[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Rock Movies/Documentaries - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:07pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:04pm
 
RPeeps I miss. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:51pm
 
The Obituary Page - kurtster - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:39pm
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - Red_Dragon - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:13pm
 
2020 Elections - kurtster - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:12pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:39pm
 
Favorite Quotes - ScottN - Oct 24, 2020 - 7:05pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Oct 24, 2020 - 5:01pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Oct 24, 2020 - 4:45pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - Red_Dragon - Oct 24, 2020 - 3:53pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Oct 24, 2020 - 1:25pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Oct 24, 2020 - 1:04pm
 
Great guitar faces - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 11:01am
 
Questions. - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:58am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:25am
 
More reggae, less Marley please - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:22am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:17am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:10am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 10:09am
 
Things that piss me off - miamizsun - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:59am
 
Music Videos - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:50am
 
Ambient Music - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:41am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:35am
 
Live Music - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:11am
 
The 1960s - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 9:03am
 
The war on funk is over! - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:57am
 
Play the Blues - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:56am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:43am
 
The Dragon's Roots - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:38am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 24, 2020 - 8:26am
 
Prog Rockers Anonymous - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 7:40am
 
Today in History - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Democratic Party - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 6:12am
 
Republican Party - Ohmsen - Oct 24, 2020 - 6:03am
 
Anti-War - Ohmsen - Oct 23, 2020 - 11:39pm
 
Make Scott laugh - kcar - Oct 23, 2020 - 11:31pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Oct 23, 2020 - 9:33pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jarro - Oct 23, 2020 - 3:20pm
 
Among Us - R_P - Oct 23, 2020 - 3:06pm
 
China - miamizsun - Oct 23, 2020 - 11:27am
 
Health Care Stories - hayduke2 - Oct 23, 2020 - 9:55am
 
Economix - R_P - Oct 23, 2020 - 9:33am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 23, 2020 - 9:00am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Oct 23, 2020 - 7:09am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - sunybuny - Oct 23, 2020 - 5:26am
 
Thanks for putting "Favorites" Channel back - chriswep - Oct 23, 2020 - 5:24am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - buddy - Oct 22, 2020 - 6:39pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Manbird - Oct 22, 2020 - 4:55pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Oct 22, 2020 - 3:42pm
 
Joni Mitchell categorization error - pmrt - Oct 22, 2020 - 11:57am
 
Name My Band - Jester - Oct 22, 2020 - 10:52am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Oct 22, 2020 - 8:40am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Oct 21, 2020 - 9:59pm
 
Things You Thought Today - jlf778 - Oct 21, 2020 - 5:19pm
 
Radio Paradise is awesome! - jlf778 - Oct 21, 2020 - 5:16pm
 
NASA & other news from space - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2020 - 4:17pm
 
New Music - scrinz - Oct 21, 2020 - 1:01pm
 
You might be getting old if...... - Ohmsen - Oct 21, 2020 - 9:05am
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - Oct 21, 2020 - 8:37am
 
Working from home - rhahl - Oct 21, 2020 - 7:01am
 
How's the weather? - miamizsun - Oct 21, 2020 - 5:05am
 
how do you feel right now? - kurtster - Oct 20, 2020 - 7:43pm
 
audiophile - kurtster - Oct 20, 2020 - 7:27pm
 
Bolivia - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 4:09pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - KarmaKarma - Oct 20, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Oct 20, 2020 - 2:18pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 20, 2020 - 1:04pm
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Oct 20, 2020 - 1:03pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 8:41am
 
Android app playing same playlist - bevgerry - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:42am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Oct 19, 2020 - 9:36pm
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - R_P - Oct 19, 2020 - 4:46pm
 
I have no idea what this thread was about, but let's talk... - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2020 - 9:35am
 
Art Show - Coaxial - Oct 19, 2020 - 5:33am
 
Index » Internet/Computer » The Web » Economix Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 198, 199, 200  Next
Post to this Topic
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: May 5, 2020 - 12:01pm



 kurtster wrote:

The US Treasury is set to borrow about $3 trillion dollars between now and July.

We'll have to see how much China, and anyone else for that matter, is willing to pony up towards that.
 

at less than 1%...but it will be ok, the fed will step in and buy all you can print.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: May 5, 2020 - 8:26am

 Lazy8 wrote:

In the past we were able to borrow the money we squandered, then borrow more to pay it back. Mostly from China.

But China's got problems of its own right now. Uncle Sugar is on his own.
 
The US Treasury is set to borrow about $3 trillion dollars between now and July.

We'll have to see how much China, and anyone else for that matter, is willing to pony up towards that.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 5, 2020 - 7:34am

black321 wrote:
they said that in 2008, but this time they may be right? I think it has less to do with central bank actions, and more with structural changes to economies  that will add costs, that must be passed on to the consumer- less globalization, more domestic production of essential inventories, less focus on efficiencies (just-in-time inventory), permanent increases in labor costs...

In the past we were able to borrow the money we squandered, then borrow more to pay it back. Mostly from China.

But China's got problems of its own right now. Uncle Sugar is on his own.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: May 4, 2020 - 4:46pm



 westslope wrote:


 black321 wrote:
.......
 
You mean to say a communist/socialist state, with a history of restricting access to free press, assembly, religion, reproduction rights...was effectively able to round up its citizens, while continuing to misrepresent the extent of the disease?  Then yes, I agree.  

I'm not some idiot conservative talking head calling this the China virus....but please, enough with the praise for how China helped the rest of the world.  

 

The one-child program was indeed draconian but it helped bring millions of Chinese out of poverty.  

Throughout the developing world including Mexico and the Central American republics, any countries and entire regions are in the midst of a Neo-Malthusian crisis where fast demographic rates have contributed to a situation where folks have eaten themselves out of house and home.    That explains in part the violence, the lack of development and the migration north.  

Perhaps El Salvador could benefit from a one-child policy?  
 

for what it's worth, my sociology prof argued the reverse. Get people into a secure economic situation and they will limit their reproduction. I think you need access to birth control, abortion, health care, and aged care along with economic security. If the one child program was an aspirational policy, not a rule, it would be ok.

Overall, I believe there is less misrepresentation of the crisis in China than there is in the USA.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: May 4, 2020 - 4:01pm



 black321 wrote:
.......
 
You mean to say a communist/socialist state, with a history of restricting access to free press, assembly, religion, reproduction rights...was effectively able to round up its citizens, while continuing to misrepresent the extent of the disease?  Then yes, I agree.  

I'm not some idiot conservative talking head calling this the China virus....but please, enough with the praise for how China helped the rest of the world.  

 

The one-child program was indeed draconian but it helped bring millions of Chinese out of poverty.  

Throughout the developing world including Mexico and the Central American republics, any countries and entire regions are in the midst of a Neo-Malthusian crisis where fast demographic rates have contributed to a situation where folks have eaten themselves out of house and home.    That explains in part the violence, the lack of development and the migration north.  

Perhaps El Salvador could benefit from a one-child policy?  
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 4:42pm



 black321 wrote:


 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


black321 wrote: appears china did the bare minimum, in terms of 'acceptable' behavior,' to let the world know, as did the US and many others in preparing for this.

——————————


I think that assertion is unfounded. I am not saying they did everything they could either, but bare minimum is a bit harsh:  ......
 
Once China got serious, it took draconian measures that are beyond the reach of the USA.  

To be blunt, I don't think this Chinese bashing is either warranted nor does it look very pretty.  It hints at the notion that country with a per capita  income 1/4th of the US per capita income is more capable of mustering and coordinating a better response than the USA.  

Besides, if you want to worry, look at the poor, developing countries whose public health systems are but a fraction of what the Chinese enjoy.   Then look at the horrific health outcomes in the USA that make American citizens all the more vulnerable to the worst consequences of COVID-19.
 
You mean to say a communist/socialist state, with a history of restricting access to free press, assembly, religion, reproduction rights...was effectively able to round up its citizens, while continuing to misrepresent the extent of the disease?  Then yes, I agree.  

I'm not some idiot conservative talking head calling this the China virus
....but please, enough with the praise for how China helped the rest of the world.  

 
yeah, I know. we just disagree on this one

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 4:40pm



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


get ready for the return of hyperinflation
 
Yeah, that's my worry because my investments are heavily skewed towards my mattress. We can only hope that the central banks have learned from the past. Oh yeah, the US republicans want to do away with the fed...

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 1:17pm

I find  encouraging
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 12:45pm

 black321 wrote:
I'm not some idiot conservative talking head calling this the China virus....but please, enough with the praise for how China helped the rest of the world. 
 
As much as you might hate it, they are helping, and the Trump Regime recognizes it...
Pompeo also announced Tuesday that the U.S. is committing an additional $225 million to overseas aid for countries affected by the virus, but that the assistance would not include personal protective equipment (PPE) because the U.S. itself is short on such critical medical gear.

The new funds come on top of an earlier $274 million committed by the U.S. for overseas aid due to the virus. The announcement also comes as China has touted its own international giving in response to the pandemic, casting itself as a global savior. The Chinese government, for example, is helping to facilitate the transfer of 1,000 ventilators to New York, one of the hardest hit states.

Some analysts
have lamented that dynamic as a “propaganda coup” for China in the face of criticism over its own internal handling of the virus. But with the U.S. in dire need of critical medical equipment from China, White House officials may feel limited in what they can say.
No more "China virus" from Pompeo's (and Trump's) mouth and some competition on the 'global savior' front...
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 9:05am



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Some stories you hear are kind of scary.. developed economies GDP to fall 30% on an annualised basis in the second quarter. That's bigger than the great depression apparently.
(hearsay, not researched) 
 

yes, in 2Q...but then a normalized recession levels in second half. Whats the recovery a quick V, U or L? 
Given the way the global economy has been shut/closed by at least 1/3, one silver lining is how the markets are taking this. Or are they being irrational?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 8:30am

 black321 wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


get ready for the return of hyperinflation
 

they said that in 2008, but this time they may be right? I think it has less to do with central bank actions, and more with structural changes to economies  that will add costs, that must be passed on to the consumer- less globalization, more domestic production of essential inventories, less focus on efficiencies (just-in-time inventory), permanent increases in labor costs...
 
Some stories you hear are kind of scary.. developed economies GDP to fall 30% on an annualised basis in the second quarter. That's bigger than the great depression apparently.
(hearsay, not researched) 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 8:07am



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


get ready for the return of hyperinflation
 

they said that in 2008, but this time they may be right? I think it has less to do with central bank actions, and more with structural changes to economies  that will add costs, that must be passed on to the consumer- less globalization, more domestic production of essential inventories, less focus on efficiencies (just-in-time inventory), permanent increases in labor costs...
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 7:36am

 islander wrote:


 black321 wrote:

Fed unveils $2.3 trillion coronavirus lending program

The Fed program will include a new fund to buy debt from banks issued to small and medium sized U.S. businesses with up to 10,000 employees and another to buy short-term notes issued by U.S. states and municipalities.

Plenty of $ getting thrown around...get in line and get some. Don't worry, we're good for it (we'll figure out how to pay for it....later on).
 

Coming soon: new 2 child policy, because one can't afford the debt we are putting on them.
 

get ready for the return of hyperinflation
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 7:08am



 black321 wrote:

Fed unveils $2.3 trillion coronavirus lending program

The Fed program will include a new fund to buy debt from banks issued to small and medium sized U.S. businesses with up to 10,000 employees and another to buy short-term notes issued by U.S. states and municipalities.

Plenty of $ getting thrown around...get in line and get some. Don't worry, we're good for it (we'll figure out how to pay for it....later on).
 

Coming soon: new 2 child policy, because one can't afford the debt we are putting on them.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 6:50am

Fed unveils $2.3 trillion coronavirus lending program

The Fed program will include a new fund to buy debt from banks issued to small and medium sized U.S. businesses with up to 10,000 employees and another to buy short-term notes issued by U.S. states and municipalities.

Plenty of $ getting thrown around...get in line and get some. Don't worry, we're good for it (we'll figure out how to pay for it....later on).
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 9, 2020 - 5:44am



 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


black321 wrote: appears china did the bare minimum, in terms of 'acceptable' behavior,' to let the world know, as did the US and many others in preparing for this.

——————————


I think that assertion is unfounded. I am not saying they did everything they could either, but bare minimum is a bit harsh:  ......
 
Once China got serious, it took draconian measures that are beyond the reach of the USA.  

To be blunt, I don't think this Chinese bashing is either warranted nor does it look very pretty.  It hints at the notion that country with a per capita  income 1/4th of the US per capita income is more capable of mustering and coordinating a better response than the USA.  

Besides, if you want to worry, look at the poor, developing countries whose public health systems are but a fraction of what the Chinese enjoy.   Then look at the horrific health outcomes in the USA that make American citizens all the more vulnerable to the worst consequences of COVID-19.
 
You mean to say a communist/socialist state, with a history of restricting access to free press, assembly, religion, reproduction rights...was effectively able to round up its citizens, while continuing to misrepresent the extent of the disease?  Then yes, I agree.  

I'm not some idiot conservative talking head calling this the China virus....but please, enough with the praise for how China helped the rest of the world.  

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 8, 2020 - 8:44pm

I see some are/were merely relaying hawkish GOP talking points fantasizing about being the world's judge:
“It’s like a bad movie. It’s like the sinister person goes out and causes a problem and then only they can solve the problem — but it’s going to cost you money,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who has proposed aggressive measures to punish China, said in an interview. “That’s exactly what this is. They caused this problem.”

Scott has secured a commitment from Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) to investigate the World Health Organization’s handling of the pandemic. The WHO is under fire for allegedly not taking a harder stance against Beijing even as it downplayed the crisis; the U.N. body is also accused of poor judgment for publicizing a preliminary Chinese finding suggesting that Covid-19 could not be transmitted from human to human. Since that assessment, the virus has spread across the globe, killing tens of thousands of people and bringing many economies to a near halt.

The Florida Republican isn’t the only senator looking to whack Beijing. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch (R-Idaho) joined calls for a WHO probe on Tuesday, including an examination of whether U.S. funding of the group should be revoked. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) recently called on the State Department to conduct its own investigation into China’s role, while Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) wants Beijing to forgive U.S. debt and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) is looking to sanction Chinese officials.
And not unexpected: Coronavirus Alarm Blends Yellow Peril and Red Scare (March 6)
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Apr 8, 2020 - 4:25pm



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


black321 wrote: appears china did the bare minimum, in terms of 'acceptable' behavior,' to let the world know, as did the US and many others in preparing for this.

——————————


I think that assertion is unfounded. I am not saying they did everything they could either, but bare minimum is a bit harsh:  ......
 
Once China got serious, it took draconian measures that are beyond the reach of the USA.  

To be blunt, I don't think this Chinese bashing is either warranted nor does it look very pretty.  It hints at the notion that country with a per capita  income 1/4th of the US per capita income is more capable of mustering and coordinating a better response than the USA.  

Besides, if you want to worry, look at the poor, developing countries whose public health systems are but a fraction of what the Chinese enjoy.   Then look at the horrific health outcomes in the USA that make American citizens all the more vulnerable to the worst consequences of COVID-19.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Apr 8, 2020 - 3:59pm



 R_P wrote:
 R_P wrote:
 westslope wrote:
=> drug-addled Americans are dying from 'legally available drugs'.

=>  the same factors driving white middle-aged Americans to die earlier could be symptoms of the underlying problems that have driven so many Americans to vote for and continue to support Donald J. Trump.
"We need to think hard about controlling the prescriptions of opioid painkillers. The Federal Drug Administration recently approved Oxycontin for kids," Deaton said. "While some kids are in awful, terminal pain, and can clearly benefit from it, the scope for abuse is there, especially if pharmaceutical companies misbehave, as they have done in the past. But if what is happening is an epidemic of despair, that people on the bottom of the economic heap are being increasingly left out as inequality expands, then what we are seeing is just one more terrible consequence of slow growth and growing inequality."

......
 

Deaton is an amazing economist.  He and his wife's work in this area are very thought provoking.  That said.

Faster economic growth will paper over deep, structural problems to some extent better than slower growth.  That does not mean that slow growth is leading to a  "terrible consequence".    Advanced, rich countries do grow slower.    If anything slow, stable economic growth should be viewed as favourable for a long list of reasons.  

The USA is hardly unique in this regard.  It has some deep regional problems of a structural nature that are tenacious and challenging to make go away.  Faster economic growth could very well deepen these structural issues by increasing the likelihood and severity of economic recession.  

When economies are forced to drop perform enhancing pills, there is almost always a high price to pay at a later date.  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 8, 2020 - 3:58pm

 steeler wrote:


 What would be the legal authority for such action/remedy?

 
Can't think of any. 

Doesn't mean that it cannot or won't or shouldn't happen. 

China, imo, bears the bulk of responsibility for the widespread outbreak of this virus based upon what we are learning about their early actions of minimizing the actuality of this virus.

Do you believe that China should get a pass on their behaviour regarding their handling of the virus and deliberately misleading the world about it ?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 198, 199, 200  Next