Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:21pm
TV shows you watch
- kcar - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:10pm
The Abortion Wars
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:07pm
The Obituary Page
- R_P - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:22pm
Words I didn't know...yrs ago
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc.
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
2024 Elections!
- steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
What Did You See Today?
- Antigone - Apr 19, 2024 - 4:42pm
Song of the Day
- buddy - Apr 19, 2024 - 4:21pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- Isabeau - Apr 19, 2024 - 3:21pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- Isabeau - Apr 19, 2024 - 3:15pm
Ask an Atheist
- R_P - Apr 19, 2024 - 3:04pm
Trump
- rgio - Apr 19, 2024 - 11:10am
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:34am
Joe Biden
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:55am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:39am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:23am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:41am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 19, 2024 - 4:43am
Israel
- R_P - Apr 18, 2024 - 8:25pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 7:04pm
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2024 - 3:27pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Apr 17, 2024 - 2:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Russia
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:14pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Ukraine
- kurtster - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:05am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:38am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:56am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Republican Party
- Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000
- gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
New Song Submissions system
- MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
Caching to Apple watch quit working
- email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting?
- black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
Sonos
- rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet
- gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
And the good news is....
- thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
How do I get songs into My Favorites
- Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
Why is Mellow mix192kbps?
- dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Europe »
Ukraine
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 14, 15, 16 ... 110, 111, 112 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:48pm |
|
haresfur wrote:
Obama was on the receiving end when he appeased Russia by not reacting when they Annexed Crimea. That didn't work out well for Ukrainians. How convenient that you are happy to ignore recent history.
I believe I pointed out that the US appeases too. In the end. Never initially, of course.
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:41pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Oh, you huff and puff quite a lot R_P. No, my point is (from my perspective) your cringeworthy disregard for the perspective of former satellite states of the Soviet Union that have suffered brutally from Russian imperialism over the years and the fact that you have pushed a Russian-friendly agenda the whole time. This makes you a friend of Russian mob FSB rule and sets you against the people. I really don't know how you square this with any kind of left-wing ideals. Just because Russia is NOT AMERICA, doesn't make them paragons of virtue. It seems your vitriolic distaste for U.S. expansionism/hegemony makes you wilfully blind to the atrocities of other nations with imperialist ambitions.
+1
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:40pm |
|
haresfur wrote:
Obama was on the receiving end when he appeased Russia by not reacting when they Annexed Crimea. That didn't work out well for Ukrainians. How convenient that you are happy to ignore recent history.
+1
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:39pm |
|
R_P wrote:
You're either with us or with (the enemy du jour)...
Maybe I should huff and puff more too.
Oh, you huff and puff quite a lot R_P. No, my point is (from my perspective) your cringeworthy disregard for the perspective of former satellite states of the Soviet Union that have suffered brutally from Russian imperialism over the years and the fact that you have pushed a Russian-friendly agenda the whole time. This makes you a friend of Russian mob FSB rule and sets you against the people. I really don't know how you square this with any kind of left-wing ideals. Just because Russia is NOT AMERICA, doesn't make them paragons of virtue. It seems your vitriolic distaste for U.S. expansionism/hegemony makes you wilfully blind to the atrocities of other nations with imperialist ambitions.
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:39pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Maximalist zero-sum nonsense. Cf. especially : a policy of appeasing an enemy or potential aggressor by making concessions
Principled! "We don't negotiate with terrorists." "We don't cut and run." "I never settle."
And sometimes it might not work. Neither the alliance nor the meddling.
The US loves and demands deference/appeasement, just not when it's on the receiving end.
Obama was on the receiving end when he appeased Russia by not reacting when they Annexed Crimea. That didn't work out well for Ukrainians. How convenient that you are happy to ignore recent history.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:22pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
So RP's whole line of argument is redundant - unless of course it's true intention is to favour Russia at the cost of Ukraine - something he doesn't have the balls to say openly, because that would be (choke) imperialism.
You're either with us or with (the enemy du jour)...
Maybe I should huff and puff more too.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:20pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
Yes, you're catching on. That is pretty much the definition of appeasement.
At every juncture in this war (and even in the post following this one) you've posted cut&paste manifestos declaring that resistance is futile, the outcome is inevitable, and that Ukraine (and the rest of the world) should just bargain with Russia over what's left of Ukraine and its sovereignty. That would indeed be surrender (on Ukraine's part) and appeasement (on its allies').
That asymmetry is why small countries try to have alliances: to protect them from big, aggressive countries. Sometimes it even works.
And maybe you should look into getting a crystal ball. If I had a nickel for every prediction of Ukraine's imminent destruction you've posted I could buy you one.
Maximalist zero-sum nonsense. Cf. especially : a policy of appeasing an enemy or potential aggressor by making concessions
Principled! "We don't negotiate with terrorists." "We don't cut and run." "I never settle."
And sometimes it might not work. Neither the alliance nor the meddling.
The US loves and demands deference/appeasement, just not when it's on the receiving end.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 11:08pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
Yes, you're catching on. That is pretty much the definition of appeasement.
At every juncture in this war (and even in the post following this one) you've posted cut&paste manifestos declaring that resistance is futile, the outcome is inevitable, and that Ukraine (and the rest of the world) should just bargain with Russia over what's left of Ukraine and its sovereignty. That would indeed be surrender (on Ukraine's part) and appeasement (on its allies').
That asymmetry is why small countries try to have alliances: to protect them from big, aggressive countries. Sometimes it even works.
And maybe you should look into getting a crystal ball. If I had a nickel for every prediction of Ukraine's imminent destruction you've posted I could buy you one.
:wry smile emoticon: I'd also expect the Ukrainians to keep fighting no matter if the U.S. continues to keep providing military aid or not. There has simply been too much shit gone down for the Ukrainians to stop now. So RP's whole line of argument is redundant - unless of course it's true intention is to favour Russia at the cost of Ukraine - something he doesn't have the balls to say openly, because that would be (choke) imperialism.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 10:47pm |
|
R_P wrote:I've read it. For one, the word surrender isn't in there. Maybe you equate that with negotiations? Appppeeasement!
Yes, you're catching on. That is pretty much the definition of appeasement.
At every juncture in this war (and even in the post following this one) you've posted cut&paste manifestos declaring that resistance is futile, the outcome is inevitable, and that Ukraine (and the rest of the world) should just bargain with Russia over what's left of Ukraine and its sovereignty. That would indeed be surrender (on Ukraine's part) and appeasement (on its allies').
You guessed wrongly, but clever boy. There's a basic asymmetry between the primary parties. It may be a failure now, but it can change too. I have no crystal ball here.
That asymmetry is why small countries try to have alliances: to protect them from big, aggressive countries. Sometimes it even works.
And maybe you should look into getting a crystal ball. If I had a nickel for every prediction of Ukraine's imminent destruction you've posted I could buy you one.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 6:50pm |
|
Basic asymmetry:
Weary Soldiers, Unreliable Munitions: Ukraineâs Many Challenges
âWeâre trading our people for their people, and they have more people and equipment,â said one Ukrainian commander whose platoon has suffered around heavy casualties since Russia launched its full-scale invasion last year.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 5:34pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
You should really read the articles you post links to.
"Optimistic" depends on which side you're rooting for, I guess. We're halfway thru the summer, a little early to declare the counteroffensive a failure.
I've read it. For one, the word surrender isn't in there. Maybe you equate that with negotiations? Appppeeasement!
You guessed wrongly, but clever boy. There's a basic asymmetry between the primary parties. It may be a failure now, but it can change too. I have no crystal ball here.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 5:16pm |
|
R_P wrote:They didn't lose because it's not over. Not sure who's making those arguments.
You should really read the articles you post links to.
There's they will be victorious and they will lose.
Ukraineâs Lack of Weaponry and Training Risks Stalemate in Fight With Russia
When Ukraine launched its big counteroffensive this spring, Western military officials knew Kyiv didnât have all the training or weaponsâfrom shells to warplanesâthat it needed to dislodge Russian forces. But they hoped Ukrainian courage and resourcefulness would carry the day.
They havenât.Hopium. Stalemate seems a little optimistic too.
"Optimistic" depends on which side you're rooting for, I guess. We're halfway thru the summer, a little early to declare the counteroffensive a failure.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 3:38pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
They didn't lose either, but at least the argument seems to have shifted from they're losing, they should surrender to they aren't winning fast enough, they should surrender.
They didn't lose because it's not over. Not sure who's making those arguments.
There's they will be victorious and they will lose. Ukraineâs Lack of Weaponry and Training Risks Stalemate in Fight With Russia
When Ukraine launched its big counteroffensive this spring, Western military officials knew Kyiv didnât have all the training or weaponsâfrom shells to warplanesâthat it needed to dislodge Russian forces. But they hoped Ukrainian courage and resourcefulness would carry the day.
They havenât. Hopium. Stalemate seems a little optimistic too.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 3:23pm |
|
R_P wrote:
They didn't get far that time either.
Too lazy to look up/link all those "Russians running out of stuff" posts, but...
They didn't lose either, but at least the argument seems to have shifted from they're losing, they should surrender to they aren't winning fast enough, they should surrender.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 2:28pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:
They didn't get far that time either.
Too lazy to look up/link all those "Russians running out of stuff" posts, but...
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 1:40pm |
|
R_P wrote:
Why Ukraineâs counter-offensive is failing
Diplomacy is more important than ever as Kyiv simply doesnât have the human resources or physical infrastructure to achieve its goals.Last March, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said that as a result of significant Western support, the Ukrainian militaryâs spring offensive had âa very good chance for success.â Former Chief of the British General Staff, General Richard Dannatt, went so far as to suggest that Ukraineâs offensive would be so successful that Putin âmay be swept out of the Kremlinâ as a result.
Combat reality, however, has now swept away those optimistic claims and exposed the harsh truth: Ukraine is unlikely to militarily evict Russia out of its territory, no matter how many men they feed into battle.
As unpalatable as it is for all supporters of Ukraine, the most prudent course for Zelensky may now be to seek a negotiated settlement that preserves as much freedom and territory as possible for Kyiv. Ending the war now would end the deaths and injuries for tens of thousands of Ukraineâs brave and heroic fighters â men and women whom Kyiv will need to rebuild their country once the war ends.
The same month that Austin was claiming Ukraine had âa very good chanceâ to defeat Russia in Kyivâs spring offensive, I wrote that embracing the concept âthat Russia is going to lose the war could leave the West to be caught off guard if the Ukrainian offensive fails to materially degrade Russian positions.â One month before the start of the offensive, I explained the very practical reasons why the Ukrainian attack would almost certainly fail to achieve even modest gains.
To succeed in its operation to cut the Russian land bridge to Crimea, I wrote that Ukrainian troops would have to attack through multiple belts of elaborate Russian defenses âwith limited offensive air power, limited air defense, insufficient quantities of artillery shells, and a force that is equipped with a hodgepodge of modern and antiquated armor â staffed by a mix of conscripts with no combat experience and some officers and men with basic training by NATO instructors.â
All of those factors have now predictably conspired to blunt Kyivâs offensive, failing after six weeks of effort to even penetrate the first belt of the main Russian defensive lines. (...)
On Monday, Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh said that Ukraine has âthe combat power to be successful on the battlefield. They have what it needs to be successful in the counteroffensive.â Such optimism is grossly out of kilter with combat realities. The United States should stop making such plainly inaccurate statements and instead start to put real diplomatic efforts into ending this war. (...)
Mark your words? Again?
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2023 - 8:29am |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 20, 2023 - 11:58am |
|
Why Ukraineâs counter-offensive is failing
Diplomacy is more important than ever as Kyiv simply doesnât have the human resources or physical infrastructure to achieve its goals.Last March, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said that as a result of significant Western support, the Ukrainian militaryâs spring offensive had âa very good chance for success.â Former Chief of the British General Staff, General Richard Dannatt, went so far as to suggest that Ukraineâs offensive would be so successful that Putin âmay be swept out of the Kremlinâ as a result.
Combat reality, however, has now swept away those optimistic claims and exposed the harsh truth: Ukraine is unlikely to militarily evict Russia out of its territory, no matter how many men they feed into battle.
As unpalatable as it is for all supporters of Ukraine, the most prudent course for Zelensky may now be to seek a negotiated settlement that preserves as much freedom and territory as possible for Kyiv. Ending the war now would end the deaths and injuries for tens of thousands of Ukraineâs brave and heroic fighters â men and women whom Kyiv will need to rebuild their country once the war ends.
The same month that Austin was claiming Ukraine had âa very good chanceâ to defeat Russia in Kyivâs spring offensive, I wrote that embracing the concept âthat Russia is going to lose the war could leave the West to be caught off guard if the Ukrainian offensive fails to materially degrade Russian positions.â One month before the start of the offensive, I explained the very practical reasons why the Ukrainian attack would almost certainly fail to achieve even modest gains.
To succeed in its operation to cut the Russian land bridge to Crimea, I wrote that Ukrainian troops would have to attack through multiple belts of elaborate Russian defenses âwith limited offensive air power, limited air defense, insufficient quantities of artillery shells, and a force that is equipped with a hodgepodge of modern and antiquated armor â staffed by a mix of conscripts with no combat experience and some officers and men with basic training by NATO instructors.â
All of those factors have now predictably conspired to blunt Kyivâs offensive, failing after six weeks of effort to even penetrate the first belt of the main Russian defensive lines. (...)
On Monday, Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh said that Ukraine has âthe combat power to be successful on the battlefield. They have what it needs to be successful in the counteroffensive.â Such optimism is grossly out of kilter with combat realities. The United States should stop making such plainly inaccurate statements and instead start to put real diplomatic efforts into ending this war. (...)
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2023 - 8:53am |
|
imho
couple of key pivots ahead
most of them economic (esp for russia)
would be a good time to negotiate some sort of cease fire/peace plan
or i hope so
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 14, 2023 - 9:30pm |
|
|
|
|