[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Joe Biden - kurtster - Sep 21, 2023 - 5:37pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - rgio - Sep 21, 2023 - 4:40pm
 
Wordle - daily game - Manbird - Sep 21, 2023 - 4:39pm
 
Trump - R_P - Sep 21, 2023 - 4:07pm
 
What's that smell? - oldviolin - Sep 21, 2023 - 3:31pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - chockenberry - Sep 21, 2023 - 2:43pm
 
Happy Halloween Yall! - kcar - Sep 21, 2023 - 1:30pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 21, 2023 - 1:13pm
 
Way Cool Video - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2023 - 1:06pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Sep 21, 2023 - 11:22am
 
Hi Res 24/96 plan? - mikehd - Sep 21, 2023 - 11:08am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 21, 2023 - 10:41am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Sep 21, 2023 - 9:32am
 
Things You Thought Today - GeneP59 - Sep 21, 2023 - 9:28am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Sep 21, 2023 - 9:15am
 
New Music - miamizsun - Sep 21, 2023 - 8:34am
 
nytimes.com/games/connections - rgio - Sep 21, 2023 - 8:32am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Sep 21, 2023 - 8:31am
 
Fox Spews - kcar - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:35am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2023 - 7:24am
 
Anti-War - Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 9:12pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 20, 2023 - 8:43pm
 
Children and the Future - R_P - Sep 20, 2023 - 7:35pm
 
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories - Red_Dragon - Sep 20, 2023 - 4:56pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - westslope - Sep 20, 2023 - 3:45pm
 
Rock Movies/Documentaries - thisbody - Sep 20, 2023 - 11:16am
 
Song about digging up bodies to deal with loneliness? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 20, 2023 - 10:14am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - ptooey - Sep 20, 2023 - 6:37am
 
Outstanding Covers - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 20, 2023 - 4:24am
 
Climate Change - haresfur - Sep 20, 2023 - 12:33am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - kurtster - Sep 19, 2023 - 11:54pm
 
::odd but intriguing:: - Manbird - Sep 19, 2023 - 8:04pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Sep 19, 2023 - 7:59pm
 
Good Deals !!! - Steely_D - Sep 19, 2023 - 7:34pm
 
New announcer? - vandys - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:52pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - Red_Dragon - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:31pm
 
Plugin RP for Volumio - NeilBlanchard - Sep 19, 2023 - 2:13pm
 
Music Requests - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2023 - 5:08am
 
Website Changes - miamizsun - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:31am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Sep 19, 2023 - 4:18am
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2023 - 5:15pm
 
~ Have a good joke you can post? ~ - DaveInSaoMiguel - Sep 18, 2023 - 2:21pm
 
Download Manager IPhone problems - RPnate1 - Sep 18, 2023 - 1:51pm
 
Tagline thought - Steely_D - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:32am
 
Nature's Creatures - Beez - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:30am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Beez - Sep 18, 2023 - 10:15am
 
Things that piss me off - GeneP59 - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:48am
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:41am
 
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't... - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2023 - 9:37am
 
Are you ready for some football? - black321 - Sep 18, 2023 - 8:59am
 
September 2023 Photo Theme - CONTRAST - fractalv - Sep 18, 2023 - 7:53am
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 17, 2023 - 2:32pm
 
Movie Recommendation - Steely_D - Sep 17, 2023 - 1:28pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Lazy8 - Sep 17, 2023 - 9:18am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - GeneP59 - Sep 17, 2023 - 8:56am
 
Germany - haresfur - Sep 16, 2023 - 7:22pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Sep 16, 2023 - 12:47pm
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - Sep 16, 2023 - 5:26am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Sep 16, 2023 - 5:25am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 15, 2023 - 8:55pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2023 - 1:48pm
 
For a Limited Time Only - Sales and Bargains - black321 - Sep 15, 2023 - 10:14am
 
sad music - lily34 - Sep 15, 2023 - 7:59am
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Sep 15, 2023 - 7:24am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - lily34 - Sep 15, 2023 - 6:15am
 
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT - miamizsun - Sep 15, 2023 - 6:14am
 
R.I.P. Lou Reed - Proclivities - Sep 15, 2023 - 4:04am
 
Favorite Quotes - black321 - Sep 14, 2023 - 9:57pm
 
Russia - R_P - Sep 14, 2023 - 2:26pm
 
Favorite Movie Quote Conversation - Proclivities - Sep 14, 2023 - 11:34am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 14, 2023 - 11:11am
 
Get the Quote - Proclivities - Sep 14, 2023 - 9:09am
 
RadioParadise FAQ List Submission - John_Carter - Sep 14, 2023 - 8:00am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - miamizsun - Sep 14, 2023 - 6:29am
 
What is the meaning of this? - miamizsun - Sep 14, 2023 - 5:52am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Artificial Intelligence Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Post to this Topic
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2023 - 11:42am

 Beaker wrote:

It's a bigger deal than the emergence of the iPhone. Or Google.
It will revolutionize everything.




I agree.
Beaker

Beaker Avatar

Location: Your safe space


Posted: Mar 24, 2023 - 10:53am

It's a bigger deal than the emergence of the iPhone. Or Google.
It will revolutionize everything.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2023 - 10:46am

probably worth your time
but you'll need to listen...



rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2023 - 7:11am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
...
The biggest problem, as I see it,  is the associated dumbing down of the audience that you refer to. A lot of younger translators are now forced to use machine translations (for cost reasons) but they just don't see the mistakes the machine makes. So over time a wrong translation becomes standard. ...
...

That is the situation that all businesses face right now, and it's a bit of a chicken and egg.  It's very hard to find financial, tax, and accounting staff who are interested in "knowing" the rules and reasons.  They want the answers.  Quickly.  As easy as possible.  Maybe the biggest change isn't work ethic, so much as a total loss of inquisitive nature.   Why or how doesn't matter...just what.

For now, more senior staff can fill in the holes and avoid the breakage, but that's going to end soon.  When nobody understands why things were done, how will they ever adapt to the constantly changing universe?  

It may all end up OK, because when they can't explain things (like the US tax code), maybe they just start over and by default remove all of the subtle problems that have built up over time, but it's a huge risk.

As negative as I and others can be about AI and its use, it is an amazingly exciting time to be working.   I've lived through the migration from analog to digital in finance, and wish I could stick around long enough to fix some of the legacy issues.   Change can't come fast enough, as I probably only have 10 or 15 years left to play.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2023 - 6:16am

 rgio wrote:

I was just having a discussion with my business partner about this very topic, albeit in a slightly different context.  Content has been the proxy for value in a lot of professions for a long time.  The best content won.  Picture quality. Sound quality.  Research details.  Quality (as you say) was king, and an acceptance of lower quality was done as a concession for other realities, primarily cost.

Now, it's more about the experience.  The ease of consumption, the integration (of everything), the universal availability of what I want, when I want it, wherever I want it.  The vast majority of users will surrender accuracy for the experience.   Thinking less is better than having to work harder, especially when so many don't know the difference between the right and wrong answers.
.
As for language, I'd suggest that it's one of the basic knowledge categories that people look for answers to.  Chair.  It's an object with pretty much a universal definition. Multiple legs, often with a back, used for sitting.  I typed "what is the word for chair in the 10 most popular languages on the planet" into Bard just now...and it returned this..
  1. Mandarin Chinese: 椅子 (yǐzi)
  2. Spanish: silla
  3. English: chair
  4. Hindi: कुर्सी (kūrsē)
  5. Arabic:เก้าอี้ (ghiyā’)
  6. Portuguese: cadeira
  7. Russian:椅子 (yézya)
  8. Japanese: 椅子 (isō)
  9. German: Stuhl
  10. French: chaise
Impressive, but basic.  Sentence structure is more complex, but still relatively simple, as the rules are fixed.  Would you give directions to your hotel using a free app to translate...sure.  Would you buy a house or take a job after translating the contracts using a free tool?  Probably not.  It's a matter of risk/reward, and that kind of complex decisioning will take a very long time to program.  

The human brain is an amazingly complex system, that we still don't quite understand completely.  We can automate some of the basic tasks and heavy lifting, but decision-making for critical issues is a long, long, way off.  At least in my (quite possibly very simple) mind.   Quality has lost ground to speed recently, but the pendulum will swing and people will want assurance of quality for the things they value enough to pay for.


You would be surprised how good some of the machine translations are getting. I also  long thought contextual based translation would be one step too far for a machine, but I was wrong. They are surprisingly good at it. In fact, they are frequently better than human translators. And getting better.

Talking of contracts I recently did a purchase contract for an American selling his apartment here and we decided to run it through DeepL and I'd tweak it a bit to make sure there were no gremlins in there.  Admittedly, I changed a lot, but it wasn't too far off being acceptable for his purposes. 
The biggest problem, as I see it,  is the associated dumbing down of the audience that you refer to. A lot of younger translators are now forced to use machine translations (for cost reasons) but they just don't see the mistakes the machine makes. So over time a wrong translation becomes standard. Likewise a lot of non-native speakers think, yeah, that's just what I wanted to say, but they don't get the cultural nuance or understand what is the right thing to say in a certain situation.  

I recently had one CEO wanting to thank the Chairman of the Supervisory Board (who was stepping down and was basically his boss) for "his cooperation", which is fine in German, as it is neutral, but in English it has a distinct whiff of "thanks for doing everything I told you to do" and IMO inappropriate. He ran it through DeepL and came back at me to say I was wrong.
So, yeah, great, whatever, dude, I thought.  Needless to say, that was one of the clients I lost. This guy is also kind of tone-deaf and the kind of non-native speaker who is convinced he has full mastery of the English language, so I'm not too unhappy to have lost his business. But the ironic thing is the Chairman of the Supervisory Board is also a non-native speaker and wouldn't have had any problem with the phrase, so it turns out the only person not on the same page is me.  In these situations, the machine is going to win.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2023 - 5:43am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


You are giving me hope rgio!!  But I have doubts about the bolded bit. 
When DVD came out I had a friend who was a sound engineer and invested heavily in a new studio to produce high-end audio quality, believing the market would move to exploit the new sound quality it afforded (mainly for classical music). The opposite happened. The market moved to compressed files and mp3, mainly because everyone could suddenly rip their own files making them basically free.  The same is now happening in my field. Machine translation can come up with some real clangers, but the translations are getting astonishingly better very rapidly. There comes a point when customers' quality expectations begin to fall in favour of something that is maybe not quite so good, but (almost) free.

And if something as complex as language can be handled, with all its nuance. I think it is only a question of time that it starts handling most other fields. All you need is a massive dataset, an ability to recognize patterns, apply logical arguments and mathematical probability models and hey presto, you've got something pretty damn close to the average brain.

I was just having a discussion with my business partner about this very topic, albeit in a slightly different context.  Content has been the proxy for value in a lot of professions for a long time.  The best content won.  Picture quality. Sound quality.  Research details.  Quality (as you say) was king, and an acceptance of lower quality was done as a concession for other realities, primarily cost.

Now, it's more about the experience.  The ease of consumption, the integration (of everything), the universal availability of what I want, when I want it, wherever I want it.  The vast majority of users will surrender accuracy for the experience.   Thinking less is better than having to work harder, especially when so many don't know the difference between the right and wrong answers.
.
As for language, I'd suggest that it's one of the basic knowledge categories that people look for answers to.  Chair.  It's an object with pretty much a universal definition. Multiple legs, often with a back, used for sitting.  I typed "what is the word for chair in the 10 most popular languages on the planet" into Bard just now...and it returned this..
  1. Mandarin Chinese: 椅子 (yǐzi)
  2. Spanish: silla
  3. English: chair
  4. Hindi: कुर्सी (kūrsē)
  5. Arabic:เก้าอี้ (ghiyā’)
  6. Portuguese: cadeira
  7. Russian:椅子 (yézya)
  8. Japanese: 椅子 (isō)
  9. German: Stuhl
  10. French: chaise
Impressive, but basic.  Sentence structure is more complex, but still relatively simple, as the rules are fixed.  Would you give directions to your hotel using a free app to translate...sure.  Would you buy a house or take a job after translating the contracts using a free tool?  Probably not.  It's a matter of risk/reward, and that kind of complex decisioning will take a very long time to program.  

The human brain is an amazingly complex system, that we still don't quite understand completely.  We can automate some of the basic tasks and heavy lifting, but decision-making for critical issues is a long, long, way off.  At least in my (quite possibly very simple) mind.   Quality has lost ground to speed recently, but the pendulum will swing and people will want assurance of quality for the things they value enough to pay for.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2023 - 3:33am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

.. and hey presto, you've got something pretty damn close to the average brain.


a case in point.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 10:37pm

 rgio wrote:

Speed comes in many forms.  The ability to consume is now immense, but machines must be trained by humans for true AI.  The training speed is going to take time.  Google has the internet mapped, and the first few answers I got from Bard were fabricated crap.  

There is also a reality that content and mediation/training are quickly forming teams, and will charge more for focused knowledge.  Chat GPT might do an OK job translating, but I'm sure you have a favorite or two already.  You using those systems will train the datasets you have access to, but they won't improve translation for everyone.  The moats will get wider and the barriers to entry greater.

This year everyone will use as much as they can.  Soon, errors will begin to matter, and people will pull back from the blind acceptance of AI that's going on now.   We have entered the peak of inflated expectations per Gartner's Hype cycle....the trough of disillusionment awaits. 


You are giving me hope rgio!!  But I have doubts about the bolded bit. 
When DVD came out I had a friend who was a sound engineer and invested heavily in a new studio to produce high-end audio quality, believing the market would move to exploit the new sound quality it afforded (mainly for classical music). The opposite happened. The market moved to compressed files and mp3, mainly because everyone could suddenly rip their own files making them basically free.  The same is now happening in my field. Machine translation can come up with some real clangers, but the translations are getting astonishingly better very rapidly. There comes a point when customers' quality expectations begin to fall in favour of something that is maybe not quite so good, but (almost) free.

And if something as complex as language can be handled, with all its nuance. I think it is only a question of time that it starts handling most other fields. All you need is a massive dataset, an ability to recognize patterns, apply logical arguments and mathematical probability models and hey presto, you've got something pretty damn close to the average brain.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 2:46pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

I think it is going to go faster than you think. AI has reached a point where its ability to learn is outpacing its  drawbacks.  In my own field (translation) there have been serious inroads by AI tools but we have learned to incorporate them. Last year was my busiest ever. This year is also busy (so far).. but prices have plummeted. I can't afford to keep my employee on anymore, which means loss of quality and ultimately less competitiveness on  a market dominated by increasingly powerful AI machines. I have lost one major client so far (well, two actually, but won three others) but still..  It's only a matter of time.  Time to think about becoming a professional athlete I guess. 

Speed comes in many forms.  The ability to consume is now immense, but machines must be trained by humans for true AI.  The training speed is going to take time.  Google has the internet mapped, and the first few answers I got from Bard were fabricated crap.  

There is also a reality that content and mediation/training are quickly forming teams, and will charge more for focused knowledge.  Chat GPT might do an OK job translating, but I'm sure you have a favorite or two already.  You using those systems will train the datasets you have access to, but they won't improve translation for everyone.  The moats will get wider and the barriers to entry greater.

This year everyone will use as much as they can.  Soon, errors will begin to matter, and people will pull back from the blind acceptance of AI that's going on now.   We have entered the peak of inflated expectations per Gartner's Hype cycle....the trough of disillusionment awaits. 

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 2:21pm

A greed bias
Medicare Advantage Uses Algorithms to Block Care for Seniors
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:47pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


ok, scratch artists. 

what's left?    clergy, diplomats, plumbers..  might go for plumber.

I have a few friends who are plumbers - one can make a good living at it once you get established, but among the building trades, fewer people seem to want that one - especially when starting out.  Yeah, I can't see AI being able to do much of what it involves - at least unless/until the methods and materials of construction change drastically.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:39pm

 rgio wrote:

It's going to be a long time before AI replaces almost all jobs.  What will happen quickly is that it will separate occupations into "those using AI" and those not.  A lawyer who effectively uses it will be much more productive than one who doesn't.  Accountants, coders, and dozens of others. 

#20 on the list is Small business owners.  While it may not eliminate the need for people to run small companies, it very well may be a requirement to successfully market, manage, and grow a company.  At some point, not using AI as a small business owner is going to put your company at a competitive disadvantage.

FWIW - I've been using both GPT4 and Bard, and they both have some serious problems.


I think it is going to go faster than you think. AI has reached a point where its ability to learn is outpacing its  drawbacks.  In my own field (translation) there have been serious inroads by AI tools but we have learned to incorporate them. Last year was my busiest ever. This year is also busy (so far).. but prices have plummeted. I can't afford to keep my employee on anymore, which means loss of quality and ultimately less competitiveness on  a market dominated by increasingly powerful AI machines. I have lost one major client so far (well, two actually, but won three others) but still..  It's only a matter of time.  Time to think about becoming a professional athlete I guess. 


dischuckin

dischuckin Avatar

Location: dry shippys wa
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:31pm


rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:28pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


ok, scratch artists. 

what's left?    clergy, diplomats, plumbers..  might go for plumber.

Professional athlete.  

rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:26pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Typed up from twitter (yeah, I know)

secure jobs that AI can't replace:

1. therapists
2. social workers
....
19. plumbers
20. small business owners


It's going to be a long time before AI replaces almost all jobs.  What will happen quickly is that it will separate occupations into "those using AI" and those not.  A lawyer who effectively uses it will be much more productive than one who doesn't.  Accountants, coders, and dozens of others. 

#20 on the list is Small business owners.  While it may not eliminate the need for people to run small companies, it very well may be a requirement to successfully market, manage, and grow a company.  At some point, not using AI as a small business owner is going to put your company at a competitive disadvantage.

FWIW - I've been using both GPT4 and Bard, and they both have some serious problems.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:22pm

 Proclivities wrote:

There are already quite a few people (entities?) selling prints of AI-generated "art" for substantial amounts of money.  Midjourney is one of the popular apps (among very many) - just type in a prompt/description and it makes a "painting".   Not necessarily "replacing" artists or designers, but not helping either, except perhaps in the cases of artists or designers using the apps as a visualization/layout tool.


ok, scratch artists. 

what's left?    clergy, diplomats, plumbers..  might go for plumber.
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:18pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Typed up from twitter (yeah, I know)

secure jobs that AI can't replace:

1. therapists
2. social workers
3. early childhood educators
4. nurses
5. artists
6. writers
......
ok, I'm going for 6 and 7.   or maybe an occupational therapist for ethical marine biologists. choices!


There are already quite a few people (entities?) selling prints of AI-generated "art" for substantial amounts of money.  Midjourney is one of the popular apps (among very many) - just type in a prompt/description and it makes a "painting".   Not necessarily "replacing" artists or designers, but not helping either, except perhaps in the cases of artists or designers using the apps as a visualization/layout tool.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 1:08pm

Typed up from twitter (yeah, I know)

secure jobs that AI can't replace:

1. therapists
2. social workers
3. early childhood educators
4. nurses
5. artists
6. writers
7. chefs
8. hairstylists
9. personal trainers
10. event planners
11. construction workers
12. occupational therapists 
13. archaeologists
14. marine biologists
15. ethicists
16. diplomats
17. clergy
18. electricians
19. plumbers
20. small business owners

ok, I'm going for 6 and 7.   or maybe an occupational therapist for ethical marine biologists. choices!
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 22, 2023 - 11:03am

ChatGOP, alternative aggrieved intelligence
Conservatives Aim to Build a Chatbot of Their Own
Elon Musk, who helped start OpenAI in 2015 before departing three years later, has accused ChatGPT of being “woke” and pledged to build his own version.

Gab, a social network with an avowedly Christian nationalist bent that has become a hub for white supremacists and extremists, has promised to release A.I. tools with “the ability to generate content freely without the constraints of liberal propaganda wrapped tightly around its code.”

“Silicon Valley is investing billions to build these liberal guardrails to neuter the A.I. into forcing their worldview in the face of users and present it as ‘reality’ or ‘fact,’” Andrew Torba, the founder of Gab, said in a written response to questions.

He equated artificial intelligence to a new information arms race, like the advent of social media, that conservatives needed to win. “We don’t intend to allow our enemies to have the keys to the kingdom this time around,” he said.


thisbody

thisbody Avatar

Location: Nose Hill
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 8, 2023 - 2:34pm

 R_P wrote:
Now that's spiffy. NYT garmenting themselves with the voice of the No. 1 intellectual of our times.
Alas, the message revealed just seems to fit their usual slime (otherwise, they've never made any intellectual fame in quoting Chomsky so far, afaik).

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next