If you're his CFO and you want him to "support the family"... you pay his legal fees. If you're anyone who attempted to help him expose the fraud of the 2020 election (ie Rudy and co....), you promise and then don't pay.
Payment is solely based on your loyalty to the family.
Trump has promised to release all of the January 6 "patriots"?
You're losing it dude. Trump starting the riot...did nothing... starts his rallies with the choir of convicts... and suggests he'll let them all go.... and you want to somehow suggest the BLM riots are similar?
And, a greatest hit:
"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them,"
"I'll pay the legal fees,"
Fair point. I would instead say encouraged the rioters and might add by helping to fund the bail for the rioters, aided and abetted them ? While being a sitting Senator. She certainly did nothing to calm thing down. That is clear.
Trump has promised to release all of the January 6 "patriots"?
You're losing it dude. Trump starting the riot...did nothing... starts his rallies with the choir of convicts... and suggests he'll let them all go.... and you want to somehow suggest the BLM riots are similar?
... And in the say anything department, Harris is now trying to portray herself as the tough law and order prosecutor. This after her history of inciting rioting.
Technically, "inciting" a riot would need to occur before the riot were to take place. Arranging for bail for rioters, after a riot takes place, could be called other things, but it is not incitement. Supporting or predicting protests is not incitement either. A better example of incitement would be something like this: "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," - though even that is subject to debate given context.
Fair point. I would instead say encouraged the rioters and might add by helping to fund the bail for the rioters, aided and abetted them ? While being a sitting Senator. She certainly did nothing to calm thing down. That is clear.
⢠Trump incited a riot at the Capitol where Police were beaten, calls to hang the Vice President were shouted and feces was smeared on the Capitol walls.
⢠Within 36 hours, five people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, and three died of natural causes, including a police officer.
⢠174 police officers were injured and 4 officers who responded to the attack died by suicide within seven months.
⢠Damage caused by attackers exceeded $2.7 million.
TRUMP DID NOTHING FOR FOUR HOURS.
Keep splitting the short and curlies over who 'incites' violence. Paper thin and pathetic.
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Aug 13, 2024 - 7:29am
Proclivities wrote:
Technically, "inciting" a riot would need to occur before the riot were to take place. Arranging for bail for rioters, after a riot takes place, could be called other things, but it is not incitement. Supporting or predicting protests is not incitement either. A better example of incitement would be something like this: "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," - though even that is subject to debate given context.
...
And in the say anything department, Harris is now trying to portray herself as the tough law and order prosecutor. This after her history of inciting rioting.
Technically, "inciting" a riot would need to occur before the riot were to take place. Arranging for bail for rioters, after a riot takes place, could be called other things, but it is not incitement. Supporting or predicting protests is not incitement either. A better example of incitement would be something like this: "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," - though even that is subject to debate given context.
Walz let this rioting go one for two days before calling in the National Guard. He waited so long because ? There is a famous video of IIRC, a CNN reporter standing in front of burning buildings saying that the protests were largely "peaceful". Harris showed her approval of the riots and rioters by organizing funds to bail out the arrested rioters. Said or did nothing to promote calm to reign in the rioting other than call for defunding the police.
And in the say anything department, Harris is now trying to portray herself as the tough law and order prosecutor. This after her history of inciting rioting.
Walz called in the National Guard before Trump offered any help.
Donald Trump regarding Tim Walz handling of Minneapolis riots (June 1, 2020 recording) :
âTim, you called up big numbers and the big numbers knocked them out so fast, it was like bowling pins,â
âWhat they did in Minneapolis was incredible. They went in and dominated, and it happened immediately,â
â(Walz is) an excellent guyâ
In the say-anything department... your boy blatantly lies about his involvement and changes his mind about the recorded and public praise he directed at Walz's handling of the events?
Walz let this rioting go one for two days before calling in the National Guard. He waited so long because ? There is a famous video of IIRC, a CNN reporter standing in front of burning buildings saying that the protests were largely "peaceful". Harris showed her approval of the riots and rioters by organizing funds to bail out the arrested rioters. Said or did nothing to promote calm to reign in the rioting other than call for defunding the police.
And in the say anything department, Harris is now trying to portray herself as the tough law and order prosecutor. This after her history of inciting rioting.
One or two days seems in line or faster than other major riot situations like Watts and Rodney King. Dynamic situation and typically one would want the police to handle things if possible. When did they say they needed the guard? I don't know and expect you don't either.
I mean unless you want the military to be patrolling your streets all the time.
I have read quite a bit of criticism of Harris from the left for her stance on crime. Her legacy is mixed, as it should be for someone in that position where you deal with actual cases and actual people rather than just a few high-profile headlines. She ran as anti-death penalty and didn't seek it in a case of a murdered police officer but also appealed a federal court ruling that the state's death penalty law was unconstitutional. Many of her reforms were successful, some not so, and some like threatening to jail parents whose children were truants (none were actually jailed) were successful but considered unwarranted. She did a good job taking on the banks after the global financial crisis, and got a huge settlement for California compared to what Obama had negotiated. But I guess you don't consider white collar crime a problem. trump certainly doesn't.
Tim Walz legacy? I guess you are saying that as governor he could have done more to reform the Minneapolis police department so that their murder didn't happen. A bit of a stretch
Walz let this rioting go one for two days before calling in the National Guard. He waited so long because ? There is a famous video of IIRC, a CNN reporter standing in front of burning buildings saying that the protests were largely "peaceful". Harris showed her approval of the riots and rioters by organizing funds to bail out the arrested rioters. Said or did nothing to promote calm to reign in the rioting other than call for defunding the police.
And in the say anything department, Harris is now trying to portray herself as the tough law and order prosecutor. This after her history of inciting rioting.
Tim Walz legacy? I guess you are saying that as governor he could have done more to reform the Minneapolis police department so that their murder didn't happen.
A bit of a stretch
Since Drumph came on the scene the attempts to grasp at the thinnest of straws has increased exponentially.
Tim Walz legacy? I guess you are saying that as governor he could have done more to reform the Minneapolis police department so that their murder didn't happen.
In the Right's classic "whataboutism"... Trump is a scumbag, so we'll find something that offsets his transgressions.
If you look up Snopes "Did Kamala have an extramarital affair that boosted her career"... the answer is mixed. (...)
Sure... he may have provided some early help in getting that "well known springboard to Attorney General... the CA unemployment insurance appeals board..." They were adults, he was estranged from his wife, it was over long before she was ever elected to anything.
Anything to distract from the reality that Trump's Vengence 3.0 tour is falling apart.
It isn't the first time these feces were flung into the forum.
I don't think misogynistic/racist attacks are going to impress many possible swing voters.
In the Right's classic "whataboutism"... Trump is a scumbag, so we'll find something that offsets his transgressions.
If you look up Snopes "Did Kamala have an extramarital affair that boosted her career"... the answer is mixed.
What's True
Harris did date former San Francisco Mayor and State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown for a period of time between 1994 to 1995. In his capacity as speaker, Brown appointed her to two political posts â first to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, and then to the Medical Assistance Commission.
What's False
Although Brown was technically still married during the time period that he dated Harris, he had been estranged from his wife Blanche Brown for more than a decade. Harris' first, successful run for office in 2003 happened well after the relationship ended, and Harris sought to distance herself from Brown.
Sure... he may have provided some early help in getting that "well known springboard to Attorney General... the CA unemployment insurance appeals board..." They were adults, he was estranged from his wife, it was over long before she was ever elected to anything.
Anything to distract from the reality that Trump's Vengence 3.0 tour is falling apart.
