[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Ukraine - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 10:54pm
 
Breaking News - kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:31pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
 
NYTimes Connections - n4ku - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:03pm
 
Uploading Music - macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
 
Oldest Rock song on RP - johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Orbiting Earth - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
 
Israel - R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Irony 101 - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App - pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
 
Trump - rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Outstanding Covers - thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
 
Motivational Office Cliches... - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
 
Food - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
 
China - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
 
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b... - jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and... - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
Basketball - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
 
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers - sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
 
Can you afford to retire? - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
 
2024 Elections! - Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
 
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great" - miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
 
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone - Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
 
Damn Dinosaurs! - oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
Great guitar faces - skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Despots, dictators and war criminals - R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
 
Media Matters - thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
 
NASA & other news from space - miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
 
MEALTICKET - drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » 2016 Elections Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 93, 94, 95, 96  Next
Post to this Topic
Rod

Rod Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2015 - 1:13pm

We're going to the Bernie Sanders rally this evening in L.A. at the Sports Arena. I'm expecting a large turnout with hopefully no major disruptions.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2015 - 2:40am

Bernie Sanders on Racism and Racial Justice


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 10, 2015 - 2:12am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Bernie Sanders cut short after 'Black Lives Matter' takes over rally

SEATTLE - Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was shoved aside by several Black Lives Matter activists and eventually left a Social Security Works rally at Westlake Park without giving his speech.

Sanders was just starting to address several thousand people gathered shoulder to shoulder at Westlake Park when two women took over the microphone.

When the crowd asked the activists to allow Sanders to speak, one activist called the crowd "white supremacist liberals," according to event participants. Participants also said a Black Lives Matter activist confronted Sanders, stating he needed "to be held accountable".

Several chants could be heard from members gathered. "I can't breathe" was chanted out as a Social Security Works rally organizer tried to calm the crowd.

After waiting about 20 minutes, Sanders himself was pushed away when he tried to take the microphone back.

Social Security Works rally organizers pleaded with Black Lives Matter activists to leave the stage and allow Sanders to speak, but the activists remained on stage until the event was forced to end.

I was pondering this event this morning (and the hyperventilating response by the Sanders campaign and the supporters I know) when it struck me there is a fearful symmetry at play here.

Consider Donald Trump (no, really! Just for a minute, I promise) and the embarrassment he has caused the Republican party. How are they similar?

Behold the monsters you created, come home to eat you.

The Donald is pandering to the worst elements the GOP has attracted—nay, courted—since the 1960s. They want their due. They aren't content to fill the ranks, they want to lead the parade. They are the real embarrassment, Trump is just the parade balloon they're anchoring. If the party as a whole doesn't move quickly to distance itself from this crowd they will drive everyone else away and it will be their parade alone.

The identity politics that have propped up the Democratic party is fighting it's way onstage as well. The nonstop celebration of anger and protest has resulted in...angry protest. When the only tactic young black people have been taught is to accuse anyone in their way of racism and the only evidence they need is that the accused is old and white well, that makes the old, white figureheads in their party vulnerable to friendly fire.

It's hard to resist the schadenfreude of watching liberal firebrands having to squirm and prove they aren't racists, when being accused alone was always good enough for their enemies. It's hard not to be amused by Republicans having to confront the Bubbas in their midsts and tell them "You're going to have to get behind someone else, because the guy just like you is embarrassing. Which means you are embarrassing if you think about it, which we used to be sure you wouldn't do but aren't anymore."

But our country's future is at stake. So really it's not funny. Not funny at all.

 
This should shed some more light of what is going on here, this is from the true progressive point of view; not party affiliated. This may also shed some light on why they have no problem with Clinton and all of the other Republicans, think about it.

Certain False Leaders of #BlackLivesMatters Want Progressives and Bernie to Fail: Why?



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 9:02pm

 islander wrote:

Do you realize that four people responded here to you?  That they espoused opinions that would be at least somewhat in line with what yours would seem to be if you weren't just tossing chaff into the wind.

So yes, it's probably good for the Democrats in the short run, but bad for our country.  I need to go back and read up on the death throws of other political parties but it seems like the  shift of demographics, attitudes in the country and the internal strife of the Republicans is shaping up to make things tough for them next year.  

 
I only counted two responses until yours, but no matter.  I was going to respond to haresfur, but checked in to see where things had gone in the meantime.  So maybe this will cover both your and his points.

Of course its good for one party when the other party's vote is split.  It is the goal, right, at least in a two party system.  

But how is it bad for the country ?   The two party system is bad for the country, period, right ?  If you want to start a viable third party it has to start as a split from an established party.  Actually Lazy8 addressed this about a week ago and I agree with his assessment that winning the White House is a false standard.

Anything that weakens a party is good, right ?  Especially if its goals are not in the best interest of the country and try and rule against the will of the people.  The Democrats are all about social justice, open borders and spreading around the wealth.  That's good right ?  What do the Repubs want ?  Well the establishment wing wants the same thing, but for different reasons, yet they want the same thing.  On the borders, Chris Matthews finally spoke the truth when he said that the Democrats wanted more voters via amnesty and the Repub establishment wanted cheap labor.  That is why immigration reform is in limbo  The anti establishment Repubs wants to close the borders and stand up for the American worker and legal immigrants who are getting screwed by the establishment in its quest for more voters and cheap labor.  The center has been sacrificed by both sides.

Then the fight for the center...  I will agree that in the past the repubs have fought to redefine the center while the Dems have moved to exorcise the center as proved by the purge of the Blue Dogs by Pelosi in 2010 that led to the Repubs getting the House in 2012 and the Senate in 2014.   The purge was successful as evidenced by the DNC Chair's inability to articulate the difference between a democrat and a socialist. This time around, the fight in the repubs is establishment vs the anti-establishment.  The center has little to do with it at this present stage of things.

In terms of the debate and its aftermath, it would seem as if Fox was clearly acting on behalf of the Repub establishment based on the questions asked and who got face time vs those who didn't.  The tone was set with the first question and the buttons were pushed by the moderators in the quest of imploding the anti candidates, namely Trump, Cruz and Paul.  The overall purpose it seemed was to expose weakness and start a food fight more than to get the candidates to expound and expand on their strengths and overall ideas of what was important to them in general.

Probably none of the above made any sense to anyone as I tried to address too much at once.  Oh well ...



ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 7:52pm

 kurtster wrote:

Yeah, I got that before I replied and subsequently asked the question.

and so I ask again, what is wrong with splitting the vote from a non Repub point of view ?

Answer, nothing.  It is good for Democrats.  It ensures a Democratic victory.  That is a good thing if one is not a Republican.

 
The discussion was Trump, so I talked about Trump, but as Lazy points out, the Democrats are excising their own tumor now.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 7:34pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
RichardPrins wrote:
Given Hitler's fierce anti-communist rhetoric (and anti-Nazi Communist violence), that sounds very implausible.

The KPD was fiercely opposed to the Nazis and vice-versa. They (KPD) couldn't get along with anybody, and bickering between them and the Social Democrats led to the Nazis seizing power in 1933.

It wasn't until it was time to carve up Poland that the Nazis and Communists made common cause, and these weren't domestic Communists.

 
ok. I heard the original statement from a bunch of Trotskyites, and you probably know how reliable they are.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 7:32pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
RichardPrins wrote:
Given Hitler's fierce anti-communist rhetoric (and anti-Nazi Communist violence), that sounds very implausible.

The KPD was fiercely opposed to the Nazis and vice-versa. They (KPD) couldn't get along with anybody, and bickering between them and the Social Democrats led to the Nazis seizing power in 1933.

It wasn't until it was time to carve up Poland that the Nazis and Communists made common cause, and these weren't domestic Communists.

I suppose one could blame the left parties for letting the Nazis seize power, but not without pointing out that it was the (opportunistic) coalition between the Nationalist-Conservatives (DNVP, formerly Germany's largest conservative party) and the Nazis that put Hitler in the driver's seat. A convenient fire then led to the establishment of absolute power. The rest is, as they say, history.

Common causes may attract strange bedfellows...
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 7:23pm

 kurtster wrote:

Yeah, I got that before I replied and subsequently asked the question.

and so I ask again, what is wrong with splitting the vote from a non Repub point of view ?

Answer, nothing.  It is good for Democrats.  It ensures a Democratic victory.  That is a good thing if one is not a Republican.

 

 
Do you realize that four people responded here to you?  That they espoused opinions that would be at least somewhat in line with what yours would seem to be if you weren't just tossing chaff into the wind.

So yes, it's probably good for the Democrats in the short run, but bad for our country.  I need to go back and read up on the death throws of other political parties but it seems like the  shift of demographics, attitudes in the country and the internal strife of the Republicans is shaping up to make things tough for them next year.  
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 7:00pm

RichardPrins wrote:
Given Hitler's fierce anti-communist rhetoric (and anti-Nazi Communist violence), that sounds very implausible.

The KPD was fiercely opposed to the Nazis and vice-versa. They (KPD) couldn't get along with anybody, and bickering between them and the Social Democrats led to the Nazis seizing power in 1933.

It wasn't until it was time to carve up Poland that the Nazis and Communists made common cause, and these weren't domestic Communists.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:59pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

It's called "having a conversation."

 
Yeah, I got that before I replied and subsequently asked the question.

and so I ask again, what is wrong with splitting the vote from a non Repub point of view ?

Answer, nothing.  It is good for Democrats.  It ensures a Democratic victory.  That is a good thing if one is not a Republican.

 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:36pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:33pm

 haresfur wrote:
If I recall, the German Communist Party supported Hitler in the 1930s, thinking it would make things so bad that there would be a backlash of support to the left. Didn't work out so well for them.
 
Given Hitler's fierce anti-communist rhetoric* (and anti-Nazi Communist violence), that sounds very implausible.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:24pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

This is an interesting sentence. (A) is why he should be out (among other reasons) but (B) is why the Party (any party) needs to excise the tumor. Because the longer they let him run, and he generates enough of a following for him to do a Ross Perot, you're going to have a split vote again. If they get him out now, well over a year before the election (!), people won't have committed so much to supporting him that they're unwilling to abandon him when he goes indy. There's already a guy locally who's had a Trump banner painted on the side of a truck trailer and parked it on the highway... how easy do you think it will be for him to vote for Jeb come the general, if Trump's running as an independent?

 
I wonder what his motives are. With his current popularity and the ugly wing of the party (those that have mistake 'honest talk' with rude vulgarity) still propping him up, he's going to be around for a bit. He doesn't need the money and as long as his ego is in the mix it will be a case of "any publicity...". This might be helping his brand anyway. An independent run, once he is drummed out of the Republican tent, will just be another round of commercials for him. 

And no, I don't think this is a good thing. The more legitimacy you lend to him the less legitimacy is left for our entire process. I already don't like the 18 potential candidates model where 2/3rds are really just looking for a book deal. This isn't theater, it's how we go about selecting leaders.  If we let it devolve into a shit slinging reality show the few good people willing to put up with the unpleasant parts of the process are going to bail out completely.  
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:23pm

 kurtster wrote:

He is highly unlikely to vote for Jeb under any circumstances.  I would guess that this guy is one of the millions of Repubs who stayed home and didn't vote for McCain and Romney.  My Dad was one of those guys.  These people gave the election to Obama as we now know with the post election analysis of those two elections.  And if its between Jeb and Hillary, I am very likely to stay home on purpose for the first time since 1972 as I once stated earlier.

So why the concern with splitting the Repub vote ?  You are not a Repub nor likely to vote for one as far as I can tell.  Splitting the Repub vote should make you happy, yes ? 

 
There is a downside, especially in the longer term. If two groups are saying similar things, there is a tendency for them to be given greater weight in public opinion, no matter how outrageous. There is also the issue of 'moving the centre' - a tactic that conservatives have employed very successfully. This not only makes non-TP republicans seem centrist, but it drags Democrat positions to the right.

I'm not a believer in tactical support for views that I disagree with. If I recall, the German Communist Party supported Hitler in the 1930s, thinking it would make things so bad that there would be a backlash of support to the left. Didn't work out so well for them.

But yeah, getting out the vote is the most critical factor in US elections. Citizens here are required to vote so it isn't the same issue. 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:19pm

Bernie Sanders cut short after 'Black Lives Matter' takes over rally

SEATTLE - Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was shoved aside by several Black Lives Matter activists and eventually left a Social Security Works rally at Westlake Park without giving his speech.

Sanders was just starting to address several thousand people gathered shoulder to shoulder at Westlake Park when two women took over the microphone.

When the crowd asked the activists to allow Sanders to speak, one activist called the crowd "white supremacist liberals," according to event participants. Participants also said a Black Lives Matter activist confronted Sanders, stating he needed "to be held accountable".

Several chants could be heard from members gathered. "I can't breathe" was chanted out as a Social Security Works rally organizer tried to calm the crowd.

After waiting about 20 minutes, Sanders himself was pushed away when he tried to take the microphone back.

Social Security Works rally organizers pleaded with Black Lives Matter activists to leave the stage and allow Sanders to speak, but the activists remained on stage until the event was forced to end.

I was pondering this event this morning (and the hyperventilating response by the Sanders campaign and the supporters I know) when it struck me there is a fearful symmetry at play here.

Consider Donald Trump (no, really! Just for a minute, I promise) and the embarrassment he has caused the Republican party. How are they similar?

Behold the monsters you created, come home to eat you.

The Donald is pandering to the worst elements the GOP has attracted—nay, courted—since the 1960s. They want their due. They aren't content to fill the ranks, they want to lead the parade. They are the real embarrassment, Trump is just the parade balloon they're anchoring. If the party as a whole doesn't move quickly to distance itself from this crowd they will drive everyone else away and it will be their parade alone.

The identity politics that have propped up the Democratic party is fighting it's way onstage as well. The nonstop celebration of anger and protest has resulted in...angry protest. When the only tactic young black people have been taught is to accuse anyone in their way of racism and the only evidence they need is that the accused is old and white well, that makes the old, white figureheads in their party vulnerable to friendly fire.

It's hard to resist the schadenfreude of watching liberal firebrands having to squirm and prove they aren't racists, when being accused alone was always good enough for their enemies. It's hard not to be amused by Republicans having to confront the Bubbas in their midsts and tell them "You're going to have to get behind someone else, because the guy just like you is embarrassing. Which means you are embarrassing if you think about it, which we used to be sure you wouldn't do but aren't anymore."

But our country's future is at stake. So really it's not funny. Not funny at all.


ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:08pm

 kurtster wrote:

So why the concern with splitting the Repub vote ?  You are not a Repub nor likely to vote for one as far as I can tell.  Splitting the Repub vote should make you happy, yes ? 

 
It's called "having a conversation."
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 6:02pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

This is an interesting sentence. (A) is why he should be out (among other reasons) but (B) is why the Party (any party) needs to excise the tumor. Because the longer they let him run, and he generates enough of a following for him to do a Ross Perot, you're going to have a split vote again. If they get him out now, well over a year before the election (!), people won't have committed so much to supporting him that they're unwilling to abandon him when he goes indy. There's already a guy locally who's had a Trump banner painted on the side of a truck trailer and parked it on the highway... how easy do you think it will be for him to vote for Jeb come the general, if Trump's running as an independent?

 
He is highly unlikely to vote for Jeb under any circumstances.  I would guess that this guy is one of the millions of Repubs who stayed home and didn't vote for McCain and Romney.  My Dad was one of those guys.  These people gave the election to Obama as we now know with the post election analysis of those two elections.  And if its between Jeb and Hillary, I am very likely to stay home on purpose for the first time since 1972 as I once stated earlier.

So why the concern with splitting the Repub vote ?  You are not a Repub nor likely to vote for one as far as I can tell.  Splitting the Repub vote should make you happy, yes ? 
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2015 - 1:40pm

 Beaker wrote:
GOP leaders say erratic attacks hurt Trump, but he vows to fight and win.

Republican leaders who have watched Donald Trump’s summer surge with alarm now believe that his presidential candidacy has been contained and may begin to collapse (A) because of his repeated attacks on a Fox News Channel star and (B) his refusal to pledge his loyalty to the eventual GOP nominee.
 
This is an interesting sentence. (A) is why he should be out (among other reasons) but (B) is why the Party (any party) needs to excise the tumor. Because the longer they let him run, and he generates enough of a following for him to do a Ross Perot, you're going to have a split vote again. If they get him out now, well over a year before the election (!), people won't have committed so much to supporting him that they're unwilling to abandon him when he goes indy. There's already a guy locally who's had a Trump banner painted on the side of a truck trailer and parked it on the highway... how easy do you think it will be for him to vote for Jeb come the general, if Trump's running as an independent?
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 8, 2015 - 1:20pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 7, 2015 - 11:46am

 sirdroseph wrote:
Trump is many things, most not so good, but he is no lunatic.  Partisans are fooling themselves if they think that he is and he speaks no truth. 

He's not a lunatic, he just spouts lunacy at regular intervals (on some subjects). Few are wrong or crazy all the time. Like the familiar stopped clock that tells the right time twice a day.


There is a spectre haunting the U.S....
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 93, 94, 95, 96  Next