Trump has already toasted all those who were halfway competent and has a habit of firing everyone after a short stint.. (he only seems to feel comfortable in a disruptive environment, probably cos then everyone is drawn down to his level). So we can expect this pattern to continue, or even get worse. If you like drama and chaos, he's your man.
Biden is by no means a first choice, but at least he can hold a team of half-way competent people together.
I will then infer that you are okay with this kind of behaviour and have no problem with your neighborhood being taken over by activists.
But then you also infer it to be a problem.
So yeah, a dodge.
No, it is not.
This is the conclusion of the post to which you responded “yep”, with the bold facing provided by you:
”This is America's future if Donald Trump doesn't win in November.”
I replied that I would take my chances — i.e., I rejected the notion that only the re-election of Trump would prevent Antifa takeovers of our cities. In my response to your further questions, I went broader: I reject the notion that the re-election of Trump is the only way we can avoid chaos and financial ruin in this country.
You now seem to have divorced your questions from the original statement that only the re-election of Trump will prevent Antifa takeovers of our cities. That is the statement to which I was responding. I will take my chances because I firmly believe the harm 4 more years of Trump will cause this country will far outweigh any harm that may occur because he no longer holds that office.
By the way, I am curious about your responses to the myriad questions I posed in my last response to you regarding the existence of a Deep State.
I have not forgotten. It is not a question that I take lightly. Nor is it easy to answer. I already have some thoughts. Just need to organize them.
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Jun 11, 2020 - 11:47am
kurtster wrote:
Kind of a dodge there.
I will then infer that you are okay with this kind of behaviour and have no problem with your neighborhood being taken over by activists.
But then you also infer it to be a problem.
So yeah, a dodge.
No, it is not.
This is the conclusion of the post to which you responded âyepâ, with the bold facing provided by you:
âThis is America's future if Donald Trump doesn't win in November.â
I replied that I would take my chances â i.e., I rejected the notion that only the re-election of Trump would prevent Antifa takeovers of our cities. In my response to your further questions, I went broader: I reject the notion that the re-election of Trump is the only way we can avoid chaos and financial ruin in this country.
You now seem to have divorced your questions from the original statement that only the re-election of Trump will prevent Antifa takeovers of our cities. That is the statement to which I was responding. I will take my chances because I firmly believe the harm 4 more years of Trump will cause this country will far outweigh any harm that may occur because he no longer holds that office.
By the way, I am curious about your responses to the myriad questions I posed in my last response to you regarding the existence of a Deep State.
You're okay with this stuff and would not object to your neighborhood being taken over like in Seattle ?
I will take my chances that Trump not being President will result in chaos and financial ruin throughout the country. In sum, I reject the notion that Trump is the only one who can fix (insert problem here).
Kind of a dodge there.
I will then infer that you are okay with this kind of behaviour and have no problem with your neighborhood being taken over by activists.
You're okay with this stuff and would not object to your neighborhood being taken over like in Seattle ?
I will take my chances that Trump not being President will result in chaos and financial ruin throughout the country. In sum, I reject the notion that Trump is the only one who can fix (insert problem here).
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Jun 11, 2020 - 9:39am
kurtster wrote:
You'll take your chances how ?
. That this kind of activity will not spread
- or-
You're okay with this stuff and would not object to your neighborhood being taken over like in Seattle ?
I will take my chances that Trump not being President will result in chaos and financial ruin throughout the country. In sum, I reject the notion that Trump is the only one who can fix (insert problem here).
Also - the anarchists in Portland & Seattle have built border walls around what they've seized to keep y'all out.
Border walls. Imagine that.
Probably a different purpose in mind, or they aren't anarchists.
Nobody would mind the idea of a wall if it included working doors, but then you wouldn't need a wall, would you?
I imagine that those who have businesses, jobs, or even homes inside these compounds are completely fine with having a new set of walls -with or without doors - keeping the undesirables out. And of course the decision to construct these walls and barriers was first approved by all the people affected ...
A day of reckoning is coming, I think. Multiple days, actually. First the anarchists will be dealt with, one way or another. Then the politicians.
I'm wondering about the many business owners who managed to survive the coronavirus lockdowns in Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, and other liberal majority cities and what they're thinking this last week or two. Some had managed to just get started back up again - only to see prompt closures due to the rioting. And then many had their businesses burned, vandalized, & looted.
After the riots and destruction - still not yet over, the ongoing civil disobedience in several cities and the damaging campaign against the police — I suspect many are thinking 'Okay, it's been a nice run.... time to pull the plug (or setup biz elsewhere)'. Say goodbye to those jobs, forever. And keep waiting for any breathless media reporting on how the riots have impacted jobs and the local economy.
