[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 10:46pm
 
Trump - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 9:58pm
 
Things You Thought Today - islander - Sep 27, 2020 - 9:49pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Yibbyl - Sep 27, 2020 - 8:44pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 27, 2020 - 8:02pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Sep 27, 2020 - 6:26pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - oldviolin - Sep 27, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 5:54pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Sep 27, 2020 - 4:18pm
 
The American Dream - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2020 - 4:02pm
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:58pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:33pm
 
Classical Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Twitter's finest moment - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 11:23am
 
KUDOS for BillG - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 9:04am
 
Today in History - westslope - Sep 27, 2020 - 8:24am
 
What are you reading now? - rhahl - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:48am
 
Dial 1 for English - westslope - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:45am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:29am
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 5:02pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 4:27pm
 
Khruangbin - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 3:36pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 2:19pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 12:19pm
 
2020 Elections - Steely_D - Sep 26, 2020 - 11:10am
 
How's the weather? - westslope - Sep 26, 2020 - 7:20am
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - Red_Dragon - Sep 25, 2020 - 1:17pm
 
Integration of RP app with Apple Music playlists - BillG - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Canada - westslope - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:58am
 
This is Odd, Gross and a good excuse to be late for work - miamizsun - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:08am
 
Amazing animals! - rhahl - Sep 25, 2020 - 8:11am
 
Drop the Puck! NHL Lockout Ends! - sunybuny - Sep 25, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 24, 2020 - 7:35pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:32pm
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:13pm
 
Bluesound Sound Dropouts - BillG - Sep 24, 2020 - 12:02pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - pigtail - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:28am
 
Language - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:12am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Film & Video Production - rgio - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Quotes: Your Favorite Comedians - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:07am
 
Questions. - whatshisname - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:10pm
 
American Justice - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
Your favourite conspiracy theory? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
*** PUNS *** ASTRONOMY - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:24pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
The Obituary Page - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:56am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Red_Dragon - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
how do you feel right now? - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
WikiLeaks - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Favorite Quotes - Coaxial - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 22, 2020 - 9:16pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:50pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
Brazil - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 22, 2020 - 7:49am
 
Things I'd LIKE to find at my house. - Antigone - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:31pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Steely_D - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:13pm
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - DianaLipka - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Best Song Comments. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Trolls at RP - Steely_D - Sep 20, 2020 - 4:41pm
 
Facebook Tips - Ohmsen - Sep 20, 2020 - 2:37pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 12:34pm
 
Environment - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 7:29am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - miamizsun - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Republican Party - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:14am
 
FLAC Streaming - gsbaronnier - Sep 20, 2020 - 3:24am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 4:57pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 2:17pm
 
TV shows you watch - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2020 - 12:57pm
 
China - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 11:07am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Those lovable acronym guys & gals Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 25, 26, 27  Next
Post to this Topic
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:23pm

 islander wrote:

No, you stated that the Progressives were " more hypocritical " and "Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable".  And does it matter that the Republicans somehow did more analysis before changing their views (I'm not sure how you quantify that)? 

 
Wow, you are working overtime trying to see some praise for the Republicans in what I wrote.  Perhaps I can be more clear: the Republican party has been petty, obstructionists and downright mean not to mention on the wrong side of most social and civil rights issues for the past 50 years or more which is why even though I voted for a couple of Republican presidents over the years, I have never voted for a Republican senator or representative and have never considered myself a Republican. Quite frankly because of their untenable social issue positions, I have completely written them off for the most part for some time. I explained quite clearly why I thought they (progressives) were more hypocritical and more unforgivable imo.  However as Richard pointed out semantically and technically it is incorrect because hypocrisy is hypocrisy.  Now the unforgivable is my personal opinion and I have quite clearly explained why that is.  If you want to think that I am somehow choosing sides in this horrible display of partisan politics from the 2 loser parties, you go right ahead if it makes you feel better.  I am merely expressing why I feel the way I do, whether you think it is because I am some kind of closet Republican or not does not change my feelings on this subject instead makes me wonder why it is so important for you to find that somewhere and what you are even trying to argue.{#Stupid}


islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:11pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Holy misinterpretation Batman! I clearly state that both Republicans and Democrats are equally hypocritical in this matter, but I expect more from progressives not to be because the issues that progressives usually champion are matters of morality and compassion whereas it is pretty clear that Republicans are usually more analytical and cold hearted in regards to a lot of their positions on issues. I am clearly stating that yes, Virginia it is incredibly stupid to shift your view based on the person in power without question.  I am just more surprised, disappointed and quite frankly disgusted with the progressive partisans for changing their opinion on such a basic issue as individual freedoms vs. aggressively pursuing Muslims and the rest of us through increased surveillance.  Where you get that I think the Republicans are a "winner" in all this is beyond me.  I just think the Democrats are a bigger "loser" in this epic fail loser match because I expected more from progressives on this.

Let me be plain and clear; I expect this from the Republicans, they have not exactly been the party of compromise for the past 30 years or so. I have always thought of Democrat liberal partisans as sometimes naive and misguided, but usually well meaning and voting on principle.  I know this is probably silly, but that is how I viewed it and hate to see that myth shattered with stuff like this.

 
No, you stated that the Progressives were " more hypocritical " and "Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable".  And does it matter that the Republicans somehow did more analysis before changing their views (I'm not sure how you quantify that)? 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:56pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Arguable, for one see Jonathan Haidt's research on "values". I thought "compassion" and "morality" were also "conservative" values. As well as being staunch defendants of "liberty" and small gov. To me there is no real difference in the hypocrisy or opportunism.

As for hawkishness: it would appear (in the current climate) to be a requirement in order to get the power.

 
Good point, I  was actually thinking of all that as I was typing it and yes when it comes down to it, hypocrisy is hypocrisy.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:54pm

 islander wrote:

wait, what?

Isn't it equally stupid to shift your view based on the person in power? And what exactly are the Republicans choosing their opinions on?  Both sides here look pretty silly/hypocritical to me, and I think the reason has as much to to with "well it's okay when we do it because we're better/smarter/more responsible... blah, blah, blah" self rationalizing bullshit than any moral/compassionate re-evaluation.  Picking a winner in this pig wrestling match says more about your personal alignment.   

 
Holy misinterpretation Batman! I clearly state that both Republicans and Democrats are equally hypocritical in this matter, but I expect more from progressives not to be because the issues that progressives usually champion are matters of morality and compassion whereas it is pretty clear that Republicans are usually more analytical and cold hearted in regards to a lot of their positions on issues. I am clearly stating that yes, Virginia it is incredibly stupid to shift your view based on the person in power without question.  I am just more surprised, disappointed and quite frankly disgusted with the progressive partisans for changing their opinion on such a basic issue as individual freedoms vs. aggressively pursuing Muslims and the rest of us through increased surveillance.  Where you get that I think the Republicans are a "winner" in all this is beyond me.  I just think the Democrats are a bigger "loser" in this epic fail loser match because I expected more from progressives on this.

Let me be plain and clear; I expect this from the Republicans, they have not exactly been the party of compromise for the past 30 years or so. I have always thought of Democrat liberal partisans as sometimes naive and misguided, but usually well meaning and voting on principle.  I know this is probably silly, but that is how I viewed it and hate to see that myth shattered with stuff like this.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:53pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable. 

Arguable, for one see Jonathan Haidt's research on "values". I thought "compassion" and "morality" were also "conservative" values. As well as being staunch defendants of "liberty" and small gov. To me there is no real difference in the hypocrisy or opportunism.

As for hawkishness: it would appear (in the current climate) to be a requirement in order to get the power.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:45pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable.

 
wait, what?

Isn't it equally stupid to shift your view based on the person in power? And what exactly are the Republicans choosing their opinions on?  Both sides here look pretty silly/hypocritical to me, and I think the reason has as much to to with "well it's okay when we do it because we're better/smarter/more responsible... blah, blah, blah" self rationalizing bullshit than any moral/compassionate re-evaluation.  Picking a winner in this pig wrestling match says more about your personal alignment.   
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:33pm

 RichardPrins wrote: 
Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:05pm

Greenwald: On PRISM, partisanship and propaganda

NEW TIME POLL: Support for the Leaker—and His Prosecution | TIME.com
ErikX

ErikX Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 6:37pm

70% of the NSA budget goes to private contractor spy agencies


haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 5:59pm

My cell phone is made by Huawei so the Chinese probably know at least as much about me as the Americans.  It's only fair...{#Think}
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 4:25pm

Anonymous trolls NSA with ‘keywords of terror,’ disables website


Why 'I Have Nothing to Hide' Is the Wrong Way to Think About Surveillance | Wired Opinion | Wired.com
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 12:26pm


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 9:10am

 sirdroseph wrote:


On the Daily Show, John Oliver made a great comment about this. Paraphrasing; "Mr. President, we are not accusing you of breaking any laws, we just think it is strange that you didn't have to!"   {#Eek} This sums it up nicely. 
 

Now on a broader note, I would not be concerned so much that the NSA is listening to anything we are saying. They probably are not. They are just compiling mountains and mountains of ALL data having it ready when they need it.  If they then have reason to suspect someone, they can then go into the mountain and compile ALL data on that individual they need.  Where the real danger lies is the potential for the many nefarious things the Government could do to you if they were so inclined.

 

That is the heart of the matter.  And who will be in charge of what 5, 10 or 20 years from now.

This discussion is more about our future than our present, although the present ain't looking to good either.
DaveInVA

DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:38am

 black321 wrote:

Done!  Thanks for sharing.  {#Lol}

 
I feel sorry for whoever they assign to watch me as they will be bored to tears pretty fast...
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:34am

 DaveInVA wrote:
They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.

 
Done!  Thanks for sharing.  {#Lol}
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:32am

 DaveInVA wrote:
They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.

 
I just use mine to order a pizza on the road or in case I need to contact EMS for Pops during a power outage. Assuming the cell towers are backed up the the -48 volt or whatever system. I don't know about that though.


DaveInVA

DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:30am

They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:27am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Story on NPR the other day about what the recent whistle blower incident does to the confidence of the "national security leadership" in it's employees. Perhaps it should have been about why people feel a whistle needs blowing. Perhaps because the gubment is overstepping its authority? Maybe? Huh?

 

On the Daily Show, John Oliver made a great comment about this. Paraphrasing; "Mr. President, we are not accusing you of breaking any laws, we just think it is strange that you didn't have to!"   {#Eek} This sums it up nicely. 
 

Now on a broader note, I would not be concerned so much that the NSA is listening to anything we are saying. They probably are not. They are just compiling mountains and mountains of ALL data having it ready when they need it.  If they then have reason to suspect someone, they can then go into the mountain and compile ALL data on that individual they need.  Where the real danger lies is the potential for the many nefarious things the Government could do to you if they were so inclined.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:24am

 bokey wrote:

What cracks me up is people who have "smart" phones but are too unsmart to know what they are actually used by the government for.{#Lol}

My cell phone was made during the Fred Flinstone era and has no GPS or the ability to be cracked with an remote SMS command.

 
My phone too.  Doesn't even have a camera.

Having a smart phone is the equivalent of inviting the vampire into your house.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:18am

Story on NPR the other day about what the recent whistle blower incident does to the confidence of the "national security leadership" in it's employees. Perhaps it should have been about why people feel a whistle needs blowing. Perhaps because the gubment is overstepping its authority? Maybe? Huh?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 25, 26, 27  Next