motivation. We have historians willing to sleep on drawers of five people in two bedrooms and for weeks muck without being able to wash. We have accountants ready to eat only porridge with stew for months. We have young students living their best years under threat of death. And they won't go anywhere - unless they all get killed.
Upon your consent.
Ukraine will fight either to victory or until it can resist.
And what will you do?
With respect,
candidate of historical sciences,
a writer, author of six books,
currently a junior sergeant of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
This came out yesterday, Boris Bondarev Russia's guy in Geneva resigned and posted this on his LinkedIn account.
Boris Bondarev• 3rd+Arms Control, Disarmament, Non-Proliferation, Export Control1d • Edited • 1 day ago
Long overdue, but today I resign from civil service. Enough is enough.
For twenty years of my diplomatic career I have seen different turns of our foreign policy, but never have I been so ashamed of my country as on February 24 of this year. The aggressive war unleashed by Putin against Ukraine, and in fact against the entire Western world, is not only a crime against the Ukrainian people, but also, perhaps, the most serious crime against the people of Russia, with a bold letter Z crossing out all hopes and prospects for a prosperous free society in our country. Those who conceived this war want only one thing - to remain in power forever, live in pompous tasteless palaces, sail on yachts comparable in tonnage and cost to the entire Russian Navy, enjoying unlimited power and complete impunity. To achieve that they are willing to sacrifice as many lives as it takes. Thousands of Russians and Ukrainians have already died just for this. I regret to admit that over all these twenty years the level of lies and unprofessionalism in the work of the Foreign Ministry has been increasing all the time. However, in most recent years, this has become simply catastrophic. Instead of unbiased information, impartial analysis and sober forecasting, there are propaganda clichés in the spirit of Soviet newspapers of the 1930s. A system has been built that deceives itself. Minister Lavrov is a good illustration of the degradation of this system. In 18 years, he went from a professional and educated intellectual, whom many my colleagues held in such high esteem, to a person who constantly broadcasts conflicting statements and threatens the world (that is, Russia too) with nuclear weapons! Today, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not about diplomacy. It is all about warmongering, lies and hatred. It serves interests of few, the very few people thus contributing to further isolation and degradation of my country. Russia no longer has allies, and there is no one to blame but its reckless and ill-conceived policy. I studied to be a diplomat and have been a diplomat for twenty years. The Ministry has become my home and family. But I simply cannot any longer share in this bloody, witless and absolutely needless ignominy. Job offers are welcome...
It's weird when you stumble across the other side of social media. Apparently Russia invaded because Ukraine is full of money laundering, sex trafficking peodophiles who are developing biological weapons. And Biden is in on it.
It's weird when you stumble across the other side of social media. Apparently Russia invaded because Ukraine is full of money laundering, sex trafficking peodophiles who are developing biological weapons. And Biden is in on it.
It's weird when you stumble across the other side of social media. Apparently Russia invaded because Ukraine is full of money laundering, sex trafficking peodophiles who are developing biological weapons. And Biden is in on it.
Richard, there would be a great conversation to be had here, were you willing to expound on where you think we should all be headed rather than constantly taking cheap shots at 2-dimensional adversaries. ,,,
You know my stance. I firmly believe that Putin turns what used to be a linear spectrum into a ring, as he has far more affinity to Nazi Germany and fascism than to the communist ideals touted in 1918. But, prey tell, what on earth is yours? I'm a European centrist. Quintessence of boring. But what are you?
Nothing like this happens in a vacuum. Maybe they let him speak to create an image of an open society, but I'm guessing they are setting the stage either for a massive build-up of the war effort (us against the world, this is WWII all over again) or for stepping back. The criticism of the sabre-rattling against Finland is intriguing as that is totally contrary to the official line, so maybe there are forces in the Russian government trying to steer the ship around and they will finally pull out. Ukraine on the other hand senses victory and I don't think they are interested in a ceasefire and giving up any territory.
(quick thought-watch fareed zakaria's doc on putin if you can) i think i can agree, there wasn't the expected pushback from the apparatchiks putin has made a horrible mistake his power profiling of nato was way off and russia's military and economy are suffering for it surely he recognizes this and is posturing for an eventual exit he appears to be following text book soviet negotiation 101 and everyone that matters seem to know it i personally wouldn't use the "weakening russia" verbiage, but those in the know are (using it as a strategy?) others are openly calling him out and agitating for wearing him/russia down and holding him accountable for his blatant atrocities
i'm somewhat puzzled by this analyst and his apparent grip on reality
not the usual propaganda and i read that this isn't his first time
translation in the chyron
Nothing like this happens in a vacuum. Maybe they let him speak to create an image of an open society, but I'm guessing they are setting the stage either for a massive build-up of the war effort (us against the world, this is WWII all over again) or for stepping back.
The criticism of the sabre-rattling against Finland is intriguing as that is totally contrary to the official line, so maybe there are forces in the Russian government trying to steer the ship around and they will finally pull out. Ukraine on the other hand senses victory and I don't think they are interested in a ceasefire and giving up any territory.
i'm somewhat puzzled by this analyst and his apparent grip on reality
not the usual propaganda and i read that this isn't his first time
translation in the chyron
i'm somewhat puzzled by this analyst and his apparent grip on reality not the usual propaganda and i read that this isn't his first time translation in the chyron
i don't think dead eye dick is behind this
i think what this guy is saying is that russia/moscow have been bleeding these small republics dry forever
and that he feels they aren't seeing any benefit of being under moscow's thumb
who knows, maybe these proletarians will organize a revolution to throw off the chains of their russian oppressors
Richard, there would be a great conversation to be had here, were you willing to expound on where you think we should all be headed rather than constantly taking cheap shots at 2-dimensional adversaries.
Today the City of Moscow took over the Renault car plant, effectively nationalising it. To me, another step into the past. Pre-1989 the Soviet regime (ignoring all the Stalinist horrors and political repression for the moment) actually did an amazing job at developing Russia and some of its vassal states from being poor agrarian economies subject to the vagaries of the weather into industrial economies subject more to the whim of the politburo than to natural hazards. The Soviets managed to be the first in space and also created some notable successes such as building pretty good nuclear power plants (I toured Greifswald and trust what western German engineers have told me). People were guaranteed a home and got a basic income. Life, while kind of on the boring and stifling side, was not all bad. Correct me, if I am wrong. (and again I'm ignoring the political repression for now, something I have issues with).
It appears these past successes have not been entirely forgotten. They obviously seem enough to keep the Russian population firmly behind the latest incarnation of the Soviet government.
But without knowing what the hell you actually stand for, it is kind of a moot point to even talk about it. There are even more variations on the left of what an ideal state should look like than there are on the right.
You know my stance. I firmly believe that Putin turns what used to be a linear spectrum into a ring, as he has far more affinity to Nazi Germany and fascism than to the communist ideals touted in 1918. But, prey tell, what on earth is yours? I'm a centrist. Quintessence of boring. But what are you?
i don't think dead eye dick is behind this
i think what this guy is saying is that russia/moscow have been bleeding these small republics dry forever
and that he feels they aren't seeing any benefit of being under moscow's thumb
who knows, maybe these proletarians will organize a revolution to throw off the chains of their russian oppressors
Hopefully Russian society has learned from its mistakes, particularly, the ones culminating in this current clusterfuck, and it will avoid kleptocracy and autocratic government going forward. Which means it will move closer towards a European style of government. One can only hope.
I have a business partner with family in St. Pete, Moscow, Kyiv, Odesa, and Chisinau (Moldova -where he was born and raised). The polling that you see suggesting that Putin is popular is correct. My partner and his US-based family deal with Nazi and "Russian capture liberation" comments all the time. Growing up in the US, I used to think "how could people possibly fall for the propaganda"? I don't wonder anymore. I can turn on my TV right now and listen to half a dozen Republicans fighting for PA seats tomorrow talk about stolen elections. They are all going to "Save America". How...that's not really important...just that they know it needs saving. The guy who "leads" their party was on record for decades as pro-choice, yet by standing in front of people and telling them exactly what they wanted to hear, they ignore anything questionable in his past. This discussion isn't about Russians, it's about people. People are scared and weak creatures, and they will do things against their own best interests to be accepted and to believe that others share their concerns and complaints. To align, the critical issue is to agree on an enemy. You don't have to have a plan, you just have to make sure your enemies don't get to implement theirs. Putin's power will eventually end. There are rumors he's sick, but father time will at some point catch up with him. He's 69 years old. When it does, Russia will face a very similar dynamic... the people in the cities will want to join Europe (again) and live democratically in a free society. The rural populations will miss the structure and the past, and they will listen when those hungry for power tell them they will Make Russia Great Again. It's hard to know who will prevail. It's likely that power will ebb and flow as groups gain and lose opportunities. Russia is a vast and rich country. Logic suggests that the insane wealth of the few people that Putin has selected could support a much more transparent, open, European-esque opportunistic Russia, but those who could gain from a free and open society will feel lost when the walls come down, and will likely long for more structure and less freedom. People are funny creatures.
I generally agree with all of the above. Just like to add that sometimes you can indeed see wider movements sweep through history: enlightenment values, civilisations coming and going, etc. Often a long and sustained period of improvement comes after a fall from grace or collapse of a corrupt civilisation or after a brutal war. I'm hoping that at least some good will come from this current nightmare.
But yes, people are herd animals by nature. The fact that Trump and his divide and rule political style, even at the cost of ripping up standing conventions, got so far in the U.S. has scared a lot of people in Europe as very few thought such a movement could be so successful in the States. At least he opened our eyes to the fact that nothing is permanent.
Agree on the rural/urban divide also affecting Russia (also driven by demographic shifts and an ageing rural population) and the possible break-up of Russia, which I am not too sure is something we want to see. Sounds a bit like dividing the country up into warlords and fiefdoms which, if you look at Chechnya, doesn't look like an improvement
Saw this after the long post I just did. I listened to the first minute...gotta do some work....but this would not surprise me at all. It would align with the cities vs. rural discussion I just mentioned (I assume this guy doesn't blow that theory up in the 30 min video...if so...I withdraw my suggestion).
For twenty years of my diplomatic career I have seen different turns of our foreign policy, but never have I been so ashamed of my country as on February 24 of this year. The aggressive war unleashed by Putin against Ukraine, and in fact against the entire Western world, is not only a crime against the Ukrainian people, but also, perhaps, the most serious crime against the people of Russia, with a bold letter Z crossing out all hopes and prospects for a prosperous free society in our country.
Those who conceived this war want only one thing - to remain in power forever, live in pompous tasteless palaces, sail on yachts comparable in tonnage and cost to the entire Russian Navy, enjoying unlimited power and complete impunity. To achieve that they are willing to sacrifice as many lives as it takes. Thousands of Russians and Ukrainians have already died just for this.
I regret to admit that over all these twenty years the level of lies and unprofessionalism in the work of the Foreign Ministry has been increasing all the time. However, in most recent years, this has become simply catastrophic. Instead of unbiased information, impartial analysis and sober forecasting, there are propaganda clichés in the spirit of Soviet newspapers of the 1930s. A system has been built that deceives itself.
Minister Lavrov is a good illustration of the degradation of this system. In 18 years, he went from a professional and educated intellectual, whom many my colleagues held in such high esteem, to a person who constantly broadcasts conflicting statements and threatens the world (that is, Russia too) with nuclear weapons!
Today, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not about diplomacy. It is all about warmongering, lies and hatred. It serves interests of few, the very few people thus contributing to further isolation and degradation of my country. Russia no longer has allies, and there is no one to blame but its reckless and ill-conceived policy.
I studied to be a diplomat and have been a diplomat for twenty years. The Ministry has become my home and family. But I simply cannot any longer share in this bloody, witless and absolutely needless ignominy.
Job offers are welcome...