[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Best guitarists - Proclivities - Sep 21, 2019 - 7:25am
 
Things You Thought Today - Ohmsen - Sep 21, 2019 - 7:24am
 
Phillip K. DIck - Ohmsen - Sep 21, 2019 - 5:38am
 
What Do You Want From RP? - Ohmsen - Sep 21, 2019 - 4:26am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Ohmsen - Sep 21, 2019 - 4:09am
 
Questions. - buzz - Sep 20, 2019 - 10:21pm
 
Guns - kurtster - Sep 20, 2019 - 8:28pm
 
Pink Floyd Set? - kurtster - Sep 20, 2019 - 7:54pm
 
Name My Band - haresfur - Sep 20, 2019 - 7:48pm
 
Good Night and Good Luck - SeriousLee - Sep 20, 2019 - 5:22pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - SeriousLee - Sep 20, 2019 - 5:21pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - SeriousLee - Sep 20, 2019 - 5:19pm
 
Apple's iOS 13 now supports telling Siri to listen to Rad... - BillG - Sep 20, 2019 - 3:54pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Sep 20, 2019 - 3:17pm
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 20, 2019 - 2:02pm
 
volcano! - R_P - Sep 20, 2019 - 2:02pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - westslope - Sep 20, 2019 - 12:38pm
 
Trump - westslope - Sep 20, 2019 - 11:00am
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - aflanigan - Sep 20, 2019 - 10:59am
 
Holy Frack! - R_P - Sep 20, 2019 - 10:33am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 20, 2019 - 9:45am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - SeriousLee - Sep 20, 2019 - 9:34am
 
Play the Blues - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2019 - 9:24am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2019 - 9:17am
 
Things I wish for ..... - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2019 - 8:17am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2019 - 6:35am
 
Live Music - R_P - Sep 19, 2019 - 7:56pm
 
The Global War on Terror - westslope - Sep 19, 2019 - 6:59pm
 
The House I Want (Today) - Isabeau - Sep 19, 2019 - 2:43pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - nickferrante10 - Sep 19, 2019 - 2:33pm
 
September 19th is International Talk Like A Pirate Day - oldviolin - Sep 19, 2019 - 1:15pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Sep 19, 2019 - 12:54pm
 
Health Care - black321 - Sep 19, 2019 - 12:48pm
 
Bob Dylan - R_P - Sep 19, 2019 - 12:02pm
 
Environment - R_P - Sep 19, 2019 - 11:39am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - miamizsun - Sep 19, 2019 - 11:32am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Sep 19, 2019 - 10:33am
 
E.O. Wilson: The Creation - oldviolin - Sep 19, 2019 - 8:59am
 
Canada - sirdroseph - Sep 19, 2019 - 8:50am
 
No RP on Amazon Echo in UK - Jim_Messenger - Sep 19, 2019 - 4:29am
 
RP App for Android - jarro - Sep 19, 2019 - 4:26am
 
Player in Firefox not stable - jarro - Sep 19, 2019 - 4:15am
 
Chair & Posture - haresfur - Sep 18, 2019 - 6:18pm
 
Room 3a - haresfur - Sep 18, 2019 - 6:15pm
 
Food Texture Issues - miamizsun - Sep 18, 2019 - 4:03pm
 
Cooking for Friends.... - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2019 - 12:03pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2019 - 11:39am
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - westslope - Sep 18, 2019 - 11:00am
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Sep 18, 2019 - 10:47am
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Sep 18, 2019 - 10:04am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 18, 2019 - 8:22am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Sep 18, 2019 - 6:59am
 
Brexit - Coaxial - Sep 18, 2019 - 5:55am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Sep 18, 2019 - 12:53am
 
The Obituary Page - Red_Dragon - Sep 17, 2019 - 2:58pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 17, 2019 - 12:29pm
 
What makes you smile? - PoundPuppy - Sep 17, 2019 - 11:46am
 
Drones - R_P - Sep 17, 2019 - 11:23am
 
Democratic Party - westslope - Sep 17, 2019 - 11:02am
 
The Electoral College - westslope - Sep 17, 2019 - 10:50am
 
What the world needs now is .... - Proclivities - Sep 17, 2019 - 8:50am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 16, 2019 - 6:40pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 16, 2019 - 3:28pm
 
What song is this... Yoshida Brothers ? - nf_able - Sep 16, 2019 - 1:32pm
 
2020 Elections - miamizsun - Sep 16, 2019 - 11:25am
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Sep 16, 2019 - 11:03am
 
Thoughts in the Middle of the Night - oldviolin - Sep 16, 2019 - 10:33am
 
Bear! - Proclivities - Sep 16, 2019 - 6:35am
 
9/11 - westslope - Sep 15, 2019 - 10:11pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - Isabeau - Sep 15, 2019 - 8:25pm
 
THE CARS featuring TODD RUNDGREN - kurtster - Sep 15, 2019 - 8:03pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Sep 15, 2019 - 4:00pm
 
Interesting or Weird Cover Versions - SeriousLee - Sep 15, 2019 - 10:52am
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Sep 15, 2019 - 10:33am
 
FLAC stream - amokbunny - Sep 15, 2019 - 4:21am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » About RP » Rating system needs a rewrite, please! Page: Previous  1, 2
Post to this Topic
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2019 - 7:56am



 kcar wrote:

"So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying."

...
fredphoesh, you need a new hobby. 
 
Maybe it's a fun hobby: contemplating ordinal and interval ratings scales and the semantics involved - one could make a living doing such things.  Plus, how often do you get the use the word "puerile" twice in one diatribe, make that the first post in a newly-created forum thread, and then paste that same diatribe in the comments sections for two different songs?
kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 7:10pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
NEW RATING SYSTEM DESCRIPTORS

  1. Your favorites.
  2. Spiny rodents. In trees.
  3. I heard it on commercial radio once.
  4. I heard it on commercial radio once but liked it.
  5. My ex-girlfriend's favorite.
  6. My girlfriend's favorite.
  7. I knew them before you.
  8. So good I think I wet myself.
  9. I definitely did.
  10. Why even have this category? If we hear music this good, we'll be raptured immediately.


 
"Spiny rodents. In trees."

photo of Spiny Norman, giant hedgehog, looming over the House of Parliament

The other, other operation...
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 6:56pm



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
NEW RATING SYSTEM DESCRIPTORS

  1. Your favorites.
  2. Spiny rodents. In trees.
  3. I heard it on commercial radio once.
  4. I heard it on commercial radio once but liked it.
  5. My ex-girlfriend's favorite.
  6. My girlfriend's favorite.
  7. I knew them before you.
  8. So good I think I wet myself.
  9. I definitely did.
  10. Why even have this category? If we hear music this good, we'll be raptured immediately.

 

Fleet  foxes aren't rodents



ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 6:55pm

NEW RATING SYSTEM DESCRIPTORS

  1. Your favorites.
  2. Spiny rodents. In trees.
  3. I heard it on commercial radio once.
  4. I heard it on commercial radio once but liked it.
  5. My ex-girlfriend's favorite.
  6. My girlfriend's favorite.
  7. I knew them before you.
  8. So good I think I wet myself.
  9. I definitely did.
  10. Why even have this category? If we hear music this good, we'll be raptured immediately.

kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 4:17pm

 fredphoesh wrote:
I am finding the RP rating categories to be really, very, very poorly conceived and annoying.

I like the idea of a rating system, but strongly dislike the way RP has given puerile and barely distinguishable descriptions to each of the 1-10 scores. There are three chunks of scores which are almost impossible to separate, and it therefore weakens the use of a scoring system instead of making it more fun/insightful.

Firstly, the top 3 are more or less the same
10-godlike 9-outstanding 8-most excellent
FFS, MOST excellent is the most excellent something can be, so how is "outstanding" better than something that is already "most" something? And if it is "most" something, it might be your "godlike" level of greatness too, so there is no distinction of note here.

Then the second bunch of 3 are interchangeable too
7-quite likeable 6-pretty good 5- decent are all saying pretty much the same thing, that the music is OK. Just OK. None of these ratings are necessarily better or worse than the other, so another stupid bunch of ratings.

The third bunch of similar ratings are 4-acceptable 3-ho-hum 2-marginal
They are all saying the music is not terrible, but is not great either. Acceptable in that you will not turn it off, but it is a bit boring perhaps (ho-hum) and on the verge of not being worthy of a listen.

Then we go from something that is marginally acceptable to completely "sucko barfo". Seriously RP, this is a really rubbish rating system. I think it would be much better if the numbers 1-10 did not have some daft attempt at making sense out of a 1-10 rating system. People rate something 7/10 for different reasons. You may love the song, but find that version to be a bit disappointing. That is completely different from someone who gives it 7/10 because though they don't like the song that much, they love the artist and also the musicianship is excellent....

So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying.

 
"So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying."


Those adjectives better apply to you, I think. This post reminds me of (former?) RP member rdo. {#Stop}

You assume that people actually adjust their rating of a song according to the description RP provides for each number in the rating. I don't think most people look at those descriptions. People raise or lower their rating of a song based on their mood or the average rating of other members or...who knows. The rating system is not a rational or reliable yardstick. It's diversive fun that might in aggregate be slightly useful to Bill and Rebecca when they review their playlists. 

fredphoesh, you need a new hobby. 
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 3:20pm



 fredphoesh wrote:
I am finding the RP rating categories to be really, very, very poorly conceived and annoying.

I like the idea of a rating system, but strongly dislike the way RP has given puerile and barely distinguishable descriptions to each of the 1-10 scores. There are three chunks of scores which are almost impossible to separate, and it therefore weakens the use of a scoring system instead of making it more fun/insightful.

Firstly, the top 3 are more or less the same
10-godlike 9-outstanding 8-most excellent
FFS, MOST excellent is the most excellent something can be, so how is "outstanding" better than something that is already "most" something? And if it is "most" something, it might be your "godlike" level of greatness too, so there is no distinction of note here.

Then the second bunch of 3 are interchangeable too
7-quite likeable 6-pretty good 5- decent are all saying pretty much the same thing, that the music is OK. Just OK. None of these ratings are necessarily better or worse than the other, so another stupid bunch of ratings.

The third bunch of similar ratings are 4-acceptable 3-ho-hum 2-marginal
They are all saying the music is not terrible, but is not great either. Acceptable in that you will not turn it off, but it is a bit boring perhaps (ho-hum) and on the verge of not being worthy of a listen.

Then we go from something that is marginally acceptable to completely "sucko barfo". Seriously RP, this is a really rubbish rating system. I think it would be much better if the numbers 1-10 did not have some daft attempt at making sense out of a 1-10 rating system. People rate something 7/10 for different reasons. You may love the song, but find that version to be a bit disappointing. That is completely different from someone who gives it 7/10 because though they don't like the song that much, they love the artist and also the musicianship is excellent....

So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying.
 
Nothing stopping you from using a 1-3-6-9 rating system.

Or whatever else you like. The only difference it makes is when you click the Play Something I Like stream.

Other people's ratings depend on their personal strictness, and everyone else is full of shit, anyway.

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 3:09pm



 fredphoesh wrote:
I am finding the RP rating categories to be really, very, very poorly conceived and annoying.

I like the idea of a rating system, but strongly dislike the way RP has given puerile and barely distinguishable descriptions to each of the 1-10 scores. There are three chunks of scores which are almost impossible to separate, and it therefore weakens the use of a scoring system instead of making it more fun/insightful.

Firstly, the top 3 are more or less the same
10-godlike 9-outstanding 8-most excellent
FFS, MOST excellent is the most excellent something can be, so how is "outstanding" better than something that is already "most" something? And if it is "most" something, it might be your "godlike" level of greatness too, so there is no distinction of note here.

Then the second bunch of 3 are interchangeable too
7-quite likeable 6-pretty good 5- decent are all saying pretty much the same thing, that the music is OK. Just OK. None of these ratings are necessarily better or worse than the other, so another stupid bunch of ratings.

The third bunch of similar ratings are 4-acceptable 3-ho-hum 2-marginal
They are all saying the music is not terrible, but is not great either. Acceptable in that you will not turn it off, but it is a bit boring perhaps (ho-hum) and on the verge of not being worthy of a listen.

Then we go from something that is marginally acceptable to completely "sucko barfo". Seriously RP, this is a really rubbish rating system. I think it would be much better if the numbers 1-10 did not have some daft attempt at making sense out of a 1-10 rating system. People rate something 7/10 for different reasons. You may love the song, but find that version to be a bit disappointing. That is completely different from someone who gives it 7/10 because though they don't like the song that much, they love the artist and also the musicianship is excellent....

So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying.
 
I give this post a 1.



ptooey

ptooey Avatar

Location: right behind you. no, over there.
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 2:25pm



 fredphoesh wrote:
I am finding the RP rating categories to be really, very, very poorly conceived and annoying.

I like the idea of a rating system, but strongly dislike the way RP has given puerile and barely distinguishable descriptions to each of the 1-10 scores. There are three chunks of scores which are almost impossible to separate, and it therefore weakens the use of a scoring system instead of making it more fun/insightful.

Firstly, the top 3 are more or less the same
10-godlike 9-outstanding 8-most excellent
FFS, MOST excellent is the most excellent something can be, so how is "outstanding" better than something that is already "most" something? And if it is "most" something, it might be your "godlike" level of greatness too, so there is no distinction of note here.

Then the second bunch of 3 are interchangeable too
7-quite likeable 6-pretty good 5- decent are all saying pretty much the same thing, that the music is OK. Just OK. None of these ratings are necessarily better or worse than the other, so another stupid bunch of ratings.

The third bunch of similar ratings are 4-acceptable 3-ho-hum 2-marginal
They are all saying the music is not terrible, but is not great either. Acceptable in that you will not turn it off, but it is a bit boring perhaps (ho-hum) and on the verge of not being worthy of a listen.

Then we go from something that is marginally acceptable to completely "sucko barfo". Seriously RP, this is a really rubbish rating system. I think it would be much better if the numbers 1-10 did not have some daft attempt at making sense out of a 1-10 rating system. People rate something 7/10 for different reasons. You may love the song, but find that version to be a bit disappointing. That is completely different from someone who gives it 7/10 because though they don't like the song that much, they love the artist and also the musicianship is excellent....

So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying.
 

Well, you're just a little ray of sunshine, ain't ya?
fredphoesh

fredphoesh Avatar



Posted: Apr 23, 2019 - 1:54pm

I am finding the RP rating categories to be really, very, very poorly conceived and annoying.

I like the idea of a rating system, but strongly dislike the way RP has given puerile and barely distinguishable descriptions to each of the 1-10 scores. There are three chunks of scores which are almost impossible to separate, and it therefore weakens the use of a scoring system instead of making it more fun/insightful.

Firstly, the top 3 are more or less the same
10-godlike 9-outstanding 8-most excellent
FFS, MOST excellent is the most excellent something can be, so how is "outstanding" better than something that is already "most" something? And if it is "most" something, it might be your "godlike" level of greatness too, so there is no distinction of note here.

Then the second bunch of 3 are interchangeable too
7-quite likeable 6-pretty good 5- decent are all saying pretty much the same thing, that the music is OK. Just OK. None of these ratings are necessarily better or worse than the other, so another stupid bunch of ratings.

The third bunch of similar ratings are 4-acceptable 3-ho-hum 2-marginal
They are all saying the music is not terrible, but is not great either. Acceptable in that you will not turn it off, but it is a bit boring perhaps (ho-hum) and on the verge of not being worthy of a listen.

Then we go from something that is marginally acceptable to completely "sucko barfo". Seriously RP, this is a really rubbish rating system. I think it would be much better if the numbers 1-10 did not have some daft attempt at making sense out of a 1-10 rating system. People rate something 7/10 for different reasons. You may love the song, but find that version to be a bit disappointing. That is completely different from someone who gives it 7/10 because though they don't like the song that much, they love the artist and also the musicianship is excellent....

So please remove the nonsense score descriptions, they are puerile and annoying.
Page: Previous  1, 2